ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor QMS ISO 9001:2015 Lead Auditor Exam Questions and Answers

Non-Conformity Report:

ISO 9001 Clause Number

Nature of Problem

ISO 9001 Requirement That Has Not Been Fulfilled

6.1.1

Several risks and opportunities have not been determined.

"The organization shall consider the requirements referred to in 4.2 and determine the risks and opportunities that need to be addressed."

6.1.2 (a)

Actions to address risks and opportunities not planned.

"The organization shall plan actions to address risks and opportunities."

Step-by-Step Reasoning:

Clause 6.1.1 - Determining Risks and Opportunities:

Requirement: The organization must determine risks and opportunities that are relevant to its Quality Management System (QMS). This ensures that the QMS achieves intended results and prevents undesired effects.

Problem Identified: While some risks and opportunities were discussed, the organization did not perform a systematic evaluation of all risks (e.g., health and safety legislation changes, retiring trainers).

Clause 6.1.2 (a) - Planning Actions for Risks and Opportunities:

Requirement: The organization must plan actions to address identified risks and opportunities. These actions should be integrated into the QMS processes to ensure continuous improvement.

Problem Identified: The Quality Systems Manager confirmed that no plans were made to address the risks and opportunities because the Managing Director deemed it unnecessary. This violates the requirement to plan actions.

Correct Options Selected:

Clause 6.1.1 with the nature of the problem as: "Several risks and opportunities have not been determined."

Clause 6.1.2 (a) with the nature of the problem as: "Actions to address risks and opportunities not planned."

ISO 9001 Requirements Not Fulfilled:

For 6.1.1:"The organization shall consider the requirements referred to in 4.2 and determine the risks and opportunities that need to be addressed."

For 6.1.2 (a):"The organization shall plan actions to address risks and opportunities."

ISO/IEC 17021-1 is the standard that specifies requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of management systems. It includes provisions for determining audit time for third-party certification audits, ensuring that the audits are conducted in a consistent, comparable, and reliable manner, which can be applied to a variety of management systems, including ISO 9001.

D. I would look for evidence that the actions resulting from the risk assessment had been taken.

According to ISO 9001:2015, Clause 6.1.2 requires the organization to plan actions to address risks and opportunities. The organization must integrate and implement these actions into its quality management system and evaluate their effectiveness. The auditor should seek evidence that the organization has assessed the risks and taken appropriate actions.

B. I would ask to audit the Technical Manager by phone.

As the Technical Manager is responsible for this process and is absent due to illness, it is reasonable to attempt to contact him to obtain accurate information. This ensures that the audit process is not unduly delayed and that the information is obtained from the appropriate person.

A. I would not accept the legal compliance expert answering the question.

While the legal compliance expert might not be the best source for technical details, outright rejecting their input is not appropriate. It is better to first verify if the expert can provide relevant information.

C. I would delay the audit until the return of the Technical Manager.

This would be an inefficient approach. Contacting the Technical Manager by phone is a more practical and reasonable option.

E. I would ask for a different guide instead of the legal compliance expert.

The guide's role is not necessarily to answer technical questions but to facilitate the audit. Since Jack is already familiar with the situation, replacing him may not add value.

F. I would ask the consultant to leave the meeting since he is not an employee of the organization.

This is inappropriate and could disrupt the audit process. There is no rule in ISO 9001 preventing a consultant from assisting in the audit if authorized by the organization.

Why Not the Other Options:

According to clause 8.3 of ISO 9001:2015, the organization should establish, implement, and maintain a design and development process that is appropriate to ensure the subsequent provision of products and services. The design and development process should include the following activities:

•Determining the requirements for the products and services to be designed and developed, considering the intended use, the statutory and regulatory requirements, the customer and other relevant interested parties’ needs and expectations, and the potential risks and opportunities.

•Defining the design and development objectives, stages, responsibilities, and authorities, and ensuring the availability of adequate resources and competence.

•Implementing design and development controls, such as reviews, verification, and validation, to ensure that the design and development outputs meet the design and development inputs, and to identify and resolve any problems or errors.

•Maintaining documented information on the design and development inputs, outputs, reviews, verification, validation, and changes, and ensuring the traceability and conformity of the products and services to the requirements.

•Managing the design and development changes, by identifying, reviewing, and controlling them, and evaluating their effects on the products and services and the QMS.

In this case, the evidence statements that provide a meaningful audit trail for the design and development process are B, E, and F, because they relate to the design and development controls, the documented information, and the verification activities that are required by the standard. These options can help the auditor to assess the effectiveness and conformity of the design and development process, and to identify any nonconformities or opportunities for improvement. The other options are not directly related to clause 8.3, although they may be relevant for other aspects of the QMS, such as clause 7.2 on competence, clause 7.3 on awareness, clause 7.4 on communication, clause 8.2 on requirements for products and services, clause 8.4 on externally provided processes, products, and services, and clause 8.7 on control of nonconforming outputs. References: ISO 9001:2015, ISO 9001 Auditing Practices Group Guidance on Design and Development, ISO 9001 Clause 8.3 Design and development of products and services

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

As per ISO 9001:2015, Clause 10.2 (Nonconformity and Corrective Action), all identified nonconformities, including minor ones, must be documented and communicated to the auditee.

Minor nonconformities can lead to major issues if left unaddressed. The auditor must inform the organization before moving to the next audit phase so that corrective actions can be taken. Clause 9.2.2 (Internal Audit) states that audit findings should be reported without undue delay.

Since Li Na did not report the minor nonconformities immediately, her decision was incorrect. Minor nonconformities should always be documented and communicated before proceeding to the next phase.

According to the ISO - Management system standards page, the key benefits of an effective management system include improved operational effectiveness and efficiency, improved risk management and protection of people and the environment, and enhanced drive for innovation. The Integrated Use of Management System Standards (IUMSS) handbook also states that the purpose and objectives of management system standards are to help organizations improve their performance by specifying repeatable steps that organizations consciously implement to achieve their goals and objectives.

Therefore, the complete sentence is:

“The purpose of a management system standard is to improve the performance of an organisation.”

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

According to ISO 19011:2018, Clause 6.4.6 (Conducting Interviews), group interviews should be conducted with at least two auditors to ensure objectivity and accuracy.

This prevents bias or misinterpretation of responses.

It allows for cross-validation of information.

It ensures that the audit results remain objective and impartial.

Since Li Na conducted the group interviews alone, she did not follow audit best practices. The correct approach would have been to have another auditor present during the interviews.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

ISO 9001:2015 is based on seven quality management principles, one of which is Relationship Management. This principle emphasizes the importance of maintaining open communication and collaboration with interested parties, including suppliers and customers.

Clause 7.4 (Communication) requires organizations to determine what, when, with whom, and how communication should take place. Since AL-TAX failed to ensure clear communication channels, it did not adhere to this principle. Effective relationship management helps improve supply chain performance, customer satisfaction, and overall QMS effectiveness.

Table

Statement

First-party audits

Second-party audits

Third-party audits

The audit scope is typically determined by the organisation being audited.

Yes

No

No

The outcome of the audit is typically certification to a recognised standard.

No

No

Yes

The audit scope is typically confined to service/product provision capability.

No

Yes

No

Here is a brief explanation of each statement:

The audit scope is typically determined by the organisation being audited: This statement applies to first-party audits, also known as internal audits, where the organisation audits its own processes and activities to ensure conformity and improvement1. The organisation can decide the scope of the audit based on its own needs and objectives2. This statement does not apply to second-party audits, where the customer audits the supplier, or third-party audits, where an independent body audits the organisation. In these cases, the audit scope is determined by the customer or the certification body, respectively34.

The outcome of the audit is typically certification to a recognised standard: This statement applies to third-party audits, where an independent body audits the organisation to verify that it meets the requirements of a specific standard, such as ISO 9001, and issues a certificate of conformity if the audit is successful34. This statement does not apply to first-party audits or second-party audits, where the outcome of the audit is not certification, but rather self-improvement or supplier qualification13.

The audit scope is typically confined to service/product provision capability: This statement applies to second-party audits, where the customer audits the supplier to ensure that they are meeting the requirements specified in the contract, such as service or product quality, delivery, or performance34. The audit scope is usually focused on the specific aspects of the service or product that are of interest to the customer3. This statement does not apply to first-party audits or third-party audits, where the audit scope is broader and covers the entire quality management system or the relevant clauses of the standard14.

Match the process descriptions below to the process names:

The process by which the accuracy of test equipment is checked against a known standard. = Calibration

The process by which a product or service is visually examined to determine conformity to requirements. = Evaluation

The process by which data is examined in detail to reach a specific answer or answers. = Analysis

The process by which a parameter of a product or service is examined to determine a specific value. = Measurement

According to the ISO 9000:2015 - Quality management systems — Fundamentals and vocabulary, the definitions of the process names are as follows:

Calibration: operation that, under specified conditions, in a first step, establishes a relation between the quantity values with measurement uncertainties provided by measurement standards and corresponding indications with associated measurement uncertainties and, in a second step, uses this information to establish a relation for obtaining a measurement result from an indication.

Evaluation: determination of the suitability, adequacy or effectiveness of an object to achieve established objectives.

Analysis: detailed examination of the elements or structure of something.

Measurement: process to experimentally obtain one or more quantity values that can reasonably be attributed to a quantity.

Therefore, the process descriptions can be matched to the process names based on these definitions.

In this scenario, the organisation A has two plants, A1 and A2, but the production in A2 was discontinued due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the plant was rented to another organisation B. There are no A employees working in A2, and the organisation A expects to reassume production in A2 as soon as possible. Therefore, the appropriate action to plan the internal audit of A’s quality management system is:

•Interview the A2 plant manager, now working in Plant A1: This action involves interviewing the person who is responsible for the management and operation of the plant A2, and who is currently working in the plant A1. The interview should aim to gather information about the status and condition of the plant A2, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the quality management system, the arrangements and agreements with the organisation B, and the plans and actions to resume production in the plant A25 . This action is relevant and necessary for the internal audit, as it can help to assess the readiness and effectiveness of the quality management system, and to identify any gaps or nonconformities that need to be addressed.

The other options are not appropriate actions to plan the internal audit of A’s quality management system, according to the web search results from my internal tool. They are:

•Visit Plant A2 to interview personnel of company B: This action involves visiting the plant A2 and interviewing the personnel of the organisation B, who are not related to the organisation A and who are not part of the quality management system. This action is irrelevant and unnecessary for the internal audit, as it can not provide any evidence or information about the conformity and improvement of the quality management system of the organisation A5 .

•Visit Plant A2 to interview B’s quality manager: This action involves visiting the plant A2 and interviewing the quality manager of the organisation B, who is not related to the organisation A and who is not part of the quality management system. This action is irrelevant and unnecessary for the internal audit, as it can not provide any evidence or information about the conformity and improvement of the quality management system of the organisation A5 .

•Visit Plant A2 to interview A’s security personnel and B’s maintenance department: This action involves visiting the plant A2 and interviewing the security personnel of the organisation A and the maintenance department of the organisation B, who are not directly involved in the quality management system. This action is irrelevant and unnecessary for the internal audit, as it can not provide any evidence or information about the conformity and improvement of the quality management system of the organisation A5 .

Therefore, the correct answer is D.

In ISO 9001:2015, the responsibility for managing the audit program lies with those overseeing the entire audit process rather than the Audit Team Leader. During the planning stage, before involving the Audit Team Leader, key actions for managing the audit program include:

1. Providing the Resources Needed: According to clause 7.1 (Resources), the audit program manager must ensure that the necessary resources are in place to conduct the audit effectively. This encompasses logistical support, personnel, and other required resources for the audit to proceed smoothly.

2. Reviewing Reports of Previous Audits: As per clause 9.2.2 (Internal Audit), it is essential to consider the results of previous audits to plan effectively for the upcoming audit. This helps identify areas that require particular attention, ensuring continuity and focusing on recurring issues or improvements since the last audit.

These actions ensure that the audit is thoroughly prepared and that there is continuity and focus on any areas that might need closer inspection. The other options, such as preparing the audit plan, assigning responsibilities, preparing checklists, and selecting the audit team members, generally fall under the duties of the Audit Team Leader once they are appointed and engaged in the planning process.

The activities that are specifically required by ISO 17021-1 as part of third-party (Certification Body) surveillance audit processes are:

•Option A: Audit use of certification marks on marketing materials. This option is correct because ISO 17021-1:2015 clause 9.6.2.2 requires the certification body to audit the client’s use of marks and/or any other reference to certification, as applicable, to ensure conformity with the certification requirements.

•Option B: Review changes to the QMS since last visit. This option is correct because ISO 17021-1:2015 clause 9.6.2.2 requires the certification body to review any changes affecting the client’s quality management system and its ability to continue to fulfil the requirements of the standard used for certification.

•Option C: Confirm effectiveness of internal audit and management review. This option is correct because ISO 17021-1:2015 clause 9.6.2.2 requires the certification body to confirm the continuing effectiveness of the client’s quality management system, including the effectiveness of the internal audit and management review processes.

•Option F: Review the status of previously raised findings and audit effectiveness of any outstanding findings. This option is correct because ISO 17021-1:2015 clause 9.6.2.2 requires the certification body to review the status of findings and any corrective actions taken by the client in response to previous audits, and to verify the effectiveness of the implemented corrective actions.

•Option H: Verify legal compliance. This option is correct because ISO 17021-1:2015 clause 9.6.2.2 requires the certification body to verify the client’s compliance with applicable statutory and regulatory requirements related to the scope of certification.

•Option I: Handling of customer complaints since last visit. This option is correct because ISO 17021-1:2015 clause 9.6.2.2 requires the certification body to review the client’s handling of customer complaints related to the certified activities since the last audit.

The following options are not correct:

•Option D: Complete a full document review of the quality management system. This option is not correct because ISO 17021-1:2015 clause 9.6.2.2 does not require the certification body to complete a full document review of the quality management system during surveillance audits. A full document review is only required during the initial certification audit or when there are significant changes to the quality management system or the certification requirements.

•Option E: Failing to meet financial responsibilities. This option is not correct because ISO 17021-1:2015 clause 9.6.2.2 does not require the certification body to audit the client’s financial responsibilities during surveillance audits. The certification body may have contractual arrangements with the client regarding the payment of fees, but this is not part of the surveillance audit process.

•Option G: Review the calibration status of the instrumentation. This option is not correct because ISO 17021-1:2015 clause 9.6.2.2 does not require the certification body to review the calibration status of the instrumentation during surveillance audits. The certification body may audit the client’s monitoring and measuring resources as part of the quality management system requirements, but this is not a specific activity required by ISO 17021-1.

•Option J: Conduct a minimum number of annual surveillance audits during the certification period. This option is not correct because ISO 17021-1:2015 clause 9.6.2.2 does not require the certification body to conduct a minimum number of annual surveillance audits during the certification period. The certification body may determine the frequency and duration of surveillance audits based on the risk and performance of the client, but this is not a specific activity required by ISO 17021-1.

Based on the scenario and the concept of an ‘audit trail’ within the context of ISO 9001, the three statements that apply would likely be:

A. Decisions on improvement action timescales not involving departmental managers. This indicates a lack of involvement and communication with those responsible for implementing the improvements, which is a key part of an effective audit trail1.

B. Evaluation of the results of the improvement action not always documented by the Quality Manager. Proper documentation is essential for an audit trail, as it provides evidence that actions have been evaluated and are effective1.

C. Limited knowledge of the content of Quality Improvement Requests by departmental staff. An audit trail should ensure that all relevant parties are aware of and understand the actions being taken, which is not the case here1.

These points suggest issues with the communication, documentation, and involvement of relevant personnel in the quality management system processes, which are crucial for maintaining an effective audit trail and, by extension, a robust quality management system.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

According to ISO 19011:2018, Clause 6.4.11 (Closing Meeting):

The audit team must proceed with the audit report, even if the auditee disagrees with findings.

Disagreements do not invalidate audit results.

The auditee has the right to file a complaint or appeal, but this is handled after the audit report is submitted.

Thus, the audit team acted correctly by proceeding with the audit report despite top management’s disagreement.

As the audit team leader, it is crucial to manage differing opinions constructively and ensure that the correct clause is selected for the nonconformity based on solid evidence. Here’s how the situation should be handled:

E. Invite you and the second auditor to fully explain your point of view and then decide which clause to select: This promotes collaboration and transparency, allowing both auditors to present their rationale for choosing the specific clause.

F. Review the evidence with you and the second auditor, and then decide which clause of ISO 9001 would best apply: Reviewing the evidence in relation to the specific requirements of ISO 9001 is essential for determining which clause is most appropriate.

H. Try to obtain a consensus between you and the second auditor after a discussion of the different opinions: Consensus-building is a crucial skill for an audit team leader. Achieving agreement ensures the nonconformity is addressed accurately and with full team support.

Options such as overruling immediately (D) or deferring the decision without full discussion (B) could undermine team dynamics and the audit process. Consulting the quality manager (A) or selecting an entirely different clause (G) is unnecessary, as the team should resolve the issue internally​​.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

Policies and guidelines are considered documentary evidence because they are written records that demonstrate how an organization complies with ISO 9001 requirements.

Clause References:

ISO 19011:2018, Clause 6.4.6 – Audit Evidence:

Documentary evidence includes manuals, procedures, and policies.

Why is the Correct Answer C?

Documentary evidence includes written records such as policies, procedures, and documented instructions that support QMS implementation.

Auditors review policies to verify conformance with ISO 9001.

Why are the Other Options Incorrect?

A (Confirmative evidence) → Not a recognized category in ISO auditing.

B (Technical evidence) → Technical evidence refers to measurements, test results, or product data, not policies.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

ISO 19011:2018, Clause 5.4 (Audit Records Management) states that the audit schedule must be maintained as a key record.

Thus, C is the correct answer.

According to ISO 9001:2015, clause 7.2, an auditor shall have the competence to:

Understand the requirements of ISO 9001 and how they relate to the audit

Understand the organization’s quality management system and its processes

Understand the applicable legal, regulatory, contractual and other requirements that affect the audit

Understand the needs and expectations of interested parties other than customers

Plan and conduct audits in accordance with ISO 19011

Evaluate audit evidence and draw appropriate conclusions

Communicate audit findings effectively1

Therefore, knowledge of ISO 9001 requirements and ISO 19011 audit principles are essential for every member of an audit team auditing an ISO 9001 quality management system.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

ISO 9001:2015 requires organizations to assess both internal and external issues that could impact the effectiveness of their Quality Management System (QMS).

Clause Reference:

Clause 4.1 – Understanding the Organization and Its Context states that organizations must determine external and internal issues that affect their ability to achieve intended results.

Internal issues include:

Knowledge within the organization (documented or undocumented)

Organizational culture

Resource availability

Technological advancements

Infrastructure and capabilities

Why is the Correct Answer C?

Knowledge (Clause 7.1.6) is a critical internal factor that directly affects the implementation and maintenance of a QMS.

Organizations must identify, maintain, and make available the necessary knowledge to achieve quality objectives and meet customer requirements.

Why are the Other Options Incorrect?

A (Social and economic environments) → These are considered external issues rather than internal.

B (Competitive environment) → Competition is external, not an internal issue affecting the QMS.

D (Expectations of suppliers) → Supplier expectations relate to external interested parties, covered under Clause 4.2 (Understanding the Needs and Expectations of Interested Parties).

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

According to ISO 19011:2018, Clause 6.4.3 (Roles and Responsibilities of Guides and Observers):

The auditee assigns a guide to assist the audit team.

The guide provides logistical support, helps with navigation, and arranges access to necessary personnel and records.

The audit team leader does not assign the guide, but they may request one.

The actions that should be taken in the context of the audit are:

•Option B: Call the individual(s) managing the audit programme to explain the situation and recommend immediate suspension of certification to protect the integrity of the Certification Body. This option is correct because the auditor has found serious and significant gaps in the QMS processes that affect the health and safety of the patients, which is a major nonconformity that may warrant suspension of certification. The auditor should inform the individual(s) managing the audit programme of the situation and the audit findings, and recommend immediate suspension of certification to protect the integrity of the Certification Body and the credibility of the certification scheme. The auditor should also follow the Certification Body’s procedures and rules for suspension of certification and communicate the decision and the consequences to the auditee.

•Option C: Continue with the meeting, present the audit conclusions and inform the DCM that the organisation will receive the audit report in due course. This option is correct because the auditor should not terminate or postpone the closing meeting due to the absence of the Catering Manager, as the DCM is the auditee’s nominated representative for the audit. The auditor should continue with the meeting, present the audit conclusions and the audit findings, and inform the DCM that the organisation will receive the audit report in due course. The auditor should also explain the audit outcome recommendation and the suspension of certification, and request the DCM to acknowledge the receipt and understanding of the audit results.

The following options are not correct:

•Option A: Close the meeting immediately after the DCM’s response and advise that the issues will be addressed at the next surveillance visit. This option is not correct because the auditor should not close the meeting without presenting the audit conclusions and the audit findings, as this would violate the audit principles of fairness and transparency. The auditor should also not advise that the issues will be addressed at the next surveillance visit, as this would imply that the auditor is accepting the auditee’s delay and inaction, and that the auditor is not taking the major nonconformity seriously.

•Option D: Conclude the meeting early and advise that it will be rescheduled once the Catering Manager has returned to work. This option is not correct because the auditor should not conclude the meeting early or reschedule it due to the absence of the Catering Manager, as this would disrupt the audit process and the audit schedule. The auditor should also not wait for the Catering Manager to return to work, as this would delay the communication and resolution of the major nonconformity, and potentially compromise the health and safety of the patients.

•Option E: Recommend that all personnel should be given urgent in-depth training in the QMS. This option is not correct because the auditor should not recommend or prescribe specific corrective actions to the auditee, as this would violate the audit principles of independence and objectivity. The auditor should only report the audit findings and the audit outcome recommendation, and leave the responsibility and authority for determining and implementing the corrective actions to the auditee.

•Option F: Thank the DCM for his time and express an expectation that improvements will be made in the QMS. This option is not correct because the auditor should not thank the DCM for his time and express an expectation that improvements will be made in the QMS, as this would imply that the auditor is satisfied and optimistic with the auditee’s performance and response, and that the auditor is not taking the major nonconformity seriously. The auditor should instead express the concern and dissatisfaction with the auditee’s QMS processes and the impact on the health and safety of the patients, and communicate the suspension of certification and the need for urgent and effective corrective actions.

The correct answer is:

Event

Selecting audit team = Individual(s) managing the audit programme

Conducting the audit = Audit team

Preparing the audit plan = Audit team leader

Requesting the audit = Audit client

To complete the table, click on the blank section you want to complete so that it is highlighted in red, and then click on the applicable text from the options below. Alternatively, drag and drop each option to the appropriate blank section. Responsibility:- Individual(s) managing the audit programme

Audit team

Audit team leader

Audit client

According to ISO 19011:2018, clause 5.3, the individual(s) managing the audit programme are responsible for selecting the audit team, taking into account the competence and availability of the auditors and any experts needed. 1

According to clause 6.2, the audit team is responsible for conducting the audit, which includes collecting and verifying audit evidence, evaluating audit findings, and preparing the audit report. 1

According to clause 6.1, the audit team leader is responsible for preparing the audit plan, which includes defining the audit objectives, scope, criteria, and duration, as well as assigning roles and responsibilities to the audit team members. 1

According to clause 5.2, the audit client is the person or organization that requests the audit, which can be the auditee (the person or organization being audited) or any other person or organization that has an interest in the audit results. 1

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

ISO 9001:2015 requires organizations to measure and monitor customer perceptions to determine whether customer requirements are being met.

Clause Reference:

Clause 9.1.2 – Customer Satisfaction states that organizations must monitor customer perceptions using relevant methods such as customer surveys, feedback forms, and complaint analysis.

One of the most effective ways to do this is gap analysis, which identifies differences between customer expectations and actual service or product performance.

Why is the Correct Answer C?

Gap analysis helps determine discrepancies between current performance and customer expectations, allowing organizations to improve quality.

It is a standard quality improvement tool used to assess customer satisfaction.

Why are the Other Options Incorrect?

A (PEST analysis) → Focuses on external macroeconomic factors (Political, Economic, Social, Technological) rather than customer satisfaction.

B (Market-share analysis) → Examines business performance relative to competitors, not customer perceptions.

D (Competitive benchmarking) → Involves comparing processes with competitors but does not directly monitor customer perceptions.

According to ISO 9001:2015, clause 9.2.2.e, the organization is required to retain documented information as evidence of the implementation of the audit programme and the audit results. This includes the records of the nonconformities identified during the internal audits and the corrective actions taken to address them. The organization is also required to verify the effectiveness of the corrective actions, as per clause 10.2.2.

Therefore, in the scenario given, the Quality Manager’s decision to automatically close any nonconformance over 3 years old without obtaining any confirmation from the relevant departments or verifying the effectiveness of the corrective actions is a clear violation of the requirements of clause 9.2.2.e. This indicates a lack of control and follow-up of the internal audit process, as well as a potential risk of recurrence or occurrence of the nonconformities in other areas. This also undermines the credibility and value of the internal audit programme, as well as the risk-based approach claimed by the Quality Manager.

Hence, the best course of action to take is D, to raise a nonconformance report against clause 9.2.2.e of ISO 9001, and to communicate the audit findings to the relevant management. The other options are either insufficient or irrelevant to address the issue, as they do not directly relate to the noncompliance with clause 9.2.2.e.

In a third-party certification audit, auditors are responsible for maintaining confidentiality as part of their professional duties. Here’s how they can demonstrate it:

A. Adhere to the CQI Professional Code of Conduct: The CQI (Chartered Quality Institute) Code of Conduct outlines ethical principles, including confidentiality. Auditors must adhere to professional standards, ensuring sensitive information is protected and not disclosed improperly.

B. Confirm the confidentiality arrangements with the auditee regarding the use of mobile devices/cameras: Before using mobile devices or cameras, auditors must seek explicit permission from the auditee and agree on confidentiality terms, preventing unauthorized recording or sharing of sensitive information.

Options C, D, and E involve breaching confidentiality and are not acceptable practices in an ISO 9001:2015 certification audit. Sharing sensitive information, removing evidence without consent, or discussing it with unauthorized parties violates audit principles and the standard's confidentiality requirements​.

In this scenario, the time allocated by the audit team leader for the Human Resources audit is fixed, and as an auditor, you must work within that constraint. Although the sampling criteria suggests reviewing 25 personnel files, it is acceptable to adjust the sample size based on time and resource limitations. ISO 9001:2015 emphasizes risk-based thinking and practical resource management (Clause 7.1), so it is reasonable to review a smaller sample if the time is insufficient.

Option B is a pragmatic approach, allowing you to focus on quality over quantity by reviewing as many cases as time allows without compromising the audit schedule.

Options like extending the audit (A, C, D) are impractical in a structured audit environment, especially for second-party audits where maintaining the agreed schedule is important​​.

According to ISO 19011:2018, clause 6.3.3, the audit plan should be reviewed and revised as necessary to address changes that occur during the audit planning. The audit plan should be agreed upon, preferably in writing, by the audit team leader, the audit client and the auditee1. Therefore, if there is a significant change in the auditee’s situation, such as the cancellation of all orders for the next week, the audit plan should be reviewed and revised accordingly, with the agreement of all parties involved.

According to ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, clause 9.1.4, the certification body should have a process to ensure that the audit team has the competence to achieve the audit objectives, and that the audit methods are appropriate for the scope and complexity of the audit. The certification body should also have a process to ensure that the audit is conducted under reasonable conditions and within a reasonable time frame2. Therefore, if there is a risk that the audit objectives cannot be achieved, or that the audit methods are not suitable, due to the change in the auditee’s situation, the certification body should be consulted and informed on how to proceed with the audit.

Therefore, the best action to take is B, ask the certification body you work for how to proceed with the audit. This action will ensure that the audit plan is revised and agreed upon by all parties, and that the audit team has the competence and the methods to conduct the audit effectively and efficiently. The other options are not correct, as they may compromise the quality and validity of the audit:

•A. Start the audit on Monday at ABC’s as planned, interviewing the functions that regularly work at the central office, and plan visits to ABC customers wherever they may be working during the following week: This action may not be feasible or acceptable, as it may extend the audit duration and cost beyond the agreed terms, and it may not provide sufficient and appropriate audit evidence to verify the conformity and effectiveness of the auditee’s processes. Moreover, this action may not be agreed upon by the audit client and the auditee, and it may not be approved by the certification body.

•C. Start the audit on Monday as planned, interviewing the functions that regularly work at the central office, and visit another customer’s premises they cleaned the week before: This action may not be relevant or reliable, as it may not reflect the current performance and condition of the auditee’s processes. The audit evidence collected from the previous customer may not be valid or representative of the audit criteria, and it may not address the risks and opportunities associated with the auditee’s context and objectives. Moreover, this action may not be agreed upon by the audit client and the auditee, and it may not be approved by the certification body.

•D. Complete the audit but ask the quality manager to clean some windows at the ABC’s office, simulating the process they carry out at customers’ premises: This action may not be objective or impartial, as it may introduce bias and influence in the audit process. The audit evidence collected from the simulated process may not be accurate or authentic, and it may not demonstrate the actual capability and effectiveness of the auditee’s processes. Moreover, this action may not be ethical or professional, as it may compromise the integrity and credibility of the audit and the certification.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

One of the seven quality management principles in ISO 9001:2015 is Improvement, which emphasizes continual enhancement of processes, products, and services.

Clause 10.3 (Continual Improvement) states that organizations must continuously assess risks, consequences, and impacts to improve their QMS.

Risk-based thinking (Clause 0.3.3) supports improvement by identifying and mitigating risks before they affect performance.

Clause 6.1 (Actions to Address Risks and Opportunities) requires organizations to take a proactive approach, ensuring long-term success.

Other options do not fully align with the question:

Process approach (A) focuses on managing interrelated activities.

Leadership (B) ensures commitment but does not directly address risk assessment.

Relationship management (D) deals with interested parties, not risk mitigation.

In the context of a third-party audit, the activities and the parties responsible can be matched as follows:

Review the organization’s processes: This is typically the responsibility of the audit team. They examine the processes to ensure they comply with the specified standards1.

Review the audit results: The audit team leader usually reviews the audit findings to ensure accuracy and completeness before they are finalized1.

Issue the certificate: The certification body is responsible for issuing the certificate if the audit is successful and the organization meets the required standards1.

Select the audit team: The individual(s) managing the audit programme are responsible for selecting the audit team. This ensures that the team has the appropriate skills and knowledge for the audit1.

These roles are essential to maintain the integrity and effectiveness of the audit process. The audit team conducts the actual audit, the team leader oversees the audit process, the certification body grants the certification, and the management of the audit program ensures that the right team is in place to conduct the audit1.

Based on the description of the image you’ve provided, here’s how the activities match with the responsible parties in the context of a third-party audit:

Review the organization’s processes: This activity is typically the responsibility of the Audit Team. They are tasked with examining the processes to ensure they meet the requirements of the standard being audited.

Review the audit results: The Audit Team Leader is usually responsible for this activity. They oversee the audit process and are in charge of reviewing the findings and ensuring that the audit objectives are met.

Issue the certificate: The Certification Body is responsible for issuing the certificate if the organization’s management system is found to be in compliance with the standard.

Select the audit team: The Individual(s) managing the audit programme are responsible for selecting the audit team. They ensure that the team has the appropriate competence and resources to effectively conduct the audit.

These roles are defined within the framework of ISO 9001:2015 and are essential for the proper conduct of a third-party audit. The audit team and its leader play a critical role in the operational aspects of the audit, while the certification body and those managing the audit programme have overarching responsibilities for the audit’s governance and integrity.

•To evaluate the preparedness of the organisation for a Stage 2 audit: This objective involves assessing the readiness of the organisation to undergo the Stage 2 audit, where the conformity and effectiveness of the quality management system will be verified123. The audit team will check the level of implementation and understanding of the quality management system, identify any major gaps or nonconformities, and confirm the audit scope, criteria, and plan123.

•To review the quality manual: This objective involves reviewing the documented information of the quality management system, such as the quality policy, the quality objectives, the scope, the processes, and the procedures, to ensure that they meet the requirements of ISO 9001:2015123. The audit team will also evaluate the organisation’s understanding and application of the standard, and identify any areas of improvement or concern123.

The other options are not included in the objectives of the Stage 1 initial certification audit, according to the web search results from my internal tool. They may be related to other stages or types of audits, but they are not the focus of the Stage 1 audit.

Therefore, the correct answer is B and D.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

According to ISO 19011:2018, Clause 5.5 (Determining Audit Team Competence), technical experts:

Provide specialized knowledge in an audit.

Must operate under the supervision of an auditor to ensure compliance with audit protocols.

Cannot work independently or under the auditee’s supervision, as they are not responsible for the audit's findings.

The audit team leader has overall responsibility, but technical experts are supervised by an auditor during the audit process.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

The PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) cycle is a continuous improvement model used in ISO 9001:2015. The "Check" phase involves monitoring, measuring, and analyzing the results to assess if the planned actions have been effective.

In scenario 1, AL-TAX tested the effectiveness of the intended actions, which aligns with the Check stage of the PDCA cycle. Clause 9.1.1 (Monitoring, Measurement, Analysis, and Evaluation) requires organizations to evaluate their QMS and determine whether improvements are necessary.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

According to ISO 17021-1:2015, Clause 9.4.8 (Audit Reporting):

The audit report must be submitted to the certification body regardless of corrective actions.

Corrective actions are reviewed after the audit, but the audit process should not be delayed.

Certification decisions should be made based on the audit findings and evidence, not pending corrective actions.

Thus, delaying audit activities until corrective actions are submitted is not acceptable.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

ISO 9001:2015, Clause 5.1.2 (Customer Focus) states that top management must ensure customer satisfaction by monitoring customer perceptions.

In scenario 2, top management initiated customer surveys, demonstrating their commitment to customer focus as required by Clause 5.1.2.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

ISO 9001:2015 requires organizations to identify and control nonconforming outputs to prevent unintended use or delivery.

Clause References:

Clause 8.7 (Control of Nonconforming Outputs): Organizations must ensure that nonconforming outputs are identified and controlled to prevent unintended use or delivery.

Clause 10.2 (Nonconformity and Corrective Action): Requires organizations to take appropriate actions when nonconformities are found, including during or after service provision.

Why is the Correct Answer C?

If nonconforming products or services are identified after delivery or during service, organizations must take corrective actions to protect customers and stakeholders.

Actions may include recalls, rework, customer notifications, compensation, or process improvements.

This approach aligns with ISO 9001:2015, ensuring that products/services consistently meet requirements.

Why are the Other Options Incorrect?

A (Retaining documentation only) → While documentation is required, it alone does not ensure proper handling of nonconforming outputs.

B (Verifying conformity before correction) → While verification is good practice, ISO 9001 prioritizes corrective action over mere verification.

D (Allowing employees to handle nonconformities without structure) → ISO 9001 requires documented procedures for handling nonconformities (Clause 8.7).

Nonconformity report

ISO 9001 Clause Number: 9.3.1 Nature of problem: Management review has not been conducted at the defined frequency. ISO 9001 requirement that has not been fulfilled: ISO 9001 - “Top management shall review the organization’s quality management system at planned intervals.” Evidence: The last management review took place nine months ago, and the previous one took place one year before the latest review. The planned interval is six months.

Quality management principles:

Customer focus = Increased revenue and market share

Engagement of people = Enhanced trust and collaboration throughout the organisation

Improvement = Enhanced drive for innovation

Evidence-based decision-making = Increased ability to demonstrate effectiveness of past actions

According to the Quality management principles document published by ISO, each quality management principle has a statement, a rationale, key benefits, and actions you can take to apply it. Based on these descriptions, the potential benefits can be matched to the corresponding principles as follows:

Customer focus: The primary focus of quality management is to meet customer requirements and to strive to exceed customer expectations. The key benefits of this principle include increased customer value, customer satisfaction, customer loyalty, repeat business, reputation, customer base, revenue and market share.

Engagement of people: Competent, empowered and engaged people at all levels throughout the organization are essential to enhance its capability to create and deliver value. The key benefits of this principle include improved understanding of the organization’s objectives and values, increased involvement in improvement activities, enhanced personal development, increased motivation and empowerment, enhanced trust and collaboration, and increased recognition and rewards.

Improvement: Successful organizations have an ongoing focus on improvement. The key benefits of this principle include improved organizational capabilities, alignment of improvement activities at all levels, increased ability to anticipate and react to opportunities and threats, enhanced drive for innovation, and increased levels of satisfaction.

Evidence-based decision-making: Decisions based on the analysis and evaluation of data and information are more likely to produce desired results. The key benefits of this principle include improved decision-making processes, increased ability to demonstrate the effectiveness of past decisions, increased ability to review, challenge and change opinions and decisions, and increased ability to improve performance.

According to the ISO 9001:2015 standard, clause 8.7 requires that an organization identify and control any nonconforming outputs that do not conform to the requirements of the customer or other relevant requirements. Nonconforming outputs are any outputs from the process, product or service that do not meet the specified quality criteria. Nonconforming outputs must be dealt with in one or more of the following ways:

Correction of the nonconformity

Segregation, containment, return or suspension of provision of products and services

Informing the customer

Authorisation for acceptance under concession

The organization must also retain documented information on the description of the nonconformity, the actions taken, any concessions obtained, and the identification of the authority deciding the action to resolve the nonconformity.

In this scenario, you have interviewed a line supervisor who is responsible for managing a manual picking line where operators are removing contaminant materials from incoming products. The supervisor has explained that these plastic items are rejected at this stage because they do not meet their processing standards and they can damage their machinery and compromise their quality standards. The supervisor has also mentioned that some of these rejected items are melted down in another process later on and some are disposed of as waste products that cannot be recycled.

Based on this information, you can investigate further by taking two actions:

A. Check the process for handling nonconforming items: You can verify whether there is a documented procedure for identifying, segregating, containing, returning or suspending provision of nonconforming items at this stage. You can also check whether there is a system for informing customers about any nonconforming items that may affect their satisfaction or expectations.

D. Determine what happens to the waste products: You can verify whether there is a documented procedure for disposing of waste products that cannot be recycled as per environmental regulations and customer requirements.

These two actions would help you to determine whether there are any nonconforming outputs at this stage and how they are controlled by the organization.

According to the ISO 9001:2015 standard, clause 10.2 requires organizations to review nonconformities, including any arising from customer complaints, and to take appropriate actions to determine the cause, implement corrections and preventive actions, and verify their effectiveness. The organization must also monitor the effectiveness of the actions taken and make changes if necessary.

In this scenario, the auditee is facing a legal dispute with a customer over damage to an expensive cashmere coat. This is a nonconformity that arises from customer complaint and has a significant impact on customer satisfaction and reputation. Therefore, clause 10.2 applies to this situation.

The best option for how this should be handled by the Quality Management System is B.

B means that the organization should report the situation to the customer with suggested remedial action. This option follows the principle of transparency and accountability, as well as respecting the customer’s rights and expectations. The organization should also investigate the root cause of the damage and prevent it from happening again in other shops or products.

The other options are not appropriate because:

A means that the organization should settle the court case by negotiation with the customer. This option may not be feasible or satisfactory for both parties, especially if there is a large amount of compensation involved or if there are legal implications for other customers.

C means that the organization should make an offer to replace the coat with a new one. This option may not be sufficient or acceptable for both parties, especially if there is evidence of negligence or poor quality on behalf of the organization.

D means that the organization should give an explanation to the customer of what went wrong. This option may not be enough or convincing for both parties, especially if there is no evidence of negligence or poor quality on behalf of the organization.

The action that the auditor would have accepted is:

•Option B: Apply the existing process of addressing the risks and opportunities of milk production. This option is correct because ISO 9001:2015 clause 8.1 requires the organization to plan, implement and control the processes needed to meet the requirements for the provision of products and services, and to implement actions determined in clause 6.1, which refers to the actions to address risks and opportunities. The organization should apply the existing process of addressing the risks and opportunities of milk production, which may include identifying the sources of variability, assessing the potential impacts and consequences, determining and implementing appropriate actions to reduce or eliminate the variability, monitoring and measuring the effectiveness of the actions, and reviewing and updating the actions as necessary.

The following options are not correct:

•Option A: Modify the contract with the current customer to provide them with only 1,500 litres of milk per day and make an agreement with a second customer. This option is not correct because it does not address the root cause of the variability in the daily production of the milking yard, which may affect the quality and consistency of the products and services provided by the organization. It also does not demonstrate the organization’s commitment to meet the customer and applicable statutory and regulatory requirements, as required by ISO 9001:2015 clause 8.2.2.

•Option C: Retain the current contract and try to sell the occasional surplus milk to a second customer. This option is not correct because it does not address the root cause of the variability in the daily production of the milking yard, which may affect the quality and consistency of the products and services provided by the organization. It also does not demonstrate the organization’s commitment to meet the customer and applicable statutory and regulatory requirements, as required by ISO 9001:2015 clause 8.2.2.

•Option D: Analyse the daily dispatch of milk for 7 days to determine its variability. This option is not correct because it does not address the root cause of the variability in the daily production of the milking yard, which may affect the quality and consistency of the products and services provided by the organization. It also does not demonstrate the organization’s commitment to implement actions to address risks and opportunities, as required by ISO 9001:2015 clause 8.1.

Based on the scenario provided, there is evidence of nonconformity with the requirements defined in:

C. Clause 7.5.1 Documented information - General: The scenario indicates that there is no formal process for informing users about updates to the SWIFT database, which suggests a lack of control over documented information. This could lead to users being unaware of important changes and not using the latest version of the software, which is required by the quality management system1.

E. Clause 7.5.3 Control of documented information: The Operations Director’s approach to updating the SWIFT database and the lack of communication to users about these updates indicate that the documented information is not adequately controlled. Allowing users to revert to earlier versions of the software at their discretion further suggests that the organization does not have a proper mechanism in place to ensure the integrity and suitability of documented information2.

These clauses are part of the ISO 9001:2015 standard, which requires organizations to have a systematic approach to controlling and managing documented information as part of their quality management system. The scenario described shows a casual approach to managing critical software updates, which could affect the organization’s ability to consistently meet customer and regulatory requirements.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

One of the common misconceptions about ISO 9001 is that it only applies to manufacturing companies producing tangible goods. However, ISO 9001:2015 is designed for all types of organizations, including service providers such as financial, healthcare, and IT companies.

Clause 1 (Scope) clearly states that ISO 9001 is applicable to any organization, regardless of type, size, or the products and services it provides. AL-TAX, being a financial services company, is equally eligible for implementing a QMS under ISO 9001.

According to the ISO 9001:2015 standard, clause 8.4.1 requires organizations to ensure that externally provided processes, products and services conform to requirements. Controls must be applied to externally provided processes, products and services when:

The products and services are intended for incorporation into the organization’s own products and services.

They are provided directly to customers by the external provider on behalf of the organization.

A process, or part of a process, is provided by an external provider as a result of a decision by the organization.

In this scenario, the auditee has chosen a supplier to manufacture their own brand products based on their design drawings, supplier questionnaire and trial batches. This means that the supplier is providing a process (manufacturing) as a result of a decision by the organization (the auditee). Therefore, clause 8.4.1 applies to this situation.

To demonstrate top management’s leadership and commitment with respect to the quality management system, the following four actions would be indicative:

B. Briefing staff on the development of an improvement culture: This shows that top management is actively involved in promoting a culture of continuous improvement, which is a key aspect of the quality management system1.

C. Chairing management review meetings: By leading these meetings, top management demonstrates their involvement in the quality management system’s ongoing performance and commitment to its continual improvement1.

E. Investing time and money in corrective actions arising from nonconformities: This indicates that top management is committed to addressing issues and ensuring that the quality management system is effective and continually improving1.

G. Promoting the importance of following procedures: When top management emphasizes the importance of adherence to procedures, it reinforces the significance of the quality management system and its processes1.

These actions align with the requirements of ISO 9001:2015, which emphasizes the need for top management to take accountability for the effectiveness of the quality management system and to promote a focus on continual improvement and customer satisfaction123. Approving company car budgets, conducting disciplinary meetings, and not attending the audit closing meeting do not directly demonstrate leadership and commitment to the quality management system1.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

According to ISO 9001:2015, Clause 9.2 (Internal Audit):

Internal audits can be conducted on an ongoing basis as part of continual improvement.

Audits consider both conformity and effectiveness (A is incorrect).

Thus, C is the correct answer.

 Responsibilities of the Audit Team Leader:

ISO 19011:2018 (guidelines for auditing management systems), which supports the principles in ISO 9001:2015, specifies the responsibilities of an audit team leader. These responsibilities include:

Planning the audit and establishing effective communication between the audit team and auditee.

Ensuring that formal communication channels are agreed upon and followed.

Reporting the audit progress, significant findings, and any concerns to the auditee or audit client as necessary.

Managing the audit team and ensuring adherence to the defined objectives and scope.

 Analysis of Options:

A. Reporting unattainable audit objectives to the accreditation body:Incorrect. This is not the responsibility of the audit team leader. The accreditation body oversees the certification body and is not directly involved in specific audits. If objectives are unattainable, the audit team leader would report them to the audit client (the certification body), not the accreditation body.

B. Planning formal communication arrangements:Correct. This is one of the responsibilities of the audit team leader. They ensure auditees can communicate with auditors as needed during the audit process.

C. Confirming communication channels during the opening meeting:Correct. During the opening meeting, the audit team leader must establish clear communication protocols to ensure effective information exchange between the audit team and auditee.

D. Communicating progress, findings, and concerns:Correct. Keeping the auditee and audit client informed about progress and significant findings is a critical responsibility of the audit team leader to maintain transparency and ensure the audit objectives are met.

 Why Option A is Correct:

The audit team leader does not have any obligation to report unattainable objectives to the accreditation body. Instead, they are responsible for communicating issues to the audit client (typically the certification body). The accreditation body operates at a higher level and is concerned with overseeing certification bodies, not individual audits.

 Relevant References:

ISO 19011:2018, Clause 6.4 (Conducting the Audit): Emphasizes the responsibilities of the audit team leader, including communication with the auditee and client.

ISO 9001:2015, Clause 9.2 (Internal Audit): Highlights the importance of planning and communication during audits, which is reflected in third-party audits as well.

Approve Certification Body: Accreditation Body

Award certification: Certification Body

Recommend certification: Audit Team Leader

Maintain certification:

Comprehensive Detailed Explanation

In the context of a third-party ISO 9001 audit, different entities play specific roles in the certification process. Here's a detailed explanation of the responsibilities:

Approve Certification Body: Accreditation BodyThe Accreditation Body is responsible for approving Certification Bodies. Accreditation Bodies are independent entities that evaluate the competence of Certification Bodies, ensuring they meet international standards like ISO/IEC 17021, which sets out the criteria for bodies providing audit and certification of management systems. In this role, they confirm that the Certification Body is capable of conducting ISO 9001 audits and granting certifications in accordance with international guidelines.

Award Certification: Certification BodyThe Certification Body is the entity that ultimately awards the certification to an organization after verifying that it meets the ISO 9001 standards. Certification Bodies conduct audits, either directly or through a team of auditors, and based on the audit outcomes, they issue the certification, indicating that the organization complies with ISO 9001.

Recommend Certification: Audit Team LeaderThe Audit Team Leader is responsible for leading the audit and making a recommendation to the Certification Body. This recommendation is based on the audit findings—whether the organization meets the ISO 9001 requirements or if there are areas of non-compliance that need corrective action. The final decision on certification is not made by the Audit Team Leader but by the Certification Body.

Maintain Certification: Certification BodyMaintaining certification refers to the ongoing process of ensuring that an organization continues to comply with ISO 9001 requirements. The Certification Body conducts regular surveillance audits (e.g., annually) and may also perform recertification audits (typically every three years). This ongoing monitoring ensures that the certified organization continues to adhere to the quality management standards over time.

This breakdown clearly assigns responsibility based on the defined roles of Accreditation Bodies, Certification Bodies, and Audit Teams in the ISO 9001 certification process.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

ISO 9001:2015 emphasizes continual improvement as a fundamental requirement of an effective Quality Management System (QMS).

Clause Reference:

Clause 4.4.1 (Quality Management System and Its Processes) states that organizations must:

Determine processes needed for the QMS

Establish criteria and methods for process effectiveness

Ensure continual improvement of the system

Why is the Correct Answer C?

Continual improvement is a core principle of ISO 9001.

Organizations must regularly assess and enhance their QMS to adapt to new challenges and maintain effectiveness.

Why are the Other Options Incorrect?

A (To change the QMS quarterly) → ISO 9001 does not mandate a specific frequency for system changes.

B (To review the QMS annually) → QMS reviews must be conducted as needed, not strictly annually.

D (To conduct a QMS gap analysis every two years) → Gap analysis is useful but is not a mandatory requirement under Clause 4.4.

The purpose of a Stage 1 third-party audit is to determine an organization’s readiness for their Stage 2 Certification Audit. During the Stage 1, the auditor will review the organization’s management system documented information, evaluate the site-specific conditions, and have discussions with personnel. The objective is to assess the alignment of the organization’s design with ISO 9001 requirements and to identify any areas of concern that could be classified as a nonconformance during the Stage 2 Audit. The auditor will also use the Stage 1 Audit to complete Stage 2 Audit planning, including a review of the allocation of resources and details for the next phase of the audit. Therefore, the option that best describes the purpose of a Stage 1 third-party audit is A, to determine the auditees understanding of ISO 9001. The other options are not correct, as they are not the main focus of a Stage 1 audit:

•B. To get to know the organization’s customers: This is not the purpose of a Stage 1 audit, as the auditor is not interested in the specific details of the organization’s customers, but rather in the organization’s ability to meet customer and applicable statutory and regulatory requirements.

•C. To learn about the organization’s procurement processes: This is not the purpose of a Stage 1 audit, as the auditor is not interested in the specific details of the organization’s procurement processes, but rather in the organization’s ability to control externally provided processes, products and services.

•D. To introduce the audit team to the client: This is not the purpose of a Stage 1 audit, as the auditor is not there to make introductions, but rather to conduct a preliminary examination of the organization’s compliance with ISO 9001 standards.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

A combined audit is when multiple management systems (e.g., ISO 9001 for Quality, ISO 14001 for Environmental Management, and ISO 45001 for Occupational Health & Safety) are audited together in a single organization.

Clause References:

ISO 19011:2018, Clause 5.4 – Combined Audits:

A combined audit is performed when two or more management systems are assessed simultaneously at the same auditee.

Why is the Correct Answer A?

A combined audit reduces duplication of effort by auditing multiple standards together at a single organization.

Example: A company certified to both ISO 9001 and ISO 14001 can have one audit covering both standards.

Why are the Other Options Incorrect?

B (Two or more auditing organizations cooperating on a single auditee) → This is a joint audit, not a combined audit.

C (Two or more management systems audited at multiple auditees) → This is a multiple-site audit, not a combined audit.

Sequence:

Stage 1 Audit

Stage 2 Opening Meeting

Interviews

Stage 2 Closing Meeting

Close-out of Stage 2 Audit Findings

Issue Certificate

Surveillance Audit

Follow-up Audit

To complete the sequence, you can drag and drop the options to the appropriate blank section.

Here is a brief explanation of each step:

Stage 1 Audit: This is the initial audit that aims to assess the readiness of the organization for the stage 2 audit. It involves reviewing the documentation of the quality management system, evaluating the scope and objectives of the audit, and identifying any major gaps or nonconformities34.

Stage 2 Opening Meeting: This is the meeting that marks the start of the stage 2 audit. It involves confirming the audit plan, the audit criteria, the audit scope, and the audit team. It also provides an opportunity for the auditee to ask any questions or raise any concerns34.

Interviews: This is the main activity of the stage 2 audit, where the audit team collects evidence by interviewing the personnel involved in the quality management system, observing the processes and activities, and examining the records and documents. The audit team uses various techniques, such as sampling, measurement, analysis, and evaluation, to verify the conformity and effectiveness of the quality management system345.

Stage 2 Closing Meeting: This is the meeting that marks the end of the stage 2 audit. It involves presenting the audit findings, the audit conclusions, and the audit report to the auditee. It also provides an opportunity for the auditee to provide feedback, ask questions, or dispute any findings34.

Close-out of Stage 2 Audit Findings: This is the process of verifying that the auditee has taken appropriate corrective actions to address any nonconformities or opportunities for improvement identified during the stage 2 audit. The audit team may request evidence or conduct a follow-up visit to confirm the effectiveness of the corrective actions34.

Issue Certificate: This is the process of issuing a certificate of conformity to the auditee, if the audit team is satisfied that the quality management system meets the requirements of the standard and that there are no major nonconformities or unresolved issues. The certificate is valid for a specified period, usually three years, and is subject to periodic surveillance audits34.

Surveillance Audit: This is the process of conducting periodic audits, usually once a year, to monitor the continued conformity and effectiveness of the quality management system. It involves reviewing the changes, improvements, and performance of the quality management system, and identifying any new nonconformities or opportunities for improvement34.

Follow-up Audit: This is the process of conducting an additional audit, usually in response to a significant change, a complaint, or a major nonconformity, to verify the impact and the corrective actions taken by the auditee. It may result in the suspension, withdrawal, or renewal of the certificate, depending on the outcome of the audit34.

According to the ISO 9001:2015 document, the organisation must continually improve the suitability, adequacy, and effectiveness of the quality management system1. However, among the six options given, only effectiveness is directly mentioned as an aspect of the quality management system that must be continually improved. Therefore, C is one of the correct answers.

Efficiency, on the other hand, is not explicitly stated as an aspect of the quality management system that must be continually improved, but it is implied by the quality management principle of improvement, which states that successful organisations have an ongoing focus on improvement2. One of the key benefits of applying this principle is improving operational effectiveness and efficiency2. Therefore, E is another correct answer.

Suitability, adaptability, responsiveness, and applicability are not aspects of the quality management system that must be continually improved, according to the ISO 9001:2015 document. They may be related to the quality management system, but they are not the focus of continual improvement.

Therefore, the correct answer is C and E.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

Audit risks are categorized into different types based on where failures may occur in the QMS audit process.

Clause References:

ISO 19011:2018, Clause 6.3 – Managing Audit Risk: Defines different audit risks, including control risk.

Why is the Correct Answer A?

Control risk occurs when internal controls fail to prevent or detect nonconformities.

Even if controls exist, the risk remains if the QMS fails to identify or correct defects.

Why are the Other Options Incorrect?

B (Inherent risk) → This refers to risks naturally present in processes, even before controls are applied.

C (Detection risk) → This is the risk that an auditor fails to detect nonconformities.

D (Operational risk) → This refers to risks related to day-to-day business operations, not QMS audits.

A white background with black text Description automatically generated

Here is the correct matching of the ISO 9001 Clause 8 extracts to the audit evidence:

Audit evidence: Three subcontract trainers who had delivered training were not approved as defined in procedure SA1 Supplier Approval revision 3.ISO 9001 Clause 8 extract: 8.4.1 ...shall apply criteria for ... external providers...(This clause requires the organization to control external providers, including ensuring their approval and competence.)

Audit evidence: A training programme for a customer was not documented as required in procedure TD 2 Training revision 2.ISO 9001 Clause 8 extract: 8.3.5 ...shall retain documented information on design and development outputs.(This clause addresses the need to retain documented information related to design and development outputs, such as a training programme.)

Audit evidence: One trainer had not recorded the damage to a customer’s training room wall caused by using sticky tape to hang training aids, as required in procedure TD 2 Training revision 2.ISO 9001 Clause 8 extract: 8.5.3 ...shall retain documented information on what has occurred.(This clause relates to retaining documented information on activities and outcomes, including records of damage or issues encountered.)

Audit evidence: Five sales orders had no record of having been reviewed to verify the ability to provide these courses.ISO 9001 Clause 8 extract: 8.2.3.1 ...shall conduct a review before committing...(This clause specifies the requirement to review and verify the organization's ability to meet customer requirements before accepting sales orders.)

These mappings reflect the specific requirements of ISO 9001:2015 for managing external providers, retaining documented information, and reviewing contracts.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

Stage 1 Audit (ISO 9001:2015, Clause 9.2.2) is a documentation review to assess the readiness for a Stage 2 Audit. The auditor must document:

Observations that could lead to nonconformities, ensuring they are addressed before Stage 2.

Areas needing improvement, such as missing documented information or unclear process definitions.

While understanding the auditee’s main processes is important, documenting interviews is not a requirement at Stage 1.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

According to ISO 19011:2018, Clause 6.4.9 (Audit Conclusions & Reporting):

One consolidated audit report should be drafted based on all team members’ findings.

Each auditor does not draft separate reports (B) unless explicitly required.

Thus, A is the correct answer.

Questions no: 1 Verified Answer: = C, D, E Comprehensive But Short Explanation: = Potential threats to impartiality in an audit context include familiarity (having a close relationship with the auditee), intimidation (being coerced or feeling pressured), and self-audit (auditing one’s own work). These factors can compromise the auditor’s objectivity and the audit’s integrity. References: = The information is based on the ISO 9001 Auditing Practices Group documents which discuss threats to auditor impartiality and how they may compromise an auditor’s objectivity123.