Paloalto Networks SD-WAN-Engineer Dumps Questions Answers

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation

To defend against volumetric attacks such as TCP SYN Floods, UDP Floods, or ICMP Floods, Prisma SD-WAN (like PAN-OS) utilizes Zone Protection Profiles.

Function: A Zone Protection Profile is a specific security object designed to screen traffic for protocol anomalies and flood behaviors before it is processed by the complex firewall policy engine. It sets thresholds (e.g., "Max 1000 SYNs/sec"). If the traffic rate exceeds this threshold, the system triggers an action (Alarm, Drop, or SYN Cookies) to protect the device's resources.

Application: Unlike a standard ZBFW Rule (A) which filters based on Source/Destination/App-ID (which might still allow the initial handshake packets that cause the flood), a Zone Protection Profile is applied to the Zone object itself (in this case, the LAN Zone). This ensures that the flood is mitigated at the ingress stage, preventing the ION's session table and CPU from being exhausted by the attack.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation

The Self-Zone is a predefined security zone in the Prisma SD-WAN ZBFW that represents the ION device's own control plane and management traffic.

Default Rule: The security policy contains an implicit, uneditable default rule that Allows traffic originating from the Self-Zone to any destination zone (Internet, Private WAN, etc.).

Rationale: This ensures that the device can always perform essential critical functions—such as connecting to the Cloud Controller, resolving DNS, syncing time via NTP, and establishing VPN tunnels—without the administrator needing to manually create "Allow" rules for the device itself. If this traffic were blocked by a "Deny All" default, the device would become unmanageable (bricked) immediately after applying the policy.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation

The best practice for managing upgrades in a large-scale Prisma SD-WAN environment is the Canary or Phased Rollout approach, utilizing Site Tags.

Risk Mitigation: Upgrading all sites simultaneously (Option B) is highly risky. If the new software version has an unforeseen bug or compatibility issue with a specific circuit type, the entire network could face an outage.

Tag-Based Management: Administrators should create tags such as "Upgrade-Phase-1" (Pilot sites) or "Region-North". By assigning the specific Software Version to the Tag (rather than the individual site or the global default), the controller pushes the update only to that subset of devices.

Procedure:

Apply update to "Pilot" tag (5 sites). Monitor for 24-48 hours.

Apply update to "Region-1" tag (50 sites). Monitor.

Eventually, update the Global default once confidence is high.

Option A is unscalable, and Option D is incorrect as the administrator retains full control over when upgrades occur; they are not forced automatically without policy configuration.