SAP C_TS422_2023 Dumps Questions Answers

In SAP S/4HANA, the goal is to plan in-house production of a semi-finished material using planned independent requirements (PIRs), with those PIRs consumed by dependent requirements from the finished good’s production:

Planning at assembly level (70)(D): Strategy 70 (material master, MRP 3 view, Strategy Group: 70) is designed for subassemblies or semi-finished materials. PIRs are entered for the semi-finished material (MD61), triggering in-house production (planned orders via MRP). When a sales order for the finished good is received, the dependent requirements (from BOM explosion) consume these PIRs within the consumption period (MRP 3 view), aligning production of the semi-finished material with higher-level demand.

Assembly processing with production orders (82)(A) is an MTO strategy tied to sales orders, not PIRs.Planning with final assembly (40)(B) applies to finished goods, where PIRs are consumed by sales orders, not dependent requirements of semi-finished items.Production by lot size (30)(C) focuses on lot-size-based production without consumption logic. Strategy 70 is explicitly designed for this scenario per SAP documentation.

In SAP S/4HANA repetitive manufacturing, confirming a finished product (e.g., via transaction MFBF) triggers default actions based on the REM profile (Customizing, OSP2):

Post the goods receipt for the finished product(A): When saving a confirmation (MFBF,Backflush tab), the system posts a goods receipt (movement type 101) for the finished product into stock (e.g., unrestricted use), assuming backflushing is active in the REM profile (field: Backflush Mandatory).

Reduce run schedule quantities(B): The confirmed quantity reduces the openrun schedule quantities(planned orders in MD04 or MF50), aligning the planned production with actual output to prevent overproduction.

Update statistics for the Business Information Warehouse(D): Confirmation data (e.g., quantity, time) updates statistical tables (e.g., S031, S032) for reporting in SAP BW or embedded analytics, providing insights into production performance (enabled by default in standard settings).

Post production costs to the planned order(C) is incorrect—costs are posted to aproduct cost collector(KKF6N) in REM, not planned orders, based on the REM profile’s costing settings.Create associated capacity requirements(E) occurs during planning (e.g., MRP), not confirmation—capacity is consumed, not created, at this stage. This is per SAP’s REM confirmation process.

In SAP S/4HANA Advanced Planning (PP/DS - Production Planning and Detailed Scheduling), infinite planning assumes unlimited capacity availability during the initial planning phase. When the documentation states that "new orders are created through infinite planning," it means that MRP generates planned orders without checking the existing capacity load on work centers. Thus,MRP creates the capacity requirements without considering existing load on the work centers(B). This approach prioritizes material availability and scheduling over capacity constraints, leaving capacity leveling to a subsequent step (e.g., using heuristics or manual adjustments in PP/DS).

Option A is incorrect because infinite planning does not sequence capacity requirements after the last operation; it ignores capacity entirely. Option C is not accurate, as "earliest possible time" implies a finite scheduling logic, which contradicts infinite planning. Option D is also incorrect, as infinite planning does not consider available capacity for assignment. This is consistent with SAP’s PP/DS documentation, where infinite planning is a preliminary step before finite scheduling.