Cisco 350-101 Dumps Questions Answers

On Cisco Catalyst 9800 Series WLCs running IOS XE 17.x, WLAN-specific client management parameters are configured under thewlan configuration context. To increase the number of client connections on the XYZ-Guest WLAN, the correct command iswlan XYZ-Guest 1 XYZ-Guest client association limit 50(orclient max-association 50depending on IOS XE version), which explicitly sets the maximum number of clients allowed per AP on this WLAN. To extend session durations and prevent frequent disconnections, theclient session timeoutcommand is applied under the same WLAN context with the desired timeout in seconds, e.g.,wlan XYZ-Guest 1 XYZ-Guest client session timeout 2800.

Profile-based session commands (options B and D) are part of wireless policy profiles, which define broader policy elements like QoS, radio settings, and security, butdo not directly enforce client association limits or session timeouts on the WLAN itself. Configuring these parameters at the WLAN level ensures that all APs associated with this WLAN apply the limits and timeout settings consistently. This approach aligns with Cisco best practices forClient Connectivity Configuration — WLAN client limits, session management, and IOS XE WLC optimization for guest networks.

The failure is occurring during WPA/WPA2 key management, not during mobility anchoring. The radioactive trace showsFailed to validate eapol mic. MIC mismatchfollowed byFailed to validate eapol key m2, which means the authenticator and supplicant derived different key material during the PSK handshake. Cisco’s Catalyst 9800 client-connectivity troubleshooting maps this log pattern directly to a wrong password condition and lists the corrective actions as fixing the password on the endpoint or on the SSID/WLAN. The11r MIC validation failedphrase does not automatically make 802.11r the root cause; it only shows that the failed MIC validation occurred while Fast Transition key logic was in use. Disabling 802.11r would be a workaround only for client capability or FT interoperability issues, but the trace points to PSK mismatch. Removing the anchor WLC would break the intended DMZ anchoring design, and matching WLANs on foreign and anchor is required for anchor deployments, but it would not produce this EAPOL M2 MIC failure. The correct remediation is to ensure the client-entered PSK matches the WLAN PSK. Reference topics: WPA/WPA2-PSK authentication, EAPOL 4-way handshake, Catalyst 9800 radioactive trace analysis, and client connectivity troubleshooting.

The correct authentication method isEAP-TLS. WPA2-Enterprise uses 802.1X/EAP authentication rather than a pre-shared key, and the supplicant, authenticator, and RADIUS authentication server participate in the enterprise authentication exchange. Cisco documentation states that in enterprise WPA/WPA2 operation, 802.1X/EAP is used for authentication and provides strong authentication between the client and authentication server.

The decisive requirement in the question iscertificate-based mutual authentication requiring both client and server certificates. Cisco explicitly describes EAP-TLS as requiring both server-side and client-side certificates, while PEAP requires only a server-side certificate and normally authenticates the client with password-based credentials inside the protected tunnel. Cisco Secure ACS documentation also states that EAP-TLS uses the certificates of the authentication server and the end-user client, enforcing mutual authentication.

MSCHAPv2 is a password-based inner authentication method, not certificate-based mutual authentication. PEAP protects credential exchange with a server certificate but does not inherently require a client certificate. TEAP can support flexible tunneled authentication, but the strict client-and-server certificate requirement maps directly toEAP-TLS. Reference topic:Client Connectivity Configuration — WPA2-Enterprise, 802.1X supplicant configuration, EAP methods, certificates, and RADIUS authentication.