CISM Certified Information Security Manager Questions and Answers

Entering identified risks into the organization's risk register ensures that they are documented, tracked, assigned, and addressed. Without recording in the risk register, there’s no formal mechanism to manage, treat, or monitor the risk.

“The risk register is the central repository for tracking all known risks, their status, and treatment plans.”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 2: Information Risk Management, Section: Risk Response and Risk Register*

Information security awareness training and campaigns are the best way to enable the desired information security culture within an organization because they help to educate, motivate and influence the behavior and attitude of the employees towards information security. They also help to raise the awareness of the risks, threats and best practices of information security among the staff and stakeholders.

References = Organizational Culture for Information Security: A Systemic Perspective on the Articulation of Human, Cultural and Social Systems, CISM Exam Content Outline

 The role of the information security manager in finalizing contract negotiations with service providers is to ensure that the outsourcing process is aligned with the organization’s information security policies, standards, and objectives. One of the key aspects of this process is to perform a risk analysis on the outsourcing process, which involves identifying, assessing, and mitigating the potential threats and vulnerabilities that may arise from outsourcing activities. A risk analysis can help the information security manager to determine the appropriate level of security controls and requirements for the outsourced process, as well as to monitor and evaluate its performance and compliance. A risk analysis can also help to avoid or minimize legal, financial, reputational, or operational risks associated with outsourcing1. References =

CISM Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 6: Information Security Program Management

CISM Review Manual (Print Version), Chapter 6: Information Security Program Management

Threat and vulnerability assessments are important primarily because they are the basis for setting control objectives. Control objectives are the desired outcomes of implementing security controls, and they should be aligned with the organization’s risk appetite and business objectives. Threat and vulnerability assessments help to identify the potential sources and impacts of security incidents, and to prioritize the mitigation actions based on the likelihood and severity of the risks. By conducting threat and vulnerability assessments, the organization can establish the appropriate level and type of security controls to protect its information assets and reduce the residual risk to an acceptable level. References = CISM Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 3: Information Security Risk Management, Section 3.1: Risk Identification, p. 115-1161. CISM Review Manual (Print Version), Chapter 3: Information Security Risk Management, Section 3.1: Risk Identification, p. 115-1162. CISM ITEM DEVELOPMENT GUIDE, Domain 3: Information Security Program Development and Management, Task Statement 3.1, p. 193.

Threat and vulnerability assessments are important PRIMARILY because they are the basis for setting control objectives. Control objectives are the desired outcomes or goals of implementing security controls in an information system. They are derived from the risk assessment process, which identifies and evaluates the threats and vulnerabilities that could affect the system’s confidentiality, integrity and availability. By conducting threat and vulnerability assessments, an organization can determine the level of risk it faces and establish the appropriate control objectives to mitigate those risks.

 A gap assessment is the best way to demonstrate that an information security program provides appropriate coverage, as it compares the current state of the information security program with the desired state based on the organization’s objectives, policies, standards, and regulations. A gap assessment can identify the strengths and weaknesses of the information security program, as well as the areas that need improvement or alignment. A gap assessment can also provide recommendations and action plans to close the gaps and achieve the desired level of information security coverage.

The other options are not as good as a gap assessment, as they do not provide a comprehensive and holistic view of the information security coverage. Security risk analysis is a process to identify and evaluate the risks to the information assets and the impact of potential threats and vulnerabilities. It can help to prioritize and mitigate the risks, but it does not measure the compliance or performance of the information security program. Maturity assessment is a process to measure the level of maturity of the information security program based on a predefined model or framework. It can help to benchmark and improve the information security program, but it does not account for the specific needs and expectations of the organization. Vulnerability scan report is a document that shows the results of a scan on the network or system to identify the existing or potential vulnerabilities. It can help to validate and improve the technical security, but it does not assess the non-technical aspects of information security, such as governance, policies, or awareness. References =

CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, ISACA, 2022, pp. 211-212, 215-216, 233-234, 237-238.

CISM Questions, Answers & Explanations Database, ISACA, 2022, QID 1015.

CISM domain 3: Information security program development and management [2022 update], Infosec Certifications, 2.

 A post-incident review (PIR) is the process of evaluating the effectiveness of the incident response after the incident has been resolved. A PIR aims to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the response process, the root causes and impacts of the incident, the lessons learned and best practices, and the recommendations and action plans for improvement1. A PIR can help an organization enhance its incident response capabilities, reduce the likelihood and severity of future incidents, and increase its resilience and maturity2.

A PIR is the best process to support the evaluation of incident response effectiveness, because it provides a systematic and comprehensive way to assess the performance and outcomes of the response process, and to identify and implement the necessary changes and improvements. A PIR involves collecting and analyzing relevant data and feedback from various sources, such as incident logs, reports, evidence, metrics, surveys, interviews, and observations. A PIR also involves comparing the actual response with the expected or planned response, and measuring the achievement of the response objectives and the satisfaction of the stakeholders3. A PIR also involves documenting and communicating the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the evaluation, and ensuring that they are followed up and implemented.

The other options are not as good as a PIR in supporting the evaluation of incident response effectiveness, because they are either more specific, limited, or dependent on a PIR. A root cause analysis (RCA) is a technique to identify the underlying factors or reasons that caused the incident, and to prevent or mitigate their recurrence. An RCA can help an organization understand the nature and origin of the incident, and to address the problem at its source, rather than its symptoms. However, an RCA is not sufficient to evaluate the effectiveness of the response process, because it does not cover other aspects, such as the response performance, outcomes, impacts, lessons, and best practices. An RCA is usually a part of a PIR, rather than a separate process. A chain of custody (CoC) is a process of maintaining and documenting the integrity and security of the evidence collected during the incident response. A CoC can help an organization ensure that the evidence is reliable, authentic, and admissible in legal or regulatory proceedings. However, a CoC is not a process to evaluate the effectiveness of the response process, but rather a requirement or a standard to follow during the response process. A CoC does not provide any feedback or analysis on the response performance, outcomes, impacts, lessons, or best practices. An incident logging is a process of recording and tracking the details and activities of the incident response. An incident logging can help an organization monitor and manage the response process, and to provide an audit trail and a source of information for the evaluation. However, an incident logging is not a process to evaluate the effectiveness of the response process, but rather an input or a tool for the evaluation. An incident logging does not provide any assessment or measurement on the response performance, outcomes, impacts, lessons, or best practices. References = 1: CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 5, Section 5.5 2: Post-Incident Review: A Guide to Effective Incident Response 3: Post-Incident Review: A Guide to Effective Incident Response : CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 5, Section 5.5 : CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 5, Section 5.5 : CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 5, Section 5.4 : CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 5, Section 5.3

The primary focus of a lessons learned exercise following a successful response to a cybersecurity incident is to evaluate how the incident management processes were executed, and to identify the strengths, weaknesses, best practices, and improvement opportunities for future incidents. A lessons learned exercise is not meant to determine the root cause, the attack vectors, or the recovery time of the incident, but rather to assess the performance and effectiveness of the incident response team and the incident response plan.

An organization is most likely to accept the risk of noncompliance with a new regulatory requirement when the cost of complying with the regulation exceeds the potential penalties. In such cases, from a cost-benefit perspective, the organization might find it more economical to absorb potential fines or penalties rather than implementing costly controls or processes to comply with the regulation.

“Risk acceptance occurs when the cost of mitigating or transferring the risk exceeds the benefit of the mitigation. This also applies to regulatory noncompliance if the penalties are less than the costs of compliance.”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 2: Risk Management, Section: Risk Treatment Options*

ISACA’s practice questions highlight that risk acceptance is a legitimate treatment when costs outweigh potential penalties or impact.

An organization's information security strategy should be aligned with its risk tolerance, which is the level of risk that an organization is willing to accept in pursuit of its objectives. The strategy should aim to balance the cost of security controls with the potential impact of security incidents on the organization's objectives. Therefore, an organization's risk tolerance has the greatest influence on its information security strategy.

The organization’s risk tolerance has the greatest influence on its information security strategy because it determines how much risk the organization is willing to accept and how much resources it will allocate to mitigate or transfer risk. The organizational structure, industry security standards, and information security awareness are important factors that affect the implementation and effectiveness of an information security strategy but not as much as the organization’s risk tolerance.

An information security strategy is a high-level plan that defines how an organization will achieve its information security objectives and address its information security risks. An information security strategy should align with the organization’s business strategy and reflect its mission, vision, values, and culture. An information security strategy should also consider the external and internal factors that influence the organization’s information security environment such as laws, regulations, competitors, customers, suppliers, partners, stakeholders, employees etc.

 The best way to test for the existence of backdoors in a mission-critical business application that was outsourced to a third-party developer is to perform security code reviews on the entire application. A backdoor is a hidden or undocumented feature or function in a software application that allows unauthorized or remote access, control, or manipulation of the application or the system it runs on. Backdoors can be intentionally or unintentionally introduced by the developers, or maliciously inserted by the attackers, and they can pose serious security risks and threats to the organization and its data. Security code reviews are the process of examining and analyzing the source code of a software application to identify and eliminate any security vulnerabilities, flaws, or weaknesses, such as backdoors, that may compromise the functionality, performance, or integrity of the application or the system. Security code reviews can be performed manually by the security experts, or automatically by the security tools, or both, and they can be done at different stages of the software development life cycle, such as design, coding, testing, or deployment. Security code reviews can help to detect and remove any backdoors in the application before they can be exploited by the attackers, and they can also help to improve the quality, reliability, and security of the application.

References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, Chapter 3: Information Security Program Development and Management, Section: Information Security Program Development, page 1581; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual, 10th Edition, Question 87, page 812; CISM ITEM DEVELOPMENT GUIDE, page 63.

Conflicting legal requirements would be of greatest concern when consolidating the information security policies of regional locations, as they may pose significant challenges and risks for the organization’s compliance, privacy, and data protection obligations. Different jurisdictions may have different laws and regulations regarding information security, such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in the European Union, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) in the United States, or the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) in Canada. These laws and regulations may have different definitions, scopes, standards, and enforcement mechanisms for information security, which may create conflicts or inconsistencies when applying a unified policy across the organization. Therefore, the information security manager should conduct a thorough analysis of the legal requirements of each location, and ensure that the consolidated policy meets the highest level of compliance and avoids any violations or penalties.

References = CISM Review Manual 2022, page 361; CISM Exam Content Outline, Domain 1, Task 1.22; CISM 2020: IT Security Policies; Information Security Due Diligence Questionnaire

A security metrics dashboard is a graphical representation of key performance indicators (KPIs) and key risk indicators (KRIs) that provide useful information about the effectiveness of the information security program. A security metrics dashboard can help communicate the value and performance of the information security program to senior management and other stakeholders, as well as identify areas for improvement and alignment with business objectives. A security metrics dashboard should be concise, relevant, timely, accurate, and actionable.

References = CISM Review Manual 16th Edition, page 163; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual 9th Edition, page 419.

Engaging stakeholders is the most important step when developing an information security strategy, as it ensures that the strategy is aligned with the business objectives, risks, and needs of the organization. Stakeholders include senior management, business units, IT staff, customers, regulators, and other relevant parties who have an interest or influence on the information security of the organization. By engaging stakeholders, the information security manager can gain their support, input, feedback, and buy-in for the strategy, as well as identify and prioritize the security requirements, expectations, and challenges.

References = CISM Review Manual, 27th Edition, Chapter 4, Section 4.1.1, page 2131; CISM Online Review Course, Module 4, Lesson 1, Topic 1

An intrusion detection system (IDS) is a software or hardware device that monitors network traffic and detects unauthorized or malicious activities, such as attacks, intrusions, or breaches. An IDS can provide valuable evidence for an information security team to investigate an alleged breach of an organization’s network, as it can capture and analyze the network traffic in real time or after the fact. An IDS can help to identify the source, type, scope, and impact of the breach, as well as to generate alerts and reports for further investigation.

File integrity monitoring software (FIM), security information and event management (SIEM) tool, and antivirus software are not single sources of evidence for an information security team to review. FIM software monitors files and directories on a network or system and detects changes or modifications that may indicate unauthorized access or tampering. SIEM tool collects and correlates data from various sources, such as logs, events, alerts, incidents, and threats, and provides a unified view of the security posture of an organization. Antivirus software scans files and programs on a network or system and detects malware infections that may compromise the security or functionality of the system.

However, these tools are not sufficient by themselves to provide conclusive evidence for an information security team to investigate an alleged breach of an organization’s network. They may provide some clues or indicators of compromise (IOCs), but they may also generate false positives or negatives due to various factors, such as configuration errors, user behavior, benign activities, or evasion techniques. Therefore, an information security team should use multiple sources of evidence from different tools and methods to verify the validity and reliability of the findings.

References = CISM Manual, Chapter 6: Incident Response Planning (IRP), Section 6.2: Evidence Collection1

1: https://store.isaca.org/s/store#/store/browse/cat/a2D4w00000Ac6NNEAZ/tiles

The technical capabilities of the provider are the MOST important thing for an information security manager to verify when selecting a third-party forensics provider because they determine the quality, reliability, and validity of the forensic services and results that the provider can deliver. The technical capabilities of the provider include the skills, experience, and qualifications of the forensic staff, the methods, tools, and standards that the forensic staff use, and the facilities, equipment, and resources that the forensic staff have. The information security manager should verify that the technical capabilities of the provider match the forensic needs and expectations of the organization, such as the type, scope, and complexity of the forensic investigation, the legal and regulatory requirements, and the time and cost constraints12. The existence of a right-to-audit clause (A) is an important thing for an information security manager to verify when selecting a third-party forensics provider, but it is not the MOST important thing. A right-to-audit clause is a contractual provision that grants the organization the right to audit or review the performance, compliance, and security of the provider. A right-to-audit clause can help to ensure the accountability, transparency, and quality of the provider, as well as to identify and resolve any issues or disputes that may arise during or after the forensic service. However, a right-to-audit clause does not guarantee that the provider has the technical capabilities to conduct the forensic service effectively and efficiently12. The results of the provider’s business continuity tests (B) are an important thing for an information security manager to verify when selecting a third-party forensics provider, but they are not the MOST important thing. The results of the provider’s business continuity tests can indicate the ability and readiness of the provider to continue or resume the forensic service in the event of a disruption, disaster, or emergency. The results of the provider’s business continuity tests can help to assess the availability, resilience, and recovery of the provider, as well as to mitigate the risks of losing or compromising the forensic evidence or data. However, the results of the provider’s business continuity tests do not ensure that the provider has the technical capabilities to perform the forensic service accurately and professionally12. The existence of the provider’s incident response plan (D) is an important thing for an information security manager to verify when selecting a third-party forensics provider, but it is not the MOST important thing. The existence of the provider’s incident response plan can demonstrate the preparedness and capability of the provider to detect, report, and respond to any security incidents that may affect the forensic service or the organization. The existence of the provider’s incident response plan can help to protect the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the forensic evidence or data, as well as to comply with the legal and contractual obligations. However, the existence of the provider’s incident response plan does not confirm that the provider has the technical capabilities to execute the forensic service competently and ethically12. References = 1: CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 310-3111; 2: A Risk-Based Management Approach to Third-Party Data Security, Risk and Compliance - ISACA2

 Information security controls should be designed primarily based on business risk scenarios, because they help to identify and prioritize the most relevant and significant threats and vulnerabilities that may affect the organization’s information assets and business objectives. Business risk scenarios are hypothetical situations that describe the possible sources, events, and consequences of a security breach, as well as the likelihood and impact of the occurrence. Business risk scenarios can help to:

Align the information security controls with the business needs and requirements, and ensure that they support the achievement of the strategic goals and the mission and vision of the organization

Assess the effectiveness and efficiency of the existing information security controls, and identify the gaps and weaknesses that need to be addressed or improved

Select and implement the appropriate information security controls that can prevent, detect, or mitigate the risks, and that can provide the optimal level of protection and performance for the information assets

Evaluate and measure the return on investment and the value proposition of the information security controls, and communicate and justify the rationale and benefits of the controls to the stakeholders and management

Information security controls should not be designed primarily based on a business impact analysis (BIA), regulatory requirements, or a vulnerability assessment, because these are secondary or complementary factors that influence the design of the controls, but they do not provide the main basis or criteria for the design. A BIA is a method of estimating and comparing the potential effects of a disruption or a disaster on the critical business functions and processes, in terms of financial, operational, and reputational aspects. A BIA can help to determine the recovery objectives and priorities for the information assets, but it does not identify or address the specific risks and threats that may cause the disruption or the disaster. Regulatory requirements are the legal, contractual, or industry standards and obligations that the organization must comply with regarding information security. Regulatory requirements can help to establish the minimum or baseline level of information security controls that the organization must implement, but they do not reflect the specific or unique needs and challenges of the organization. A vulnerability assessment is a method of identifying and analyzing the weaknesses and flaws in the information systems and assets that may expose them to exploitation or compromise. A vulnerability assessment can help to discover and remediate the existing or potential security issues, but it does not consider the business context or impact of the issues.

References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, ISACA, 2021, pages 119-120, 122-123, 125-126, 129-130.

The best course of action when the organization receives complaints from users that some of their files have been encrypted and they are receiving demands for money to decrypt the files is to initiate incident response. This is because the organization is facing a ransomware attack, which is a type of malicious software that encrypts the victim’s data and demands a ransom for the decryption key. Ransomware attacks can cause significant disruption, damage, and loss to the organization’s operations, assets, and reputation. Therefore, the organization needs to quickly activate its incident response plan and team, which are designed to handle such security incidents in a coordinated, effective, and efficient manner. The incident response process involves the following steps1:

Preparation: The incident response team prepares the necessary resources, tools, and procedures to respond to the incident. The team also establishes the roles, responsibilities, and communication channels among the team members and other stakeholders.

Identification: The incident response team identifies the scope, source, and severity of the incident. The team also collects and preserves the relevant evidence and logs for further analysis and investigation.

Containment: The incident response team isolates the affected systems and networks to prevent the spread of the ransomware and limit the impact of the incident. The team also implements temporary or alternative solutions to restore the essential functions and services.

Eradication: The incident response team removes the ransomware and any traces of its infection from the affected systems and networks. The team also verifies that the systems and networks are clean and secure before restoring them to normal operations.

Recovery: The incident response team restores the affected systems and networks to normal operations. The team also decrypts or restores the encrypted data from backups or other sources, if possible. The team also monitors the systems and networks for any signs of recurrence or residual issues.

Lessons learned: The incident response team conducts a post-incident review to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of the incident response process and team. The team also identifies the root causes, lessons learned, and best practices from the incident. The team also recommends and implements the necessary improvements and corrective actions to prevent or mitigate similar incidents in the future.

References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, Chapter 4: Information Security Incident Management, Section: Incident Response Process, pages 229-2331; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual, 10th Edition, Question 45, page 432.

The primary role of an information security manager in a software development project is to assess and approve the security application architecture. The security application architecture is the design and structure of the software application that defines how the application components interact with each other and with external systems, and how the application implements the security requirements, principles, and best practices. The information security manager is responsible for ensuring that the security application architecture is aligned with the organization’s information security policies, standards, and guidelines, and that it meets the business objectives, functional specifications, and user expectations. The information security manager is also responsible for reviewing and evaluating the security application architecture for its completeness, correctness, consistency, and compliance, and for identifying and resolving any security issues, risks, or gaps. The information security manager is also responsible for approving the security application architecture before the software development project proceeds to the next phase, such as coding, testing, or deployment.

References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, Chapter 3: Information Security Program Development and Management, Section: Information Security Program Development, page 1581; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual, 10th Edition, Question 80, page 742.

Change control is the process of ensuring that changes to an information system are authorized, tested, documented and implemented in a controlled manner. Inadequate change control can result in deficient technical security controls, such as missing patches, misconfigurations, vulnerabilities or errors in the new application.

References = CISM Review Manual, 27th Edition, Chapter 4, Section 4.3.2, page 2291

AI-driven tools enable real-time analysis, anomaly detection, and automated response, drastically reducing the time to identify and respond to threats. This capability is particularly effective against advanced persistent threats (APTs) and zero-day exploits.

“AI tools enhance security operations by enabling rapid threat detection and incident response, often before traditional tools can react.”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 4: Security Operations and Threat Intelligence*

Other benefits (e.g., prioritization or patching) are secondary compared to the speed and precision of AI-based threat response.

Performing a vulnerability analysis is the best option to ensure that a new application complies with information security policy because it helps to identify and evaluate any security flaws or weaknesses in the application that may expose it to potential threats or attacks, and provide recommendations or solutions to mitigate them. Reviewing the security of the application before implementation is not a good option because it may not detect or prevent all security issues that may arise after implementation or deployment. Integrating security functionality at the development stage is not a good option because it may not account for all security requirements or challenges of the application or its environment. Periodically auditing the security of the application is not a good option because it may not address any security issues that may occur between audits or after deployment. References: https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2017/volume-2/secure-software-development-lifecycle https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2016/volume-4/integrating-assurance-functions

The best course of action for the information security manager to support the initiative of leveraging popular social network platforms to promote the organization’s products and services is to assess the security risk associated with the use of social networks. Security risk assessment is a process of identifying, analyzing, and evaluating the potential threats and vulnerabilities that may affect the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of information assets and systems. By conducting a security risk assessment, the information security manager can provide valuable input to the decision-making process regarding the benefits and costs of using social networks, as well as the appropriate security controls and mitigation strategies to reduce the risk to an acceptable level. The other options are not the best course of action, although they may be part of the security risk management process. Establishing processes to publish content on social networks is an operational task that should be performed after assessing the security risk and implementing the necessary controls. Conducting vulnerability assessments on social network platforms is a technical activity that may not be feasible or effective, as the organization does not have control over the platforms’ infrastructure and configuration. Developing security controls for the use of social networks is a preventive measure that should be based on the results of the security risk assessment and aligned with the organization’s risk appetite and tolerance

The greatest benefit of information asset classification is providing a basis for imple-menting a need-to-know policy. Information asset classification is a process of catego-rizing information based on its level of sensitivity and importance, and applying appro-priate security controls based on the level of risk associated with that information1. A need-to-know policy is a principle that states that access to information should be granted only to those individuals who require it to perform their official duties or tasks2. The purpose of a need-to-know policy is to limit the exposure of sensitive information to unauthorized or unnecessary parties, and to reduce the risk of data breaches, leaks, or misuse. Information asset classification provides a basis for implementing a need-to-know policy by:

•Defining the value and protection requirements of different types of information

•Labeling the information with the appropriate classification level, such as public, internal, confidential, secret, or top secret

•Establishing the roles and responsibilities of information owners, custodians, and users

•Enforcing access controls and encryption for the information

•Documenting the security policies and procedures for the information

By providing a basis for implementing a need-to-know policy, information asset classi-fication can help organizations to protect their sensitive information, comply with rele-vant laws and regulations, and achieve their business objectives. The other options are not the greatest benefits of information asset classification. Helping to determine the recovery point objective (RPO) is not a benefit, but rather a consequence of applying security controls based on the classification level. RPO is the acceptable amount of data loss in case of a disruption3. Supporting segregation of duties is not a benefit, but rather a prerequisite for implementing a need-to-know policy. Segregation of duties is a principle that states that no single individual should have control over two or more phases of a business process or transaction that are susceptible to errors or fraud4. De-fining resource ownership is not a benefit, but rather a component of information asset classification. Resource ownership is the assignment of accountability and authority for an information asset to an individual or a group5. References: 1: Information Classifi-cation - Advisera 2: Need-to-Know Principle - NIST 3: Recovery Point Objective - NIST 4: Segregation of Duties - NIST 5: Resource Ownership - NIST : Information Classification in Information Security - GeeksforGeeks : Information Asset Classification Policy - UCI

The first thing an information security manager should do after learning through mass media of a data breach at the organization’s hosted payroll service provider is to validate the breach with the provider, which means contacting the provider directly and confirming the details and scope of the breach, such as when it occurred, what data was compromised, and what actions the provider is taking to mitigate the impact. Validating the breach with the provider can help the information security manager assess the situation accurately and plan the next steps accordingly. The other options, such as suspending the data exchange, notifying regulatory authorities, or initiating the business continuity plan, may be premature or unnecessary before validating the breach with the provider. References:

https://www.wired.com/story/sequoia-hr-data-breach/

https://cybernews.com/news/kronos-major-hr-and-payroll-service-provider-hit-with-ransomware-warns-of-a-long-outage/

https://www.afr.com/work-and-careers/workplace/pay-in-crisis-as-major-payroll-company-hacked-20211117-p599mr

The best security control for an organization that permits the storage and use of its critical and sensitive information on employee-owned smartphones is establishing the authority to remote wipe. Remote wipe is a feature that allows an authorized administrator or user to remotely erase the data on a device in case of loss, theft, or compromise1. Remote wipe can help prevent unauthorized access or disclosure of the organization’s information on employee-owned smartphones, as well as protect the privacy of the employee’s personal data. Remote wipe can be implemented through various methods, such as mobile device management (MDM) software, native device features, or third-party applications2. However, remote wipe requires the consent and cooperation of the employee, as well as a clear policy that defines the conditions and procedures for its use. The other options are not the best security controls for an organization that permits the storage and use of its critical and sensitive information on employee-owned smartphones. Developing security awareness training is an important measure to educate employees about the security risks and responsibilities associated with using their own smartphones for work purposes, but it does not provide a technical or physical protection for the data on the devices3. Requiring the backup of the organization’s data by the user is a good practice to ensure data availability and recovery in case of device failure or loss, but it does not prevent unauthorized access or disclosure of the data on the devices4. Monitoring how often the smartphone is used is a possible way to detect abnormal or suspicious activities on the devices, but it does not prevent or mitigate the impact of a data breach on the devices. References: 4: Mobile Device Backup - NIST 3: Security Awareness Training - NIST 1: Remote Wipe - Lifewire 2: How Businesses with a BYOD Policy Can Secure Employee Devices - IBM : Mobile Device Security Policy – SANS

Information security policies are high-level statements or rules that define the goals and objectives of information security in an organization, and provide the framework and direction for implementing and enforcing security controls and processes1. Information security policies should be aligned with the organization’s business goals and objectives, and reflect the organization’s risk appetite and tolerance2. Therefore, the most helpful activity for determining which information security policies should be implemented by an organization is a risk assessment.

A risk assessment is a systematic process of identifying, analyzing, and evaluating the risks that an organization faces, and determining the appropriate risk responses3. A risk assessment helps to determine the following aspects of information security policies:

The scope and applicability of the policies, based on the assets, threats, and vulnerabilities that affect the organization’s security objectives and requirements.

The level and type of security controls and processes that are needed to mitigate the risks, based on the likelihood and impact of the risk scenarios and the cost-benefit analysis of the risk responses.

The roles and responsibilities of the stakeholders involved in the implementation and enforcement of the policies, based on the risk ownership and accountability.

The metrics and indicators that are used to measure and monitor the effectiveness and compliance of the policies, based on the risk appetite and tolerance.

The other options, such as a business impact analysis (BIA), a vulnerability assessment, or industry best practices, are not as helpful as a risk assessment for determining which information security policies should be implemented by an organization, because they have the following limitations:

A business impact analysis (BIA) is a process of identifying and evaluating the potential effects of disruptions or incidents on the organization’s critical business functions and processes, and determining the recovery priorities and objectives. A BIA can help to support the risk assessment by providing information on the impact and criticality of the assets and processes, but it cannot identify or analyze the threats and vulnerabilities that pose risks to the organization, or determine the appropriate risk responses or controls.

A vulnerability assessment is a process of identifying and measuring the weaknesses or flaws in the organization’s systems, networks, or applications that could be exploited by threat actors. A vulnerability assessment can help to support the risk assessment by providing information on the vulnerabilities and exposures that affect the organization’s security posture, but it cannot identify or analyze the threats or likelihood that could exploit the vulnerabilities, or determine the appropriate risk responses or controls.

Industry best practices are the standards or guidelines that are widely accepted and followed by the information security community or the organization’s industry sector, based on the experience and knowledge of the experts and practitioners. Industry best practices can help to inform and guide the development and implementation of information security policies, but they cannot replace or substitute the risk assessment, as they may not reflect the organization’s specific context, needs, and objectives, or address the organization’s unique risks and challenges.

References = 1: CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 29 2: CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 30 3: CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 121 : CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 122 : CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 123 : CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 124 : CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 125 : CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 126

 The message that security supports and protects the business is the most effective in obtaining senior management’s commitment to information security management. This message emphasizes the value and benefits of security for the organization’s strategic goals, mission, and vision. It also aligns security with the business needs and expectations, and demonstrates how security can enable and facilitate the business processes and functions. The other messages are not as effective because they either overstate the role of security (A), focus on technical aspects rather than business outcomes (B), or confuse the nature and purpose of security ©. References = CISM Review Manual 2022, page 23; CISM Item Development Guide 2022, page 9; CISM Information Security Governance Certified Practice Exam - CherCherTech

According to the CISM Review Manual, the first step an information security manager should take when a vulnerability has been disclosed is to conduct a risk assessment to determine the likelihood and impact of the vulnerability being exploited, and the appropriate response strategy. Performing a patch update, a penetration test or an impact assessment are possible subsequent steps, but not the first one.

References = CISM Review Manual, 27th Edition, Chapter 3, Section 3.3.2, page 1331.

The reduction of organizational risk is the desired outcome that best supports a decision to invest in a new security initiative. The organizational risk is the level of exposure or uncertainty that the organization faces in achieving its objectives. The organizational risk is influenced by various factors, such as the threat landscape, the vulnerability of the assets, the impact of the incidents, and the effectiveness of the controls. The information security manager should evaluate the organizational risk and propose security initiatives that can reduce the risk to an acceptable level. The security initiatives should be aligned with the business goals, the risk appetite, and the available resources of the organization. The security initiatives should also provide a positive return on investment (ROI) or value for money (VFM) for the organization. The reduction of organizational risk is the ultimate goal and benefit of any security initiative, as it enhances the security posture, performance, and resilience of the organization. Enhanced security monitoring and reporting, reduced control complexity, and enhanced threat detection capability are all possible outcomes of security initiatives, but they are not the best ones to support a decision to invest in a new security initiative. These outcomes are more specific and technical, and they may not directly relate to the business objectives or the risk appetite of the organization. These outcomes are also intermediate or enabling, rather than final or ultimate, as they may not necessarily lead to the reduction of organizational risk. For example, enhanced security monitoring and reporting may improve the visibility and awareness of the security status, but it may not prevent or mitigate the incidents. Reduced control complexity may simplify the security management and maintenance, but it may not address the emerging or evolving threats. Enhanced threat detection capability may increase the speed and accuracy of identifying the attacks, but it may not reduce the impact or the likelihood of the attacks. Therefore, the reduction of organizational risk is the best outcome to support a decision to invest in a new security initiative, as it demonstrates the value and effectiveness of the security initiative for the organization. References = CISM Review Manual 2023, page 40 1; CISM Practice Quiz 2

A validation of the current firewall rule set is the best method for determining whether a firewall has been configured to provide a comprehensive perimeter defense because it verifies that the firewall rules are consistent, accurate, and effective in allowing or blocking traffic according to the security policies and standards of the organization. A port scan of the firewall from an internal source is not a good method because it does not test the firewall’s behavior from an external perspective, which is more relevant for perimeter defense. A ping test from an external source is not a good method because it only tests the firewall’s availability and responsiveness, not its security or functionality. A simulated denial of service (DoS) attack against the firewall is not a good method because it only tests the firewall’s resilience and performance under high traffic load, not its security or functionality. References: https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2016/volume-4/technical-security-standards-for-information-systems https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2017/volume-2/the-value-of-penetration-testing https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2016/volume-5/security-scanning-versus-penetration-testing

The primary reason for creating a business case when proposing an information security project is to establish the value of the project in relation to the business objectives and to justify the investment required. A business case should demonstrate how the project aligns with the organization’s strategy, goals, and mission, and how it supports the business processes and functions. A business case should also include the expected benefits, costs, risks, and alternatives of the project, and provide a clear rationale for choosing the preferred option.

References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition eBook1, Chapter 1: Information Security Governance, Section: Information Security Strategy, Subsection: Business Case Development, Page 33.

An information security governance framework is a set of principles, policies, standards, and processes that guide the development, implementation, and management of an effective information security program that supports the organization’s objectives and strategy. The framework provides direction to meet business goals while balancing risks and controls, as it helps to align the information security activities with the business needs, priorities, and risk appetite, and to ensure that the security resources and investments are optimized and justified.

References = CISM Review Manual 2022, page 321; CISM Exam Content Outline, Domain 1, Knowledge Statement 1.22; CISM domain 1: Information security governance Updated 2022

The best way to support the incident management process for attacks on an organization’s supply chain is to establish communication paths with vendors. This means that the organization and its vendors have clear and agreed-upon channels, methods, and protocols for exchanging information and coordinating actions in the event of an incident that affects the supply chain. Communication paths with vendors can help to identify the source, scope, and impact of the incident, as well as to share best practices, lessons learned, and recovery strategies. Communication paths with vendors can also facilitate the escalation and resolution of the incident, as well as the reporting and documentation of the incident. Communication paths with vendors are part of the incident response plan (IRP), which is a component of the information security program (ISP) 12345.

The other options are not the best ways to support the incident management process for attacks on the organization’s supply chain. Including service level agreements (SLAs) in vendor contracts can help to define the expectations and obligations of the parties involved in the supply chain, as well as the penalties for non-compliance. However, SLAs do not necessarily address the specific procedures and requirements for incident management, nor do they ensure effective communication and collaboration among the parties. Requiring security awareness training for vendor staff can help to reduce the likelihood and severity of incidents by enhancing the knowledge and skills of the vendor personnel who handle the organization’s data and systems. However, security awareness training does not guarantee that the vendor staff will follow the appropriate incident management processes, nor does it address the communication and coordination issues that may arise during an incident. Performing integration testing with vendor systems can help to ensure the compatibility and functionality of the systems that are part of the supply chain, as well as to identify and mitigate any vulnerabilities or errors that could lead to incidents. However, integration testing does not cover all the possible scenarios and risks that could affect the supply chain, nor does it provide the necessary communication and response mechanisms for incident management. References = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

https://niccs.cisa.gov/education-training/catalog/skillsoft/cism-information-security-incident-management-part-1 https://niccs.cisa.gov/education-training/catalog/skillsoft/cism-information-security-incident-management-part-1

Redirecting the attacker’s traffic is a viable containment strategy for a distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack because it helps to divert the malicious traffic away from the target server and reduce the impact of the attack. A DDoS attack is an attempt by attackers to overwhelm a server or a network with a large volume of requests or packets, preventing legitimate users from accessing the service or resource. Redirecting the attacker’s traffic is a technique that involves changing the DNS settings or routing tables to send the attacker’s traffic to another destination, such as a sinkhole, a honeypot, or a scrubbing center. A sinkhole is a server that absorbs and discards the malicious traffic. A honeypot is a decoy server that mimics the target server and collects information about the attacker’s behavior and techniques. A scrubbing center is a service that filters out the malicious traffic and forwards only the legitimate traffic to the target server. Redirecting the attacker’s traffic helps to contain the DDoS attack by reducing the load on the target server and preserving its availability and performance. Therefore, redirecting the attacker’s traffic is the correct answer.

Developing a business case to replace the system is the FIRST course of action that the information security manager should take, because it helps to justify the need for a new and effective email filtering system that can prevent or reduce phishing incidents. A business case should include the problem statement, the proposed solution, the costs and benefits, the risks and assumptions, and the expected outcomes and metrics.

References =

CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, ISACA, 2020, p. 42: “A business case is a document that provides the rationale and justification for an information security investment. It should include the problem statement, the proposed solution, the costs and benefits, the risks and assumptions, and the expected outcomes and metrics.”

Email Filtering Explained: What Is It and How Does It Work: “Email filtering is a process used to sort emails and identify unwanted messages such as spam, malware, and phishing attempts. The goal is to ensure that they don’t reach the recipient’s primary inbox. It is an essential security measure that helps protect users from unwanted or malicious messages.”

Cloud-based email phishing attack using machine and deep learning …: “This attack is used to attack your email account and hack sensitive data easily.”

Assessing the risk of noncompliance ensures that decisions are based on an understanding of the business impact and security implications.

“Before reporting or remediating, it is critical to assess the risk associated with the control bypass to make informed decisions.”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 2: Risk Management, Section: Risk Assessment*

 The information security manager’s first course of action should be to validate the relevance of the information received from the threat intelligence service. This means verifying the source, credibility, accuracy, and timeliness of the information, as well as assessing the potential impact and likelihood of the threat for the organization. This will help the information security manager to determine the appropriate response and prioritize the actions to mitigate the threat. Conducting an information security audit, performing a gap analysis, and informing senior management are possible subsequent actions, but they are not the first course of action. An information security audit is a systematic and independent assessment of the effectiveness of the information security controls and processes. A gap analysis is a comparison of the current state of the information security program with the desired state or best practices. Informing senior management is a communication activity that should be done after validating the information and assessing the risk. References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, pages 44-451; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual, 10th Edition, page 632

The first step the information security manager should take upon learning of the potential threat is to validate the relevance of the information. This should involve researching the threat to evaluate its potential impact on the organization and to determine the accuracy of the threat intelligence. Once the information is validated, the information security manager can then take action, such as informing senior management, conducting an information security audit, or performing a gap analysis.

Data classification is the sole responsibility of the client organization when adopting a Software as a Service (SaaS) model. Data classification is the process of categorizing data based on its sensitivity, value and criticality to the organization. Data classification helps to determine the appropriate level of protection, access control and retention for different types of data. Data classification is an essential part of data governance and risk management, as it enables the organization to comply with legal and regulatory requirements, protect its intellectual property and reputation, and optimize its data storage and usage costs.

In a SaaS model, the client organization has the least control and responsibility over the cloud infrastructure, platform and application, as these are fully managed by the cloud service provider (CSP). The client organization only has control and responsibility over its own data and users. Therefore, the client organization is responsible for defining and implementing data classification policies and procedures, and ensuring that its data is properly labeled and handled according to its classification level. The client organization is also responsible for educating its users about the importance of data classification and the best practices for data security and privacy.

The other options are not the sole responsibility of the client organization in a SaaS model, as they are either shared with or delegated to the CSP. Host patching, penetration testing and infrastructure hardening are all related to the security and maintenance of the cloud infrastructure and platform, which are the responsibility of the CSP in a SaaS model. The CSP is expected to provide regular updates, patches and fixes to the host operating system, network and application components, and to conduct periodic security assessments and audits to identify and remediate any vulnerabilities or weaknesses in the cloud environment. The client organization may have some responsibility to monitor and verify the CSP’s performance and compliance with the service level agreement (SLA) and the cloud security standards and regulations, but it does not have direct control or access to the cloud infrastructure and platform. References =

Understanding the Shared Responsibilities Model in Cloud Services - ISACA, Figure 1

CISM Review Manual, Chapter 3, page 121

 Role-based access control (RBAC) is a policy-neutral access control mechanism that assigns access privileges to defined roles in the organization and then makes each user a member of the appropriate roles. RBAC reduces security administration efforts by simplifying the management of access rights across different users and resources. RBAC also enables consistent and efficient enforcement of the principle of least privilege, which grants users only the minimum rights required to perform their assigned tasks. RBAC can also facilitate the implementation of separation of duties, which prevents users from having conflicting or incompatible responsibilities. RBAC is among the most widely used methods in the information security tool kit1. References = CIS Control 6: Access Control Management - Netwrix, CISSP certification: RBAC (Role based access control), What is RBAC? (Role Based Access Control) - IONOS

After implementing controls, performing a vulnerability assessment is the best way to verify that all previously identified weaknesses have been addressed. The CISM Review Manual specifies that vulnerability assessments systematically scan for known vulnerabilities and confirm remediation effectiveness. Penetration testing is valuable but is typically used to exploit vulnerabilities, not comprehensively verify their remediation as efficiently as vulnerability assessments.

A vulnerability assessment process is a systematic and proactive approach to identify, analyze and prioritize the vulnerabilities in an information system. It helps to reduce the exposure of the system to potential threats and improve the security posture of the organization. By implementing a vulnerability assessment process, the organization can facilitate proactive risk management, which is the PRIMARY benefit of this process. Proactive risk management is the process of identifying, assessing and mitigating risks before they become incidents or cause significant impact to the organization. Proactive risk management enables the organization to align its security strategy with its business objectives, optimize its security resources and investments, and enhance its resilience and compliance.

A. Threat management is enhanced. This is a secondary benefit of implementing a vulnerability assessment process. Threat management is the process of identifying, analyzing and responding to the threats that may exploit the vulnerabilities in an information system. Threat management is enhanced by implementing a vulnerability assessment process, as it helps to reduce the attack surface and prioritize the most critical threats. However, threat management is not the PRIMARY benefit of implementing a vulnerability assessment process, as it is a reactive rather than proactive approach to risk management.

B. Compliance status is improved. This is a secondary benefit of implementing a vulnerability assessment process. Compliance status is the degree to which an organization adheres to the applicable laws, regulations, standards and policies that govern its information security. Compliance status is improved by implementing a vulnerability assessment process, as it helps to demonstrate the organization’s commitment to security best practices and meet the expectations of the stakeholders and regulators. However, compliance status is not the PRIMARY benefit of implementing a vulnerability assessment process, as it is a result rather than a driver of risk management.

C. Security metrics are enhanced. This is a secondary benefit of implementing a vulnerability assessment process. Security metrics are the quantitative and qualitative measures that indicate the effectiveness and efficiency of the information security processes and controls. Security metrics are enhanced by implementing a vulnerability assessment process, as it helps to provide objective and reliable data for security monitoring and reporting. However, security metrics are not the PRIMARY benefit of implementing a vulnerability assessment process, as they are a means rather than an end of risk management.

References =

CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, pages 1-301

CISM Exam Content Outline2

Risk Assessment for Technical Vulnerabilities3

A Step-By-Step Guide to Vulnerability Assessment4

The incident response team can best leverage the results of a business impact analysis (BIA) by assigning restoration priority during incidents. A BIA is a process that identifies and evaluates the criticality and dependency of the organization’s business functions, processes, and resources, and the potential impacts and consequences of their disruption or loss. The BIA results provide the basis for determining the recovery objectives, strategies, and plans for the organization’s business continuity and disaster recovery. By using the BIA results, the incident response team can prioritize the restoration of the most critical and time-sensitive business functions, processes, and resources, and allocate the appropriate resources, personnel, and time to minimize the impact and duration of the incident.

Determining total cost of ownership (TCO) (B) is not a relevant way to leverage the results of a BIA, as it is not directly related to incident response. TCO is a financial metric that estimates the total direct and indirect costs of owning and operating an asset or a system over its lifecycle. TCO may be useful for evaluating the cost-effectiveness and return on investment of different security solutions or alternatives, but it does not help the incident response team to respond to or recover from an incident.

Evaluating vendors critical to business recovery © is also not a relevant way to leverage the results of a BIA, as it is not a primary responsibility of the incident response team. Evaluating vendors critical to business recovery is a part of the vendor management process, which involves selecting, contracting, monitoring, and reviewing the vendors that provide essential products or services to support the organization’s business continuity and disaster recovery. Evaluating vendors critical to business recovery may be done before or after an incident, but not during an incident, as it does not contribute to the incident response or restoration activities.

Calculating residual risk after the incident recovery phase (D) is also not a relevant way to leverage the results of a BIA, as it is not a timely or effective use of the BIA results. Residual risk is the risk that remains after the implementation of risk treatment or mitigation measures. Calculating residual risk after the incident recovery phase may be done as a part of the incident review or improvement process, but not during the incident response or restoration phase, as it does not help the incident response team to resolve or contain the incident.

References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, Chapter 4: Information Security Incident Management, Section: Incident Response Plan, Subsection: Business Impact Analysis, page 182-1831

Security metrics are the most important to include in a report to key stakeholders regarding the effectiveness of an information security program because they provide objective and measurable evidence of security performance and progress. Security metrics can include measures such as the number and severity of security incidents, the level of compliance with security policies and standards, the effectiveness of security controls, and the return on investment (ROI) of security initiatives. The other choices may also be included in a security report, but security metrics are the most important.

An information security program is a set of policies, procedures, standards, guidelines, and tools that aim to protect an organization’s information assets from threats and ensure compliance with laws and regulations. The effectiveness of an information security program depends on various factors, such as the organization’s risk appetite, business objectives, resources, culture, and external environment. Regular reporting to key stakeholders, such as senior management, the board of directors, and business partners, is critical to maintaining their support and buy-in for the program. The report should provide clear and concise information on the program’s status, achievements, challenges, and future plans, and it should be tailored to the audience’s needs and expectations.

= Information classification is the process of assigning appropriate labels to information assets based on their sensitivity and value to the organization. Information classification should be aligned with the business objectives and risk appetite of the organization, and should be reviewed periodically to ensure its accuracy and relevance. The information security manager is responsible for establishing and maintaining the information classification policy and procedures, as well as providing guidance and oversight to the data owners and custodians. Data owners are the individuals who have the authority and accountability for the information assets within their business unit or function. Data owners are responsible for determining the appropriate classification level and security controls for their information assets, as well as ensuring compliance with the information classification policy and procedures. Data custodians are the individuals who have the operational responsibility for implementing and maintaining the security controls for the information assets assigned to them by the data owners.

If the information security manager believes that information has been classified inappropriately, increasing the risk of a breach, the best action is to complete a risk assessment and refer the results to the data owners. A risk assessment is a systematic process of identifying, analyzing, and evaluating the risks associated with the information assets, and recommending appropriate risk treatment options. By conducting a risk assessment, the information security manager can provide objective and evidence-based information to the data owners, highlighting the potential impact and likelihood of a breach, as well as the cost and benefit of implementing additional security controls. This will enable the data owners to make informed decisions about the appropriate classification level and security controls for their information assets, and to justify and document any deviations from the information classification policy and procedures.

The other options are not the best actions for the information security manager. Refering the issue to internal audit for a recommendation is not the best action, because internal audit is an independent and objective assurance function that provides assurance on the effectiveness of governance, risk management, and control processes. Internal audit is not responsible for providing recommendations on information classification, which is a management responsibility. Re-classifying the data and increasing the security level to meet business risk is not the best action, because the information security manager does not have the authority or accountability for the information assets, and may not have the full understanding of the business context and objectives of the data owners. Instructing the relevant system owners to reclassify the data is not the best action, because system owners are not the same as data owners, and may not have the authority or accountability for the information assets either. System owners are the individuals who have the authority and accountability for the information systems that process, store, or transmit the information assets. System owners are responsible for ensuring that the information systems comply with the security requirements and controls defined by the data owners and the information security manager. References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, ISACA, 2020, pp. 49-51, 63-64, 69-701; CISM Online Review Course, Domain 3: Information Security Program Development and Management, Module 2: Information Security Program Framework, ISACA2

The best way to determine corrective actions after a major information security incident is to conduct a postmortem assessment, which is a systematic and structured review of the incident, its causes, its impacts, and its lessons learned. A postmortem assessment can help to identify the root causes of the incident, the strengths and weaknesses of the incident response process, the gaps and deficiencies in the security controls, and the opportunities for improvement and remediation. A postmortem assessment can also help to document the recommendations and action plans for preventing or minimizing the recurrence of similar incidents in the future.

References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition eBook1, Chapter 4: Information Security Incident Management, Section: Incident Response, Subsection: Postincident Activities, Page 211.

Penetration testing simulates real-world attacks to identify any remaining exploitable vulnerabilities after controls are implemented. It validates that mitigation has been successful from an attacker’s perspective.

“Penetration testing is essential to verify the effectiveness of remediation efforts and ensure vulnerabilities can no longer be exploited.”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 2: Risk Management, Section: Security Testing and Evaluation*

Vulnerability assessments and audits are valuable, but pen testing provides practical assurance.

Creating an inventory is the FIRST step in developing an asset classification program because it helps to identify and list all the information systems assets of the organization that need to be protected and classified. An inventory should include the asset name, description, owner, custodian, location, type, value, and other relevant attributes. Creating an inventory also enables the establishment of the ownership and custody of the assets, which are essential for defining the roles and responsibilities for asset protection and classification12. Categorizing each asset (A) is a subsequent step in developing an asset classification program, after creating an inventory. Categorizing each asset involves assigning a security level or category to each asset based on its value, sensitivity, and criticality to the organization. The security level or category determines the protection level and controls required for each asset12. Creating a business case for a digital rights management tool © is not a step in developing an asset classification program, but rather a possible outcome or recommendation based on the asset classification results. A digital rights management tool is a type of control that can help to enforce the security policies and objectives for the classified assets, such as preventing unauthorized access, copying, or distribution of the assets3. Implementing a data loss prevention (DLP) system (D) is also not a step in developing an asset classification program, but rather a possible outcome or recommendation based on the asset classification results. A DLP system is a type of control that can help to monitor, detect, and prevent the loss or leakage of the classified assets, such as through email, web, or removable media4. References = 1: CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 77-781; 2: IT Asset Valuation, Risk Assessment and Control Implementation Model - ISACA2; 3: What is Digital Rights Management? - Definition from Techopedia3; 4: What is Data Loss Prevention (DLP)? - Definition from Techopedia4

= The PRIMARY objective of performing a post-incident review is to identify the root cause of the incident, which is the underlying factor or condition that enabled the incident to occur. Identifying the root cause helps to prevent or mitigate future incidents, as well as to improve the incident response process. Re-evaluating the impact of incidents, identifying vulnerabilities, and identifying control improvements are secondary objectives of a post-incident review, which are derived from the root cause analysis. References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, page 3061; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual, 10th Edition, page 1512

The primary objective of performing a post-incident review is to identify the root cause of the incident. After an incident has occurred, the post-incident review process involves gathering and analyzing evidence to determine the cause of the incident. This analysis will help to identify both the underlying vulnerability that allowed the incident to occur, as well as any control improvements that should be implemented to prevent similar incidents from occurring in the future. Additionally, the post-incident review process can also be used to re-evaluate the impact of the incident, as well as any potential implications for the organization.

The ultimate goal of an anti-phishing campaign is to reduce the risk and impact of phishing attacks on the organization. Therefore, the most relevant and reliable indicator of the effectiveness of an anti-phishing campaign is the decreased number of incidents that have occurred as a result of phishing. This metric shows how well the employees have learned to recognize and report phishing emails, and how well the security controls have prevented or mitigated the damage caused by phishing.

References = Five Ways to Achieve a Successful Anti-Phishing Campaign; Don’t click: towards an effective anti-phishing training. A comparative literature review; CISA, NSA, FBI, MS-ISAC Publish Guide on Preventing Phishing Intrusions

The most important information to communicate with regard to the open items from the risk register to senior management is the potential business impact of these risks. The potential business impact is the estimated consequence or loss that the organization may suffer if the risk materializes or occurs. The potential business impact can be expressed in quantitative or qualitative terms, such as financial, operational, reputational, legal, or strategic impact. Communicating the potential business impact of the open items from the risk register helps senior management to understand the severity and urgency of these risks, and to prioritize the risk response actions and resources accordingly. Communicating the potential business impact also helps senior management to align the risk management objectives and activities with the business objectives and strategies, and to ensure that the risk appetite and tolerance of the organization are respected and maintained.

References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, Chapter 2: Information Risk Management, Section: Risk Assessment, page 831; CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, Chapter 2: Information Risk Management, Section: Risk Reporting, page 1012.

= Standardization of compliance requirements is the best approach to reduce unnecessary duplication of compliance activities, as it allows for a common understanding of the objectives and expectations of various stakeholders, such as regulators, auditors, customers, and business partners. Standardization also facilitates the alignment of compliance activities with the organization’s risk appetite and tolerance, and enables the identification and elimination of redundant or conflicting controls. References = CISM Review Manual, 27th Edition, page 721; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Database, 12th Edition, question 952

Learn more:

 Information security governance is the process of establishing and maintaining a framework to provide assurance that information security strategies are aligned with and support business objectives, are consistent with applicable laws and regulations, and are effectively managed. By aligning information security governance with corporate governance, the organization can ensure that information security is integrated into the business processes and decision making, and that the information security risks and opportunities are properly identified, assessed, and addressed. References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, Chapter 1, Section 1.1

Email software packages that provide native encryption of messages use proprietary algorithms and formats that are not compatible with other email software packages. This means that the encryption cannot interoperate across product domains, and the recipients of encrypted messages must use the same email software package as the sender to decrypt and read the messages. This limits the usability and scalability of native encryption, and may also pose security risks if the encryption algorithms or formats are not well-tested or widely accepted. A common drawback of email software packages that provide native encryption of messages is that the encryption cannot interoperate across product domains1234. References = CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 206. The Top 10 Email Encryption Solutions In 2023 - Expert Insights2, The Best Email Encryption Services for 2023 | PCMag3, The Top 12 Email Encryption Services for 2023 - Right Inbox4.

A common drawback of email software packages that provide native encryption of messages is that the encryption cannot interoperate across product domains. This means that emails sent from one product cannot be read by another product, as the encryption keys used are not compatible. This can be a problem when sending emails to people who use different software packages, as the encrypted emails cannot be read.

The fundamental purpose of establishing security metrics is to provide feedback on the effectiveness of the information security controls and processes. Security metrics are quantitative or qualitative measures that indicate how well the organization is achieving its security objectives and goals. Security metrics can help the information security manager to monitor, evaluate, and improve the performance of the information security program, as well as to identify gaps, weaknesses, and areas for improvement. Security metrics can also help the organization to demonstrate compliance with internal and external standards, regulations, and best practices. Increasing return on investment (ROI), adopting security best practices, and establishing security benchmarks are possible outcomes or benefits of using security metrics, but they are not the fundamental purpose of establishing them. References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, pages 46-471; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual, 10th Edition, page 642

Learn more:

1. isaca.org2. amazon.com3. gov.uk

Security metrics are used to measure the effectiveness of controls and evaluate the overall security posture of an organization. This feedback provides an understanding of the progress made towards achieving security objectives and allows organizations to make necessary adjustments.

Enterprise goals are the most critical input because security policies must align with and support the organization’s objectives and mission. Policies that do not align with enterprise goals are less likely to gain management support and may not effectively protect key assets.

“Information security must support enterprise goals and objectives to ensure alignment with the broader business strategy.”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 1: Information Security Governance, Section: Alignment with Business Goals and Objectives

ISACA’s CISM questions reiterate that alignment with enterprise goals is essential for policy effectiveness.

Incident impact is the primary factor for classification and categorization. It ensures incidents are addressed based on their potential to disrupt the organization.

“Incident impact should be the primary factor in defining categorization levels to ensure appropriate prioritization and response.”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 4: Incident Management, Section: Incident Classification and Prioritization*

ISACA practice database stresses that focusing on impact ensures incidents receive the proper response priority.

An endpoint detection and response (EDR) solution provides advanced visibility, detection, and response capabilities at the endpoint level, which are critical for investigating and responding to incidents.

“EDR solutions help identify, investigate, and respond to threats on endpoints quickly, making them vital for incident response teams.”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 4: Incident Management, Section: Tools and Technologies for Incident Response*

ISACA’s practice questions highlight EDR as the most helpful tool for comprehensive incident analysis and response.

The best option to enable the capability of an organization to sustain the delivery of products and services within acceptable time frames and at predefined capacity during a disruption is B. Business continuity plan (BCP). This is because a BCP is a documented collection of procedures and information that guides the organization to prepare for, respond to, and recover from a disruption, such as a natural disaster, a cyberattack, or a pandemic. A BCP aims to ensure the continuity of the critical business functions and processes that support the delivery of products and services to the customers and stakeholders. A BCP also defines the roles, responsibilities, resources, and actions required to maintain the operational resilience of the organization in the face of a disruption.

References = CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 4, Section 4.2.3, page 2141; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual 9th Edition, Question 6, page 3

= Security reporting is the process of providing relevant and timely information on the status and performance of the information security program to the stakeholders. Security reporting should be aligned with the business objectives and risk appetite of the organization, and should provide meaningful insights and recommendations for decision making and improvement. Security reporting should also include forward-looking trends, which are projections or predictions of future events or conditions based on historical data, current situation, and external factors. Forward-looking trends can help the organization anticipate and prepare for potential risks and opportunities, and adjust their strategies and plans accordingly.

One of the most effective ways to communicate forward-looking trends within security reporting is to use key risk indicators (KRIs). KRIs are metrics that measure the level of exposure or likelihood of a risk event occurring, and provide early warning signals of potential changes in the risk profile. KRIs can help the organization monitor and manage the key risks that may affect the achievement of their objectives, and take proactive actions to mitigate or avoid them. KRIs can also help the organization identify emerging risks and trends, and evaluate the effectiveness of their risk treatment options. KRIs should be aligned with the risk appetite and tolerance of the organization, and should be regularly reviewed and updated to reflect the changing risk environment.

The other options are not the most effective ways to communicate forward-looking trends within security reporting. Key control indicators (KCIs) are metrics that measure the effectiveness and efficiency of the security controls implemented to reduce the impact or likelihood of a risk event. KCIs can help the organization assess and improve the performance of their security processes and activities, and ensure compliance with the security policies and standards. However, KCIs do not directly measure the level of exposure or likelihood of a risk event, and may not provide sufficient information on the future trends and scenarios. Key performance indicators (KPIs) are metrics that measure the achievement of the security objectives and goals, and demonstrate the value and contribution of the information security program to the organization. KPIs can help the organization evaluate and communicate the results and outcomes of their security initiatives and projects, and align them with the business strategy and vision. However, KPIs do not directly measure the level of exposure or likelihood of a risk event, and may not provide sufficient information on the future trends and scenarios. Key goal indicators (KGIs) are metrics that measure the progress and completion of the security goals and targets, and indicate the degree of success and satisfaction of the information security program. KGIs can help the organization track and report the status and milestones of their security plans and actions, and ensure alignment with the stakeholder expectations and requirements. However, KGIs do not directly measure the level of exposure or likelihood of a risk event, and may not provide sufficient information on the future trends and scenarios. References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, ISACA, 2020, pp. 77-78, 81-821; CISM Online Review Course, Domain 3: Information Security Program Development and Management, Module 4: Information Security Program Resources, ISACA2

 Before relying on a vendor’s certification for international security standards, such as ISO/IEC 27001, it is most important that the information security manager confirms that the certification scope is relevant to the service being offered. The certification scope defines the boundaries and applicability of the information security management system (ISMS) that the vendor has implemented and audited. The scope should cover the processes, activities, assets, and locations that are involved in delivering the service to the client. If the scope is too narrow, too broad, or not aligned with the service, the certification may not provide sufficient assurance of the vendor’s security capability and performance.

The current international standard was used to assess security processes (A) is an important factor, but not the most important one. The information security manager should verify that the vendor’s certification is based on the latest version of the standard, which reflects the current best practices and requirements for information security. However, the standard itself is generic and adaptable, and does not prescribe specific security controls or solutions. Therefore, the certification does not guarantee that the vendor has implemented the most appropriate or effective security processes for the service being offered.

The certification will remain current through the life of the contract (B) is also an important factor, but not the most important one. The information security manager should ensure that the vendor’s certification is valid and up to date, and that the vendor maintains its compliance with the standard throughout the contract period. However, the certification is not a one-time event, but a continuous process that requires periodic surveillance audits and recertification every three years. Therefore, the certification does not ensure that the vendor’s security capability and performance will remain consistent or satisfactory for the duration of the contract.

The certification can be extended to cover the client’s business (D) is not a relevant factor, as the certification is specific to the vendor’s ISMS and does not apply to the client’s business. The information security manager should not rely on the vendor’s certification to substitute or supplement the client’s own security policies, standards, or controls. The information security manager should conduct a due diligence and risk assessment of the vendor, and establish a clear and comprehensive service level agreement (SLA) that defines the security roles, responsibilities, expectations, and metrics for both parties.

References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, Chapter 3: Information Security Program Development and Management, Section: Information Security Program Management, Subsection: Procurement and Vendor Management, page 142-1431

Reviewing controls listed in the vendor contract is the most helpful approach for properly scoping the security assessment of an existing vendor because it helps to determine the security requirements and expectations that the vendor has agreed to meet. A vendor contract is a legal document that defines the terms and conditions of the business relationship between the organization and the vendor, including the scope, deliverables, responsibilities, and obligations of both parties. A vendor contract should also specify the security controls that the vendor must implement and maintain to protect the organization’s data and systems, such as encryption, authentication, access control, backup, monitoring, auditing, etc. Reviewing controls listed in the vendor contract helps to ensure that the security assessment covers all the relevant aspects of the vendor’s security posture, as well as to identify any gaps or discrepancies between the contract and the actual practices. Therefore, reviewing controls listed in the vendor contract is the correct answer.

Social engineering is a technique used by attackers to manipulate individuals into divulging sensitive information or performing actions that can compromise the security of an organization. Multi-factor authentication (MFA) is a security mechanism that requires users to provide at least two forms of authentication to verify their identity. By requiring MFA, even if an attacker successfully obtains a user's credentials through social engineering, they will not be able to access the network without the additional form of authentication.

Inconsistent device security is the primary challenge for an information security manager when deploying a bring your own device (BYOD) mobile program in an enterprise because it increases the risk of data breaches and compromises. A BYOD mobile program allows employees to use their personal devices, such as smartphones, tablets, or laptops, to access the organization’s network, applications, and data. However, personal devices may have different operating systems, versions, configurations, and security settings than the organization’s standard devices. Moreover, personal devices may not be updated regularly, may have unauthorized or malicious apps installed, or may not have adequate protection against malware or theft. Inconsistent device security makes it difficult for the information security manager to enforce and monitor the security policies and controls across all devices, as well as to ensure compliance with the regulatory requirements for data privacy and security. Therefore, inconsistent device security is the correct answer.

The best way to identify the risk associated with a social engineering attack is to test user knowledge of information security practices. Social engineering is a type of attack that exploits human psychology and behavior to manipulate, deceive, or influence users into divulging sensitive information, granting unauthorized access, or performing malicious actions. Therefore, user knowledge of information security practices is a key factor that affects the likelihood and impact of a social engineering attack. By testing user knowledge of information security practices, such as through quizzes, surveys, or simulated attacks, the information security manager can measure the level of awareness, understanding, and compliance of the users, and identify the gaps, weaknesses, or vulnerabilities that need to be addressed.

Monitoring the intrusion detection system (IDS) (A) is a possible way to detect a social engineering attack, but not to identify the risk associated with it. An IDS is a system that monitors network or system activities and alerts or responds to any suspicious or malicious events. However, an IDS may not be able to prevent or recognize all types of social engineering attacks, especially those that rely on human interaction, such as phishing, vishing, or baiting. Moreover, monitoring the IDS is a reactive rather than proactive approach, as it only reveals the occurrence or consequences of a social engineering attack, not the potential or likelihood of it.

Reviewing single sign-on (SSO) authentication lags (B) is not a relevant way to identify the risk associated with a social engineering attack. SSO is a method of authentication that allows users to access multiple applications or systems with one set of credentials. Authentication lags are delays or failures in the authentication process that may affect the user experience or performance. However, authentication lags are not directly related to social engineering attacks, as they do not indicate the user’s knowledge of information security practices, nor the attacker’s attempts or success in compromising the user’s credentials or access.

Performing a business risk assessment of the email filtering system (D) is also not a relevant way to identify the risk associated with a social engineering attack. An email filtering system is a system that scans, filters, and blocks incoming or outgoing emails based on predefined rules or criteria, such as spam, viruses, or phishing. A business risk assessment is a process that evaluates the potential threats, vulnerabilities, and impacts to the organization’s business objectives, processes, and assets. However, performing a business risk assessment of the email filtering system does not address the risk associated with a social engineering attack, as it only focuses on the technical aspects and performance of the system, not the human factors and behavior of the users.

References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, Chapter 2: Information Risk Management, Section: Risk Identification, Subsection: Threat Identification, page 87-881

The best way to ensure that frequently encountered incidents are reflected in the user security awareness training program is to include examples of help desk requests. Help desk requests are requests for assistance or support from users who encounter problems or issues related to information security, such as password resets, malware infections, phishing emails, unauthorized access, data loss, or system errors. Help desk requests can provide valuable insights into the types, frequencies, and impacts of the incidents that affect the users, as well as the users’ knowledge, skills, and behaviors regarding information security. By including examples of help desk requests in the user security awareness training program, the information security manager can achieve the following benefits12:

Increase the relevance and effectiveness of the training content: By using real-life scenarios and cases that the users have experienced or witnessed, the information security manager can make the training content more relevant, engaging, and applicable to the users’ needs and situations. The information security manager can also use the examples of help desk requests to illustrate the consequences and costs of the incidents, and to highlight the best practices and solutions to prevent or resolve them. This can help the users to understand the importance and value of information security, and to improve their knowledge, skills, and attitudes accordingly.

Identify and address the gaps and weaknesses in the training program: By analyzing the patterns and trends of the help desk requests, the information security manager can identify and address the gaps and weaknesses in the existing training program, such as outdated or inaccurate information, insufficient or ineffective coverage of topics, or lack of feedback or evaluation. The information security manager can also use the examples of help desk requests to measure and monitor the impact and outcomes of the training program, such as changes in the number, type, or severity of the incidents, or changes in the users’ satisfaction, performance, or behavior.

Enhance the communication and collaboration with the users and the help desk staff: By including examples of help desk requests in the user security awareness training program, the information security manager can enhance the communication and collaboration with the users and the help desk staff, who are the key stakeholders and partners in information security. The information security manager can use the examples of help desk requests to solicit feedback, suggestions, or questions from the users and the help desk staff, and to provide them with timely and relevant information, guidance, or support. The information security manager can also use the examples of help desk requests to recognize and appreciate the efforts and contributions of the users and the help desk staff in reporting, responding, or resolving the incidents, and to encourage and motivate them to continue their involvement and participation in information security.

The other options are not the best way to ensure that frequently encountered incidents are reflected in the user security awareness training program, as they are less reliable, relevant, or effective sources of information. Results of exit interviews are feedback from employees who are leaving the organization, and they may not reflect the current or future incidents that the remaining or new employees may face. Previous training sessions are records of the past training activities, and they may not capture the changes or updates in the information security environment, threats, or requirements. Responses to security questionnaires are answers to predefined questions or surveys, and they may not cover all the possible or emerging incidents that the users may encounter or experience12. References = Information Security Awareness Training: Best Practices - Infosec Resources, How to Create an Effective Security Awareness Training Program - Infosec Resources, Security Awareness Training: How to Build a Successful Program - ISACA, Security Awareness Training: How to Educate Your Employees - ISACA

The effectiveness of a SIEM (Security Information and Event Management) system heavily relies on properly configured alert thresholds. Misconfiguration of alert thresholds can result in missed detection of significant incidents (false negatives) or an overwhelming number of false positives, making it difficult to identify real threats. According to the CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, Domain 4: Information Security Incident Management, the configuration and tuning of monitoring tools like SIEMs are crucial for timely and accurate detection of incidents.

 The board of directors is ultimately responsible for the governance of the organization, including the approval of the information security governance framework and the oversight of its implementation and performance. References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, Domain 1: Information Security Governance, Chapter 2: Establish and Maintain an Information Security Governance Framework, Section: Roles and Responsibilities of Senior Management and the Board of Directors1

Senior leadership needs to understand how Zero Trust supports risk reduction and business needs. Communicating the impact on risk reduction and user experience aligns security initiatives with business goals.

“Communicating how security initiatives support business objectives and risk reduction is critical for gaining senior management support.”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 1: Information Security Governance, Section: Business Alignment*

The business impact analysis (BIA) is the foundational step in disaster recovery planning. The CISM Review Manual states that BIA should be performed first to determine critical business functions, recovery priorities, and the impact of disruptions. Risk assessments and documentation follow after the BIA.

The first step is to research legal and regulatory requirements for the new locations. Different countries have varying security and privacy laws, and understanding these is critical before adapting policies or procedures.

“Security requirements will vary depending on local legal and regulatory obligations, which must be understood as part of international expansion.”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 1: Information Security Governance, Section: Compliance Requirements

The ISACA CISM practice database also highlights this step as the initial and critical move in international expansions.

The data owner is the most appropriate role to determine access rights for specific users of an application because they have legal rights and complete control over data elements4. They are also responsible for approving data glossaries and definitions, ensuring the accuracy of information, and supervising operations related to data quality5. The data custodian is responsible for the safe custody, transport, and storage of the data and implementation of business rules, but not for determining access rights4. The system administrator is responsible for managing the security and storage infrastructure of data sets according to the organization’s data governance policies, but not for determining access rights5. Senior management is responsible for setting the strategic direction and priorities for data governance, but not for determining access rights5. References: 5 https://www.cpomagazine.com/cyber-security/data-owners-vs-data-stewards-vs-data-custodians-the-3-types-of-data-masters-and-why-you-should-employ-them/ 4 https://cloudgal42.com/data-privacy-difference-between-data-owner-controller-and-data-custodian-processor/

Digital encryption is the process of transforming data into an unreadable form using a secret key or algorithm. Digital encryption will ensure the confidentiality of content when accessing an email system over the Internet, as it prevents unauthorized parties from intercepting, viewing, or modifying the email messages. Digital encryption can be applied to both the email content and the email transmission, using different methods such as symmetric encryption, asymmetric encryption, or hybrid encryption. Digital encryption can also provide other benefits such as authentication, integrity, and non-repudiation, depending on the encryption scheme and the use of digital signatures or certificates. References = CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 101, page 102.

Decreasing false positives is the best indicator that the information security manager has tuned the system to address senior management’s concern that the organization’s intrusion prevention system (IPS) may repeatedly disrupt business operations. False positives are alerts generated by the IPS when it mistakenly blocks legitimate traffic or activity, causing disruption or downtime. Decreasing false positives means that the IPS has been configured to reduce such errors and minimize unnecessary interruptions. Increasing false negatives is not a good indicator because it means that the IPS has failed to detect or block malicious traffic or activity, increasing the risk of compromise or damage. Decreasing false negatives is not a good indicator because it does not affect business operations, but rather improves security detection or prevention. Increasing false positives is not a good indicator because it means that the IPS has increased its errors and interruptions, worsening senior management’s concern. References: https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2017/volume-6/the-value-of-penetration-testing https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2016/volume-5/security-scanning-versus-penetration-testing

Conducting a business impact analysis (BIA) is the first step when creating an organization’s disaster recovery plan (DRP) because it helps to identify and prioritize the critical business functions or processes that need to be restored after a disruption, and determine their recovery time objectives (RTOs) and recovery point objectives (RPOs)2. Identifying the response and recovery teams is not the first step, but rather a subsequent step that involves assigning roles and responsibilities for executing the DRP. Reviewing the communications plan is not the first step, but rather a subsequent step that involves defining the communication channels and protocols for notifying and updating the stakeholders during and after a disruption. Developing response and recovery strategies is not the first step, but rather a subsequent step that involves selecting and implementing the appropriate solutions and procedures for restoring the critical business functions or processes. References: 2 https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2018/volume-3/business-impact-analysis-bia-and-disaster-recovery-planning-drp

= Patch management is the process of applying updates to software and hardware systems to fix security vulnerabilities and improve functionality. Patch management is one of the best ways to prevent the exploitation of system vulnerabilities, as it reduces the attack surface and closes the gaps that attackers can exploit. Patch management also helps to ensure compliance with security standards and regulations, and maintain the performance and availability of systems.

Intrusion detection is the process of monitoring network or system activities for signs of malicious or unauthorized behavior. Intrusion detection can help to detect and respond to attacks, but it does not prevent them from happening in the first place. Log monitoring is the process of collecting, analyzing and reviewing log files generated by various systems and applications. Log monitoring can help to identify anomalies, errors and security incidents, but it does not prevent them from occurring. Antivirus software is the program that scans files and systems for viruses, malware and other malicious code. Antivirus software can help to protect systems from infection, but it does not prevent the exploitation of system vulnerabilities that are not related to malware.

Therefore, patch management is the best security process to prevent the exploitation of system vulnerabilities, as it addresses the root cause of the problem and reduces the risk of compromise. References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition eBook | Digital | English1, Chapter 4: Information Security Program Development and Management, Section 4.3: Information Security Program Resources, Subsection 4.3.1: Information Security Infrastructure and Architecture, Page 204.

The Recovery Time Objective (RTO) defines the maximum acceptable downtime for a business function or system following a disruption. If the organization requires recovery in 30 minutes, that is the system’s RTO.

This metric guides the selection of technologies, staffing, and procedures needed to meet recovery expectations.

“RTO defines the target time set for the recovery of IT and business activities after a disruption. It is a key BCP design parameter.”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 3: Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery Planning*

Mapping the risk scenarios by likelihood and impact on a chart is the best method of comparing risk scenarios, as it helps to visualize and prioritize the different types and levels of risks associated with each option. A chart can also facilitate the communication and decision-making process by showing the trade-offs and benefits of each option. A chart can be based on qualitative or quantitative data, depending on the availability and accuracy of the information.

References = CISM Review Manual 2022, page 371; CISM Exam Content Outline, Domain 1, Task 1.32; A risk assessment model for selecting cloud service providers; Security best practices for IaaS workloads in Azure

The best option to facilitate recovery of data lost as a result of a cybersecurity incident is offsite data backups. This is because offsite data backups provide a secure and reliable way to restore data that may have been corrupted, deleted, or encrypted by malicious actors. Offsite data backups also reduce the risk of data loss due to physical damage, theft, or natural disasters that may affect the primary data storage location. Offsite data backups should be part of a comprehensive disaster recovery plan (DRP) that defines the roles, responsibilities, procedures, and resources for restoring normal operations after a cyber incident.

Ensuring security requirements are defined at the request-for-proposal (RFP) stage is the most effective security outcome in an organization’s contract management process because it establishes and communicates the security expectations and obligations for both parties, and enables the organization to evaluate and select the most suitable and secure vendor or service provider. Performing vendor security benchmark analyses at the RFP stage is not an effective security outcome, but rather a possible security activity that involves comparing and ranking different vendors or service providers based on their security capabilities or performance. Extending security assessment to cover asset disposal on contract termination is not an effective security outcome, but rather a possible security activity that involves verifying and validating that any assets or data belonging to the organization are securely disposed of by the vendor or service provider at the end of the contract. Extending security assessment to include random penetration testing is not an effective security outcome, but rather a possible security activity that involves testing and auditing the vendor’s or service provider’s security controls or systems at random intervals during the contract. References: https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2017/volume-1/data-ownership-and-custodianship-in-the-cloud https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2016/volume-4/integrating-assurance-functions

The best way to obtain senior management support for an information security governance program is to demonstrate the program’s value to the organization, such as how it can help achieve business objectives, reduce operational risks, enhance resilience, and comply with regulations. Demonstrating the value of information security governance can help senior management understand the benefits and costs of the program, and motivate them to participate in the decision-making process. The other options, such as discussing governance programs in similar organizations, providing external audit results, or providing examples of incidents, may not be sufficient or persuasive enough to obtain senior management support, as they may not reflect the specific needs and goals of the organization. References:

https://www.isaca.org/resources/news-and-trends/isaca-now-blog/2020/how-to-involve-senior-management-in-the-information-security-governance-process

https://www.sans.org/white-papers/992/

https://www.govtech.com/blogs/lohrmann-on-cybersecurity/how-to-get-management-support-for-your-security-program.html

 Information security is the most critical function when initiating the removal of system access for terminated employees, as it is responsible for ensuring that the access rights of the employees are revoked in a timely and effective manner, and that the security of the organization’s data and systems is maintained. Information security should coordinate with other functions, such as HR, legal, and help desk, to implement the access removal process, but it is the primary function that has the authority and capability to disable or delete the access credentials of the terminated employees. The other options are not as critical as information security, as they may have different roles or responsibilities in the access removal process, or they may not have direct access to the systems or tools that control the access rights of the employees. References =

CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 114: “Information security is responsible for ensuring that access rights are revoked in a timely and effective manner.”

SOC 2 Controls: Access Removal for Terminated or Transferred Users, snippets: “Systems access that is no longer required for terminated or transferred users is removed within one business day. For terminated employees, access to key IT systems is revoked in a timely manner. A termination checklist and ticket are completed, and access is revoked for employees as a component of the employee termination process.”

IT Involvement in Employee Termination, A Checklist, snippets: “Disable all network access. If your company uses a master access list of active passwords, tell the system to deny any passcodes associated with the user being terminated. If your system doesn’t have a deny function, delete the user and their associated passwords. Monitor employee access.”

Human resources (HR) is the most critical function when initiating the removal of system access for terminated employees because it is responsible for notifying the relevant parties, such as information security, help desk, and legal, of the employee’s termination status and date. HR also ensures that the employee’s exit process is completed and documented, and that the employee returns any company-owned devices or assets. HR also coordinates with the employee’s manager and team to ensure a smooth transition of work and responsibilities.

The most important thing to verify before entering into a relationship with a third party to host sensitive archived data is the vendor’s controls are in line with the organization’s security standards. This is because the organization is ultimately responsible for the security and privacy of its data, even if it is stored or processed by a third party. The organization should ensure that the vendor has adequate and effective controls to protect the data from unauthorized access, modification, disclosure, or destruction. The organization should also ensure that the vendor complies with the applicable laws and regulations regarding data protection, such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in the European Union. The organization should conduct a thorough risk assessment of the vendor and its services, and establish a clear contract that defines the roles, responsibilities, expectations, and obligations of both parties.

References = CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 3, Section 3.2.1, page 1341; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual 9th Edition, Question 2, page 2

 The FIRST step in developing an information security strategy is to perform a gap analysis based on the current state of the organization’s information security posture. A gap analysis is a systematic process of comparing the current state with the desired state and identifying the gaps or deficiencies that need to be addressed. A gap analysis helps to establish a baseline for the information security strategy, as well as to prioritize the actions and resources needed to achieve the strategic objectives. A gap analysis also helps to align the information security strategy with the organizational goals and strategies, as well as to ensure compliance with relevant standards and regulations. References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, page 331; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual, 10th Edition, page 162

first step in developing an information security strategy is to conduct a risk-aware and comprehensive inventory of your company’s context, including all digital assets, employees, and vendors. Then you need to know about the threat environment and which types of attacks are a threat to your company1. This is similar to performing a gap analysis based on the current state3.

Before outsourcing any application or service, an information security manager should first determine the required security controls for the new solution, based on the organization’s risk appetite, security policies and standards, and regulatory requirements. This will help to evaluate and select the most suitable provider, as well as to define the security roles and responsibilities, service level agreements (SLAs), and audit requirements. References: https://www.isaca.org/credentialing/cism https://www.wiley.com/en-us/CISM+Certified+Information+Security+Manager+Study+Guide-p-9781119801948

Management support is the factor that has the greatest influence on the successful implementation of information security strategy goals. Management support refers to the commitment and involvement of senior executives and other key stakeholders in defining, approving, funding, and overseeing the information security strategy. Management support is essential for aligning the information security strategy with the business objectives, ensuring adequate resources and budget, fostering a security-aware culture, and enforcing accountability and compliance. According to ISACA, management support is one of the critical success factors for information security governance1. The other options are not factors that influence the successful implementation of information security strategy goals, but rather outcomes or components of the information security strategy. Regulatory requirements are external obligations that the information security strategy must comply with2. Compliance acceptance is the degree to which the organization adheres to the information security policies and standards3. Budgetary approval is the process of allocating financial resources for the information security activities and initiatives4. References: 2: Information Security: Goals, Types and Applications - Exabeam 3: How to develop a cybersecurity strategy: Step-by-step guide 4: Information Security Goals And Objectives 1: The Importance of Building an Information Security Strategic Plan

The best way to reduce the risk of disruption from an emergency system change is to confirm rollback plans are in place. According to the CISM Review Manual, having an effective rollback (or backout) plan ensures that if the emergency change causes unexpected issues, the organization can quickly revert to a known, stable state. This minimizes downtime and impact to business operations. Approval and communication are important, but only a rollback plan directly addresses risk reduction during unexpected disruptions.

The best way to support the justification for investment in a new security solution is to show how the solution contributes to the business strategy of the organization. The business strategy defines the vision, mission, goals, and objectives of the organization, and the security solution should align with and support them. The security solution should also demonstrate how it adds value to the organization, such as by enabling new business opportunities, enhancing customer satisfaction, or increasing competitive advantage. The business case should include the expected benefits, costs, risks, and alternatives of the security solution, and provide a clear rationale for choosing the preferred option1.

References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition eBook2, Chapter 1: Information Security Governance, Section: Information Security Strategy, Subsection: Business Case Development, Page 33.

When preventive controls to appropriately mitigate risk are not feasible, the most important action for the information security manager is to manage the impact, which means taking measures to reduce the likelihood or severity of the consequences of the risk. Managing the impact can involve using alternative controls, such as engineering, administrative, or personal protective controls, that can lower the exposure or harm to the organization. The other options, such as identifying unacceptable risk levels, assessing vulnerabilities, or evaluating potential threats, are part of the risk assessment process, but they are not actions to mitigate risk when preventive controls are not feasible. References:

https://bcmmetrics.com/risk-mitigation-evaluating-your-controls/

https://www.osha.gov/safety-management/hazard-prevention

https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/hierarchy/default.html

 A security information and event management (SIEM) system is a tool that collects, analyzes, and correlates security events from various sources, such as firewalls, intrusion detection systems, antivirus software, and other devices. A SIEM system can provide real-time alerts, dashboards, reports, and forensic analysis of security incidents. The greatest value of a SIEM system is that it can facilitate the monitoring of risk occurrences by identifying anomalies, trends, patterns, and indicators of compromise that may otherwise go unnoticed. A SIEM system can also help with incident response, compliance, and audit activities by providing evidence and documentation of security events.

References =

ISACA, CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, 2020, page 2291

ISACA, CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Database - 12 Month Subscription, 2020, question ID 2082

The greatest value provided by a Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) system is facilitating the monitoring of risk occurrences. SIEM systems collect, analyze and alert on security-related data from various sources such as firewall logs, intrusion detection/prevention systems, and system logs. This allows organizations to identify security threats in real-time and respond quickly, helping to mitigate potential harm to their systems and data.

The best way to achieve compliance with new global regulations related to the protection of personal information is to determine the current and desired state of controls, as this helps the information security manager to identify the gaps and requirements for compliance, and to prioritize and implement the necessary actions and measures to meet the regulatory standards. The current state of controls refers to the existing level of protection and compliance of the personal information, while the desired state of controls refers to the target level of protection and compliance that is required by the new regulations. By comparing the current and desired state of controls, the information security manager can assess the maturity and effectiveness of the information security program, and plan and execute a risk treatment plan to address the risks and issues related to the protection of personal information. Executing a risk treatment plan, reviewing contracts and statements of work (SOWs) with vendors, and implementing data regionalization controls are also important, but not as important as determining the current and desired state of controls, as they are dependent on the outcome of the gap analysis and the risk assessment, and may not be sufficient or appropriate to achieve compliance with the new regulations. References = CISM Review Manual 2023, page 491; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual 2023, page 352; ISACA CISM - iSecPrep, page 203

 Standards are detailed statements of the minimum requirements for hardware, software, or security configurations. They are used to define the minimum security controls required for user workstations. References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, page 69.

The disk hash value is a unique identifier that is calculated from the binary data of the disk. It is used to verify that the disk image is an exact copy of the original disk and that no changes have occurred during the acquisition or analysis process. The disk hash value is stored externally, such as on a CD-ROM or a USB drive, to prevent tampering or corruption. The disk hash value can also be used as evidence in court to prove the authenticity and reliability of the digital evidence123 References = 1: CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, ISACA, 2017, page 2532: Guide to Computer Forensics and Investigations Fourth Edition, page 4-103: Forensic disk acquisition over the network, Andrea Fortuna, 2018.

The main purpose of creating and storing an external disk hash value when performing forensic data acquisition from a hard disk is to validate the integrity of the data during the analysis. This is done by comparing the original hash value of the disk to the hash value created during the acquisition process, which can be used to ensure that the data has not been tampered with or corrupted in any way. Additionally, by creating a hash value of the disk, it can be used to quickly verify the integrity of any data that is accessed from the disk in the future.

= Annual loss expectancy (ALE) is the most important criterion when deciding whether to accept residual risk, because it represents the expected monetary loss for an asset due to a risk over a one-year period. ALE is calculated by multiplying the annual rate of occurrence (ARO) of a risk event by the single loss expectancy (SLE) of the asset. ARO is the estimated frequency of a risk event occurring within a one-year period, and SLE is the estimated cost of a single occurrence of a risk event. ALE helps to compare the cost and benefit of different risk responses, such as avoidance, mitigation, transfer, or acceptance. Risk acceptance is appropriate when the ALE is lower than the cost of other risk responses, or when the risk is unavoidable or acceptable within the organization’s risk appetite and tolerance. ALE also helps to prioritize the risks that need more attention and resources.

References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, Chapter 2: Information Risk Management, Section: Risk Assessment, page 831; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual, 10th Edition, Question 22, page 242

Corporate culture is the most important factor to consider when trying to gain organization-wide support for an information security program because it reflects the values, beliefs, and behaviors of the organization and its members. Corporate culture influences how the organization perceives, prioritizes, and responds to information security risks and issues, and how it adopts and implements information security policies and practices. By understanding and aligning with the corporate culture, the information security manager can communicate the benefits and value of the information security program, and foster a positive and collaborative security culture across the organization.

The best action for the system admin manager to address the issue of negligent handling of incident alerts by system admins is to provide incident response training to data custodians because it helps to improve their awareness and skills in recognizing and reporting security incidents, and following the incident response procedures and protocols. Conducting a risk assessment and sharing the result with senior management is not a good action because it does not address the root cause of the issue or provide any solutions or improvements. Revising the incident response plan to align with business processes is not a good action because it does not address the root cause of the issue or provide any solutions or improvements. Providing incident response training to data owners is not a good action because data owners are not responsible for handling incident alerts or performing incident response tasks. References: https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2017/volume-5/incident-response-lessons-learned https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2018/volume-3/incident-response-lessons-learned

 A compromised endpoint device is a potential threat to the security of the network and the data stored on it. The best course of action to prevent further damage is to isolate the endpoint device from the network and other devices, so that the attacker cannot access or spread to other systems. Isolating the endpoint device also allows the information security manager to investigate the incident and determine the root cause, the extent of the compromise, and the appropriate remediation steps. Wiping and resetting the endpoint device may not be feasible or desirable, as it may result in data loss or evidence destruction. Powering off the endpoint device may not stop the attack, as the attacker may have installed persistent malware or backdoors that can resume once the device is powered on again. Running a virus scan on the endpoint device may not be effective, as the attacker may have used sophisticated techniques to evade detection or disable the antivirus software. References = CISM Review Manual, 15th Edition, page 1741; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Database, question ID 2112; Using EDR to Address Unmanaged Devices - ISACA3; Boosting Cyberresilience for Critical Enterprise IT Systems With COBIT and NIST Cybersecurity Frameworks - ISACA; Endpoint Security: On the Frontline of Cyber Risk.

The best way to reduce the risk associated with a bring your own device (BYOD) program is to implement a mobile device policy and standard. This policy should include guidelines and rules regarding the use of mobile devices, such as acceptable use guidelines and restrictions on the types of data that can be stored or accessed on the device. Additionally, it should also include requirements for secure mobile device practices, such as the use of strong passwords, encryption, and regular patching. A mobile device management (MDM) solution can also be implemented to help ensure mobile devices meet the organizational security requirements. However, it is not enough to simply implement the policy and MDM solution; employees must also be trained on the secure mobile device practices to ensure the policy is followed.

 = A new regulatory requirement affecting an organization’s information security program is released. The information security manager’s first course of action should be to notify the legal department, as they are responsible for ensuring compliance with the relevant laws and regulations. The legal department can advise the information security manager on how to interpret and implement the new requirement, as well as what are the potential implications and risks for the organization12.

References = 1: CISM Review Manual (Digital Version), page 271 2: CISM Review Manual (Print Version), page 271

Learn more:

1. isaca.org2. csoonline.com

 An information security program is best positioned for success when it is closely aligned with the information security strategy, which defines the organization’s vision, mission, goals, objectives, and risk appetite for information security. The information security strategy provides the direction and guidance for developing and implementing the information security program, ensuring that it supports the organization’s business processes and objectives. The information security strategy also helps to establish the scope, boundaries, roles, responsibilities, and resources for the information security program.

References = CISM Manual, Chapter 3: Information Security Program Development (ISPD), Section 3.1: Information Security Strategy1

1: https://store.isaca.org/s/store#/store/browse/cat/a2D4w00000Ac6NNEAZ/tiles

 The best indicator that information assets are classified accurately is appropriate prioritization of information risk treatment. Information asset classification is the process of assigning a level of sensitivity or criticality to information assets based on their value, impact, and legal or regulatory requirements. The purpose of information asset classification is to facilitate the identification and protection of information assets according to their importance and risk exposure. Therefore, if information assets are classified accurately, the organization can prioritize the information risk treatment activities and allocate the resources accordingly. The other options are not direct indicators of information asset classification accuracy, although they may be influenced by it. References = CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 671; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Database - 12 Month Subscription, Question ID: 1031

= The best way to enable the integration of information security governance into corporate governance is to establish an information security steering committee with business representation. An information security steering committee is a group of senior executives and managers from different business units and functions who are responsible for overseeing, directing, and supporting the information security program and strategy of the organization. An information security steering committee with business representation can enable the integration of information security governance into corporate governance by providing the following benefits12:

Align the information security objectives and priorities with the business objectives and priorities, and ensure that the information security program and strategy support and enable the achievement of the organizational goals and performance.

Communicate and promote the value and importance of information security to the board of directors, senior management, and other stakeholders, and ensure that information security is considered and incorporated in the decision making and planning processes of the organization.

Provide guidance and direction to the information security manager and the information security team, and ensure that they have the necessary authority, resources, and support to implement and maintain the information security program and strategy effectively and efficiently.

Monitor and evaluate the performance and outcomes of the information security program and strategy, and ensure that they are aligned with the expectations and requirements of the organization and its stakeholders, as well as the relevant laws, regulations, standards, and best practices.

Identify and address the issues, challenges, and opportunities related to information security, and ensure that the information security program and strategy are continuously improved and updated to reflect the changes and developments in the internal and external environment.

The other options are not the best way to enable the integration of information security governance into corporate governance, as they are less comprehensive, effective, or influential than establishing an information security steering committee with business representation. Well-documented information security policies and standards are important components of the information security program and strategy, but they are not sufficient to enable the integration of information security governance into corporate governance, as they may not reflect or align with the business needs, priorities, or expectations, and they may not be communicated, implemented, or enforced properly or consistently across the organization. Clear lines of authority across the organization are important factors for the information security governance structure, but they are not sufficient to enable the integration of information security governance into corporate governance, as they may not ensure the involvement, participation, or support of the senior executives, managers, and other stakeholders who are responsible for or affected by information security. Senior management approval of the information security strategy is an important outcome of the information security governance process, but it is not sufficient to enable the integration of information security governance into corporate governance, as it may not ensure the alignment, communication, or monitoring of the information security strategy with the business strategy, and it may not ensure the accountability, responsibility, or authority of the information security manager and the information security team12. References = CISM Domain 1: Information Security Governance (ISG) [2022 update], Information Security Governance for CISM® | Pluralsight, Aligning Information Security with Business Strategy - ISACA, Aligning Information Security with Business Objectives - ISACA

An information security dashboard is the most effective way to present quarterly reports to the board on the status of the information security program, because it provides a concise, visual, and high-level overview of the key performance indicators (KPIs), metrics, and trends of the information security program. An information security dashboard can help the board to quickly and easily understand the current state, progress, and performance of the information security program, and to identify any gaps, issues, or areas of improvement. An information security dashboard can also help the board to align the information security program with the organization’s business goals and strategies, and to support the decision-making and oversight functions of the board.

A capability and maturity assessment is a way of measuring the effectiveness and efficiency of the information security program, and of identifying the strengths and weaknesses of the program. However, a capability and maturity assessment is not the most effective way to present quarterly reports to the board, because it may not provide a clear and timely picture of the status of the information security program, and it may not reflect the changes and dynamics of the information security environment. A capability and maturity assessment is more suitable for periodic or annual reviews, rather than quarterly reports.

A detailed analysis of security program KPIs is a way of evaluating the performance and progress of the information security program, and of determining the extent to which the program meets the predefined objectives and targets. However, a detailed analysis of security program KPIs is not the most effective way to present quarterly reports to the board, because it may be too technical, complex, or lengthy for the board to comprehend and appreciate. A detailed analysis of security program KPIs is more suitable for operational or tactical level reporting, rather than strategic level reporting.

An information security risk register is a tool for recording and tracking the information security risks that affect the organization, and for documenting the risk assessment, treatment, and monitoring activities. However, an information security risk register is not the most effective way to present quarterly reports to the board, because it may not provide a comprehensive and balanced view of the information security program, and it may not highlight the achievements and benefits of the program. An information security risk register is more suitable for risk management or audit purposes, rather than performance reporting. References =

ISACA, CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, 2020, pages 47-48, 59-60, 63-64, 67-68.

ISACA, CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Database, 12th Edition, 2020, question ID 1019.

An information security dashboard is an effective way to present quarterly reports to the board on the status of the information security program. It allows the board to quickly view key metrics and trends at a glance and to drill down into more detailed information as needed. The dashboard should include metrics such as total incidents, patching compliance, vulnerability scanning results, and more. It should also include high-level overviews of the security program and its components, such as the security policy, security architecture, and security controls.

 Reviewing the results of the vendor’s independent control reports is the best way to assess the risk associated with using a SaaS vendor because it provides an objective and reliable evaluation of the vendor’s security controls and practices. Independent control reports, such as SOC 2 or ISO 27001, are conducted by third-party auditors who verify the vendor’s compliance with industry standards and best practices. These reports can help the customer identify any gaps or weaknesses in the vendor’s security posture and determine the level of assurance and trust they can place on the vendor.

Verifying that information security requirements are included in the contract is a good practice, but it does not provide sufficient assurance that the vendor is actually meeting those requirements. The contract may also have limitations or exclusions that reduce the customer’s rights or remedies in case of a breach or incident.

Requesting customer references from the vendor is not a reliable way to assess the risk associated with using a SaaS vendor because the vendor may only provide positive or biased references that do not reflect the true experience or satisfaction of the customers. Customer references may also not have the same security needs or expectations as the customer who is conducting the assessment.

Requiring vendors to complete information security questionnaires is a useful way to gather information about the vendor’s security policies and procedures, but it does not provide enough evidence or verification that the vendor is actually implementing and maintaining those policies and procedures. Information security questionnaires are also subject to the vendor’s self-reporting and interpretation, which may not be accurate or consistent. References =

CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 144

SaaS Security Risk and Challenges - ISACA1

SaaS Security Checklist & Assessment Questionnaire | LeanIX2

Risk Assessment Guide for Microsoft Cloud3

 The most important thing to include in the outsourcing agreement for disaster recovery activities is the recovery time objectives (RTOs). RTOs are the maximum acceptable time frames within which the critical business processes and information systems must be restored after a disaster or disruption. RTOs are based on the business impact analysis (BIA) and the risk assessment, and they reflect the business continuity requirements and expectations of the organization. By including the RTOs in the outsourcing agreement, the organization can ensure that the service provider is aware of and committed to meeting the agreed service levels and minimizing the downtime and losses in the event of a disaster. The other options are not as important as the RTOs, although they may be relevant and useful to include in the outsourcing agreement depending on the scope and nature of the disaster recovery services. References = CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 2471; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Database - 12 Month Subscription, Question ID: 1033

 The needs of the organization define the triggers within a business continuity plan (BCP). Triggers are the events or conditions that initiate the activation of the BCP. The triggers should be based on the organization’s business objectives, risk appetite, recovery time objectives, and recovery point objectives. The triggers should also be aligned with the organization’s information security policy, disaster recovery plan, and gap analysis. However, these are not the primary factors that define the triggers, but rather the supporting elements that help implement the BCP. The needs of the organization are the main drivers for determining the triggers, as they reflect the organization’s priorities, expectations, and requirements for business continuity. References =

CISM Review Manual (Digital Version) 1, Chapter 4: Information Security Incident Management, pages 191-192, 195-196, 199-200.

Business Continuity Management Guideline 2, page 5, Section 4.2.1: Triggers

Business Continuity Plan - Open Risk Manual 3, page 1, Section 1: Introduction

 The business process owner is the person who is responsible for overseeing and managing the business processes and functions that are essential for the organization’s operations and objectives. The business process owner has the most direct and detailed knowledge of the inputs, outputs, dependencies, resources, and performance indicators of the business processes and functions. Therefore, the business process owner is the best person to calculate the recovery time and cost estimates when performing a business impact analysis (BIA), which is a process of identifying and quantifying the potential losses, damages, or consequences that could result from a disruption or an incident that affects the availability, integrity, or confidentiality of the information assets and systems that support the business processes and functions. The recovery time and cost estimates are the measures that indicate the time and money that are needed to resume and restore the normal business operations and functions after the disruption or incident. The recovery time and cost estimates can help to prioritize and protect the critical activities and resources, to allocate the appropriate budget and resources, to implement the necessary controls and measures, and to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of the business continuity and disaster recovery plans.

The business continuity coordinator, the senior management, and the information security manager are all important roles in the BIA process, but they are not the best ones to calculate the recovery time and cost estimates. The business continuity coordinator is the person who is responsible for coordinating and facilitating the BIA process, as well as the development, implementation, and maintenance of the business continuity and disaster recovery plans. The business continuity coordinator can help to define and communicate the scope, objectives, and methodology of the BIA, to collect and analyze the data and information from the business process owners and other stakeholders, to report and present the BIA results and recommendations, and to provide feedback and suggestions for improvement and optimization of the BIA and the plans. The senior management is the group of people who have the ultimate authority and accountability for the organization’s strategy, direction, and performance. The senior management can help to approve and support the BIA process and the plans, to provide the strategic guidance and vision for the business continuity and disaster recovery, to allocate the necessary budget and resources, to oversee and monitor the BIA and the plans, and to make the final decisions and approvals. The information security manager is the person who is responsible for ensuring the security of the information assets and systems that support the business processes and functions. The information security manager can help to identify and assess the information security risks and issues that could affect the BIA and the plans, to implement and manage the security controls and measures that are needed to protect and recover the information assets and systems, to coordinate and collaborate with the business process owners and other stakeholders on the security aspects of the BIA and the plans, and to provide the security expertise and advice. References = CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, pages 228-2291; CISM Practice Quiz, question 1722

When operating in a highly regulated market, compliance requirements become paramount, as failure to comply can lead to severe legal penalties, financial losses, and reputational harm. According to the CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, Domain 2: Information Risk Management, Task 2, understanding and addressing legal, regulatory, and contractual requirements is critical in risk management, especially in regulated environments. This ensures that the risk management strategy is aligned with mandatory regulations and industry standards. Other factors (such as outsourcing and business culture) are important, but compliance is the primary driver in highly regulated markets.

= Documenting incident notification and escalation processes is the most critical step when creating an incident response plan, as this ensures that the appropriate stakeholders are informed and involved in the response process. Identifying vulnerable data assets, what constitutes an incident, and aligning with the risk assessment process are important, but not as critical as documenting the communication and escalation procedures. References = CISM Review Manual 2023, page 1631; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual 2023, page 282

 When granting remote access to confidential information to a vendor, the most important security consideration is to ensure that the vendor complies with the organization’s information security policy. The information security policy defines the roles, responsibilities, rules, and standards for accessing, handling, and protecting the organization’s information assets. The vendor must agree to the policy and sign a contract that specifies the terms and conditions of the access, the security controls to be implemented, the monitoring and auditing mechanisms, the incident reporting and response procedures, and the penalties for non-compliance or breach. The policy also establishes the organization’s right to revoke the access at any time if the vendor violates the policy or poses a risk to the organization.

References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, Chapter 1: Information Security Governance, Section: Information Security Policies, page 34; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual, 10th Edition, Question 44, page 45.

Misconfigured alert thresholds can lead to either false positives (alert fatigue) or missed critical events, undermining the purpose of the SIEM.

“SIEM effectiveness relies on appropriate configuration. Poor threshold settings can result in either overwhelming alerts or failure to detect real threats.”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 4: Incident Management, Section: Security Monitoring Tools*

While audits and assessments provide periodic insights, the best time to verify that security mechanisms meet control objectives is continuously—through monitoring and automation.

Continuous monitoring allows the organization to detect misconfigurations, anomalies, or control failures in real-time, significantly improving response capabilities. Modern environments, especially in production systems, require real-time feedback loops to maintain compliance and effectiveness due to rapidly evolving threats and configuration changes.

“Continuous monitoring provides assurance that controls are operating effectively in real time, enabling timely corrective actions.”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 4: Incident Management, Section: Control Monitoring*

Purchasing cybersecurity insurance is a textbook example of risk transfer — transferring financial risk to a third party (the insurer).

“Risk transfer shifts the impact of a risk to another party, such as through insurance or outsourcing.”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 2: Risk Management, Section: Risk Treatment*

The greatest risk comes from not performing risk classification on the findings. Without classification, the organization cannot prioritize remediation efforts, allocate resources effectively, or understand the business impact of the vulnerabilities.

"Risk classification helps determine the priority for mitigating vulnerabilities and enables risk-informed decisions.”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 2: Risk Assessment and Analysis*

Even if some findings are unfixed or reclassified, the lack of any classification process undermines the whole risk management effort.

Communication is a key factor for the effectiveness of cybersecurity incident response, as it ensures that all relevant parties are informed, coordinated, and aligned on the incident status, impact, actions, and responsibilities. Communication also helps to maintain trust, confidence, and transparency among the stakeholders, such as senior management, business units, customers, regulators, law enforcement, and media. References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, Chapter 5, Section 5.4.2.11

Changes to the risk landscape are the most likely events to require an organization to revisit its information security framework, because they may affect the organization’s risk appetite, risk tolerance, risk profile, and risk treatment strategies. The information security framework should be aligned with the organization’s business objectives and risk management approach, and should be reviewed and updated regularly to reflect the changing internal and external environment.

References =

CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, ISACA, 2020, p. 35: “The information security framework should be reviewed and updated regularly to ensure that it remains aligned with the enterprise’s business objectives and risk management approach and reflects the changing internal and external environment.”

CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, ISACA, 2020, p. 36: “Changes in the risk landscape may require the enterprise to revisit its risk appetite, risk tolerance, risk profile, and risk treatment strategies.”

= According to the CISM Review Manual, one of the key success factors for an information security program is to maintain management support and commitment. This can be achieved by providing regular reports to management on the security status of the organization, the effectiveness of the security controls, and the alignment of the security program with the business objectives and strategy. By informing management about the security of business operations, the information security manager can demonstrate the value and benefits of the security program, and ensure that management is aware of the security risks and issues that need to be addressed. This technique can also help to build trust and confidence between the information security manager and the senior management, and foster a culture of security within the organization1

The other options are not as effective as informing management about the security of business operations. Implementing a comprehensive security awareness and training program is important, but it is mainly targeted at the end users and staff, not the senior management. Identifying the risks and consequences of failure to comply with standards can help to justify the need for security controls, but it can also create a negative impression of the security program as being too restrictive or punitive. Benchmarking the security programs of comparable organizations can provide some insights and best practices, but it may not reflect the specific needs and context of the organization, and it may not be relevant or applicable to the management’s expectations and priorities1

References = 1: CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, ISACA, 2020, pp. 28-29…

 Defining security strategies to support organizational programs is a primary responsibility of the information security governance function, as it involves providing strategic direction for security activities and ensuring that objectives are achieved. According to ISACA, information security governance is a subset of corporate governance that provides guidance for aligning information security with business objectives, managing information security risks, and using information resources responsibly12.

References = CISM Review Manual, 27th Edition, Chapter 4, Section 4.1.1, page 2131; CISM Online Review Course, Module 4, Lesson 1, Topic 12

Comprehensive and Detailed Step-by-Step Explanation:

Recovering from ransomware attacks often depends on having a robust data recovery strategy:

A. Automatic quarantine of systems: This can limit the spread of ransomware but does not address recovery.

B. Thorough communication plans: Communication is important during incidents but does not directly mitigate ransomware.

C. Effective backup plans and processes: This is the BEST option because having backups ensures that encrypted data can be restored, minimizing downtime and data loss.

D. Strong password requirements: This helps prevent unauthorized access but is not sufficient to combat ransomware once it has entered the system.

The next thing that an information security manager should do after creating a roadmap to execute the strategy for an information security program is D. Develop a project plan to implement the strategy. This is because a project plan is a detailed document that outlines the scope, objectives, deliverables, milestones, tasks, resources, roles, responsibilities, risks, and dependencies of the implementation process. A project plan can help the information security manager to organize, coordinate, monitor, and control the activities and resources required to execute the strategy and achieve the desired outcomes. A project plan can also facilitate communication, collaboration, and reporting among the project team, stakeholders, and sponsors.

A project plan is a detailed document that outlines the scope, objectives, deliverables, milestones, tasks, resources, roles, responsibilities, risks, and dependencies of the implementation process. (From CISM Manual or related resources)

References = CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 3, Section 3.1.2, page 1281; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual 9th Edition, Question 74, page 19

The explanation given in the manual is:

The information security manager’s knowledge of the business is the most critical factor for information security program success because it enables him or her to align security objectives with business goals and communicate effectively with senior management and other stakeholders. The other choices are important elements of an information security program but not as critical as the information security manager’s knowledge of the business.

An information security program is a set of policies, procedures, standards, guidelines, and tools that aim to protect an organization’s information assets from threats and ensure compliance with laws and regulations. An information security manager is a professional who oversees and coordinates the implementation and maintenance of an information security program. An information security manager should have a good understanding of the business environment, culture, strategy, processes, and needs of an organization to ensure that security supports its objectives.

Management decisions concerning information security investments will be most effective when they are based on the reporting of consistent and periodic assessments of risks. This will help management to understand the current and emerging threats, vulnerabilities, and impacts that affect the organization’s information assets and business processes. It will also help management to prioritize the allocation of resources and funding for the most critical and cost-effective security controls and solutions. The reporting of consistent and periodic assessments of risks will also enable management to monitor the performance and effectiveness of the information security program, and to adjust the security strategy and objectives as needed. References = CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 28.

The core objective of a post-incident review (PIR) is to identify gaps and weaknesses in the response process. This includes missteps, delays, communication failures, or policy limitations — all of which provide insight to improve future incident handling.

"Post-incident reviews focus on identifying root causes and areas for improvement to enhance the organization’s preparedness for future incidents.”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 4: Post-Incident Activities*

Though training, reporting, and budgeting may follow, they are secondary outcomes of this process.

A monitoring system for a critical application can help detect and prevent incidents that could affect the availability, integrity, and confidentiality of the application and its data. The impact of downtime could include loss of revenue, reputation, customer satisfaction, and regulatory compliance. Therefore, the cost of implementing the system should be justified by the potential savings from avoiding or minimizing these impacts.

References = CISM Review Manual, 15th Edition, page 173; An Introduction to Metrics, Monitoring, and Alerting; Business-critical applications: What are they and how do you protect them from cyberattack?

A walk-through of the disaster recovery plan (DRP) is a method of testing the plan by simulating a disaster scenario and having the participants review their roles and responsibilities, as well as the procedures and resources required to execute the plan. A walk-through has the greatest positive impact on the ability to execute the DRP, as it helps to identify and resolve any gaps, errors, or inconsistencies in the plan, as well as to enhance the awareness and readiness of the stakeholders involved in the recovery process. References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, Chapter 5, Section 5.3.2.21

= According to the CISM Manual1, risk is defined as the combination of the probability of an event and its consequence. Therefore, determining the risk for a particular threat/vulnerability pair before controls are applied can be expressed as a function of the likelihood and impact, should a threat exploit a vulnerability. Likelihood is the probability or frequency of a threat occurring, while impact is the magnitude or severity of the harm or loss that would result from a threat exploiting a vulnerability. The higher the likelihood and impact, the higher the risk. The lower the likelihood and impact, the lower the risk.

The other options are not correct because they do not capture the full expression of risk. Option B only considers the impact, but not the likelihood, of a threat exploiting a vulnerability. Option C confuses the risk with the risk response, which is the action taken to reduce or mitigate the risk. Option D only considers the likelihood, but not the impact, of a threat attempting to exploit a vulnerability.

References = CISM Manual1, Chapter 2: Information Risk Management (IRM), Section 2.1: Risk Concepts2

1: https://store.isaca.org/s/store#/store/browse/cat/a2D4w00000Ac6NNEAZ/tiles 2: 2

 The most appropriate time to conduct a disaster recovery test would be after the business continuity plan (BCP) has been updated, as it ensures that the disaster recovery plan (DRP) is aligned with the current business requirements, objectives, and priorities. The BCP should be updated regularly to reflect any changes in the business environment, such as new threats, risks, processes, technologies, or regulations. The disaster recovery test should validate the effectiveness and efficiency of the DRP, as well as identify any gaps, issues, or improvement opportunities123. References =

1: CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 2114

2: CISM Practice Quiz, question 1042

3: Business Continuity Planning and Disaster Recovery Testing, section “Testing the Plan”

The greatest concern resulting from the lack of severity criteria in incident classification is that escalation procedures will be ineffective because they rely on severity criteria to determine when and how to escalate an incident to higher levels of authority or responsibility, and what actions or resources are required for resolving an incident. Statistical reports will be incorrect is not a great concern because they do not affect the incident response process directly, but rather provide information or analysis for improvement or evaluation purposes. The service desk will be staffed incorrectly is not a great concern because it does not affect the incident response process directly, but rather affects the availability or efficiency of one of its components. Timely detection of attacks will be impossible is not a great concern because it does not depend on severity criteria, but rather on monitoring and alerting mechanisms. References: https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2017/volume-5/incident-response-lessons-learned https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2018/volume-3/incident-response-lessons-learned

The strongest justification for granting an exception to the security policy that disables access to USB storage devices on laptops and desktops is that the benefit is greater than the potential risk. A security policy is a document that defines the goals, objec-tives, principles, roles, responsibilities, and requirements for protecting information and systems in an organization. A security policy should be based on a risk assessment that identifies and evaluates the threats and vulnerabilities that affect the organiza-tion’s assets, as well as the potential impact and likelihood of incidents. A security pol-icy should also be aligned with the organization’s business objectives and risk appe-tite1. However, there may be situations where a security policy cannot be fully enforced or complied with due to technical, operational, or business reasons. In such cases, an exception to the policy may be requested and granted by an authorized person or body, such as a security manager or a policy committee. An exception to a security policy should be justified by a clear and compelling reason that outweighs the risk of non-compliance. An exception to a security policy should also be documented, approved, monitored, reviewed, and revoked as necessary2. The strongest justification for grant-ing an exception to the security policy that disables access to USB storage devices on laptops and desktops is that the benefit is greater than the potential risk. USB storage devices are portable devices that can store large amounts of data and can be easily connected to laptops and desktops via USB ports. They can provide several benefits for users and organizations, such as:

•Enhancing data mobility and accessibility

•Improving data backup and recovery

•Supporting data sharing and collaboration

•Enabling data encryption and authentication

However, USB storage devices also pose significant security risks for users and organi-zations, such as:

•Introducing malware or viruses to laptops and desktops

•Exposing sensitive data to unauthorized access or disclosure

•Losing or stealing data due to device loss or theft

•Violating security policies or regulations

Therefore, an exception to the security policy that disables access to USB storage de-vices on laptops and desktops should only be granted if the benefit of using them is greater than the potential risk of compromising them. For example, if a user needs to transfer a large amount of data from one laptop to another in a remote location where there is no network connection available, and the data is encrypted and protected by a strong password on the USB device, then the benefit of using the USB device may be greater than the risk of losing or exposing it. The other options are not the strongest justifications for granting an exception to the security policy that disables access to USB storage devices on laptops and desktops. Enabling USB storage devices based on user roles is not a justification, but rather a possible way of implementing a more gran-ular or flexible security policy that allows different levels of access for different types of users3. Users accepting the risk of noncompliance is not a justification, but rather a requirement for requesting an exception to a security policy that acknowledges their responsibility and accountability for any consequences of noncompliance4. Accessing being restricted to read-only is not a justification, but rather a possible control that can reduce the risk of introducing malware or viruses from USB devices to laptops and desktops5. References: 1: Information Security Policy - NIST 2: Policy Exception Man-agement - ISACA 3: Deploy and manage Removable Storage Access Control using In-tune - Microsoft Learn 4: Policy Exception Request Form - University of California 5: Re-movable Media Policy Writing Tips - CurrentWare

The best step to address the situation of losing a smartphone that contains sensitive information is to remotely wipe the device, which means erasing all the data on the device and restoring it to factory settings. Remotely wiping the device can prevent unauthorized access to the sensitive information and protect the organization from data breaches or leaks. Remotely wiping the device can be done through services such as Find My Device for Android or Find My iPhone for iOS, or through mobile device management (MDM) solutions. The other options, such as disabling the user’s access, terminating the device connectivity, or escalating to the user’s management, may not be effective or timely enough to secure the sensitive information on the device. References:

https://www.security.org/resources/protect-data-lost-device/

https://support.google.com/android/answer/6160491?hl=en

https://www.pcmag.com/how-to/locate-lock-erase-how-to-find-lost-android-phone

The best automated control to resolve the issue of security incidents not being appropriately escalated by the help desk is to integrate incident response workflow into the help desk ticketing system. This will ensure that the help desk staff follow the predefined steps and procedures for handling and escalating security incidents, based on the severity, impact, and urgency of each incident. The incident response workflow will also provide clear guidance on who to notify, when to notify, and how to notify the relevant stakeholders and authorities. This will improve the efficiency, effectiveness, and consistency of the incident response process.

References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, page 2901; A Practical Approach to Incident Management Escalation2

 This is the most urgent and effective action to prevent further damage or compromise of the organization’s network and data. The other options are less important or irrelevant in this situation.

According to How to identify suspicious insider activity using Active Directory, one of the steps to detect and respond to suspicious activity is to isolate the affected device from the network. This can be done by disabling the network adapter, unplugging the network cable, or blocking the device’s IP address on the firewall1. This will prevent the device from communicating with any malicious actors or spreading malware to other devices on the network.

`

The greatest benefit of conducting an organization-wide security awareness program is to improve the security behavior of the employees, contractors, partners, and other stakeholders who interact with the organization’s information assets. Security behavior refers to the actions and decisions that affect the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of information, such as following the security policies and procedures, reporting security incidents, avoiding risky practices, and applying security controls. By improving the security behavior, the organization can reduce the human-related risks and vulnerabilities, enhance the security culture and awareness, and support the security strategy and objectives.

The other options are not as beneficial as improving the security behavior, although they may also be outcomes or objectives of a security awareness program. Promoting the security strategy is important to communicate the vision, mission, and goals of the security function, as well as to align the security activities with the business needs and expectations. However, promoting the security strategy alone is not enough to ensure its implementation and effectiveness, as it also requires the involvement and commitment of the stakeholders, especially the senior management. Reporting fewer security incidents may indicate a lower level of security breaches or threats, but it may also reflect a lack of detection, reporting, or awareness mechanisms. Moreover, reporting fewer security incidents is not a reliable measure of the security performance or maturity, as it does not account for the impact, severity, or root causes of the incidents. Detecting more security incidents may indicate a higher level of security monitoring, alerting, or awareness capabilities, but it may also reflect a higher level of security exposures or attacks. Moreover, detecting more security incidents is not a desirable goal of a security awareness program, as it also implies a higher level of security incidents that need to be responded to and resolved. References =

CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, ISACA, 2022, pp. 201-202, 207-208.

CISM Questions, Answers & Explanations Database, ISACA, 2022, QID 1006.

The Benefits of Information Security and Privacy Awareness Training Programs, ISACA Journal, Volume 1, 2019, 1.

An increase in false negatives would be of greatest concern when reviewing the performance of an organization’s IDSs, because it means that the IDSs are failing to detect and alert on actual attacks that are occurring on the network. False negatives can lead to serious security breaches, data loss, reputational damage, and legal liabilities for the organization. False positives, on the other hand, are alerts that are triggered by benign or normal activities that are mistaken for attacks. False positives can cause annoyance, inefficiency, and desensitization, but they do not pose a direct threat to the security of the network. Therefore, a decrease in false positives would be desirable, and an increase in false positives would be less concerning than an increase in false negatives.

References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, page 2231; Intrusion Detection Systems | NIST

The BEST way for an organization to ensure that incident response teams are properly prepared is by conducting tabletop exercises appropriate for the organization.

Tabletop exercises are an effective way to test and validate an organization's incident response plan (IRP) and the readiness of the incident response team. These exercises simulate different scenarios in a controlled environment and allow the team to practice their response procedures, identify gaps, and make improvements to the plan. By conducting regular tabletop exercises, the incident response team can stay current with changes in the threat landscape and ensure that they are prepared to respond to incidents effectively.

According to the Certified Information Security Manager (CISM) Study Manual, "Tabletop exercises are a valuable tool for testing and validating the effectiveness of the IRP and the readiness of the incident response team. These exercises simulate different scenarios in a controlled environment and allow the team to practice their response procedures, identify gaps, and make improvements to the plan."

While providing training from third-party forensics firms, obtaining industry certifications, and documenting multiple scenarios for the organization and response steps can all be useful in preparing incident response teams, they are not as effective as conducting tabletop exercises appropriate for the organization.

The results of a risk assessment would best enable an informed decision by senior management when developing a business case to justify an information security investment. A risk assessment will help to identify and prioritize the threats and vulnerabilities that affect the organization’s assets and processes, as well as the potential impact and likelihood of occurrence. A risk assessment will also provide a basis for selecting and evaluating the effectiveness of controls to mitigate the risks. According to CISA, developing a business case for security will be based on an in-depth understanding of organizational vulnerabilities, operational priorities, and return on investment1. The information security strategy, losses due to security incidents, and security investment trends in the industry are possible inputs or outputs of a risk assessment, but they are not sufficient to enable an informed decision by senior management. References: 1: The Business Case for Security - CISA 2: The Business Case for Security | CISA 3: #HowTo: Build a Business Case for Cybersecurity Investment 4: Making the Business Case for Information Security

The first step is to invoke the incident response plan to ensure a systematic, controlled, and compliant response to the security incident.

“The incident response plan should be activated immediately to investigate, contain, and resolve incidents of unauthorized access.”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 4: Incident Management, Section: Incident Response Plan Execution*

ISACA practice questions also reinforce that invoking the incident response plan is the essential first response to contain the breach.

Chain of custody is the MOST important requirement when collecting admissible evidence, because it ensures the integrity and authenticity of the evidence by documenting its history, handling, and storage. Chain of custody records who, what, when, where, why, and how the evidence was collected, analyzed, and preserved. Without a proper chain of custody, the evidence may be challenged or rejected in a court of law. Need to know, preserving audit logs, and due diligence are important aspects of evidence collection, but they are not as critical as chain of custody. References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, page 3031; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual, 10th Edition, page 1492

The most important requirement when collecting admissible evidence is the chain of custody. The chain of custody is a documented record of who had control of the evidence at any given time, from the point of collection until the evidence is presented in court. This is important in order to ensure the evidence can be authenticated and is not subject to tampering or any other form of interference. Other important considerations include need to know, preserving audit logs, and due diligence.

Requiring the provider to follow stringent data classification procedures is the BEST way to ensure data is not co-mingled or exposed when using a cloud service provider, because it helps to define the sensitivity and confidentiality levels of the data and the corresponding security controls and access policies that should be applied. Data classification procedures can help to prevent unauthorized access, disclosure, modification, or deletion of the data, as well as to segregate the data from other customers’ data.

References =

CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, ISACA, 2020, p. 72: “Data classification is the process of assigning a level of sensitivity to data that reflects its importance and the impact of its disclosure, alteration, or destruction.”

CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, ISACA, 2020, p. 73: “Data classification should be based on the business requirements for confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the data, and should consider the legal, regulatory, and contractual obligations of the enterprise.”

Best Practices to Manage Risks in the Cloud - ISACA: “Commingling of data: A big concern many enterprises have with public cloud services is the commingling of data with that of the cloud provider’s other customers. One of your first questions should be: “How do you ensure that my data is not commingled with others?” How does the cloud provider ensure that only your team has access to your data?”

Unexpected outcomes may arise in production when using only sanitized data for the testing of applications. Sanitized data is data that has been purposely and permanently deleted or modified to prevent unauthorized access or misuse. Sanitized data may not reflect the real characteristics, patterns, or behaviors of the original data, and thus may not be suitable for testing applications that rely on data quality and accuracy. According to NIST, data sanitization methods can affect the usability of data for testing purposes1. The other options are not risks introduced by using sanitized data for testing applications, but rather risks that can be mitigated by using sanitized data. Data loss, data disclosure, and breaches of compliance obligations are possible consequences of using unsanitized data that contains sensitive or confidential information. References: 2: What is Data Sanitization? | Data Erasure Methods | Imperva 3: Data sanitization techniques: Standards, practices, legislation 1: Data sanitization – Wikipedia

Performing an analysis of the change is the first step in addressing the issue of an IT employee making a change to a firewall rule outside of the change control process because it helps to understand the reason, impact, and risk of the change and to decide whether to approve, reject, or reverse it. Requiring that the change be reversed is not the first step because it may cause more disruption or damage without proper analysis and testing. Reviewing the change management process is not the first step because it does not address the specific issue or incident at hand, but rather focuses on improving the process for future changes. Reporting the event to senior management is not the first step because it does not resolve the issue or incident, but rather escalates it without sufficient information or recommendation. References: https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2018/volume-3/change-management-in-the-age-of-digital-transformation https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/

Determining the root cause of the incident is essential for preventing or minimizing the recurrence of similar incidents, as well as for identifying and implementing corrective actions to improve the security posture of the organization.

References = CISM Review Manual 2022, page 3121; CISM Exam Content Outline, Domain 4, Task 4.3

= The information security manager’s first course of action in this situation should be to conduct a risk assessment, which is a process of identifying, analyzing, and evaluating the information security risks that arise from the violation of the policy prohibiting the use of cameras at the office. The risk assessment can help to determine the likelihood and impact of the unauthorized or inappropriate use of the cameras on the smartphones and tablet computers, such as capturing, transmitting, or disclosing sensitive or confidential information, compromising the privacy or security of the employees, customers, or partners, or violating the legal or regulatory requirements. The risk assessment can also help to identify and prioritize the appropriate risk treatment options, such as implementing technical, administrative, or physical controls to disable, restrict, or monitor the camera usage, enforcing the policy compliance and awareness, or revising the policy to reflect the current business needs and environment. The risk assessment can also help to communicate and report the risk level and status to the senior management and the relevant stakeholders, and to provide feedback and recommendations for improvement and optimization of the policy and the risk management process.

Revising the policy, performing a root cause analysis, and communicating the acceptable use policy are all possible courses of action that the information security manager can take after conducting the risk assessment, but they are not the first ones. Revising the policy is a process of updating and modifying the policy to align with the business objectives and strategy, to address the changes and challenges in the business and threat environment, and to incorporate the feedback and suggestions from the risk assessment and the stakeholders. Performing a root cause analysis is a process of investigating and identifying the underlying causes and factors that led to the violation of the policy, such as the lack of awareness, training, or enforcement, the inconsistency or ambiguity of the policy, or the conflict or gap between the policy and the business requirements or expectations. Communicating the acceptable use policy is a process of informing and educating the employees and the other users of the smartphones and tablet computers about the purpose, scope, and content of the policy, the roles and responsibilities of the users, the benefits and consequences of complying or violating the policy, and the methods and channels of reporting or resolving any policy issues or incidents. References = CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, pages 51-531; CISM Practice Quiz, question 1482

Program metrics measure the effectiveness of governance processes and provide a basis for continuous improvement and informed decision-making.

“Metrics are essential for evaluating governance performance, demonstrating effectiveness, and identifying areas for improvement.”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 1: Information Security Governance, Section: Monitoring and Metrics*

ISACA’s practice questions confirm that program metrics are key to evaluating governance effectiveness.

Performing a risk assessment of the access rights is the best way to address the concern of conflicting access rights during the integration of two companies. A risk assessment will help to identify and prioritize the threats and vulnerabilities that affect the access rights of both companies, as well as the potential impact and likelihood of information exposure. A risk assessment will also provide a basis for selecting and evaluating the controls to mitigate the risks. According to NIST, a risk assessment is an essential component of risk management and should be performed before implementing any security controls1. The other options are not the best ways to address the concern of conflicting access rights during the integration of two companies, but rather possible subsequent actions based on the risk assessment. Reviewing access rights as the acquisition integration occurs may be too late or too slow to prevent information exposure. Escalating concerns for conflicting access rights to management may not be effective without evidence or recommendations from a risk assessment. Implementing consistent access control standards may not be feasible or desirable for different systems or business units. References: 1: NIST SP 800-30 Rev. 1 Guide for Conducting Risk Assessments 2: M&A integration strategy is crucial for deal success but remains difficult: PwC 3: The 10 steps to successful M&A integration | Bain & Company : Cracking the code to successful post-merger integration

Encryption tools and personal data are the most often associated with legal issues in the context of transborder flow of technology-related items because they involve the protection of privacy and security of individuals and organizations across different jurisdictions, and may be subject to different laws and regulations that govern their access, use, or transfer. Website transactions and taxation are not very often associated with legal issues in this context because they involve the exchange of goods and services and the collection of taxes across different jurisdictions, which may not be directly related to technology transfer or data flow. Software patches and corporate data are not very often associated with legal issues in this context because they involve the maintenance and improvement of software functionality and the management and sharing of business information, which may not be directly related to technology transfer or data flow. Lack of competition and free trade are not very often associated with legal issues in this context because they involve the market structure and trade policies of different jurisdictions, which may not be directly related to technology transfer or data flow. References: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/science-and-technology/oecd-declaration-on-transborder-data-flows_230240624407 https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/public/doc/108/108.en.pdf

Phishing awareness training is the best way to mitigate the risk of employees clicking on malicious links in emails, as it educates them on how to recognize and avoid phishing attempts. (From CISM Review Manual 15th Edition)

Prioritizing incidents based on data classification standards ensures that the most sensitive and critical data exposures are addressed first, reducing the potential impact on the business.

“The impact of incidents should be evaluated based on the classification and sensitivity of the data involved.”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 4: Incident Management, Section: Incident Classification and Prioritization*

ISACA practice questions emphasize the importance of using data classification to properly prioritize incident response efforts.

 The best way to proceed when an independent penetration test results show a high-rated vulnerability in a cloud-based application that is close to going live is to assess whether the vulnerability is within the organization’s risk tolerance levels. This is because the organization should not implement the application without understanding the potential impact and likelihood of the vulnerability being exploited, and the cost and benefit of fixing or mitigating the vulnerability. The organization should also consider the contractual and legal obligations, service level agreements, and performance expectations of the cloud service provider and the application users. By assessing the risk tolerance levels, the organization can make an informed and rational decision on whether to accept, transfer, avoid, or reduce the risk, and how to allocate the resources and responsibilities for managing the risk.

Implementing the application and requesting the cloud service provider to fix the vulnerability is not the best way to proceed, because it exposes the organization to unnecessary and unacceptable risk, and it may violate the terms and conditions of the cloud service contract. The organization should not rely on the cloud service provider to fix the vulnerability, as the provider may not have the same level of urgency, accountability, or capability as the organization. The organization should also not assume that the vulnerability will not be exploited, as cyberattackers may target the cloud-based application due to its high visibility, accessibility, and value.

Commissioning further penetration tests to validate initial test results is not the best way to proceed, because it may delay the implementation of the application, and it may not provide any additional or useful information. The organization should trust the results of the independent penetration test, as it is conducted by a qualified and objective third party. The organization should also not waste time and resources on conducting redundant or unnecessary tests, as it may affect the budget, schedule, and quality of the project.

Postponing the implementation until the vulnerability has been fixed is not the best way to proceed, because it may not be feasible or desirable for the organization. The organization should consider the business impact and opportunity cost of postponing the implementation, as it may affect the organization’s reputation, revenue, and customer satisfaction. The organization should also consider the technical feasibility and complexity of fixing the vulnerability, as it may require significant changes or modifications to the application or the cloud environment. The organization should not adopt a zero-risk or risk-averse approach, as it may hinder the organization’s innovation and competitiveness. References =

ISACA, CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, 2020, pages 97-98, 101-102, 105-106, 109-110.

ISACA, CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Database, 12th Edition, 2020, question ID 1025.

Reviewing the vendor contract should be the information security manager’s first course of action when discovering an HVAC vendor has remote access to the stores to enable real-time monitoring and equipment diagnostics. The vendor contract should specify the terms and conditions of the vendor’s access to the retailer’s network, such as the scope, purpose, duration, frequency, and method of access. The vendor contract should also define the roles and responsibilities of both parties regarding security, privacy, compliance, liability, and incident response. Reviewing the vendor contract will help the information security manager to understand the contractual obligations and expectations of both parties, and to identify any gaps or issues that need to be addressed or resolved1. The other options are not the first course of action for the information security manager when discovering an HVAC vendor has remote access to the stores. Conducting a penetration test of the vendor may be a useful way to assess the vendor’s security posture and potential vulnerabilities, but it should be done with the vendor’s consent and cooperation, and after reviewing the vendor contract2. Reviewing the vendor’s technical security controls may be a necessary step to verify the vendor’s compliance with security standards and best practices, but it should be done after reviewing the vendor contract and in accordance with the agreed-upon audit procedures3. Disconnecting the real-time access may be a drastic measure that could disrupt the vendor’s service delivery and violate the vendor contract, unless there is a clear and imminent threat or breach that warrants such action. References: 1: Vendor Access: Addressing the Security Challenge with Urgency - BeyondTrust 2: Penetration Testing - NIST 3: Reduce Risk from Third Party Access | BeyondTrust : Third-Party Vendor Security Risk Management & Prevention

The most important thing to include in security incident escalation procedures is notification criteria. This is because notification criteria define who needs to be informed of an incident, when, and how, depending on the severity, impact, and nature of the incident. Notification criteria help to ensure that the appropriate stakeholders are aware of the incident and can take the necessary actions to respond, mitigate, and recover from it. Notification criteria also help to comply with legal and regulatory requirements for reporting incidents to external parties, such as customers, authorities, or media.

Notification criteria define who needs to be informed of an incident, when, and how, depending on the severity, impact, and nature of the incident. (From CISM Manual or related resources)

References = CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 4, Section 4.2.2, page 2121; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual 9th Edition, Question 1, page 1

= To confirm that a third-party provider complies with an organization’s information security requirements, it is most important to ensure that the right to audit is included in the service level agreement (SLA), which is a contract that defines the scope, quality, and terms of the services that the third-party provider delivers to the organization. The right to audit is a clause that grants the organization the authority and opportunity to inspect and verify the third-party provider’s security policies, procedures, controls, and performance, either by itself or by an independent auditor, at any time during the contract period or after a security incident. The right to audit can help to ensure that the third-party provider adheres to the organization’s information security requirements, as well as to the legal and regulatory standards and obligations, and that the organization can monitor and measure the security risks and issues that arise from the outsourcing relationship. The right to audit can also help to identify and address any gaps, weaknesses, or errors that could compromise the security of the information assets and systems that are shared, stored, or processed by the third-party provider, and to provide feedback and recommendations for improvement and optimization of the security posture and performance.

Security metrics, contract clauses, and the information security policy of the third-party provider are all important elements of ensuring the compliance of the third-party provider with the organization’s information security requirements, but they are not the most important ones. Security metrics are quantitative and qualitative measures that indicate the effectiveness and efficiency of the security controls and processes that the third-party provider implements and reports to the organization, such as the number of security incidents, the time to resolve them, the level of customer satisfaction, or the compliance rate. Security metrics can help to evaluate and compare the security performance and outcomes of the third-party provider, as well as to identify and address any deviations or discrepancies from the expected or agreed levels. Contract clauses are legal and contractual terms and conditions that bind the third-party provider to the organization’s information security requirements, such as the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the information assets and systems, the roles and responsibilities of the parties, the liabilities and penalties for breach or violation, or the dispute resolution mechanisms. Contract clauses can help to enforce and protect the organization’s information security interests and rights, as well as to prevent or resolve any conflicts or issues that arise from the outsourcing relationship. The information security policy of the third-party provider is a document that defines and communicates the third-party provider’s security vision, mission, objectives, and principles, as well as the security roles, responsibilities, and rules that apply to the third-party provider’s staff, customers, and partners. The information security policy of the third-party provider can help to ensure that the third-party provider has a clear and consistent security direction and guidance, as well as to align and integrate the third-party provider’s security practices and culture with the organization’s security expectations and requirements. References = CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, pages 57-581; CISM Practice Quiz, question 1662

The lack of audit rights prevents the organization from verifying the security posture and compliance of the provider, representing a major governance and assurance gap.

“Right to audit clauses ensure that organizations retain oversight and can verify the security controls and compliance of their service providers.”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 3: Outsourced Services, Section: Third-Party Governance*

Control inadequacy can be fixed; lack of oversight cannot be tolerated.

Cybersecurity policies are the high-level statements that define the organization’s objectives, principles, and expectations for protecting its information assets from cyber threats. Cybersecurity policies provide the foundation for developing and implementing cybersecurity strategies, plans, procedures, standards, and guidelines. However, cybersecurity policies alone are not enough to ensure effective cybersecurity. The organization also needs to allocate sufficient budget resources to support the implementation and maintenance of cybersecurity controls, such as hardware, software, personnel, training, testing, auditing, and incident response. Sufficient cyber budget allocation demonstrates the organization’s commitment to cybersecurity and enables it to achieve its cybersecurity goals. References: https://www.isaca.org/credentialing/cism https://www.wiley.com/en-us/CISM+Certified+Information+Security+Manager+Study+Guide-p-9781119801948

Reputational damage is often intangible, subjective, and hard to quantify, making it the most challenging aspect to measure.

“Reputation impact is difficult to quantify and may have long-term effects that are not immediately apparent.”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 4: Incident Management, Section: Post-incident Analysis*

ISACA practice questions highlight that reputational damage is uniquely challenging to measure accurately.

An advanced persistent threat (APT) is a stealthy and sophisticated attack that aims to compromise and maintain access to a target network or system over a long period of time, often for espionage or sabotage purposes. APTs are difficult to detect by conventional security tools, such as antivirus or firewalls, that rely on signatures or rules to identify threats. Therefore, the best way to monitor for APTs is to search for anomalies in the environment, such as unusual network traffic, user behavior, file activity, or system configuration changes, that may indicate a compromise or an ongoing attack. References: https://www.isaca.org/credentialing/cism https://www.nist.gov/publications/information-security-handbook-guide-managers

Gap analysis is the MOST helpful tool for understanding where to focus efforts when developing an information security strategy for an organization, because it helps to identify the current state and the desired state of the information security governance, and the gaps between them. Gap analysis also helps to prioritize the actions and resources needed to close the gaps and achieve the information security objectives.

References =

CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, ISACA, 2020, p. 36: “Gap analysis is the process of comparing the current state and the desired state of information security governance and identifying the gaps that need to be addressed.”

CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, ISACA, 2020, p. 37: “Gap analysis should be performed periodically to assess the effectiveness and efficiency of the information security strategy and program and to identify the areas for improvement.”

CISM domain 1: Information security governance [Updated 2022] - Infosec Resources: “Gap analysis: This is a comparison of the current state of security with the desired state. It helps to identify the gaps in security and prioritize the actions required to close them.”

The best way to ensure the organization’s security objectives are embedded in business operations is to implement an information security governance framework. An information security governance framework is a set of policies, procedures, standards, guidelines, roles, and responsibilities that define and direct how the organization manages and measures its information security activities. An information security governance framework helps to align the information security strategy with the business strategy and the organizational culture, and to ensure that the information security objectives are consistent with the business objectives and the stakeholder expectations. An information security governance framework also helps to establish the authority, accountability, and communication channels for the information security function, and to provide the necessary resources, tools, and controls to implement and monitor the information security program. By implementing an information security governance framework, the organization can embed the information security objectives in business operations, and ensure that the information security function supports and enables the business processes and functions, rather than hinders or restricts them.

References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, Chapter 1: Information Security Governance, Section: Information Security Governance Framework, page 181; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual, 10th Edition, Question 75, page 702.

 An information security post-incident review is a process that aims to identify the root causes, impacts, lessons learned, and improvement actions of a security incident. The highest priority during a post-incident review should be evaluating the effectiveness of the incident response, which means assessing how well the incident response plan, procedures, roles, resources, and communication were executed and aligned with the business objectives and requirements. Evaluating the incident response effectiveness can help to identify the gaps, weaknesses, strengths, and opportunities for improvement in the incident response process and capabilities. Documenting actions taken in sufficient detail, updating key risk indicators (KRIs), and evaluating the performance of incident response team members are also important activities during a post-incident review, but they are not as critical as evaluating the incident response effectiveness, which can provide a holistic and strategic view of the incident response maturity and value.

References =

ISACA, CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, 2020, page 2411

ISACA, CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Database - 12 Month Subscription, 2020, question ID 2192

During post-incident reviews, the highest priority should be given to evaluating the effectiveness of the incident response effort. This includes assessing the accuracy of the response to the incident, the timeliness of the response, and the efficiency of the response. It is important to assess the effectiveness of the response in order to identify areas for improvement and ensure that future responses can be more effective. Documenting the actions taken in sufficient detail, updating key risk indicators (KRIs), and evaluating the performance of incident response team members are all important components of a post-incident review, but evaluating incident response effectiveness should be given the highest priority.

If the residual risk of the business activity is lower than the acceptable risk level, it means that the existing controls are effectively mitigating the identified risks. In this case, the best course of action is to monitor the effectiveness of the controls and ensure they remain effective. The information security manager should review and test the controls periodically to ensure that they continue to provide adequate protection. It is also essential to update the risk assessment framework to reflect changes in the business environment or risk landscape.

The primary goal of the eradication phase in an incident response process is to remove the threat and restore affected systems because it eliminates any traces or remnants of malicious activity or compromise from the systems or network, and returns them to their normal or secure state. Maintaining a strict chain of custody is not a goal of the eradication phase, but rather a requirement for preserving and documenting digital evidence throughout the incident response process. Providing effective triage and containment of the incident is not a goal of the eradication phase, but rather a goal of the containment phase, which isolates and stops the spread of malicious activity or compromise. Obtaining forensic evidence from the affected system is not a goal of the eradication phase, but rather a goal of the identification phase, which collects and analyzes data or artifacts related to malicious activity or compromise. References: https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2017/volume-5/incident-response-lessons-learned https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2018/volume-3/incident-response-lessons-learned

The first thing that an information security manager should do upon confirming a privileged user’s unauthorized modifications to a security application is to enforce the security configuration and require the change to be reverted. This is because the unauthorized modification may have compromised the security of the application and the data it protects, and may have violated the security policies and standards of the organization. By enforcing the security configuration and requiring the change to be reverted, the information security manager can restore the security posture of the application and prevent further unauthorized modifications.

Information security due diligence is the process of assessing the current state of information security in an organization, identifying any gaps, risks, or vulnerabilities, and estimating the costs and efforts required to remediate them. Performing information security due diligence prior to making the purchase is important to determine the security exposures that may affect the value, reputation, or liability of the organization, as well as the feasibility and compatibility of integrating the security systems and processes of the two organizations.

References = CISM Review Manual 2022, page 361; CISM Exam Content Outline, Domain 1, Task 1.22; Information Security Due Diligence Questionnair

The Information Security Manager's primary responsibility is to ensure that the organization's information assets are adequately protected. In this scenario, there is a conflict between the approved mobile access policy and industry best practices. Developing security standards based on a flawed policy could lead to significant security vulnerabilities.

Why the other options are not the best course of action:

A. Align the standards with the organizational policy: This would perpetuate the misalignment with best practices, potentially leaving the organization exposed to risks.

B. Align the standards with industry best practices: While this is ideal from a security perspective, it directly contradicts the approved policy, which could create operational and compliance issues.

D. Perform a cost-benefit analysis of aligning the standards to policy: A cost-benefit analysis might be useful at some point, but it does not address the fundamental issue of a policy that is not in line with best practices.

Key CISM Principles Reflected:

Alignment with Organizational Objectives: Security standards and policies should support and enable the organization's business objectives.

Risk Management: Identifying, assessing, and mitigating risks are essential elements of information security management.

Governance: Effective governance ensures that information security activities are aligned with the organization's strategies and objectives.

In summary: The Information Security Manager should proactively engage senior management to highlight the discrepancy between the approved policy and industry best practices. The goal is to revise the policy to ensure it adequately addresses security risks while supporting the organization's objectives. Once the policy is aligned with best practices, the security standards can be developed accordingly.

Compartmentalization is the best defense-in-depth implementation for protecting high value assets or for handling environments that have trust concerns because it is a strategy that divides the network or system into smaller segments or compartments, each with its own security policies, controls, and access rules. Compartmentalization helps to isolate and protect the most sensitive or critical data and functions from unauthorized or malicious access, as well as to limit the damage or impact of a breach or compromise. Compartmentalization also helps to enforce the principle of least privilege, which grants users or processes only the minimum access rights they need to perform their tasks. Therefore, compartmentalization is the correct answer.

Performing post-incident reviews is the best way to enhance training for incident response teams because it allows them to identify the strengths and weaknesses of their response, learn from the lessons and best practices, and implement corrective actions and improvement plans for future incidents. Post-incident reviews also help to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of the incident response process and procedures, and to update them as needed.

A brute force attack is a type of cyberattack that attempts to gain unauthorized access to an account, file, or other protected information by trying different combinations of usernames and passwords until finding the correct one. Brute force attacks can be very effective if the target system has weak or default passwords, or if the attacker has access to a large number of potential credentials. To mitigate this risk, an organization should implement multi-factor authentication (MFA) for its critical systems. MFA is a security method that requires users to provide more than one piece of evidence to verify their identity before accessing a system or service. For example, MFA can involve using a password in addition to a code sent to a phone or email, or using a biometric factor such as a fingerprint or face scan. MFA can significantly reduce the impact of brute force attacks by making it harder for attackers to guess or obtain valid credentials, and by increasing the time and effort required for them to compromise the system. References = CISM Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 3: Information Security Risk Management, Section 3.1: Risk Identification, p. 115-1161. CISM Review Manual (Print Version), Chapter 3: Information Security Risk Management, Section 3.1: Risk Identification, p. 115-1162. CISM ITEM DEVELOPMENT GUIDE, Domain 3: Information Security Program Development and Management, Task Statement 3.1, p. 193.

The Recovery Time Objective (RTO) specifies the maximum acceptable downtime before operations must resume. A 30-minute requirement directly defines the RTO for those systems.

“RTO defines the duration within which systems must be restored following an outage to prevent unacceptable business impact.”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 3: Business Continuity Planning, Section: Continuity Metrics*

The organizational risk register is the most useful for an information security manager when determining the need to escalate an incident to senior management because it contains a list of identified risks to the organization, their likelihood and impact, and their predefined risk thresholds or targets, which can help the information security manager assess the severity and urgency of the incident and decide whether it requires senior management’s attention or action. Incident management procedures are not very useful for this purpose because they do not provide any specific criteria or guidance on when to escalate an incident to senior management. Incident management policy is not very useful for this purpose because it does not provide any specific criteria or guidance on when to escalate an incident to senior management. System risk assessment is not very useful for this purpose because it does not reflect the current risk exposure or status of the organization as a whole. References: https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2016/volume-6/how-to-measure-the-effectiveness-of-information-security-using-iso-27004 https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2017/volume-5/incident-response-lessons-learned

“A successful security program requires management support and involvement. One of the key aspects of management support is to decide on the value of assets and the acceptable level of risk for them. This will help define the security objectives and priorities for the program. The other options are possible activities within a security program, but they are not as important as management decision on asset value.”