NSE6_SDW_AD-7.6 Fortinet NSE 6 - SD-WAN 7.6 Enterprise Administrator Questions and Answers

From the exhibit, both branches have an SD-WAN zone named overlay with set advpn-select enable, and each SD-WAN member in that zone is assigned a transport-group value.

Branch-A members:

T1 → transport-group 1

T2 → transport-group 1

T3 → transport-group 2

Branch-B members:

TA → transport-group 1

TB → transport-group 2

TC → transport-group 3

In FCSS SD-WAN 7.6 ADVPN design, transport-group is used to constrain which underlays are allowed to form ADVPN shortcuts with each other. A spoke can establish an ADVPN shortcut only between interfaces that belong to the same transport-group on both sides. This prevents building shortcuts across dissimilar transports.

Evaluating the options:

Option D (T2 on Branch-A with transport-group 1 and TA on Branch-B with transport-group 1) is a valid shortcut pairing.

Option C is not valid because T3 is transport-group 2 while TC is transport-group 3, so they are not permitted to form a shortcut.

Option A is incorrect because not all overlay-zone interfaces are eligible; eligibility is restricted by transport-group matching.

Option B is incorrect because ADVPN shortcuts are spoke-to-spoke tunnels (facilitated by the hub), not limited to “interfaces connected to hub only.”

Therefore, the valid shortcut pairing listed is between T2 on Branch-A and TA on Branch-B, which corresponds to Option D.

The SD-WAN rule (config service edit 1) is configured with set mode priority. This means the rule selects the best interface based on a defined performance metric, as opposed to a simple static priority or SLA. The event log (image_41cfb5.png) shows Metric latency and Message Service prioritized by performance metric will be redirected in sequence order. This indicates that the rule is using latency to determine the preferred member. Given that the log message is about a change, and the most logical reason for a change in a priority mode is that a different member is now the best performer, it implies that the latency on port2 has become lower than that on port1.

The log message Service prioritized by performance metric will be redirected in sequence order confirms that FortiGate is changing the member being used for this service. Because the mode is priority, FortiGate dynamically selects the member that currently meets the best performance criteria, which in this case is latency. The log implies a new member has been selected as the most optimal, and with the default configuration, the members are sorted based on their performance, so the outgoing interface list is effectively updated to prefer the new best-performing member (port2).

In the exhibits, port2 is already assigned to the SD-WAN zone named Test. An interface can only belong to a single SD-WAN zone, so before you can add both port1 and port2 into the new SD-WAN zone Underlay, you must first delete the SD-WAN Zone Test to free port2.

This configuration demonstrates a typical IPsec setup for SD-WAN overlays where the hub side requires a manually defined tunnel IP address, and the spoke can be flexibly configured, including interoperability with third-party IPsec devices. As described in the Fortinet SD-WAN Architect Guide: “For some overlays, the tunnel interface IP is configured statically on the hub side, which allows more control over overlay subnetting and facilitates the use of user-defined overlay IP addresses. This approach is also a requirement for compatibility with non-FortiGate endpoints, such as third-party IPsec devices that may not support dynamic address assignment via IKE or proprietary mechanisms.” This enables hybrid SD-WAN environments and advanced designs involving external partners or cloud services. Overlay IP flexibility is critical for route control and segmentation.

In an SD-WAN rule, you can steer application traffic by using Internet Service Database (ISDB) entries. Facebook and LinkedIn are predefined ISDB objects in FortiGate, so the correct way is to select them in the Internet service field under Destination. This ensures that all traffic to these applications is matched and routed through the chosen (less costly) link.

When SD-WAN load balancing is required with link quality awareness, FortiOS relies on SLA-based strategies. These strategies evaluate link performance using performance SLAs (latency, jitter, packet loss, MOS) and then make forwarding decisions accordingly.

Option A is correct.

In FortiOS 7.6, when an SLA-based SD-WAN rule has load balancing enabled, FortiGate distributes traffic only across the members that meet the SLA targets. Any member that is out of SLA is excluded from load balancing. This behavior ensures that traffic is not forwarded over degraded links while still allowing load distribution across healthy paths.

Option C is correct.

The lowest cost (SLA) strategy is an SLA-based strategy that considers link quality while also allowing SD-WAN load balancing. When multiple members meet the SLA requirements and have equal cost, FortiGate can load balance traffic across them using the configured hash mode. This makes the lowest cost SLA strategy suitable when both link quality and load balancing are required.

Why the other options are incorrect:

Option B is incorrect because the best quality strategy is designed to select the single best-performing link based on SLA metrics. It does not support SD-WAN load balancing across multiple links.

Option D is incorrect because the best quality strategy does not support load balancing at all, so the statement about round-robin hash mode is invalid.

Therefore, the two correct facts to consider are A and C.

The SD-WAN overlay template defines a zone for each underlay interface and moves the interfaces into those zones. This statement perfectly describes the likely sequence of events. The template, when applied, re-organizes the interfaces and zones, causing the existing firewall policy that relies on the old zone configuration to fail. This is the most plausible root cause.

From the SD-WAN monitor in FortiManager:

"The SD-WAN monitor provides a summary view of the branch devices and their members. In the scenario shown, it is clear that branch2_fgt is missing SLA configuration for one member, as evidenced by the lack of performance metrics. The monitor also shows only two branches in the current topology, allowing quick assessment of branch health and configuration completeness."

This kind of visibility is vital for proactive monitoring and rapid troubleshooting in SD-WAN environments.

The line sdwan_mbr_seq=1 sdwan_service_id=4 indicates that this session is part of an SD-WAN rule. sdwan_service_id=4 confirms that the session is being handled by SD-WAN rule ID 4. This directly links the flow to the SD-WAN configuration.

The line no_offload_reason: redir-to-ips denied-by-nturbo shows that the session is not offloaded to the NPU (Network Processing Unit) and is being processed by the main CPU. A session that is not offloaded can be re-evaluated. If the outgoing interface (the one currently being used) goes down, the FortiGate will re-evaluate the session against the SD-WAN rules to find a new active member to steer the traffic through. This is a fundamental behavior of SD-WAN, which ensures network resilience.

The router policy explicitly denies traffic with source 10.0.1.128/25 (which includes 10.0.1.130) and destination 128.66.0.0/24 (which includes 128.66.0.125). Even though SD-WAN service 4 shows members (port1 and port2) alive and available for this traffic, the router policy is evaluated first and blocks it. Therefore, FortiGate drops the traffic flow.

From the Underlay and network advertisement configuration exhibit for the Secondary HUB:

Under Underlay, the template explicitly lists:

WAN Underlay 1 = port1

WAN Underlay 2 = port2

In FortiManager SD-WAN Overlay Orchestrator, underlay interfaces selected for a hub are the transports used to build the overlay IPsec tunnels (one overlay per underlay, per peer as defined by the template). Because both port1 and port2 are configured as underlays, FortiManager will build overlay tunnels over both underlay links. That supports:

Option C (overlay tunnel on port1)

Option B (overlay tunnel on port2)

For the BGP neighbor options:

The Network Advertisement section shows Interface 1 = port5, which indicates a LAN/internal interface whose connected or static networks may be advertised into the overlay routing domain. This does not make port5 a BGP neighbor interface; it is the interface whose routes are being advertised.

The template indicates Dynamic BGP is enabled. In Overlay Orchestrator designs, BGP neighbor relationships are formed across the overlay tunnel interfaces / overlay endpoints, not directly on the raw underlay interfaces (port1/port2) and not on the advertised LAN interface (port5). Therefore, options A and D are not valid conclusions from what is shown.

So, the two correct conclusions are B and C.

Before FortiGate can steer traffic according to SD-WAN rules, certain configuration elements must be present. The guide states:

"SD-WAN is not a standalone feature and interacts with several fundamental FortiGate configurations. Specifically, you must: (1) Define the interfaces (physical, VLAN, or IPsec) that will act as SD-WAN members, (2) Create firewall policies to allow traffic to be steered by SD-WAN, and (3) Set up routing so that traffic has valid routes via SD-WAN members. Without these, SD-WAN rules will not be able to match or steer any traffic."

Security profiles and traffic shaping are not mandatory for basic SD-WAN steering but can be layered on for enhanced security and QoS once foundational elements are present.

The FortiManager SD-WAN overlay template preview, as described in the document, indicates:

"When the device is acting as a hub, the configuration enables the sending of ADVPN shortcut offers to spokes. This means the hub can facilitate on-demand dynamic shortcut tunnel creation between spokes, improving performance for branch-to-branch communication by bypassing the hub for inter-branch traffic after initial discovery."

Such a role is critical in scalable ADVPN topologies, enabling hub devices to optimize overlays dynamically.

For FortiGate to steer traffic using SD-WAN rules, two foundational elements must be in place: available WAN paths (underlay links) and firewall policies that allow traffic to reach the SD-WAN interface.

Underlay links (Option B) are mandatory because SD-WAN operates by selecting among multiple WAN transports (for example, broadband, MPLS, LTE, or IPsec tunnels). These links are configured as SD-WAN members and form the physical or logical paths over which traffic can be steered. Without underlay links, SD-WAN has no paths to evaluate or select.

Firewall policies (Option E) are also mandatory because FortiGate only processes and forwards traffic that is explicitly permitted by a firewall policy. When SD-WAN is enabled, firewall policies must reference the SD-WAN interface or SD-WAN zone as the outgoing interface. If no such policy exists, traffic will not be forwarded and SD-WAN rules will never be evaluated.

Why the other options are incorrect:

Security profiles (Option A) are optional and relate to inspection, not SD-WAN steering.

Overlay links (Option C) are used in specific designs such as ADVPN or hub-and-spoke overlays, but SD-WAN can steer traffic without overlays (for example, DIA-only designs).

Traffic shaping (Option D) is not required for SD-WAN decision-making; it is an optional optimization feature.

Therefore, the two required features that must be configured before FortiGate can steer traffic according to SD-WAN rules are underlay links and firewall policies, which correspond to B and E.

When planning to deploy a large number of branches (e.g., 50), Fortinet recommends several preparatory steps to simplify and automate the rollout. Creating model devices allows you to predefine configurations and settings that can be cloned or adapted for each branch, saving time and minimizing manual errors. Preparing a Zero Touch Provisioning (ZTP) template enables automatic onboarding and provisioning of new FortiGates as soon as they come online, reducing manual intervention. Lastly, creating a policy blueprint allows for standardized policy deployment across all branches, ensuring consistent security and SD-WAN rule enforcement. This holistic approach streamlines the deployment process, allows for rapid scaling, and ensures that all devices are configured according to corporate policy from day one.

When an SD-WAN member is deleted, FortiGate can also remove static routes that were tied to that interface. If those routes are needed for destinations not covered by SD-WAN rules, traffic to those networks becomes unreachable. This explains why flows not matching SD-WAN rules are interrupted after the member was removed.

The use of SLA targets is specific to certain SD-WAN strategies. The "Lowest Cost (SLA)" and "Maximize Bandwidth (SLA)" strategies are explicitly designed to use the configured SLA targets to make routing decisions. The "Best Quality" strategy uses performance metrics but does not necessarily require or reference SLA targets in the same way, while "Manual" does not use metrics at all for path selection.

This is a core function of SD-WAN rules with SLA targets. The purpose of configuring an SLA target with specific thresholds for latency, jitter, and packet loss is to define what is considered "acceptable" performance for an application. SD-WAN rules then use these targets to check if the members (interfaces) meet these requirements before a flow is steered over them, ensuring that a preferred path still offers a good user experience.

FortiGate allows for a single SD-WAN rule to reference multiple, different performance SLAs. This is crucial for complex deployments where a single SD-WAN rule needs to handle traffic for multiple applications that have distinct performance requirements. For example, a single rule might direct VoIP traffic based on one performance SLA with strict latency/jitter targets, while simultaneously handling general web traffic using another performance SLA with more lenient requirements.

In FortiOS 7.6, static routes can reference either:

an SD-WAN zone (for example, virtual-wan-link or a user-defined SD-WAN zone), or

a specific SD-WAN member interface that belongs to that zone.

However, FortiOS enforces a routing constraint to avoid ambiguity during route resolution. Two static routes cannot have the same destination prefix if one points to an SD-WAN zone and the other points to an SD-WAN member within that zone. This would create an overlapping and conflicting forwarding decision.

Therefore, if you configure:

one static route that references an SD-WAN zone, and

another static route that references an SD-WAN member belonging to that same zone,

the destination subnets of the two static routes must be different.

Why the other options are incorrect:

Option A is incorrect because FortiOS does allow static routes that reference individual SD-WAN members.

Option B is incorrect because static routes can reference SD-WAN zones.

Option D is incorrect because static routing decisions in FortiOS are based on destination prefixes, not source prefixes.

Thus, the correct answer is C.

This is because the setting minimum-sla-meet-members = 2 requires at least two SD-WAN zone members (in this case, HUB2-VPN1, HUB2-VPN2, and HUB2-VPN3) to pass the defined SLA health check (HUB1_HC) before the FortiGate will establish ADVPN shortcuts. If fewer than two members meet the SLA, shortcuts will not be created.