The Open Group OGEA-103 Dumps Questions Answers

OptionAbest aligns withTOGAF Phase A: Architecture Vision, which is thestarting phasefor an architecture development cycle in TOGAF. This phase sets the foundation for the architecture engagement and ensuresalignment with stakeholders and their concerns, especially when evaluating a major transformation like moving to acloud-based planning and scheduling system.

????Key TOGAF Concepts Supporting Option A:

1. Phase A: Architecture Vision Objectives

Establish thehigh-level scope, constraints, and expectations.

Identify stakeholdersand define theirconcerns and business requirements.

Create theArchitecture Vision, which includes:

Summary-levelBaseline and Target Architectureviews (business, data, application, and technology).

Initialrequirementsandkey concerns.

Stakeholder buy-inand approval for moving forward.

2. Engagement with Stakeholders

In this case, theplant managers and local supply chain partnershave concerns regarding safety and dependability.

TOGAF emphasizes early engagement withbusiness stakeholdersto ensure concerns are identified and incorporated into the vision.

3. Creating Architecture Vision Document

A deliverable of Phase A.

Includeshigh-level descriptionsof the baseline and target architectures, initialbusiness goals, andstakeholder viewpoints.

Used tobuild agreement and obtain formal approvalto proceed with detailed architecture work in later phases (B–D).

❌Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

B: Focuses onsuppliersand not theactual stakeholdersimpacted by the architecture — i.e.,plant managers and internal operations. This diverts from TOGAF’s stakeholder-driven approach in Phase A.

C: This reflectsPhases B–Dof the ADM (Business, Information Systems, and Technology Architecture). It istoo detailed and prematurefor the start of the project. In Phase A, you don’t yet develop full baseline and target architectures or conduct a consolidated gap analysis.

D: While interviewing stakeholders is valid in Phase A, this option lacks aholistic view of the Architecture Vision development, and skips the TOGAF requirement to producesummary views of the baseline and target architecturesand to use them to drive stakeholder buy-in. It istactically correct, butstrategically incomplete.

????TOGAF Source References:

TOGAF 9.2 – Section 6.2 (Phase A: Architecture Vision)

"The Architecture Vision describes how the proposed architecture support the business goals, and the strategic direction. It also provides a high-level description of the baseline and target architectures and identifies key stakeholders and concerns."

TOGAF 9.2 – Part IV, Architecture Content Framework

"The Architecture Vision includes the scope, constraints, and expectations. It forms the basis for approval to proceed with further architecture development."

The correct answer is C, as it aligns with the key TOGAF principles necessary for guiding enterprise architecture in a merger scenario where retail operations and systems are being consolidated.

Analysis of the Principles in Option C:

Common Use Applications

Since the two companies are merging, it is essential to standardize applications across the enterprise.

Using common applications ensures consistency, reduces costs, and improves efficiency.

TOGAF emphasizes this principle to prevent duplicate or redundant systems, which aligns with the CIO’s goal of reducing the number of applications used.

Data is an Asset

In the scenario, a central inventory management system is a core business function.

Treating data as an asset ensures it is managed properly, shared efficiently, and used strategically across the merged organization.

This principle supports the company’s ability to predict demand, adjust stock levels, and automate reordering.

Common Vocabulary and Data Definitions

The merger requires integrating different systems and data structures.

Having a common vocabulary ensures that all stakeholders (stores, fulfillment centers, and digital platforms) use consistent terminology and data definitions.

This minimizes confusion and ensures interoperability across business functions.

Maximize Benefit to the Enterprise

Every architectural decision should focus on the overall benefit to the business.

By consolidating IT systems and reducing redundancies, the company achieves cost savings, which directly supports this principle.

Business Continuity

The stores operate seven days a week, so system changes must ensure uninterrupted service.

Business continuity ensures that customers are not affected during the transition and that critical retail operations (sales, inventory tracking, and fulfillment) remain functional.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect?

Option A: Control Technical Diversity, Interoperability, Data is an Asset, Data is Shared, Business Continuity

Control Technical Diversity is not the primary concern here. The focus is on system consolidation, not necessarily on limiting technology diversity.

Interoperability is important but not as critical as defining a common system and data structure.

Option B: Service Orientation, Compliance with the Law, Requirements-Based Change, Responsive Change Management, Data Security

While service orientation and compliance are valuable, they are not the most relevant to this specific business transition.

Change management and data security are important but do not address the primary enterprise-wide architectural concerns of system consolidation.

Option D: Ease of Use, Common Use Applications, Data is an Asset, Technology Independence, Business Continuity

Ease of Use is beneficial but is not a core architecture principle in this case.

Technology Independence is useful but does not align directly with the scenario’s priority, which is consolidating applications and data structures.

According to the TOGAF standard, the Target Architecture is the description of a future state of the architecture being developed for an organization. It should be aligned with the Architecture Vision, Principles, and Requirements that have been agreed with the stakeholders. To address the incompatibilities between key stakeholder preferences, the TOGAF standard recommends creating and evaluating multiple alternative Target Architectures that meet different sets of criteria. These criteria should reflect the value preferences and priorities of the stakeholders, as well as the business drivers and objectives. The alternative Target Architectures should be illustrated using a set of architecture views that show the impact of each alternative on the business, data, application, and technology domains. The impact on planned projects should also be identified and analyzed. The strengths and weaknesses of each alternative should be understood and documented. A formal stakeholder review should then be conducted to decide which alternative is the most fit for purpose and should be moved forward with. The funding required for implementing the chosen alternative should also be determined and secured. References:

The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2 - Phase B: Business Architecture - The Open Group

The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2 - Phase C: Information Systems Architectures - The Open Group

[The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2 - Phase D: Technology Architecture - The Open Group]

[The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2 - Phase E: Opportunities and Solutions - The Open Group]

[The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2 - Phase F: Migration Planning - The Open Group]