CGEIT Certified in the Governance of Enterprise IT Exam Questions and Answers

The BEST way to decide how to prioritize issues identified in an IT risk and control self-assessment (CSA) is to understand the risk and the impact to the enterprise. A CSA is a process of identifying, analyzing, and evaluating the potential threats and impacts that could affect the IT objectives, processes, and resources of an organization1. A CSA can help to determine the actions and resources needed to bridge the gaps and achieve the desired outcomes2. To prioritize the issues identified in a CSA, it is important to understand the risk and the impact to the enterprise. The risk is the measure of the likelihood and severity of an adverse event occurring and its consequences on the organization3. The impact is the measure of the extent and magnitude of the harm or damage that an adverse event can cause to the organization, such as financial loss, operational disruption, reputational damage, legal liability, etc.4. By understanding the risk and the impact to the enterprise, the issues can be prioritized based on their importance and urgency, and the most appropriate and effective solutions can be implemented.

IT resource staffing requirements are the human resources needed to deliver IT services and support business objectives. Periodically evaluating IT resource staffing requirements is important to ensure the enterprise has sufficient resources to address changing business and IT needs, such as new projects, technologies, regulations, or customer expectations12. By assessing the current and future demand and supply of IT skills and competencies, the enterprise can identify any gaps or surpluses and plan accordingly to optimize IT performance and value34. The other options are not the primary reason for periodically evaluating IT resource staffing requirements, although they may be related or beneficial outcomes. Ascertaining the IT function has sufficient skilled staff to maintain daily operations, verifying that human resource recruitment and retention processes meet enterprise IT objectives, and confirming IT-related responsibilities are defined for the enterprise’s business and IT staff are all part of the IT resource staffing management process, but they are not the main driver or purpose of it34. References:

• 3: https://www.aihr.com/blog/staffing-planning/
• 1: https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/people-and-organizational-performance/our-insights/the-organization-blog/the-future-of-the-workplace-embracing-change-and-fostering-connectivity
• 2: https://www.ccl.org/articles/leading-effectively-articles/adaptability-1-idea-3-facts-5-tips/
• 4: https://www.indeed.com/career-advice/career-development/staffing-plan

This is because enterprise risk appetite is the amount and type of risk that an organization is willing and able to accept in pursuit of its objectives. It reflects the organization’s risk culture, strategy, and values. When implementing an emerging technology with unclear regulatory and compliance requirements, the organization should consider its risk appetite and tolerance, as well as the potential benefits, costs, and impacts of the technology. The organization should also assess the likelihood and severity of the regulatory and compliance risks, and implement appropriate controls and mitigation measures to manage them within acceptable levels.

Some of the sources that support this answer are:

• 1: This source provides a comprehensive guide on how to navigate the hype and risk of emerging technologies. It suggests that organizations should define their risk appetite and tolerance for adopting emerging technologies, and conduct a balanced risk and benefit assessment before making any decisions.
• 2: This source discusses the challenges and best practices for mitigating emerging technology risk. It recommends that organizations should align their emerging technology strategy with their enterprise risk appetite, and establish a governance framework that covers the identification, evaluation, response, and monitoring of emerging technology risks.
• 3: This source defines enterprise risk appetite and explains its importance for effective risk management. It also provides some guidance on how to develop, communicate, and monitor enterprise risk appetite statements.

The greatest consideration when evaluating whether to comply with new carbon footprint regulations impacted by blockchain technology is the enterprise's risk appetite. This involves understanding the level of risk the organization is willing to accept in relation to the potential environmental impact and regulatory compliance requirements associated with blockchain technology. The organization's risk appetite guides decision-making processes, influencing whether to invest in more sustainable practices or technologies, or to accept the risks associated with non-compliance. While the organizational structure, IT process capability maturity, and the IT strategic plan are relevant, the risk appetite is the key factor in determining the approach to compliance with environmental regulations.

 The next course of action in response to the CIO’s concern is to assess the risk associated with the device. This means that the CIO should evaluate the potential impact and likelihood of security threats posed by the device, such as data leakage, unauthorized access, malware infection, or privacy violation. The CIO should also consider the benefits and drawbacks of allowing or banning such devices, such as productivity, innovation, user satisfaction, or compliance. A risk assessment can help the CIO to make an informed decision based on facts and evidence, rather than assumptions or emotions. A risk assessment can also provide a basis for defining a risk mitigation strategy, updating the acceptable use policy, or researching competitor usage of similar devices. References := 10 security risks of wearables | CSO Online, Wearable Devices are on the Rise, Presenting New Security Risks, Common privacy and security vulnerabilities in wearable devices, Wearables Device Data Security & Protection | Voler Systems

The key risk indicator (KRI) that would be of most interest to the CIO of a financial institution with a highly regarded reputation for protecting customer interests that has recently deployed a mobile payments program is the total volume of suspicious transactions. This KRI measures the number and value of transactions that are flagged as potentially fraudulent, malicious, or erroneous by the mobile payments system or by the customers. This KRI reflects the level of security and reliability of the mobile payments program, as well as the customer trust and satisfaction. A high volume of suspicious transactions indicates a high risk of financial losses, reputational damage, regulatory penalties, and customer attrition for the financial institution. Therefore, the CIO should monitor this KRI closely and take appropriate actions to prevent or mitigate any incidents that may compromise the mobile payments program

 A balanced scorecard (BSC) is a tool that helps measure and communicate the performance of an organization or a function in relation to its strategy and objectives. A BSC typically includes four perspectives: financial, customer, internal process, and learning and growth. A BSC can help a CIO to make improvements to the enterprise’s IT governance by defining the IT vision, mission, goals, and metrics that align with the business needs and expectations. A BSC can also help demonstrate the expected benefits from proposed changes by showing how they will affect the IT performance indicators and outcomes in each perspective. A BSC can provide a clear and comprehensive picture of the current and desired state of IT governance, as well as the gaps and opportunities for improvement. 

Before implementing an information architecture that restricts access to data based on sensitivity, the enterprise must establish the classification and ownership of the data. Classification is the process of tagging data according to its type, sensitivity, and value to the organization if altered, stolen, or destroyed. It helps the organization understand the risk and impact of data breaches and comply with relevant regulations. Ownership is the process of assigning roles and responsibilities for data creation, maintenance, protection, and disposal. It helps the organization ensure accountability and governance of data throughout its lifecycle

The most important thing for a data steward to verify when a system’s data is edited by an automated tool to fix an incident is that the change maintains consistency among databases and has no other impacts. Data consistency is a dimension of data quality that describes the data’s uniformity as it moves across applications and networks and when it comes from multiple sources1. Data is considered consistent if two or more values in different locations are identical and do not conflict1. Data consistency is related to data integrity and data currency1. To ensure data consistency, some steps include data governance, automated data integration, and regular data audits and quality control checks1. If the automated tool changes the data in one database, but not in others, it can create inconsistencies and errors that affect the reliability and usability of the data. Similarly, if the automated tool changes the data in a way that affects other processes or systems that depend on the data, it can cause disruptions and failures that impact the business operations and performance. Therefore, the data steward should verify that the change is consistent and has no other impacts before approving it.

The other options are not as important as verifying the data consistency and impact of the change. Requesting and approving the change by the business department and the data owner is a good practice, but not a verification step. Documenting the change in preparation for future audits is a necessary step, but not a verification step. Addressing the permanent solution for the incident by problem management is a relevant step, but not a verification step. References := What is Data Quality - Definition, Dimensions … - Simplilearn

The best way to ensure that security risk is properly addressed when implementing an information security policy exception process is to confirm process owners’ acceptance of residual risk. Residual risk is the risk that remains after applying controls or mitigating measures to reduce the original risk1. Process owners are the individuals or groups that are responsible for the design, execution, and performance of a business process2. By confirming process owners’ acceptance of residual risk, the enterprise can ensure that the security risk associated with the policy exception is understood, acknowledged, and agreed upon by the relevant stakeholders. This can also help to assign accountability and liability for the potential consequences of the policy exception, as well as to monitor and review the risk level and the effectiveness of the controls or mitigating measures. The other options are not as effective as confirming process owners’ acceptance of residual risk for ensuring that security risk is properly addressed when implementing an information security policy exception process. Performing an internal and external network penetration test is a useful technique for identifying and exploiting vulnerabilities in the network infrastructure, but it does not address the specific security risk related to the policy exception. Obtaining IT security approval on security policy exceptions is a necessary step for validating and authorizing the policy exception, but it does not ensure that the process owners are aware of and accept the residual risk. Benchmarking policy against industry best practice is a good practice for comparing and improving the policy quality and performance, but it does not address the security risk associated with the policy exception.

The CIO’s first step in deciding the appropriate response to the new regulatory requirement should be to consult with legal and risk experts to understand the requirements. This step is important because the legal and risk experts can provide the CIO with the relevant and accurate information about the new regulation, such as its scope, objectives, implications, and deadlines. The legal and risk experts can also advise the CIO on the potential risks and impacts of non-compliance, as well as the best practices and strategies for compliance .

The other options are not the first step in deciding the appropriate response to the new regulatory requirement, but rather subsequent steps that depend on the outcome of the consultation with the legal and risk experts. Revising initiatives that are active to reflect the new requirements is a step that occurs after the CIO has understood the requirements and assessed their impact on the current IT-enabled business activities. Confirming there are adequate resources to mitigate compliance requirements is a step that occurs after the CIO has identified and prioritized the actions and tasks needed to achieve compliance. Consulting with the board for guidance on the new requirements is a step that occurs after the CIO has developed and proposed a feasible and effective compliance plan.

References: : How to Respond to Regulatory Changes - Smartsheet : Regulatory Change Management: A Guide for Compliance Teams | LogicGate

The best way to address the risk associated with new IT investments is to integrate security requirements at the beginning of projects. This means that security is considered as a key factor in the planning, design, development and testing phases of IT projects. By doing so, organizations can ensure that security is built into the IT solutions, rather than added as an afterthought. This can help to prevent or reduce security vulnerabilities, breaches, incidents and costs. Integrating security requirements at the beginning of projects is also consistent with the IT risk management frameworks that recommend a proactive and preventive approach to IT risk management12. References := Proactive IT Risk Management in an Era of Emerging Technologies, IT Risk Management Process & Frameworks

The executive team consists of the senior leaders of the enterprise, such as the CEO, CFO, COO, etc. They are responsible for setting the vision, mission, goals, and strategy of the enterprise, and for overseeing its performance and governance. The CIO is part of the executive team and should align the IT strategic plan with the enterprise business objectives. Therefore, the CIO would be most effective by starting the interview process with the executive team, as they can provide the most relevant and authoritative input on the enterprise’s direction, priorities, challenges, and expectations. The executive team can also help the CIO gain support and approval for the IT strategic plan from other stakeholders, such as the internal auditors, senior IT managers, and business process owners. References: ISACA, Reporting Cybersecurity Risk to the Board of Directors, page 81. ISACA, Performance Measurement Metrics for IT Governance, page 1

According to the CGEIT exam content outline1, one of the subtopics under the domain of Risk Optimization is “Risk Ownership and Accountability”. This subtopic covers the process of assigning and communicating the roles and responsibilities for risk management to the appropriate stakeholders, such as business owners, process owners, or risk owners. Risk ownership is the best way to enable effective enterprise risk management (ERM), as it ensures that the risks are identified, assessed, treated, monitored, and reported by the people who have the authority, knowledge, and interest to manage them. Risk ownership also fosters a risk-aware culture and promotes accountability and transparency for risk management23.

The other options are not as effective as risk ownership to enable ERM. A risk register is a tool that records and tracks the information about the risks, such as their description, category, impact, likelihood, status, and action plan. A risk register is useful for documenting and communicating the risks, but it does not ensure that the risks are managed properly by the responsible parties4. A risk tolerance is a measure that defines the acceptable level of variation from the expected outcome or objective. A risk tolerance is important for setting the boundaries and criteria for risk management, but it does not guarantee that the risks are aligned with the business strategy and objectives5. A risk training is a program that provides education and awareness on risk management concepts, methods, and tools. A risk training is beneficial for enhancing the skills and competencies of the risk management staff and stakeholders, but it does not ensure that they perform their roles and responsibilities effectively6.

References: 1: CGEIT Exam Content Outline | ISACA1 2: Risk Ownership - ISACA2 3: Risk Ownership: The First Step in Enterprise Risk Management - ERM3 4: What Is a Risk Register? Explanation & Free Template - ProjectManager.com 5: What Is Risk Tolerance? Definition & Examples - Talend 6: IT Risk Management Training | ISACA

Principles and policies are the best way to convey IT governance direction and objectives, as they provide a clear and consistent framework for decision making, behavior, and actions in the organization. Principles are the fundamental statements that guide the IT governance process and reflect the values and beliefs of the organization. Policies are the specific rules and procedures that implement the principles and ensure compliance with the IT governance objectives12.

Skills and competencies are the abilities and knowledge that enable the IT staff to perform their roles and responsibilities effectively. They are important for achieving IT governance objectives, but they do not convey them directly. Skills and competencies are developed through training, education, and experience3.

Corporate culture is the shared set of norms, beliefs, and values that influence the behavior and attitudes of the organization’s members. Corporate culture can support or hinder IT governance, depending on how well it aligns with the IT governance objectives. Corporate culture is influenced by leadership, communication, and incentives4.

Business processes are the activities and tasks that deliver value to the organization’s customers and stakeholders. Business processes are aligned with the IT governance objectives to ensure efficiency, effectiveness, and quality. Business processes are designed, executed, monitored, and improved using various methods and tools5.

References: 1: What is IT governance? A formal way to align IT & business strategy | CIO1 2: IT Governance: Definition, Frameworks, and Best Practices - InvGate2 3: IT Governance Framework in ITSM - KnowledgeHut4 4: Corporate governance of information technology - Wikipedia3 5: What Is IT Governance? Definition, Practices and Frameworks5

 According to the CGEIT certification guide, key risk indicators (KRIs) are the best way to provide ongoing assurance that significant IT risk is being proactively monitored and does not exceed agreed risk tolerance levels. KRIs are metrics that measure the likelihood or impact of potential or actual risks, and provide early warning signals of increasing risk exposures1. KRIs can help IT management to track and report the status and trends of IT risks, and to trigger timely responses and actions when the risk levels approach or exceed the predefined thresholds2. The other options are less suitable than option C, as they do not provide ongoing assurance or proactive monitoring of IT risk. An IT risk appetite statement is a document that expresses the amount and type of risk that an organization is willing to take in order to meet their strategic objectives3. A risk management policy is a document that defines the principles, framework, and processes for managing risks in an organization. A risk register is a tool that records and tracks the identified risks, their causes, impacts, likelihood, responses, and owners.

References :=

• CGEIT certification guide, domain 3: Risk Optimization, section 3.4: Risk Monitoring and Assurance, page 98.
• Key Risk Indicators (KRIs) - Definition from KWHS
• Risk Appetite - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
• Risk Management Policy - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
• Risk Register - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics

A risk register is a tool that records and tracks the risks associated with a project or an activity, such as developing consumer-based services using emerging technologies involving sensitive personal data. A risk register typically includes information such as the risk description, category, impact, probability, status, response strategy, and owner. Reviewing the risk register will enable the CIO to make the best decision for the customers, as it will help them to identify, assess, and prioritize the risks that may affect the security, privacy, and quality of the services, and to determine the appropriate actions to mitigate or avoid them. The other options are not as relevant, as they do not provide specific information about the risks involved in the project or activity. References: : CGEIT Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 4: Risk Optimization, Section 4.3: IT Risk Management, Subsection 4.3.2: IT Risk Management Process, Page 156 : CGEIT Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 4: Risk Optimization, Section 4.3: IT Risk Management, Subsection 4.3.3: IT Risk Management Techniques and Tools, Page 158 : Capability Maturity Model and Risk Register Integration1

The security status of a new business acquisition is a critical factor that can affect the value, performance, and reputation of the acquiring company. Therefore, it is essential to conduct a thorough IT risk assessment of the target company as part of the overall due diligence process. An IT risk assessment can help to identify and evaluate the current and potential cybersecurity threats, vulnerabilities, and controls in the target company’s IT environment, as well as the compliance with relevant laws and regulations. An IT risk assessment can also help to estimate the costs and efforts required to remediate any security gaps or issues, and to align the security policies and standards of both parties. By integrating IT risk assessment into the due diligence process, the acquiring company can make informed decisions about the feasibility, valuation, and integration of the new business acquisition12. References: Due diligence for Mergers and Acquisitions through a cybersecurity lens. Microsoft Security tips for mitigating risk in mergers and acquisitions.

 When introducing the concept of governance to the new acquisition, it is most important that executive management recognize the impact of cultural changes. This is because culture can influence how people understand and practice governance, and how they respond to different governance frameworks and policies1. Culture can also change over time, either by choice or by external factors, and this can affect the governance arrangements of an organization2. Therefore, executive management needs to be aware of the cultural differences and similarities between the multinational enterprise and the new acquisition, and how they can affect the governance objectives, processes, and outcomes. Executive management also needs to respect and value the cultural diversity of the new acquisition, and foster a culture of trust, collaboration, and alignment3. References: How corporate culture affects governance - The CEO Magazine3, Governance | Diversity of Cultural Expressions - UNESCO4, 2.0 Culture and governance - AIGI

The primary goal of an IT risk optimization process from a governance perspective is to ensure that the impact of IT risk to the enterprise is managed in alignment with the enterprise risk management (ERM) framework and the enterprise objectives. IT risk optimization is not only about defining thresholds, approving strategies or mapping metrics, but about ensuring that IT risk is effectively mitigated, monitored and communicated to support the achievement of enterprise goals. References := CGEIT Exam Content Outline, Domain 4: Risk Optimization1; Certified in Governance of Enterprise IT (CGEIT) Course, Learning Tree2

 An IT investment portfolio is a collection of IT projects, programs, and services that are funded and implemented by an enterprise to achieve its strategic and operational objectives. An IT investment portfolio should be reviewed first to ensure IT congruence with the new business strategy, as it would help to align the IT investments with the business goals, priorities, and needs. A review of the IT investment portfolio would also help to identify and evaluate the current and planned IT initiatives, assess their costs, benefits, risks, and value, and optimize the allocation of IT resources and capabilities. The other options are not as relevant, as they are more related to the execution or delivery of IT activities, rather than the planning or direction of them. References: : CGEIT Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 3: Benefits Realization, Section 3.2: IT Investment Management, Subsection 3.2.1: IT Investment Management Overview, Page 97 : CGEIT Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 3: Benefits Realization, Section 3.2: IT Investment Management, Subsection 3.2.4: IT Investment Management Process, Page 104 : The Power of IT Investment Risk Quantification and Visualization: IT Portfolio Management

 Communicating the program to stakeholders to gain consensus is the first step after developing the scope of the IT governance program, as it helps to ensure that the program is aligned with the enterprise goals and objectives, and that it has the support and commitment of the key parties who have an interest or influence in the IT governance. Communication also helps to overcome resistance, address concerns, and foster collaboration among the stakeholders12. References := CGEIT Exam Content Outline, Domain 1, Subtopic A: Governance Framework, Task 3: Ensure that stakeholder needs, conditions and options are evaluated to determine balanced, agreed-on enterprise objectives to be achieved; setting direction through prioritization and decision making; and monitoring performance and compliance against agreed-on direction and objectives.

A business impact analysis (BIA) is a process of predicting the organizational and financial impact of business disruptions, such as vendor system failures. A BIA can help the CIO to prepare for this concern by identifying the critical business processes, the potential effects of disruption, and the recovery requirements and strategies. A BIA can also help the CIO to prioritize the resources and actions needed to restore the normal operations as quickly as possible1. A BIA is an essential component of business continuity planning (BCP) and disaster recovery planning (DRP)2.

An IT balanced scorecard is a tool that measures and monitors the performance of IT in relation to the strategic goals and objectives of the organization. An IT balanced scorecard can help the CIO to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of IT, but it does not address the impact of business disruptions or the recovery plans.

Service-level metrics are indicators that measure and report the quality and availability of IT services delivered to the customers or users. Service-level metrics can help the CIO to track and improve the service delivery, but they do not assess the impact of business disruptions or the recovery plans.

An IT procurement policy is a document that defines the rules and procedures for acquiring IT products and services from external vendors. An IT procurement policy can help the CIO to manage the vendor relationships, contracts, and risks, but it does not analyze the impact of business disruptions or the recovery plans. References: How To Conduct Business Impact Analysis in 8 Easy Steps. The Top 10 Vendor Risks & How to Manage Them. What is FMEA? Failure Mode & Effects Analysis. Definition of Business Impact Analysis (BIA). [IT Balanced Scorecard: Definition, Frameworks, Examples]. [Service Level Metrics: Definition, Types, Examples]. [IT Procurement Policy: Definition, Components, Examples].

Applying behavioral change management is the greatest challenge to implementing IT governance, as it involves changing the culture, mindset, and behavior of the people who are affected by or involved in IT governance. IT governance is not just a technical or procedural issue, but also a human and organizational one. Therefore, it requires effective communication, education, motivation, and leadership to ensure that the stakeholders understand, accept, and support the IT governance objectives, principles, and practices. The other options are not as challenging, as they can be addressed by following established methods, frameworks, and standards for IT governance. References: : CGEIT Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 1: Governance of Enterprise IT, Section 1.2: IT Governance Frameworks and Standards, Subsection 1.2.1: IT Governance Frameworks and Standards Overview, Page 17 : CGEIT Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 1: Governance of Enterprise IT, Section 1.4: Implementing and Maintaining an IT Governance Framework, Subsection 1.4.2: Implementing an IT Governance Framework, Page 29 : CGEIT Preparation Tips and the Timelessness of Good Governance1

 IT governance is a framework that provides a formal structure for organizations to ensure that IT investments support business objectives. The primary reason for an enterprise to adopt an IT governance framework is to assure that IT sustains and extends the enterprise strategies and objectives, by aligning IT with business needs, optimizing IT performance and value, managing IT risks and resources, and measuring IT outcomes and benefits12. References: ISACA, CGEIT Review Manual, 7th Edition, 2019, page 15. What Is IT Governance? Definition, Practices and Frameworks. IT Governance: Definition, Frameworks, and Best Practices.

 Repeatability is the most immediate outcome of defining all IT processes within the enterprise, as it ensures that the processes can be performed consistently and reliably by different people or teams, following the same steps and procedures. Repeatability also enables the measurement and improvement of IT processes over time12. References := CGEIT Exam Content Outline, Domain 1, Subtopic A: Governance Framework, Task 2: Ensure that IT governance is aligned with the enterprise governance framework and is integrated into the enterprise governance approach.

Business management involvement as IT strategies are developed is the best indication of effective IT-business strategic alignment, because it ensures that the IT strategies are aligned with the business goals, needs, and expectations, and that the business stakeholders have a clear understanding and ownership of the IT initiatives. Business management involvement can also facilitate the communication, collaboration, and coordination between the IT and business functions, and help resolve any conflicts or issues that may arise during the IT strategy development process. Business management involvement can also foster a culture of trust, mutual respect, and shared vision between the IT and business functions, and enhance the value proposition and performance of the IT strategies. References := IT Strategic Planning and Alignment: Best Practices, What Is “IT-Business Alignment”?, Aligning IT and Business Strategy for Project Success

 According to the CGEIT certification guide, the most effective approach to ensure senior management sponsorship of IT risk management is to integrate IT risk into enterprise risk management (ERM). This is because ERM is a holistic and strategic approach that considers all types of risks that may affect the achievement of the enterprise’s objectives. By integrating IT risk into ERM, senior management can better understand the impact and interdependencies of IT risks on the enterprise’s performance and value, and can provide more effective oversight and guidance to the IT risk management processes1. The other options are less effective than option D, as they do not address the alignment and integration of IT risk with the enterprise’s strategy and objectives. References:= CGEIT certification guide, domain 3: Risk Optimization, section 3.1: Risk Governance, page 86.

Ensuring the commitment of stakeholders is the most important consideration to effectively influence organizational and process change, as it involves engaging and communicating with the key parties who have an interest or influence in the IT governance structure. Stakeholder commitment can help to overcome resistance, gain support, and ensure alignment and collaboration among the enterprise units1. Stakeholder commitment can also facilitate the adoption and implementation of the IT governance framework, policies, and standards . References := CGEIT Exam Content Outline, Domain 1, Subtopic A: Governance Framework, Task 3: Ensure that stakeholder needs, conditions and options are evaluated to determine balanced, agreed-on enterprise objectives to be achieved; setting direction through prioritization and decision making; and monitoring performance and compliance against agreed-on direction and objectives.

Business innovation is the process of creating new or improved products, services, processes, or business models that create value for the organization and its customers. IT can enable business innovation by providing the tools, platforms, data, and capabilities that support the generation, implementation, and diffusion of innovative ideas. However, IT alone cannot drive business innovation; it requires a close collaboration and alignment between IT and business. Therefore, IT participation in business strategy development is the best way to enable business innovation through IT, because it can help to ensure that IT understands the business goals and needs, that IT contributes to the identification and evaluation of opportunities and challenges, that IT provides feasible and effective solutions and recommendations, and that IT supports the execution and monitoring of the innovation initiatives123. References: How to Drive Business Innovation Through IT. How to Enable Business Innovation with IT. Business Innovation: What It Is and How to Achieve It.

The best way to ensure the continued usefulness of IT governance reports for stakeholders is to establish a standard process for providing feedback. This means that the organization should define and communicate the purpose, scope, format, frequency, and distribution of the IT governance reports, and solicit input from the stakeholders on how well the reports meet their information needs and expectations. The feedback process should also include mechanisms for collecting, analyzing, and acting on the feedback, as well as reporting back to the stakeholders on the changes made or planned. This will help to ensure that the IT governance reports are relevant, accurate, timely, and consistent, and that they support the decision-making and accountability of the stakeholders

The responsibility that should be retained within an enterprise when outsourcing a project management office (PMO) function is selecting projects. This is because selecting projects is a strategic decision that involves aligning the project portfolio with the enterprise goals, vision, and mission. Selecting projects also requires understanding the business needs, priorities, and value proposition of each project, as well as the available resources, risks, and opportunities. These are aspects that the enterprise should have more knowledge and authority over than the outsourced PMO provider. Outsourcing the project selection process may result in a loss of control, alignment, and accountability for the enterprise. Therefore, selecting projects is a responsibility that should be retained within an enterprise when outsourcing a PMO function.

References: Build the Next Gen PMO by Outsourcing - Project Management Institute1, How to Outsource a PMO: Your Options and Which Will Suit Your Business - PM Majik2, What is an Outsourced PMO and How Does it Work? - PM Majik3

The best course of action for the CIO in this scenario is to identify business risk appetite and tolerance levels. Risk appetite is the amount and type of risk that an organization is willing to pursue, retain, or take in order to achieve its strategic objectives. Risk tolerance is the acceptable level of variation from the risk appetite. By identifying the business risk appetite and tolerance levels, the CIO can align the IT strategy and operations with the business goals, needs, and expectations, and ensure that the IT risks are managed within the acceptable boundaries. Identifying the business risk appetite and tolerance levels can also help the CIO to communicate and justify the IT decisions and actions to the senior management, board, and stakeholders, and to balance the costs and benefits of IT investments and initiatives. According to CPG 235 – Managing Data Risk, “The adequacy of data controls in ensuring that a regulated entity operates within its risk appetite would normally be assessed as part of introducing new business processes and then on a regular basis thereafter (or following material change to either the process, usage of data, internal controls or external environments).”

The next step for the IT organization when they receive news that the branches in a country where the impact to the enterprise is to be greatest are being sold is to adjust the ERP implementation plan and budget. This means that the IT organization should assess the implications of the sale on the ERP transformation objectives, scope, timeline, resources, costs, and risks. The IT organization should also communicate with the relevant stakeholders, such as the business units, the vendors, and the buyers, to coordinate and align the ERP activities with the sale process. The IT organization should then revise the ERP implementation plan and budget to reflect the changes and ensure that the ERP transformation delivers value to the remaining enterprise

A business case evaluation is the best input for prioritizing strategic IT improvement initiatives because it provides a clear and objective assessment of the costs, benefits, risks, and value of each initiative. A business case evaluation helps to compare different options and select the ones that align with the organization’s goals, strategy, and budget. A business case evaluation also helps to justify the investment and secure the support and approval from the stakeholders.

A business dependency assessment is a process that identifies the critical business functions and processes that rely on IT services and resources. It helps to determine the impact of IT disruptions or failures on the business continuity and recovery. A business dependency assessment is useful for IT risk management and disaster recovery planning, but not for prioritizing strategic IT improvement initiatives.

A business process analysis is a method that examines the current state of the business processes, identifies the gaps, inefficiencies, and opportunities for improvement, and proposes solutions to optimize the processes. A business process analysis helps to streamline the workflows, reduce costs, increase quality, and enhance customer satisfaction. A business process analysis is valuable for IT process improvement and automation, but not for prioritizing strategic IT improvement initiatives.

A business impact analysis (BIA) is a technique that evaluates the potential consequences of a disruption or disaster on the organization’s operations, assets, reputation, and stakeholders. It helps to estimate the financial and nonfinancial losses, recovery time objectives, recovery point objectives, and criticality levels of each business function and process. A BIA is essential for IT business continuity management and contingency planning, but not for prioritizing strategic IT improvement initiatives.

References := IT Strategy Examples & Best Practices — IT Companies Network, How to create an IT strategy plan section. What is an IT Roadmap? | Benefits and Roadmap Examples - ProductPlan, How to Prioritize Your IT Roadmap section. 7 ways to make IT operations more efficient | CIO, Use data to increase visibility section.

 A program roadmap is a strategic plan that outlines the vision, objectives, scope, deliverables, milestones, dependencies, risks, and benefits of a large-scale IT program. A program roadmap can help the CIO and other stakeholders to communicate, align, and monitor the progress and outcomes of the program. A program roadmap is essential for a complex and long-term IT program such as centralizing the core business processes of global entities into one core system. A program roadmap can help to ensure that the program is aligned with the IT strategy and the business goals, that the program has a clear and realistic scope and schedule, that the program has adequate resources and governance, and that the program delivers the expected value and benefits1234. References: How to Create an IT Strategy Roadmap. Definitive Guide to Developing an IT Strategy and Roadmap. What is an IT Roadmap?. How To Develop a Strategy Roadmap in Six Steps.

 An IT steering committee is a group of senior executives who are responsible for directing, reviewing, and approving IT strategic plans, overseeing major initiatives, and allocating resources. They are the most appropriate group to approve the implementation of new technology, as they can ensure that it aligns with the organization’s vision, mission, goals, and objectives. They can also evaluate the business case, risks, benefits, and alternatives of the new technology and provide guidance and support to the IT team. According to one of the web search results1, “the steering committee establishes IT priorities for the business as a whole.” References := What is an IT Steering Committee? – BMC Software | Blogs

Key performance indicators (KPIs) are metrics that measure the performance of a project, program, or investment against a set of targets, objectives, or benchmarks. KPIs can help an enterprise to determine whether a current program for IT infrastructure migration to the cloud is continuing to provide benefits by tracking the progress, efficiency, quality, and outcomes of the program. KPIs can also help to identify any gaps, issues, or risks that may affect the program’s success and enable timely corrective actions12.

Total cost of ownership (TCO) is the purchase price of an asset plus the costs of operation over its life span. TCO can help an enterprise to compare the costs and benefits of different IT infrastructure options, such as cloud versus on-premise, but it does not measure the ongoing performance or benefits of a chosen option3.

Key risk indicators (KRIs) are metrics that monitor and predict potential risks that may negatively impact an enterprise’s objectives or operations. KRIs can help an enterprise to identify and mitigate any risks associated with IT infrastructure migration to the cloud, such as security breaches, data loss, or service disruptions, but they do not measure the benefits or value of the program45.

Net present value (NPV) is the difference between the present value of cash inflows and the present value of cash outflows over a period of time. NPV is used to evaluate the profitability or return on investment of a project or investment by discounting the future cash flows to their present value. NPV can help an enterprise to decide whether to undertake an IT infrastructure migration to the cloud based on its expected net value, but it does not measure the actual performance or benefits of the program16. References :=

• 3: Total Cost of Ownership: How It’s Calculated With Example - Investopedia
• 4: Key Risk Indicators (KRIs) - National Treasury
• 2: How to Develop Key Risk Indicators (KRIs) to Fortify Your Business | AuditBoard
• 5: How to Develop Effective Key Risk Indicators - Secureframe
• 1: Net Present Value (NPV) - Definition, Examples, How to Do NPV Analysis
• 6: NPV Formula - Learn How Net Present Value Really Works, Examples

Enterprise architecture (EA) is the most useful in developing IT strategic plans aligned with technological needs because it provides a holistic view of the current and desired state of the organization, including its business processes, information systems, data, applications, infrastructure, and security. EA helps to align the organization’s vision, strategy, and goals with its IT capabilities and resources. EA also helps to identify the gaps, risks, and opportunities for improvement in the existing IT environment and to design and implement the optimal IT solutions that can support the business needs and objectives. EA can help to ensure that the IT strategic plans are consistent, coherent, and feasible12.

A business impact analysis (BIA) is a tool that helps to assess the potential impact of a disruption or change on the business objectives, processes, and functions. A BIA can help to prioritize the criticality of the IT resources and determine the acceptable level of risk and recovery time. A BIA can provide a basis for deciding how to allocate the budget, reduce the requirements, or contract external resources3. However, a BIA is not sufficient for developing IT strategic plans aligned with technological needs because it does not provide a comprehensive view of the current and future IT architecture and its alignment with the business strategy.

A business case is a document that describes the rationale and justification for initiating a project or investment. A business case can help to evaluate the costs, benefits, risks, and alternatives of different IT options and to communicate the value proposition to the stakeholders4. However, a business case is not enough for developing IT strategic plans aligned with technological needs because it does not provide a holistic view of the current and future IT architecture and its alignment with the business strategy.

A benchmark analysis is a process of comparing the performance, quality, or practices of an organization with those of its peers or competitors. A benchmark analysis can help to identify the best practices, standards, or trends in the industry and to measure the gap between the current and desired state of an organization. However, a benchmark analysis is not adequate for developing IT strategic plans aligned with technological needs because it does not provide a holistic view of the current and future IT architecture and its alignment with the business strategy.

References := Implement Agile IT Strategic Planning with Enterprise Architecture, The Benefits of Enterprise Architecture in Organizational Transformation, Business Impact Analysis, Business Case, [Benchmark Analysis]

Value delivery is the process of ensuring that IT delivers the promised benefits against the strategy, concentrating on optimizing costs and proving the intrinsic value of IT. Value delivery is the greatest consideration when trying to optimize the use of benefits from IT, as it focuses on maximizing the value of IT investments and services to the business and stakeholders. Quality management, process improvement, and alignment of business to IT are important aspects of value delivery, but they are not the ultimate goal or consideration. References := CGEIT Review Manual, 27th Edition, Domain 1: Governance of Enterprise IT, page 21-22.

 An IT balanced scorecard (BSC) is a tool that helps align IT goals and performance with the business strategy and vision. The first step in designing an IT BSC is to analyze the business strategy and understand its objectives, priorities, and challenges. This will help identify the key stakeholders, customers, and value propositions of the IT function, as well as the critical success factors and risks that affect IT performance. Analyzing the business strategy will also help define the scope and purpose of the IT BSC, and establish the linkages between the IT goals and the business goals. Analyzing the business strategy should be done before developing key performance indicators (KPIs), communicating to stakeholders, or reviewing the IT resource plan, as these steps depend on the clarity and alignment of the business strategy.

 Moving to a virtualized architecture will have the greatest impact on vendor management, as it will require the enterprise to select, contract, and monitor the performance of the cloud or virtualization service providers. Vendor management is essential for ensuring that the virtualized architecture meets the enterprise’s requirements, standards, and expectations, as well as for managing the risks, costs, and benefits of the virtualization strategy. Vendor management also involves negotiating and enforcing service level agreements (SLAs), ensuring compliance with regulations and policies, and resolving any issues or disputes that may arise with the vendors.

System life cycle management, asset classification, and vulnerability management are also important aspects of IT governance, but they are not as significantly affected by moving to a virtualized architecture as vendor management. System life cycle management is the process of planning, developing, testing, deploying, maintaining, and retiring IT systems. Asset classification is the process of identifying, categorizing, and labeling IT assets based on their value, sensitivity, and criticality. Vulnerability management is the process of identifying, assessing, prioritizing, and mitigating IT vulnerabilities that may pose a threat to the enterprise’s security or operations. These processes may need to be adapted or updated to accommodate the virtualized architecture, but they are not fundamentally changed by it.

References := Steps to Meet Cloud and Virtualized Architecture Governance; Crafting the optimal model for the IT architecture organization; Enterprise Architecture Governance – Why It Is Important (Part 2); What is IT governance? A formal way to align IT & business strategy.

The best way for an IT governance board to establish standards of behavior for the adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) is to direct the creation and approval of an ethical use policy. An ethical use policy is a document that defines the principles, values, and guidelines for the responsible and ethical design, development, and deployment of AI systems and applications within the enterprise. An ethical use policy can help to ensure that AI is aligned with the enterprise’s mission, vision, goals, and values, and that it respects the rights, dignity, and interests of all stakeholders, including customers, employees, partners, regulators, and society at large. An ethical use policy can also help to address the potential risks, challenges, and impacts of AI on various aspects such as privacy, security, fairness, accountability, transparency, trustworthiness, human dignity, human agency, social good, etc. According to ISACA’s article on Developing an Artificial Intelligence Governance Framework1, “an ethical use policy is essential for any enterprise that wants to adopt AI in a responsible and sustainable manner. An ethical use policy can help to establish trust and confidence in AI among the stakeholders and customers, and to avoid or mitigate any negative consequences or harms that may arise from AI.” Furthermore, according to ISACA’s article on Governance of Responsible AI: From Ethical Guidelines to Legal Frameworks2, “an ethical use policy can provide a common framework and language for the governance of AI across different domains, sectors, and regions. An ethical use policy can also facilitate the compliance with existing laws and regulations that may apply to AI.” Therefore, directing the creation and approval of an ethical use policy is the best way for an IT governance board to establish standards of behavior for the adoption of AI.

A gap analysis is the process of comparing the current state and the desired state of an organization or a system, and identifying the gaps or differences between them1. A gap analysis can help to determine the actions and resources needed to bridge the gaps and achieve the desired outcomes2. In the context of an IT infrastructure integration after a major acquisition, a gap analysis can help to:

• Assess the compatibility and interoperability of the IT systems, applications, data, and processes of both companies3
• Identify the gaps, risks, issues, and opportunities related to the IT infrastructure integration4
• Prioritize and plan the IT infrastructure integration activities and projects5
• Align the IT infrastructure integration with the business goals and objectives of the acquisition

Therefore, conducting a gap analysis should be done NEXT after deciding that both companies will be using the parent company’s IT infrastructure.

The other options are not as important as option C. While it is important to update the enterprise architecture (EA), perform a business impact analysis (BIA), and develop a communication plan to support the merger, these are subsequent steps that can be done after conducting a gap analysis. A gap analysis can provide valuable inputs and insights for these steps, such as the current and target EA, the potential impacts of the IT infrastructure integration on the business operations and stakeholders, and the communication needs and channels for the IT infrastructure integration. References :=

• What is Gap Analysis? Definition, Methodology & Examples | ASQ1
• Gap Analysis: How to Bridge the Gap Between Performance and …2
• How to Make a Successful IT Integration Strategy for Mergers and …4
• M&A: The Six Phases of IT Integration - Interlink Cloud Blog3
• Post-Merger Integration: M&A Integration Process Guide - DealRoom5
• Success Factors for Integrating IT Systems After a Merger | CIO

Qualitative analysis is a method that uses subjective judgments and opinions to assess plausible risk scenarios that could result in reputational risk to the enterprise. Qualitative analysis can help identify the sources, causes, and impacts of reputational risk, as well as the likelihood and severity of such risk. Qualitative analysis can also involve stakeholder feedback, surveys, interviews, focus groups, and expert opinions to evaluate the reputation of the enterprise and its IT functions.

The other options are not the most likely methods to assess plausible risk scenarios that could result in reputational risk to the enterprise. Controls gap analysis is a method that compares the existing controls with the required controls to identify any deficiencies or weaknesses that could expose the enterprise to risk. Controls gap analysis can help improve the effectiveness and efficiency of IT processes and services, but it does not directly assess the reputational risk scenarios. Quantitative analysis is a method that uses numerical data and mathematical models to measure and evaluate risk scenarios. Quantitative analysis can help estimate the financial impact and probability of risk events, but it may not capture the intangible and subjective aspects of reputational risk. SWOT analysis is a method that evaluates the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of an organization or a project. SWOT analysis can help identify the internal and external factors that affect the performance and success of the organization or the project, but it does not specifically assess the reputational risk scenarios.

For more information on qualitative analysis and reputational risk, you can refer to these web sources:

• Qualitative Risk Analysis: What it is and how to implement it
• Reputational Risk Management: A Framework for Measurement
• Reputational Risk Management in IT Outsourcing: A Case Study

An enterprise is determining the objectives for an IT training improvement initiative from a governance perspective. Governance is the process of decision-making and implementation that involves various actors and structures, both formal and informal1. Governance aims to achieve good governance, which is characterized by participation, consensus, accountability, transparency, responsiveness, effectiveness, efficiency, equity, inclusion, and rule of law2. Therefore, it would be most important to ensure that the policies and processes for IT training address both the enterprise requirements and the professional growth of the IT employees. This would ensure that the IT training is aligned with the strategic goals and priorities of the enterprise, as well as the needs and expectations of the IT staff. It would also foster a culture of learning and development that enhances the performance, quality, and value of IT services345. The other options are not the most important objectives for an IT training improvement initiative from a governance perspective. Identifying courses of instruction that will maximize employee productivity, creating several different training strategies for final approval by the CIO, and surveying and interviewing IT employees to identify development needs are all useful steps or methods for designing and implementing an IT training improvement initiative, but they are not the ultimate objectives or outcomes. They are subordinate or instrumental to the main objective of addressing both the enterprise requirements and the professional growth of the IT employees through policies and processes that reflect good governance principles345. References:

• 3: https://topworkplaces.com/improving-training-and-development-strategies/
• 4: https://shrm.org/ResourcesAndTools/hr-topics/organizational-and-employee-development/Pages/Key-Steps-for-Better-Training-Development-Programs.aspx
• 5: https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbeshumanresourcescouncil/2021/07/13/12-ways-to-implement-successful-employee-training-initiatives/
• 1: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40647-017-0197-4
• 2: https://www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/good-governance.pdf

Discretionary investments are those that are not mandatory or essential for the business, but may provide some benefits or opportunities. The IT strategy committee should evaluate whether the discretionary investment supports the corporate goals and aligns with the business strategy, as this is the most important criterion for IT governance and value creation. The technical feasibility, the business and technical scope, and the alignment with the EA are also important factors, but they are secondary to the strategic alignment and value proposition of the investment. References := ISACA, CGEIT Review Manual, 7th Edition, 2019, p. 92-93; Rethinking traditional technology budgeting processes; Discretionary Investment Management Definition, Benefits & Risks.

The scope and stakeholders of the audit are the most important information to provide to the consultant before the audit begins, because they define the objectives, boundaries, and expectations of the audit. The scope and stakeholders of the audit are also part of the IT governance domain 1: Framework for the Governance of Enterprise IT1. References := 1: CGEIT Review Manual 2023, ISACA, page 23.

This should be identified first when creating an inventory of information systems and data related to the mobile app, as they are the individuals or groups who have the authority and responsibility to define, classify, protect, and manage the data assets of the enterprise1. By identifying the application and data owners, the enterprise can ensure that the data is properly accounted for, categorized, and secured according to its value, sensitivity, and risk. Application and data owners can also establish data policies, standards, and procedures, as well as monitor and report on data quality, usage, and compliance1. Identifying the application and data owners is a prerequisite for identifying the other options, such as data maintained by vendors, vendors and outsourced systems, and information classification scheme, as these depend on the accurate identification and assignment of data ownership roles and responsibilities.

The main responsibility of the board of directors regarding the management of enterprise risk is to ensure a risk process exists which addresses the risk appetite, because this would help the board to oversee and direct the enterprise’s risk management activities and ensure that they are aligned with the enterprise’s strategic objectives and value creation. The risk process should include identifying, assessing, responding, monitoring, and reporting the risks that may affect the enterprise’s performance and outcomes, and ensuring that the risks are within the acceptable level that the enterprise is willing and able to tolerate12. The other options are not the main responsibility of the board of directors, because they are either part of or dependent on the risk process.

To generate value for the enterprise, it is most important that IT investments are consistent with the enterprise’s business objectives. This means that IT investments should support and enable the achievement of the enterprise’s vision, mission, goals, and strategies. IT investments should also align with the enterprise’s values, culture, risk appetite, and stakeholder expectations. By ensuring that IT investments are consistent with the enterprise’s business objectives, the enterprise can maximize the benefits and value that IT can deliver, and avoid wasting resources on IT projects or initiatives that are not relevant, necessary, or effective. According to one source1, “Driving value creation with technology investments requires a clear understanding of how technology can enable business strategy and create value for the organization.” The other options are not the most important factor for generating value for the enterprise, but rather some of the steps or outcomes that can support or result from IT investments. Aligning IT investments with the IT strategic objectives is important, but not sufficient, as the IT strategic objectives should also be aligned with the enterprise’s business objectives. Approving IT investments by the CFO is a part of the financial governance process, but it does not guarantee that the IT investments are consistent with the enterprise’s business objectives. Including IT investments in the balanced scorecard is a way of measuring and reporting on the performance and value of IT investments, but it does not ensure that the IT investments are consistent with the enterprise’s business objectives. References := Driving value creation with technology investments

 Enterprise architecture (EA) is the most important input for managing the risk associated with creating a mobile application, because it provides a holistic view of the current and future state of the enterprise’s IT environment, including its goals, principles, standards, policies, processes, technologies, and systems. EA helps to identify the gaps, dependencies, constraints, and opportunities for the mobile application initiative, and to align it with the enterprise’s strategic objectives and business requirements. EA also helps to assess the impact of the mobile application on the existing IT infrastructure, security, performance, and compliance. By using EA as an input for IT risk management, the enterprise can ensure that the mobile application is designed, developed, deployed, and maintained in a consistent, coherent, and optimal way that minimizes the potential risks and maximizes the expected benefits. The other options are not the most important input for managing the risk associated with creating a mobile application, but rather some of the outputs or outcomes of IT risk management. An IT risk scorecard is a tool that measures and reports the performance of IT risk management activities and controls. An enterprise risk appetite is a statement that defines the level and type of risk that an enterprise is willing to accept or avoid in pursuit of its objectives. Business requirements are the specifications that describe what the mobile application should do and how it should meet the needs and expectations of the users and stakeholders. References := ISACA, CGEIT Review Manual, 27th Edition, 2020, page 15; Enterprise Architecture as Business Capabilities Architecture

An operational risk assessment is the most effective way of assessing enterprise risk, as it evaluates the potential losses and impacts that may arise from inadequate or failed internal processes, people, systems, or external events. An operational risk assessment also helps to identify and prioritize the key risk indicators (KRIs), risk scenarios, and mitigation strategies for the enterprise12. References := CGEIT Exam Content Outline, Domain 4, Subtopic B: IT Risk Management, Task 1: Ensure that an IT risk management framework exists to identify, analyze, mitigate, manage, monitor, and communicate IT-related business risk, and that the framework for IT risk management is in alignment with the enterprise risk management (ERM) framework.

Implementing an IT portfolio management policy would best enable remediation of this situation because it would help the organization to establish and adopt a process for measuring and monitoring the value of IT investments. This process would let the organization manage IT investments similarly to a financial portfolio by balancing potential returns, determining if an investment fits the business objectives, and performing a risk assessment. An IT portfolio management policy would also help to avoid overlap and duplication of IT projects by providing a clear and consistent way of prioritizing, categorizing, and aligning them with the enterprise strategy and goals. An IT portfolio management policy would also facilitate the evaluation and reporting of IT performance and benefits realization

The first strategic action to address the report is to authorize a risk analysis of the practice. A risk analysis is a systematic process of identifying, assessing, and prioritizing the potential threats and vulnerabilities that may arise from the use of an offsite cloud for analyzing sensitive “big data” files. A risk analysis can help to determine the level of exposure and impact of the practice on the organization’s data security, privacy, compliance, and performance. A risk analysis can also provide recommendations for mitigating or avoiding the risks, such as implementing appropriate controls, policies, and procedures.

Updating data governance practices, revising the information security policy, and recommending the use of a private cloud are possible actions that may result from the risk analysis, but they are not the first step. Data governance practices are the rules and processes that define how data is created, stored, accessed, used, and disposed of within an organization. Data governance practices should align with the organization’s data strategy, objectives, and values. Information security policy is a document that outlines the principles, guidelines, and responsibilities for protecting the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data. Information security policy should reflect the organization’s risk appetite, legal obligations, and industry standards. A private cloud is a cloud computing model that provides dedicated resources and services to a single organization. A private cloud may offer more control, security, and customization than an offsite cloud, but it may also require more investment, maintenance, and expertise.

Therefore, before updating data governance practices, revising the information security policy, or recommending the use of a private cloud, it is important to conduct a risk analysis of the current practice of using an offsite cloud for analyzing sensitive “big data” files. This will help to ensure that the organization makes informed and strategic decisions that balance the benefits and risks of using cloud computing for big data analytics.

The most effective way for a CIO to govern business unit deployment of shadow IT applications in a cloud environment is to educate the executive team about the risk associated with shadow IT applications. This is because shadow IT applications are often deployed without the knowledge or approval of the central IT organization, and may pose security, compliance, and performance risks to the enterprise. By raising awareness of these risks among the executive team, the CIO can foster a culture of IT governance and alignment, and encourage the business units to follow the established application implementation process. References: CGEIT Certification | Certified in Governance of Enterprise IT | ISACA1, IT Governance: Definitions, Frameworks and Planning - ProjectManager2

 A RACI chart is a tool that defines the roles and responsibilities of different stakeholders in a project or a process. RACI stands for Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, and Informed. A RACI chart can help to clarify who is responsible for performing the tasks, who is accountable for the outcomes, who is consulted for input or feedback, and who is informed of the progress or results. A RACI chart can help to improve communication, collaboration, and coordination among the stakeholders, as well as to avoid confusion, duplication, or conflict of work12.

If an enterprise has established a new department to oversee the life cycle of activities that support data management objectives, the next step should be to establish a RACI chart for the data management process. This can help to define the roles and responsibilities of the new department and other existing departments or units that are involved in the data management process, such as IT, business, security, compliance, etc. A RACI chart can also help to align the data management process with the enterprise’s strategy and goals, and to ensure that the data management objectives are met effectively and efficiently34. References: What is a RACI Chart? Definition & Example. How to Use a RACI Matrix: Everything You Need to Know. Data Management Process: Definition & Best Practices. Data Lifecycle Management: A 2023 Guide for Your Business.

A policy is a document that defines the rules and guidelines for how an organization conducts its activities and operations. A policy can help to ensure the compliance, consistency, and quality of the organization’s performance and outcomes1. A policy typically consists of several components, such as purpose, scope, terms and definitions, roles and responsibilities, procedures, compliance, and review2.

From a governance perspective, one of the most important components of a policy is roles and responsibilities, because it clarifies who is accountable and responsible for implementing, enforcing, monitoring, and improving the policy. Roles and responsibilities can help to establish the authority, accountability, and communication among different stakeholders involved in the policy, such as the board of directors, senior management, business units, IT staff, customers, regulators, etc. Roles and responsibilities can also help to avoid confusion, duplication, or conflict of work among the stakeholders3 .

The governance of enterprise IT (GEIT) is the system by which the current and future use of IT is directed and controlled by an organization. GEIT aims to ensure that IT supports the organization’s strategy and objectives, delivers value and benefits, manages risks and resources, and measures performance and outcomes. GEIT requires a clear definition of roles and responsibilities for the IT governance policies, processes, structures, and relationships. Some of the common roles and responsibilities involved in GEIT are:

• The board of directors: provides strategic direction, oversight, and approval for IT governance
• The senior management: provides leadership, support, and guidance for IT governance
• The business units: provide input, feedback, and collaboration for IT governance
• The IT function: provides execution, delivery, and improvement for IT governance
• The audit function: provides assurance, evaluation, and recommendation for IT governance
• The external stakeholders: provide requirements, expectations, and compliance for IT governance References: What is a Policy? Definition & Examples. Policy Components: Definition & Examples. Roles & Responsibilities in Policy Development. [Policy Development: Roles & Responsibilities]. [What is IT Governance? Definition & Frameworks]. [IT Governance Roles & Responsibilities]. [Roles & Responsibilities in IT Governance].

The best key risk indicator (KRI) to show progress in IT employee behavior regarding application security issues is the results of application security awareness training quizzes. This KRI measures the level of knowledge and understanding that IT employees have acquired from the security training sessions, and how well they can apply it to their work. This KRI can also help to identify the gaps and weaknesses in the training content and delivery, and suggest areas for improvement. A high score on the quizzes indicates a high level of IT employee risk awareness and a low likelihood of creating serious security issues in application design and configuration

 Documenting and communicating key management practices across divisions is the best way to facilitate the adoption of strong IT governance practices throughout a multi-divisional enterprise. This can help to ensure that all divisions are aware of and aligned with the corporate IT governance framework, policies, and standards. It can also promote collaboration, coordination, and consistency among the divisions, as well as transparency, accountability, and trust. According to one of the web search results1, “communication is a critical success factor for IT governance implementation” and “effective communication can help to create a shared understanding of IT governance objectives, roles, responsibilities, and benefits among stakeholders.” Ensuring each divisional policy is consistent with corporate policy, ensuring divisional governance fosters continuous improvement processes, and mandating data standardization across the distributed enterprise are not the best ways to facilitate the adoption of strong IT governance practices throughout a multi-divisional enterprise. They are more likely to be part of the implementation or improvement of IT governance practices, rather than the facilitation of them. They may also encounter resistance or challenges from the divisions due to different business needs, cultures, or preferences. References := IT Governance Practices For Improving Strategic And Operational …

 A balanced scorecard is a strategic management tool that measures and monitors the performance of an organization against its vision, mission, goals, and objectives. It uses four perspectives: financial, customer, internal process, and learning and growth. A balanced scorecard can help evaluate the effectiveness of IT governance by aligning IT activities with business strategies, assessing IT value delivery, identifying IT strengths and weaknesses, and facilitating continuous improvement. References := CGEIT Exam Content Outline, Domain 1: Governance of Enterprise IT, Subdomain B: Strategic Management, Task 3: Establish and maintain a framework for the governance of enterprise IT to enable the achievement of enterprise objectives.

 Data stewardship has the greatest influence on data quality assurance. Data stewardship is the process of defining, implementing, and enforcing policies and standards for data quality, security, privacy, and usage1. Data stewards are the individuals or groups who are responsible for ensuring that the data is accurate, consistent, complete, timely, and compliant with the business rules and regulations2. Data stewardship involves activities such as data profiling, data cleansing, data validation, data monitoring, and data reporting3. Data stewardship helps to improve the trustworthiness and usability of the data for analysis and decision making. References: Data Quality Assurance: Importance & Best Practices in 2023 - AIMultiple1, Data Owners vs. Data Stewards vs. Data Custodians - CPO Magazine2, What is Data Stewardship? - Talend3

 The most important factor for the effective design of an IT balanced scorecard is identifying appropriate key performance indicators (KPIs). KPIs are the measures that reflect the critical success factors of the IT strategy and goals, and that help to monitor and evaluate the IT performance and value. KPIs should be aligned with the four perspectives of the balanced scorecard: financial, customer, internal process, and learning and growth. KPIs should also be SMART: specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound. By choosing the right KPIs, the IT balanced scorecard can provide a comprehensive and balanced view of the IT contribution to the business, and support the decision-making and improvement processes

 Before deciding whether to pursue a strategic initiative, it is important to understand the potential consequences of the risks involved. Assessing the impact of each risk means estimating how likely it is to occur and how severe its effects would be on the enterprise’s objectives, performance, reputation, or resources. This can help to prioritize the most critical risks and compare them with the expected benefits of the initiative. According to one of the web search results1, “the impact assessment is a key element of any risk management process. It helps to evaluate the significance of each risk and determine the appropriate response strategy.” Defining the risk mitigation strategy, establishing a baseline for each initiative, and selecting qualified personnel to manage the project are important steps, but they are not the first ones. They are more likely to be part of the implementation or execution phase of the initiative, after it has been approved and funded. References := Risk Impact Assessment and Prioritization

 Risk management strategies are primarily adopted to achieve acceptable residual risk levels, which are the levels of risk that remain after applying risk response measures. Risk management strategies are the approaches or methods that an organization uses to identify, assess, and treat its IT-related risks. Risk management strategies can vary depending on the organization’s risk appetite, tolerance, and capacity, as well as the nature and impact of the risks. Some common risk management strategies are: avoid, reduce, transfer, share, or accept. The other options are not as primary, as they are more related to the outcomes or objectives of risk management strategies, rather than the purpose or intention of them. References: : CGEIT Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 4: Risk Optimization, Section 4.3: IT Risk Management, Subsection 4.3.1: IT Risk Management Overview, Page 153 : CGEIT Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 4: Risk Optimization, Section 4.3: IT Risk Management, Subsection 4.3.2: IT Risk Management Process, Page 156 : CGEIT Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 4: Risk Optimization, Section 4.3: IT Risk Management, Subsection 4.3.3: IT Risk Management Techniques and Tools, Page 158 : Proactive IT Risk Management in an Era of Emerging Technologies1

 Objectives and metrics are the most critical for the successful implementation of an IT process, as they define the purpose, scope, and expected outcomes of the process. Objectives and metrics also help to measure and monitor the performance, efficiency, and effectiveness of the process, and to identify and implement improvement opportunities12. References := CGEIT Exam Content Outline, Domain 1, Subtopic C: Technology Governance, Task 2: Ensure that IT processes are defined, implemented, monitored and continually improved in alignment with the enterprise governance framework.

Strategy mapping is an advantage of using strategy mapping, as it helps to visualize and communicate how the enterprise can create value by achieving its strategic objectives. Strategy mapping also helps to align the IT goals and activities with the enterprise strategy, and to measure and monitor the IT performance and outcomes123. References := CGEIT Exam Content Outline, Domain 3, Subtopic A: Performance Management, Task 2: Ensure that IT performance measurement supports IT performance management by providing relevant, complete, reliable, timely and consistent information.

 Gap analysis results will provide the most useful information for the CIO to determine if IT staff have adequate skills to deliver on key strategic objectives, as they compare the current state of the IT staff skills with the desired or required state. Gap analysis results also help to identify the gaps or deficiencies in the IT staff skills, and to plan and implement the actions and strategies to close or reduce the gaps1. A gap analysis can be performed using various methods and tools, such as SWOT analysis, skill matrix, competency framework, etc.

 Information architecture (IA) is the practice of structuring and presenting the parts of something — whether that’s a website, mobile app, blog post, book, or brick-and-mortar store — to users so that it’s easy to understand. IA can help users find information and complete tasks1.

An enterprise that has ineffective information architecture may suffer from poor business decisions, because it may not be able to access, analyze, or use the data and information that are relevant, accurate, consistent, and timely for decision making. Poor business decisions can lead to negative consequences, such as losing customers, market share, revenue, or competitive advantage, or facing legal, financial, reputational, or operational risks23.

Some examples of how ineffective information architecture can impact business decisions are:

• If the enterprise’s website has a confusing or inconsistent navigation system, users may not be able to find the information they need or want, such as product details, prices, reviews, or contact information. This can result in lower customer satisfaction, engagement, conversion, and retention14.
• If the enterprise’s data is stored in multiple systems or platforms that are not integrated or interoperable, users may not be able to access or share the data across different departments or functions. This can result in data silos, duplication, inconsistency, or incompleteness25.
• If the enterprise’s data is not labeled or categorized properly, users may not be able to search or filter the data effectively. This can result in data overload, irrelevance, or obscurity25.
• If the enterprise’s data is not governed or managed properly, users may not be able to trust or verify the data quality or integrity. This can result in data errors, inaccuracies, or biases25.

Therefore, an enterprise that has ineffective information architecture may have poor business decisions as its greatest impact. References: Information Architecture Basics | Usability.gov. The Importance of Information Architecture to UX Design. How Enterprise Architecture Can Help You Eliminate Technical Debt. What Is Information Architecture & Why Does It Matter? - HubSpot Blog. Why Do We Need Information Architecture - Architecture.

Enterprise growth plans should be the most important consideration during the development of a technology resource acquisition and management policy, because they define the vision, goals, and strategies of the start-up company and how technology can support them. A technology resource acquisition and management policy should align with the enterprise growth plans and ensure that the technology resources are acquired and managed in a way that enables the company to achieve its desired outcomes, such as increasing market share, enhancing customer satisfaction, improving operational efficiency, or creating innovative products or services. A technology resource acquisition and management policy should also consider the scalability, flexibility, and adaptability of the technology resources to accommodate the changing needs and demands of the company as it grows and evolves. A technology resource acquisition and management policy should also balance the costs and benefits of acquiring and managing technology resources and ensure that they deliver value to the company and its stakeholders.

References := Managing Technology as a Business Strategy, A Complete Guide To Strategic Technology Planning, Policy on IT Acquisition Strategies and Planning Under FITARA

The best long-term solution to address the concern regarding loss of experienced staff is to implement knowledge management practices, because knowledge management is the process of creating, sharing, using, and managing the knowledge and information of an organization1. Knowledge management practices can help capture, document, and transfer the valuable knowledge and expertise of the experienced staff before they leave the organization, as well as facilitate the learning and development of the new or existing staff. Knowledge management practices can also enhance the organizational performance, innovation, and competitiveness by leveraging the intellectual capital and creating a culture of knowledge sharing2. According to a study by 3, the impact of knowledge management practices on employee retention is significant and positive in both IT and banking industries. Another study by 4 found that knowledge management practices can improve job satisfaction and employee retention by fostering a supportive work environment, providing growth opportunities, and rewarding knowledge contributions. Therefore, implementing knowledge management practices can help mitigate the risk of losing experienced staff and their knowledge in the long run.

The other options are not the best long-term solutions, because they are either short-term or partial solutions. Establishing a mentoring program for IT staff can help transfer some of the knowledge and skills of the experienced staff to the mentees, but it may not be sufficient or systematic enough to capture and preserve all the relevant knowledge. Determining key risk indicators (KRIs) can help monitor and measure the risk exposure of losing experienced staff, but it does not address the root cause or provide a solution for the problem. Retaining key staff as consultants can help retain some of the expertise and experience of the staff, but it may not be feasible or cost-effective in the long term, and it may also create dependency and vulnerability issues for the organization.

 The FIRST step when defining responsibilities for ownership of information and systems is to require an inventory of information assets. An information asset is any data, device, or other component of the environment that supports information-related activities1. An inventory of information assets is a comprehensive list of all the information assets that an organization owns, controls, or uses2. By creating an inventory of information assets, an organization can:

• Identify the types, locations, formats, and volumes of information assets3
• Determine the value, sensitivity, and criticality of information assets4
• Assign ownership and accountability for information assets5
• Establish appropriate security controls and protection measures for information assets6
• Monitor and audit the usage and lifecycle of information assets7

The other options are not as important as option D. While it is important to require an information risk assessment, identify systems that are outsourced, and ensure information is classified, these are subsequent steps that depend on the availability and accuracy of the inventory of information assets. Without an inventory of information assets, it would be difficult to perform a risk assessment, identify outsourced systems, or classify information according to its value and sensitivity. References :=

• Information Asset - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics1
• Information Asset Inventory - NIST CSRC2
• How to Create an Information Asset Inventory - Infosec Resources3
• Information Asset Valuation: A Methodology - ISACA4
• Data Ownership: Considerations for Risk Management - ISACA5
• Information Asset Protection - NIST CSRC6
• Information Asset Management - NIST CSRC7

Data classification is a process of organizing and categorizing data based on its characteristics, confidentiality, and sensitivity. Data classification helps to determine the level of access and protection that data requires. Data classification also makes data easier to understand, compare, and analyze. Data classification is an essential part of information security, as it helps to align the security measures and policies with the data’s value and risk. By incorporating data classification into the information architecture, the IT processes can ensure that information security requirements are taken into consideration from the design stage to the implementation stage. References :=

• What is Data Classification? A Data Classification Definition
• What is Sensitive Data? Definition, Examples, and More

The best approach to address the concern of outdated internal processes is to map the processes to a capability maturity model (CMM). A CMM is a framework that describes the levels of maturity and capability of a process, from initial to optimized. Mapping the processes to a CMM can help the CIO to assess the current state and performance of the processes, as well as identify and prioritize the areas for improvement. Mapping the processes to a CMM can also help align the processes with the IT strategy and goals, as well as ensure compliance with standards and best practices. Software Capability Maturity Model (CMM) | IT Governance UK provides an overview of the CMM framework and its benefits.

Implementing a process review policy, assembling a project review team, and verifying that the processes are still needed are also possible steps to take to address the concern of outdated internal processes, but they are not the best approach. Implementing a process review policy is a measure that defines the frequency, scope, criteria, and methods for reviewing and updating the processes. Implementing a process review policy can help ensure the consistency and quality of the process review activities, as well as prevent future obsolescence or inefficiency of the processes. Assembling a project review team is a task that involves selecting and assigning the roles and responsibilities of the people who will conduct or participate in the process review activities. Assembling a project review team can help ensure the availability and suitability of the resources and skills for the process review activities, as well as facilitate the collaboration and communication among the stakeholders. Verifying that the processes are still needed is a question that evaluates the relevance and value of the processes for the enterprise’s objectives and operations. Verifying that the processes are still needed can help eliminate or simplify any unnecessary or redundant processes, as well as optimize or integrate any overlapping or interdependent processes.

The first thing that a new CIO should do to ensure information assets are effectively governed is to perform an information gap analysis. An information gap analysis is a process of comparing the current state and performance of the information assets with the desired state and expectations of the information governance program. Information assets include data, metadata, documents, and records that have value to the organization and need to be managed and protected. An information gap analysis can help identify the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of the information assets, as well as the gaps, risks, and issues that need to be addressed. An information gap analysis can also provide insights and recommendations for improving and aligning the information assets with the information governance program. According to 1, an information gap analysis is a key step in developing an information governance strategy that supports the organization’s goals and objectives.

The other options are not the first things that a new CIO should do to ensure information assets are effectively governed. Quantifying the business value of information assets is a step that may be done after performing an information gap analysis, as it involves measuring and communicating the benefits and costs of the information assets to the organization and its stakeholders. Reviewing information classification procedures is a step that may be done after performing an information gap analysis, as it involves evaluating and updating the policies and practices for categorizing and labeling the information assets according to their sensitivity and criticality. Evaluating information access methods is a step that may be done after performing an information gap analysis, as it involves assessing and improving the mechanisms and controls for granting and restricting access to the information assets.

A project governance framework is a set of principles, policies, roles, responsibilities, and processes that guide, direct, and control the initiation, planning, execution, monitoring, and closure of IT projects. A project governance framework can help the enterprise address the problems of poor project performance, lack of accountability, and inconsistency in execution by:

• Providing a clear and consistent structure for managing IT projects across the enterprise
• Aligning IT projects with the strategic objectives and priorities of the enterprise
• Defining the roles and responsibilities of the project stakeholders, including the board of directors, senior management, project sponsors, project managers, project teams, and end-users
• Establishing the criteria and methods for selecting, prioritizing, approving, and funding IT projects
• Setting the standards and expectations for project planning, execution, quality, risk management, communication, and reporting
• Implementing the mechanisms and tools for monitoring, controlling, evaluating, and reviewing IT project performance and outcomes
• Ensuring the accountability and transparency of IT project decisions and results

References:

• According to the CGEIT Review Manual 2022, "Project governance is a subset of IT governance that provides a framework for managing IT projects. Project governance ensures that IT projects are aligned with business objectives; are delivered on time, within budget, and with acceptable quality; and are managed in a consistent and transparent manner."1
• According to the ISACA article on Project Governance: An Essential Element of Project Management Success2, “Project governance is an empowering aspect of the project management office (PMO) infrastructure management. It enables effective decision making by providing clarity on roles and responsibilities; it also provides a framework for escalation management.”
• According to the PMI article on Project Governance: What You Need to Know3, “Project governance is a critical element of any project since it provides a framework for accountabilities and responsibilities associated with an organization’s capital investments (projects). It is defined as an integrated framework of processes and tools that address matters essential to successful project delivery.”

The primary consideration for determining optimal IT service levels is cost-benefit analysis. Cost-benefit analysis is a technique that compares the costs and benefits of providing a certain level of IT service to the business and the stakeholders1. It helps to identify the optimal balance between the value and the cost of IT service delivery, and to justify the investment and resources required for achieving the desired service level objectives1. Cost-benefit analysis can also help to evaluate alternative options, prioritize improvement initiatives, and measure the return on investment of IT service management1. The other options are not as relevant as cost-benefit analysis, as they do not consider both the costs and benefits of IT service levels. Internal rate of return is a financial metric that measures the profitability of an investment, but it does not account for the non-financial benefits or risks of IT service delivery2. Recovery time objective is a parameter that specifies the maximum acceptable time for restoring an IT service after a disruption, but it does not reflect the cost or value of achieving that time3. Resource utilization analysis is a technique that monitors and optimizes the usage and allocation of IT resources, but it does not assess the impact or outcome of IT service delivery on the business and the stakeholders4. References: Cost-Benefit Analysis in IT Service Management. Internal Rate of Return (IRR). Recovery Time Objective (RTO). Resource Utilization Analysis.

This is a barrier to strategic alignment of business and IT, as it creates inconsistency and fragmentation in the IT governance process across the enterprise. Strategic alignment of business and IT is the degree of fit and integration among business strategy, IT strategy, business infrastructure, and IT infrastructure1. It helps to ensure that IT supports and enables the achievement of the enterprise’s goals and objectives, and delivers value to the stakeholders1. To achieve strategic alignment, an enterprise needs to have a coherent and coordinated IT governance process that aligns IT with business goals, optimizes IT investments and resources, manages IT risks and opportunities, and measures IT performance and benefits1. However, if each business unit has its own steering committee for IT investment and prioritization, this may result in conflicting or competing IT priorities, duplication or waste of IT resources, lack of communication or collaboration among IT stakeholders, or misalignment of IT services and capabilities with business needs and expectations1. Therefore, each business unit having its own steering committee for IT investment and prioritization is a barrier to strategic alignment of business and IT.

The other options are not barriers to strategic alignment of business and IT, as they are possible enablers or indicators of strategic alignment. Uniform portfolio management is the process of selecting, prioritizing, balancing, and monitoring the IT investments and initiatives that support the enterprise’s strategic objectives and deliver value to the stakeholders2. Uniform portfolio management can help to align IT with business goals, optimize resource allocation, manage risks and dependencies, and measure performance and benefits2. IT being the exclusive provider of IT services to the business units can help to ensure that the IT services are consistent, reliable, secure, and compliant with the enterprise’s standards and policies3. The enterprise’s CIO being a member of the executive committee can help to demonstrate the strategic importance and contribution of IT to the enterprise’s success, as well as facilitate the communication and collaboration between IT and business leaders4.

The data owner is the role that is accountable for the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of information within an enterprise, because the data owner is the person who has the authority and responsibility to classify, label, and protect the information assets according to their value and sensitivity1. The data owner also defines the business requirements for the information security and ensures that the data custodian implements the appropriate controls to safeguard the information2. The data owner is also part of the IT governance domain 4: Value Delivery3. References := 1: Data Classification Standard3, page 42: 3 Pillars of Data Security: Confidentiality, Integrity & Availability43: CGEIT Review Manual 2023, ISACA, page 155.

The best approach to assist an enterprise in planning for IT-enabled investments is enterprise architecture (EA). EA is a holistic and integrated view of the current and future state of the business, IT, and their alignment1. EA helps to identify and prioritize the business needs and objectives, and to design and deliver the IT solutions that support them2. EA also helps to optimize the IT resources and processes, and to ensure that they are aligned with the business strategy and goals3. EA also helps to measure and monitor the IT performance and outcomes, and to evaluate the value and benefits of the IT investments4. EA also helps to manage the risks, costs, and complexity of the IT investments, and to ensure that they comply with the legal and regulatory requirements5.

IT process mapping, task management, and service level management are not as comprehensive or effective as EA in assisting an enterprise in planning for IT-enabled investments. IT process mapping is a visual representation of a process that shows the steps and their relationships6. It can help to understand how a process works, but it does not provide a strategic or architectural view of the business or IT. Task management is a process of managing individual or group tasks to achieve goals7. It can help to track and delegate work, but it does not address the alignment or optimization of IT with the business. Service level management is a process of defining, documenting, and agreeing on service levels within an IT service management system8. It can help to ensure that services are delivered at an agreed level, but it does not cover the design or delivery of IT solutions that meet the business needs. Therefore, EA is the best approach to assist an enterprise in planning for IT-enabled investments.

 To enable the development of required IT skill sets for the enterprise, it is most important to define skill requirements based on each role within the IT department, because different roles may have different responsibilities, tasks, and expectations that require specific skills and competencies. By defining skill requirements based on each role, the enterprise can ensure that the IT staff have the appropriate knowledge, abilities, and experience to perform their roles effectively and efficiently, and to support the enterprise’s goals and objectives. According to ISACA’s CGEIT Domain 2: IT Resources1, “the enterprise should identify the skills required for each IT role and assess the current and future skill gaps.” Furthermore, according to ISACA’s article on IT Skills Gap2, “the skills gap is not a one-size-fits-all problem. It varies by industry, organization and department/role.” Therefore, defining skill requirements based on each role within the IT department is the best way to enable the development of required IT skill sets for the enterprise. References:

• IT Skills Gap: Trends, Implications and Best Practices - ISACA
• IT Governance: Definitions, Frameworks and Planning - ProjectManager
• What is IT governance? A formal way to align IT & business strategy | CIO
• CGEIT Domain 2: IT Resources

 Privacy requirements should be the most important consideration for a hospital planning to use cloud services and mobile applications, because they involve the protection of sensitive and personal health information (PHI) of the patients and staff. PHI is a type of data that is subject to strict regulations and standards, such as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) in the US1, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in the EU2, and the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) in Canada3. These regulations and standards require the hospital to ensure that PHI is collected, stored, processed, and transmitted in a secure and compliant manner, and that the rights and consent of the data subjects are respected. Using cloud services and mobile applications can pose significant challenges and risks to privacy, such as data breaches, unauthorized access, data loss, data residency, third-party liability, etc. Therefore, the hospital should carefully evaluate the privacy requirements and implications of using cloud services and mobile applications, and adopt appropriate governance, policies, controls, and measures to safeguard PHI in the cloud environment.

According to the CGEIT exam guide, ERM is the process of identifying, assessing, responding to and monitoring enterprise risks in alignment with the enterprise’s risk appetite and tolerance. ERM helps to ensure that the enterprise achieves its objectives and creates value for its stakeholders. To apply ERM practices consistently, IT staff need to have a common understanding of the ERM framework, principles, processes and tools that are used by the enterprise. Therefore, the most effective corrective action for an assessment that reveals inconsistent ERM practices by IT staff is to require ERM orientation sessions. These sessions can help to educate and train IT staff on the ERM concepts, terminology, roles and responsibilities, and best practices that are relevant to their work. The other options are not as effective as ERM orientation sessions, as they do not address the root cause of the inconsistency, which is the lack of ERM knowledge and awareness among IT staff. References: CGEIT Exam Candidate Guide, page 15. CGEIT Certification, Enterprise-risk-management practices: Where’s the evidence?

 An IT risk-aware culture is one that promotes a shared understanding of risk and supports the organization’s strategy, business model, operational practices, and competitive advantage1. It works to strengthen the core of an organization’s operations and protects customers, the brand, and the bottom line1. An IT risk-aware culture also involves the participation and collaboration of all stakeholders in identifying, assessing, and managing IT risks2. Therefore, the BEST evidence of an IT risk-aware culture across an enterprise is when business staff report identified IT risks. This indicates that the business staff are aware of the potential threats and impacts that IT risks can pose to the organization, and that they are willing and able to communicate and escalate them to the appropriate authorities3.

The other options are not as good as option A. While it is important to communicate IT risks to the business, publish IT risk-related policies, and ensure the resilience of the IT infrastructure, these are not sufficient to demonstrate an IT risk-aware culture across an enterprise. They are rather means to achieve the end goal of managing and mitigating IT risks. They do not necessarily reflect the level of awareness, attitude, and behavior of the organization’s employees toward risk and how risk is managed within the organization. References :=

• Cultivating a Risk Intelligent Culture - Deloitte US1
• Building an Effective Risk-Aware Culture - Magazine4
• 7 Steps to Create a Risk-Aware Culture | Treasury & Risk3

Key performance indicators (KPIs) are metrics that help measure the performance of IT service delivery and align it with the business goals and stakeholder expectations. KPIs can help the IT governance committee to monitor, evaluate and improve the availability, quality and efficiency of the web-facing infrastructure. KPIs can also help identify and address any issues or risks that may affect the service level agreements (SLAs) or customer satisfaction. KPIs should be established before implementing other measures such as web operations procedures, business continuity plans (BCPs) or customer survey processes, as they provide the basis for setting objectives, targets and benchmarks for these measures. References: ISACA, Performance Measurement Metrics for IT Governance, page 11. datapine, Top 20 IT KPIs - Explore The Best IT KPI Examples & IT Metrics

 A data steward is a role that is responsible for data normalization when it is found that a new system includes duplicates of data items, because a data steward is accountable for the quality, integrity, and consistency of the data in the enterprise. A data steward can define and enforce data standards, policies, and rules, and perform data cleansing, validation, and reconciliation activities to ensure that the data is accurate, complete, and reliable12.

Architecture and design reviews are an effective way to ensure that IT solutions are aligned with the business requirements and objectives for specific business processes. By involving the business process stakeholders in these reviews, IT can gain a better understanding of the business needs, expectations, and constraints, as well as receive feedback and validation from the end users. This can help to avoid miscommunication, gaps, or conflicts between IT and business, and ensure that the IT capabilities are fit for purpose and deliver value to the business. References := CGEIT Review Manual, 27th Edition, Domain 1: Governance of Enterprise IT, page 20-21.

Data stewards are primarily responsible for applying frameworks for the governance of IT to balance the need for security controls with business requirements, as they are the custodians of the data quality, integrity, and security within an organization. Data stewards define and implement data policies, standards, and procedures, as well as monitor and report on data compliance and performance. Data stewards also collaborate with other stakeholders, such as data owners, data users, and data scientists, to ensure that the data is aligned with the business objectives and meets the regulatory and ethical requirements.

Data scientists, data analysts, and data processors are not primarily responsible for applying frameworks for the governance of IT, as they are more focused on the technical aspects of data collection, analysis, and processing. Data scientists use advanced methods and tools to extract insights and value from data. Data analysts use descriptive and inferential statistics to explore and interpret data. Data processors perform operations on data, such as entry, validation, transformation, storage, and retrieval.

References := What is a Data Steward? | Informatica; Data Governance Roles: The Ultimate Guide | Collibra; Data Governance Roles: Who Does What? | erwin; [What is IT governance? A formal way to align IT & business strategy].

The first consideration for an enterprise faced with a pandemic situation resulting in a mandatory remote work environment should be ensuring staff has the necessary technology to be productive, because this would enable the enterprise to maintain its business continuity and resilience, and to minimize the disruption and loss of the IT services and capabilities. The necessary technology may include hardware, software, network, security, and communication tools that support the remote work activities and requirements of the staff12. The enterprise should also provide guidance and training to the staff on how to use the technology effectively and securely12. The other options are not the first consideration, because they are either dependent on or secondary to the availability and functionality of the technology.

The best way for an IT steering committee to monitor the adoption of a new enterprise IT strategy is to establish key performance indicators (KPIs), because they are metrics that measure the progress and achievement of the IT strategic objectives and goals, and provide feedback and guidance for improvement. KPIs can help the IT steering committee to track and evaluate the performance and outcomes of the IT function, and to ensure that the IT activities and resources are aligned with the business needs and expectations12. KPIs can also help to communicate and report the IT value delivery and innovation to the board and other stakeholders12. References := ISACA, CGEIT Review Manual, 7th Edition, 2019, page 43-44.

The best way to enable the mapping of cost to risk for selecting a disaster recovery site based on available risk data is to perform a business impact analysis (BIA). A BIA is a process of identifying and evaluating the potential effects of various disaster scenarios on the critical business functions and processes of an organization. A BIA can help estimate the financial and operational impacts of losing or disrupting the business functions and processes, such as revenue loss, customer dissatisfaction, regulatory fines, contractual penalties, reputation damage, etc. A BIA can also help determine the recovery time objectives (RTOs) and recovery point objectives (RPOs) for each business function and process, which indicate how quickly and how much data they need to be restored after a disaster. By performing a BIA, the IT steering committee can map the cost of each disaster recovery site option to the risk of each disaster scenario, and compare the trade-offs between different levels of protection and investment1.

The other options are not the best ways to enable the mapping of cost to risk for selecting a disaster recovery site. Key risk indicators (KRIs) are metrics that indicate the level of risk exposure or potential impact of a risk event on an organization. KRIs can help monitor and manage IT risks, but they do not necessarily reflect the cost of different disaster recovery site options. Scenario-based assessment is a method of analyzing and evaluating the likelihood and consequences of various risk scenarios. Scenario-based assessment can help identify and prioritize IT risks, but it does not provide a clear measure of the cost of different disaster recovery site options. Qualitative forecasting is a technique of using expert opinions, judgments, or intuition to predict future outcomes or trends. Qualitative forecasting can help estimate the future demand or growth of IT services, but it does not provide a reliable or objective basis for mapping the cost to risk of different disaster recovery site options.

This is because senior management is responsible for defining and communicating the IT strategy, objectives, and performance expectations for the organization. Senior management is also responsible for establishing and overseeing the IT governance framework, which includes the performance measurement metrics, processes, and tools. Senior management should ensure that the performance measurement metrics are aligned with the business goals and value creation, as well as the IT governance principles and policies. Senior management should also monitor and evaluate the IT performance results and take corrective actions if needed.

Some of the sources that support this answer are:

• 1: This source explains the roles and responsibilities of senior management in IT governance, and how they can use COBIT 5 to implement effective IT governance practices. It states that senior management should define the IT-related goals and objectives, establish the IT governance structure and processes, assign roles and responsibilities, and ensure adequate resources and capabilities for IT governance.
• 2: This source discusses the importance and benefits of IT performance measurement for IT governance, and provides some tips and tools for conducting it. It suggests that senior management should be involved in setting the IT performance measurement criteria, selecting the key performance indicators (KPIs), defining the targets and thresholds, and reviewing and reporting the IT performance outcomes.
• 3: This source provides a comprehensive guide on how to optimize IT project intake, approval, and prioritization. It mentions that senior management should be responsible for defining the strategic alignment, value delivery, risk optimization, and resource optimization criteria for IT projects, as well as for monitoring and evaluating the IT project portfolio performance.

One of the primary responsibilities of a data steward is to classify and label organizational data assets, which means to assign categories and tags to the data based on its characteristics, such as type, source, sensitivity, quality, or purpose. Classifying and labeling data helps to organize, manage, and protect the data assets, as well as to facilitate their discovery, access, and usage. Data stewards are also responsible for defining and maintaining the data classification and labeling standards and policies, and ensuring their compliance across the organization. References: What Is a Data Steward? Roles & Responsibilities | Zuar1, Data Stewards: Who They Are & Why Data Stewardship Matters - HubSpot Blog2, Data Steward: Roles, Responsibilities, and Certification3

 Quality of services is the degree to which the IT services meet the expectations and requirements of the customers and stakeholders. Quality of services is usually defined and measured by the service level agreements (SLAs), which are contracts that specify the service level objectives, metrics, targets, and responsibilities of both parties. If the SLAs are not clearly defined in all cases, the business faces the greatest risk of not being able to enforce the quality of services from the third-party providers. This can lead to poor performance, customer dissatisfaction, reputational damage, legal disputes, and financial losses for the business. Therefore, it is essential to have clear and comprehensive SLAs for all IT outsourcing contracts. References: CGEIT Exam Content Outline | ISACA1, CGEIT Review Manual (Digital Version), Outsourcing IT: What to Expect from Your SLAs | AxiaTP2, What is an SLA? Best practices for service-level agreements | CIO1

 It addresses key stakeholder requirements. Information architecture (IA) is the process of organizing, structuring, and labeling content in an effective and sustainable way1. A well-defined IA should address the key stakeholder requirements, such as the business goals, user needs, and technical constraints1. By addressing the key stakeholder requirements, a well-defined IA can ensure that the content is relevant, accessible, understandable, and usable for the intended audience1. It can also support the communication, collaboration, and decision-making processes within the enterprise1. The other options are not as important as addressing the key stakeholder requirements, as they are possible outcomes or benefits of a well-defined IA, but not its defining characteristic. Ensuring compliance with regulations, enabling achievement of service level agreements (SLAs), and supporting IT strategic goals are some of the advantages that a well-defined IA can provide, but they are not the primary purpose or criteria of IA1

 This should be the committee’s first recommendation, as it will help to identify and evaluate the potential threats, vulnerabilities, and impacts of using personal smartphones to conduct corporate business1. A risk assessment will also help to determine the appropriate controls and mitigation strategies to protect the corporate information and assets, as well as comply with the relevant regulations and standards1. The other options are not as important as performing a risk assessment, as they are dependent on the outcome of this step. Documenting procedures for securing personal devices, improving training courses on securing corporate information, and updating the corporate security policy to include personal devices are possible actions that may be taken after performing a risk assessment, based on the identified risks and their levels2.

An enterprise that has identified potential environmental disasters that could occur in the area where its data center is located should next assess the likelihood and impact on the data center, because this would help to evaluate the level of risk and prioritize the appropriate risk response strategies. The likelihood and impact assessment should consider the frequency, severity, duration, and scope of the potential disasters, and the potential consequences for the data center’s availability, integrity, confidentiality, and performance12. References := ISACA, CGEIT Review Manual, 7th Edition, 2019, page 75-76.

Business ethics is the application of ethical values to business behaviour. It encompasses the people, processes, and technologies required to manage and protect data assets1. Promoting business ethics within the IT enterprise should be the primary objective because it ensures trust among internal and external stakeholders, such as customers, employees, suppliers, regulators, and society234. Trust is important because it makes cooperation possible, enhances performance, fosters engagement, and creates long-term value21. While the other options are also desirable outcomes of business ethics, they are not the primary objective. Employees acting more responsibly, corporate social responsibility, and legal and regulatory compliance are all consequences of trust-building rather than the main goal. References:

• 2: https://www.ibm.com/topics/data-governance
• 1: https://www.cio.com/article/202183/what-is-data-governance-a-best-practices-framework-for-managing-data-assets.html
• 3: https://www.sailpoint.com/identity-library/enterprise-data-governance/
• 4: https://atlan.com/enterprise-data-governance/

because this is a role that should approve major IT purchases to help prevent conflicts of interest. An IT steering committee is a group of senior executives and board members who are responsible for overseeing and directing the IT function and ensuring that it aligns with the enterprise’s vision, mission, goals, and strategy12. An IT steering committee should approve major IT purchases, such as hardware, software, services, or projects, to ensure that they are justified, prioritized, and aligned with the business needs and expectations, and that they deliver value and performance to the enterprise12. An IT steering committee should also ensure that the IT procurement process is transparent, fair, and ethical, and that there are no conflicts of interest or undue influence from the IT vendors or suppliers1

 The first course of action when assessing the impact of a new regulatory requirement is to map the regulation to business processes. This means identifying and analyzing which business processes are affected by the new regulation, how they are affected, and what changes are needed to comply with the regulation1. Mapping the regulation to business processes helps to understand the scope, complexity, and priority of the regulatory compliance project, and to align the IT and business objectives and strategies1. It also helps to identify the stakeholders, roles, responsibilities, and risks involved in the compliance process, and to communicate and coordinate with them effectively1. The other options are not as important as mapping the regulation to business processes, as they are dependent on the outcome of this step. Updating affected IT policies, assessing the budget impact of the new regulation, and implementing new regulatory requirements are subsequent steps that should be done after mapping the regulation to business processes2. References: How to Map Regulations to Business Processes. CGEIT Certification | Certified in Governance of Enterprise IT | ISACA.

 A strategic HR plan is a document that drives the business forward by evaluating where the workforce is at and comparing it to future needs. It sets out the organizational goals and outlines how the HR team will help achieve them1. A strategic HR plan for IT would help to identify and address the gaps, challenges, and opportunities in the IT talent management, such as recruitment, retention, development, engagement, and succession2. A strategic HR plan for IT would also help to align the IT workforce with the IT strategy and objectives, and to ensure that the IT personnel have the skills, competencies, and motivation to support the organization’s new strategy3. A strategic HR plan for IT would also help to communicate and collaborate with the IT personnel and other stakeholders, and to foster a positive and supportive IT culture4.

The MOST important thing for the IT steering committee to consider before deciding on a policy to anonymize personal data in enterprise systems is the regulatory requirements. Anonymization is the process of protecting private or sensitive information by erasing or encrypting identifiers that connect an individual to stored data1. However, different jurisdictions may have different definitions, standards, and rules for anonymization and data protection2. For example, the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) outlines a specific set of rules that protect user data and create transparency1. The GDPR permits companies to collect anonymized data without consent, use it for any purpose, and store it for an indefinite time—as long as companies remove all identifiers from the data1. However, if the data is not fully anonymized and can be re-identified by using de-anonymization methods, then the GDPR still applies and requires consent, purpose limitation, and data minimization2. Therefore, the IT steering committee should consider the regulatory requirements of the applicable legislation in both the home and host countries before deciding on a policy to anonymize personal data in enterprise systems. This can help to ensure compliance, avoid fines or penalties, and protect the reputation and trust of the business.

 Business use cases are descriptions of the business processes, scenarios, and interactions that support the achievement of a specific business goal or objective1. By considering the business use cases supporting the digital strategy, the enterprise can ensure that the information architecture is aligned with and driven by the business needs and expectations2. The information architecture can also support the communication, collaboration, and decision-making processes among the stakeholders involved in the digital strategy2.

The other options are not as important as the business use cases supporting the digital strategy, as they are either specific aspects or outcomes of information architecture, but not comprehensive factors. Resource constraints related to implementing the digital strategy are the limitations and challenges that affect the availability and quality of the resources required for executing the digital strategy, such as time, money, people, technology, or data3. Resource constraints can affect the information architecture, but they are not the most important factor to consider, as they are only one of the many criteria that evaluate information architecture3. Changes to the legacy business and data architectures are the modifications and adaptations that are needed to update and improve the existing business and data structures, models, and systems to align with the digital strategy4. Changes to the legacy business and data architectures can affect the information architecture, but they are not the most important factor to consider, as they are only one of the many components that constitute information architecture4. The history of fraud incidents and their root causes are the records and analyses of the previous fraud events and their underlying factors that occurred within or against the enterprise5. The history of fraud incidents and their root causes can affect the information architecture, but they are not the most important factor to consider, as they are only one of the many sources of information that inform information architecture5.

 A defined enterprise architecture (EA) is a key requirement of a governance framework to facilitate the alignment of IT and business strategies. An EA is a blueprint that describes the current and future state of the organization’s structure, processes, information, and technology, as well as the principles and standards that guide their design and evolution. An EA helps to align IT and business strategies by providing a common vision, language, and framework for the organization, and by ensuring that the IT investments and initiatives support the business goals and objectives. An EA also helps to optimize the performance, efficiency, and effectiveness of the IT function and its services, and to manage the risks and changes associated with IT. An EA can be developed and maintained using various methodologies and frameworks, such as TOGAF, Zachman, or FEAF. References: CGEIT Exam Content Outline | ISACA1, CGEIT Review Manual (Digital Version), What is enterprise architecture? A framework for transformation | CIO2, Enterprise Architecture: Definition, Benefits & Examples3

Communicating the objectives and responsibilities to staff is the BEST way to demonstrate senior management’s commitment to IT governance. IT governance is the process of ensuring that IT supports the achievement of the organization’s goals and objectives, and delivers value to its stakeholders1. IT governance involves aligning the IT strategy, policies, processes, and resources with the business strategy, needs, and expectations2. However, implementing and sustaining IT governance requires a significant amount of change in the organization, such as introducing new technologies, standards, roles, and responsibilities3. Therefore, communicating the objectives and responsibilities to staff is essential for demonstrating senior management’s commitment to IT governance, as it can:

• Provide the direction and mandate for the IT governance initiative on an ongoing basis
• Communicate the vision, mission, goals, and objectives of the IT function to all stakeholders
• Allocate the necessary resources and capabilities to enable the IT governance processes and activities
• Monitor and evaluate the performance and outcomes of the IT function and provide feedback and recognition
• Foster a positive and collaborative culture that values IT as a strategic partner and enabler of the business

The other options are not as good as option C. While it is important to communicate the legal and regulatory requirements, the approved IT investment opportunities, and the need for enterprise architecture (EA), these are not sufficient to demonstrate senior management’s commitment to IT governance. They are rather means to achieve the end goal of implementing and sustaining IT governance. They do not necessarily reflect the level of commitment, involvement, and support from the management toward IT governance. References :=

• What is IT Governance? Definition & Examples | ASQ2
• What is IT governance? A formal way to align IT & business strategy1
• How to Involve Senior Management in the Information Security Governance …3

 The first step that the CIO should do to help ensure continuous alignment of IT with the new business strategy is to review the existing IT strategy against the new business strategy. A review is a process of evaluating and comparing the current state and performance of the IT strategy with the desired state and expectations of the new business strategy. A review can help identify the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of the IT strategy, as well as the gaps, risks, and issues that need to be addressed. A review can also provide insights and recommendations for improving and aligning the IT strategy with the new business strategy. According to COBIT 5, one of the seven enablers of IT governance is performance management, which includes reviewing and monitoring the achievement of IT-related goals and objectives1. The review is also part of the IT governance domain 2: Strategic Alignment2.

The other options are not the first steps that the CIO should do to ensure continuous alignment of IT with the new business strategy. Revising the existing IT strategy to align with the new business strategy is a step that follows after reviewing the existing IT strategy, as it involves making changes and adjustments to the IT strategy based on the findings and recommendations of the review. Establishing a new IT strategy committee for the new enterprise is a step that may or may not be necessary depending on the existing governance structure and processes, and it does not directly address the alignment issue. Assessing the IT cultural aspects of the acquired entity is a step that may be relevant for integrating and harmonizing the IT functions and practices of both entities, but it does not ensure alignment with the new business strategy. References := 1: COBIT 5: A Business Framework for the Governance and Management of Enterprise IT, ISACA, page 312: CGEIT Review Manual 2023, ISACA, page 69.

The primary basis for establishing categories within an information classification scheme should be the business impact, because it reflects the level of importance and sensitivity of the information to the organisation and its stakeholders. The business impact can be assessed by considering the potential consequences of unauthorised disclosure, modification, or loss of availability of the information. The higher the business impact, the higher the level of protection required for the information. For example, information that could cause severe damage to the organisation’s reputation, operations, or finances if compromised should be classified as Top Secret1, whereas information that is intended for public release should be classified as Public2. The information security policy should provide guidance on how to classify information based on the business impact, but it is not the primary basis for establishing categories. The information architecture and industry standards may also influence the classification scheme, but they are not as relevant as the business impact.

 The best way to prevent adverse effects to the enterprise resulting from the new technology is to develop key risk indicators (KRIs), because they are metrics that measure the potential impact and likelihood of the risks associated with the new technology, and provide early warning signals for taking corrective actions. KRIs can help the enterprise to monitor and manage the risks of integrating the new technology with the current IT infrastructure, and to ensure that the expected benefits and value are realized12. References := ISACA, CGEIT Review Manual, 7th Edition, 2019, page 75-76.

When preparing a new IT strategic plan for board approval, the MOST important consideration is to ensure the plan identifies roles and responsibilities that link to IT objectives. A well-defined IT strategic plan should clearly articulate the vision, mission, goals, and objectives of the IT function, as well as the strategies and actions to achieve them1. However, without assigning roles and responsibilities to the relevant stakeholders, the plan may lack accountability, ownership, and alignment2. Therefore, it is crucial to identify who is responsible for what, how they will collaborate and communicate, and how they will be measured and rewarded3. This can help to ensure the successful execution and monitoring of the IT strategic plan, as well as the alignment with the business strategy and expectations4.

The other options are not as important as option A. While it is useful to have specific resourcing requirements, frameworks, and implications of the strategy on the procurement process, these are more operational and tactical aspects that can be determined later in the implementation phase. They are not essential for the board approval of the IT strategic plan, which should focus more on the strategic direction and value proposition of the IT function. References :=

• How to Write an Information Technology (IT) Business Proposal | Examples1
• The Role of Board Approval in the Strategic Planning Process - Veralon2
• How To Get The Board To Say Yes - Gartner3
• The Board’s Role in Strategy | WATSON4
• Overseeing strategy: A framework for boards of directors - CPA Canada

Risk appetite is the amount and type of risk that an organization is willing to accept in pursuit of its objectives. Risk appetite of the enterprise should be the primary consideration when developing a risk management policy for a portfolio of IT-enabled investments, because it helps to align the risk management strategy with the business strategy and goals. Risk appetite also helps to define the risk tolerance and thresholds for each investment, and to prioritize and allocate resources accordingly. Risk appetite also helps to communicate the expectations and responsibilities of the stakeholders involved in the risk management process, and to foster a risk-aware culture within the organization. References := CGEIT Review Manual, Chapter 4: Risk Optimization, Section 4.1: IT Risk Management Strategy, Subsection 4.1.1: Establishing IT Risk Appetite, Page 139.

A procurement manager should agree to purchase IT equipment from a specific vendor during a sales promotion only if the equipment adds value to the enterprise. This means that the equipment supports the business goals and objectives, meets the current and future needs of the stakeholders, and delivers benefits that outweigh the costs and risks. The procurement manager should also consider the quality, reliability, compatibility, and security of the equipment, as well as the vendor’s reputation, service level, and warranty.

The other options are not the best justification for a procurement manager to agree to purchase IT equipment from a specific vendor during a sales promotion. The IT benefit surpasses the business benefit from the purchase is not a valid justification, as it implies that the IT department’s interests are more important than the enterprise’s interests. The procurement manager should align the IT strategy with the business strategy and ensure that the IT equipment supports the enterprise value creation. The business profit surpasses the IT cost for the equipment is not a sufficient justification, as it does not account for other factors such as quality, performance, functionality, and risk of the equipment. The procurement manager should evaluate the total cost of ownership (TCO) and return on investment (ROI) of the IT equipment, not just the initial purchase price. The product is offered at the lowest price is not a convincing justification, as it does not guarantee that the equipment is suitable for the enterprise’s needs and expectations. The procurement manager should not compromise on quality, functionality, or security for a lower price.

For more information on IT procurement and value creation, you can refer to these web sources:

• IT Procurement Manager Job Description w/ Role & Responsibilities
• IT Governance: Definitions, Frameworks and Planning
• What is Governance in Procurement? Its Model
• What is IT governance? A formal way to align IT & business strategy

The best way for IT to prepare for a transformation initiative by leveraging emerging technology that will have a significant impact on existing products and services is to assess the impact on the existing IT strategy. An IT strategy is a plan that defines how IT will support the business strategy and objectives, and how IT will deliver value to the enterprise1. By assessing the impact of the emerging technology on the existing IT strategy, IT can determine whether the current IT vision, mission, goals, and capabilities are aligned with the transformation initiative, and whether they need to be revised or updated2. Assessing the impact of the emerging technology on the existing IT strategy also helps IT to identify and prioritize the opportunities, challenges, and risks that the emerging technology may bring, and to develop appropriate solutions and responses3. Assessing the impact of the emerging technology on the existing IT strategy also helps IT to communicate and collaborate with the business stakeholders, and to ensure that the IT investments are aligned with the business needs and expectations4.

References := IT Strategy: What is it?, How to create an effective IT strategy in 2022, Emerging Technology Strategy: A Guide for CIOs, Maximizing Emerging Technology Adoption Benefits - Gartner

A data classification policy is a set of rules and standards that define how data is categorized and labeled according to its sensitivity, value, and criticality for the organization1. An effective data classification policy helps to ensure that data is properly protected, accessed, and managed throughout its lifecycle2. The best way to support the implementation of an effective data classification policy is to have clear guidelines adopted by the business, because they provide a common understanding and framework for data owners, stewards, and users to classify and handle data according to the business context and requirements3. Clear guidelines also help to ensure consistency, compliance, and accountability for data classification across the organization4.

References :=

• Data Classification Policy | Information Security Office
• Data Governance and Classification Policy - University of Cincinnati
• Data governance processes - Cloud Adoption Framework
• Data classification in the Microsoft Purview governance portal

Analysis of data flows and the full data life cycle should be conducted at the enterprise level, because it provides a holistic and comprehensive view of how data is created, stored, processed, used, and disposed of across the entire organization. By conducting data analysis at the enterprise level, the financial institution can ensure that the data integration from branch locations is aligned with the business objectives, needs, and expectations, and that the data quality, security, and compliance are maintained throughout the data life cycle. Data analysis at the enterprise level can also help to identify and address any data gaps, issues, or risks that may affect the regulatory reporting requirements or the performance and value of the data. According to Data Life Cycle and Data Governance What CDOs and CISOs Can Learn, “Data governance is an enterprise-wide program that requires a holistic approach to managing data throughout its life cycle.”

The primary role of the CEO in IT governance is establishing enterprise strategic goals. The CEO is responsible for setting the vision and strategic direction of the organization, which includes ensuring that IT governance aligns with and supports these broader objectives. While managing the risk governance process, evaluating ROI, and nominating IT steering committee membership are important, these are typically shared responsibilities or delegated to other roles within the organization. The CEO's leadership in defining the strategic goals is fundamental to guiding all aspects of IT governance and ensuring alignment with the business strategy.

Standardization is the best option to lower costs and improve scalability from an IT enterprise architecture perspective, because it reduces complexity, increases interoperability, and enables reuse of IT resources. References:= ISACA, CGEIT Review Manual, 27th Edition, 2019, page 79.

 Loss of data confidentiality represents the greatest risk for a large financial institution that is considering outsourcing customer call center operations, as it would expose sensitive customer and business information to unauthorized access, disclosure, or misuse by the chosen vendor or other third parties. Data confidentiality is especially important for financial institutions, as they deal with personal, financial, and transactional data that are subject to strict regulatory and legal requirements, such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS). A breach of data confidentiality could result in reputational damage, customer dissatisfaction, legal liability, and financial loss for the financial institution. The other options are not as great, as they are more related to the operational or performance aspects of outsourcing, rather than the security or compliance aspects of it. References: : CGEIT Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 4: Risk Optimization, Section 4.3: IT Risk Management, Subsection 4.3.1: IT Risk Management Overview, Page 153 : CGEIT Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 5: Resource Optimization, Section 5.3: Security Resource Management, Subsection 5.3.1: Security Resource Management Overview, Page 192 : Offshore bank call centers face risks around privacy, resilience amid COVID-191 : Call Center Outsourcing Risks and How to Mitigate Them

The CIO should update the IT strategic plan to align with the decision of the CEO to commence a major business expansion that will double the size of the organization. This means that the CIO should review the current IT vision, mission, goals, objectives, strategies, and actions, and assess how they support the business expansion plan. The CIO should also identify the IT opportunities, challenges, risks, and gaps that may arise from the business expansion, and develop appropriate solutions and mitigation measures. The CIO should then revise the IT strategic plan to reflect the changes and ensure that IT is aligned with and contributes to the business growth and success

 The business strategy requiring significant IT resource scalability over the next five years is the best justification for the decision to outsource portions of IT operations, as it implies that the manufacturing company needs to adapt to changing market demands, customer expectations, and business opportunities. Outsourcing IT operations can provide the company with access to external IT resources, such as infrastructure, software, and services, that can be scaled up or down according to the business needs and goals12. Outsourcing IT operations can also help the company to reduce costs, improve efficiency, and focus on its core competencies

Enterprise architecture (EA) is a discipline that defines and organizes the components, relationships, principles, and standards of an organization’s IT environment. EA can help to align IT with business strategy and objectives, optimize IT performance and value, and manage IT complexity and change12.

One of the benefits of EA is that it can help to address the concern of duplicate IT applications and services across an enterprise. EA can help to identify and eliminate the redundancies, inconsistencies, and inefficiencies in the IT landscape, by providing a holistic and integrated view of the current and future state of IT. EA can also help to rationalize and consolidate the IT applications and services, by establishing a common framework, taxonomy, and governance for IT decision making. EA can also help to improve the integration and interoperability of IT applications and services, by defining the interfaces, protocols, and standards for data exchange123.

Some examples of how EA can help to address the concern of duplicate IT applications and services are:

• EA can help to conduct an inventory and assessment of the existing IT applications and services, to determine their purpose, scope, functionality, quality, cost, and value. EA can also help to compare and contrast the IT applications and services across different business units, to identify the overlaps, gaps, or conflicts among them4.
• EA can help to define and prioritize the business needs and requirements for IT applications and services, to ensure that they support the business goals and processes. EA can also help to evaluate and select the best IT solutions for each business need, based on criteria such as feasibility, suitability, scalability, security, compliance, etc5.
• EA can help to design and implement a target IT architecture that eliminates or minimizes the duplicate IT applications and services, by using approaches such as application portfolio management (APM), service-oriented architecture (SOA), or cloud computing. EA can also help to plan and execute a migration strategy that ensures a smooth transition from the current to the target state .
• EA can help to monitor and control the IT applications and services, by using metrics, indicators, and reports to measure their performance, availability, reliability, quality, and value. EA can also help to review and update the IT applications and services regularly, by using feedback mechanisms and continuous improvement practices .

References:

What is Enterprise Architecture? Definition & Frameworks. Enterprise Architecture: Definition & Best Practices. How Enterprise Architecture Can Help You Eliminate Technical Debt. Application Inventory: Definition & Best Practices. Business Requirements: Definition & Best Practices. [Application Portfolio Management: Definition & Best Practices]. [Service-Oriented Architecture: Definition & Benefits]. [IT Performance Management: Definition & Best Practices]. [Continuous Improvement: Definition & Best Practices].

The first governance action for implementing a BYOD program should be to assess the BYOD risk. This is because BYOD introduces various security, legal, and operational risks to the enterprise, such as data loss or leakage, unauthorized access, malware infection, compliance violation, device management, and user privacy. Assessing the BYOD risk can help to identify and evaluate the potential threats, vulnerabilities, and impacts of allowing employees to use personal devices for email. Assessing the BYOD risk can also help to determine the appropriate controls and mitigation strategies to reduce the risk to an acceptable level.

Assessing the enterprise architecture (EA) is not the first governance action, as it is a subsequent step after assessing the BYOD risk. EA is a framework that defines the structure, components, relationships, and principles of the enterprise’s IT environment. Assessing the EA can help to ensure that the BYOD program aligns with the enterprise’s vision, strategy, goals, and standards. However, assessing the EA does not address the specific risks associated with BYOD.

Updating the network infrastructure is not the first governance action, as it is an implementation step after assessing the BYOD risk and EA. Updating the network infrastructure can help to enhance the performance, reliability, scalability, and security of the network that supports the BYOD program. However, updating the network infrastructure does not provide a comprehensive risk assessment or governance framework for BYOD.

Updating the BYOD policy is not the first governance action, as it is a result of assessing the BYOD risk and EA. A BYOD policy is a document that defines the rules, guidelines, and responsibilities for employees who use personal devices for email. Updating the BYOD policy can help to communicate the expectations and requirements for BYOD users and enforce compliance and accountability. However, updating the BYOD policy does not provide a thorough risk analysis or architectural alignment for BYOD.

References := BYOD Best Practices - JumpCloud, Assessing your needs section. End user device security for Bring-Your-Own-Device (BYOD) deployment models - ITSM.70.003 - Canadian Centre for Cyber Security, 1 Introduction section. BYOD Policy Best Practices: The Ultimate Checklist - Scalefusion, Introduction section. The Ultimate Guide to BYOD Security: Definition & More - Digital Guardian, The Challenges of BYOD Security section.

The board of directors is ultimately responsible for the governance of IT and ensuring that IT supports the enterprise’s objectives and strategy. The board of directors should also oversee the implementation and monitoring of IT governance controls to ensure compliance with laws and regulations. References: ISACA, CGEIT Review Manual, 7th Edition, 2019, page 17.

Performance indicators are quantitative measures that can be used to evaluate the availability of a system or service. They can include metrics such as uptime, downtime, response time, availability percentage, etc. Balanced scorecard, capability maturity levels, and critical success factors are not directly related to availability objectives, but rather to strategic alignment, process improvement, and goal achievement respectively. References := CGEIT Exam Content Outline, Domain 1: Governance of Enterprise IT, Subdomain A: Governance Framework, Task 5: Establish and monitor key performance indicators (KPIs) and key goal indicators (KGIs) that are aligned with strategic objectives.

 Before an IT strategy committee can approve an IT risk assessment framework, the most important thing to have established is enterprise definitions for risk impact and probability. This is because a risk assessment framework is an approach for prioritizing and sharing information about the security risks posed to an information technology organization1. To do this effectively, the organization needs to have a common understanding of how to measure and communicate the likelihood and consequences of different risks. Without consistent definitions for risk impact and probability, the risk assessment framework might not be aligned with the enterprise’s risk appetite and tolerance, and might not provide meaningful or actionable results. References: Risk Assessment Framework (RAF) - CIO Wiki1, IT Risk Resources | ISACA2, 5 IT risk assessment frameworks compared | CSO Online

Providing clear objectives and transparency is the best way to manage an outsourced vendor relationship, because it ensures that both parties have a common understanding of the expectations, deliverables, and outcomes of the outsourcing arrangement. By providing clear objectives, the client can communicate the business goals, needs, and requirements to the vendor, and the vendor can align their services, processes, and resources accordingly. By providing transparency, the client can share relevant information, feedback, and insights with the vendor, and the vendor can report on their performance, issues, and risks regularly. Providing clear objectives and transparency can also foster trust, collaboration, and innovation between the client and the vendor, and help resolve any conflicts or disputes that may arise. According to Outsourcing Vendor Best Practices: 5 Tips for a Successful Relationship, “Transparency is critical to a successful outsourcing relationship. It helps to ensure that both parties are on the same page regarding expectations, deliverables and performance.”

To obtain a holistic view of IT performance and identify potential gaps in service delivery, a CIO should review Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). KPIs are quantifiable measures that reflect the critical success factors of an organization and provide a comprehensive overview of performance across various aspects of IT service delivery, including efficiency, effectiveness, quality, and compliance with agreed service levels. While ROI analysis, SLA reporting, and staff performance evaluations offer valuable insights into specific areas, KPIs provide a broader perspective that encompasses various dimensions of IT performance, making them essential for a comprehensive assessment.

When conducting a risk assessment in support of a new regulatory requirement, the IT risk committee should first consider the risk profile of the enterprise. Understanding the overall risk landscape, including existing vulnerabilities, threats, and the impact of potential risks, provides a foundation for evaluating how new regulatory requirements will affect the organization. This initial step ensures that subsequent risk management efforts, including compliance activities, are aligned with the enterprise's risk appetite and strategic objectives. While cost, system readiness, and operational disruption are important considerations, they should be evaluated in the context of the enterprise's risk profile.

To help ensure that IT projects related to a new business opportunity deliver the required business outcomes, the best approach is to implement stage-gate reviews that require business sign-off at each critical phase of the project. This process provides structured checkpoints where project progress, alignment with business requirements, and expected outcomes can be evaluated and validated by business stakeholders. This ensures ongoing alignment between IT project execution and business objectives, allowing for timely adjustments as needed. Hiring consultants, developing policies, and focusing on process maturity are supportive actions, but stage-gate reviews with business sign-off directly link project progression to business expectations.

Business risk has the greatest impact on the design of an IT governance framework, as it determines the level of control, oversight, and alignment that is required for the IT function to support the business objectives and mitigate the potential threats and vulnerabilities. Business risk is influenced by various factors, such as the industry, market, customer, competitor, regulatory, and environmental context of the enterprise. Therefore, the IT governance framework should be tailored to suit the specific risk profile and appetite of the enterprise, and to address the key risk areas and scenarios that could affect the business performance and value. According to COBIT 2019, one of the design factors that can influence the design of an enterprise’s governance system is the risk profile1. This design factor reflects the degree of risk exposure and tolerance that the enterprise has in relation to its use of information and technology1. The risk profile can be assessed by considering various aspects, such as the likelihood and impact of risk events, the sources and types of risks, the risk appetite and thresholds, the risk management capabilities and maturity, and the risk culture and awareness1. Based on the risk profile, the enterprise can decide on the appropriate governance objectives, components, enablers, practices, and activities that are needed to manage and mitigate the risks effectively1. The other options, IT performance metrics, resource allocation, and business leadership, are also important for the design of an IT governance framework, but they are not as impactful as business risk. IT performance metrics are used to measure and monitor the effectiveness and efficiency of the IT function in delivering value to the business2. Resource allocation is a process that optimizes the use of IT resources across multiple programs and projects in alignment with the business goals and priorities3. Business leadership is a role that provides strategic direction, guidance, and support for the IT function in achieving its objectives4. However, these factors are more related to the implementation and execution of the IT governance framework, rather than its design. They are also influenced by the business risk factor, as they depend on the level of risk exposure and tolerance that the enterprise has. References := IT Governance: Definitions, Frameworks and Planning - ProjectManager, Resource Allocation Done Right: Best Practices for 2022 & Beyond, The Role of Business Leadership in Effective IT Governance, COBIT Design Factors: A Dynamic Approach to Tailoring Governance in … - ISACA

• This is because an information steward is a person or group who is accountable for the quality, integrity, and usability of the information assets within a specific domain or function1. The responsibilities of an information steward include the following1:

An information steward plays a key role in ensuring that the information assets are accurate, complete, consistent, reliable, and fit for purpose1.

The other options, information custodian, information analyst, and information owner are not directly responsible for information quality. They are more involved in the creation, storage, access, and use of information assets, rather than their quality2. They may also have different perspectives and interests than the information steward regarding the information quality. For example, the information custodian may focus on the security and availability of information assets, while the information analyst may focus on the analysis and interpretation of information assets. The information owner may focus on the value and benefits of information assets. Therefore, they may not have the same authority or responsibility as the information steward for ensuring information quality. References := What Is an Information Steward? | Informatica, Data Roles: Data Owner vs Data Steward vs Data Custodian

The best way to address the issue of IT staff not keeping their skills current, despite an adequate training budget, is to establish an agreed-upon skills development plan with each employee. This personalized approach ensures that training and development activities are directly aligned with both the organization's needs and the individual's career goals, thereby increasing the likelihood of participation and the application of new skills. While providing incentives and creating centers of excellence can be supportive, a tailored development plan directly engages each staff member in their growth, ensuring relevance and commitment.

• This is because calibrating and scaling delivery of IT services means adjusting and optimizing the IT service portfolio, processes, and resources to meet the changing and diverse needs and expectations of the business1. By following this approach, the large enterprise can:

Calibrating and scaling delivery of IT services can help the large enterprise revamp its IT services in a way that supports and enables the business success.

The other options, addressing gaps within the management of IT-related risk, focusing on business innovation through knowledge, expertise, and initiatives, and adhering to on-time and on-budget IT service delivery are not as appropriate as calibrating and scaling delivery of IT services for a large enterprise to follow when revamping its IT services. They are more related to specific aspects or outcomes of IT service management, rather than a holistic and strategic approach. They may also be too narrow or rigid for a large enterprise that needs to adapt and evolve its IT services to the dynamic and complex business environment. They may not address the full scope or potential of IT service improvement and transformation.

Information architecture is the design and organization of data and information assets in an enterprise, such as databases, documents, metadata, and taxonomies. Enterprise architecture (EA) is the holistic view and planning of the business strategy, processes, systems, and technology in an enterprise, such as business architecture, application architecture, data architecture, and technology architecture1. Aligning information architecture with EA means ensuring that the data and information assets are consistent, coherent, and supportive of the EA goals and objectives2.

The primary benefit of aligning information architecture with EA is that it enables the tracing of data to business functions, which means that the data can be linked to the business processes, activities, roles, and outcomes that use or produce it. This benefit has several advantages for the enterprise, such as34:

• Improving data quality, accuracy, and reliability by identifying and resolving any data issues or gaps in the business functions
• Enhancing data governance, security, and compliance by defining and enforcing the data policies and standards for the business functions
• Increasing data value, usability, and accessibility by providing the data consumers with relevant and timely data for their business functions
• Supporting data-driven decision making and innovation by enabling the analysis and evaluation of data for the business functions

The other options are not the primary benefit of aligning information architecture with EA, but rather secondary or potential benefits. Improving communication with senior management and the business is a benefit of EA in general, but not specific to information architecture alignment. Ensuring the adoption of enterprise data quality standards is a benefit of data governance, which may be facilitated by information architecture alignment, but not guaranteed. Facilitating appropriate access to data consumers is a benefit of data security and privacy, which may be improved by information architecture alignment, but not directly.

References: 1: What is Enterprise Architecture? | Gartner1 2: Aligning Information Architecture with Business Strategy - DATAVERSITY2 3: The Benefits of Enterprise Architecture in Organizational …3 4: An Enterprise Architecture Approach for Assessing the Alignment Between

The best way for an enterprise to address new legal and regulatory requirements applicable to IT is to treat them as a risk to be assessed before developing a response. This approach involves identifying the potential impact of the new requirements on the organization, evaluating the likelihood and consequences of non-compliance, and then developing a prioritized response plan based on this risk assessment. This method ensures a measured and proportional response that aligns with the organization's risk appetite and strategic objectives. While benchmarking, adopting a zero-tolerance approach, and using cost-benefit analysis are useful, they should be part of a broader risk-based strategy to address compliance effectively.

The first consideration with regard to the IT service desk that will remain centralized is the effect of regional differences on service delivery. This is because regional differences can pose various challenges and opportunities for the IT service desk, such as:

• Language and cultural barriers: The IT service desk staff should be able to communicate effectively and respectfully with customers from different countries and backgrounds, and understand their needs, preferences, and expectations. This may require hiring multilingual staff, providing language training, using translation tools, or outsourcing some services to local providers1.
• Time zone differences: The IT service desk should be able to provide timely and consistent support to customers across different time zones, and avoid delays or disruptions in service delivery. This may require extending the service hours, implementing shift work, using automation tools, or outsourcing some services to local providers2.
• Legal and regulatory differences: The IT service desk should be aware of and comply with the local laws and regulations that apply to the IT services they provide, such as data protection, privacy, security, taxation, and consumer rights. This may require conducting a risk assessment, obtaining legal advice, implementing policies and procedures, or outsourcing some services to local providers3.
• Technical and operational differences: The IT service desk should be able to adapt to the technical and operational requirements and challenges of the different regions they serve, such as network connectivity, bandwidth, infrastructure, devices, software, standards, and best practices. This may require conducting a feasibility study, investing in technology upgrades, implementing quality assurance measures, or outsourcing some services to local providers4.

The other options, identification of IT service desk functions that can be outsourced, enforcement of a standardized policy across all regions, and availability of adequate resources to provide support for new users are also important considerations for the IT service desk that will remain centralized, but they are not the first one. They are more related to the implementation and execution of the IT service desk strategy, rather than its design. They are also influenced by the regional differences factor, as they depend on the level of variation and complexity that the IT service desk faces in different regions. References := Five Ways to Provide a World Class Service Desk Experience, How to Run an IT Service Desk in a Hybrid or Remote World - Gartner, Best Practices for Building a Service Desk | Atlassian, The Top 18 Help Desk Metrics and Best Practices - HubSpot Blog

When determining the process for meeting an internal health organization's legal and regulatory obligations following a data breach, the most important consideration is the context of the breach, including data ownership and location. Understanding who owns the breached data and where it was stored or processed is crucial for determining jurisdictional and regulatory requirements. This context informs the organization's legal obligations, such as notification requirements and potential liabilities. While organizational structure, data classification, security policy, and details of the breach and incident response efforts are relevant, the context of the breach is paramount in guiding the legal and regulatory response.

• This is because moving all IT applications to an external SaaS cloud provider means that the organization is outsourcing the development, deployment, maintenance, and operation of its IT applications to a third-party vendor. This implies that the organization is relinquishing some control and ownership over its IT applications, and relying on the vendor to provide the required functionality, performance, quality, and security1. Therefore, the organization needs to shift its focus from delivering IT services internally to managing IT services externally. This involves the following activities2:

The shift from service delivery to service management can have a significant impact on the IT governance framework, processes, policies, and practices of the organization. It can also affect the IT skills, roles, and responsibilities of the IT staff and stakeholders. Therefore, the organization needs to adapt and adjust its IT governance approach accordingly to ensure that it can effectively oversee and optimize its IT services in a SaaS environment3.

The other options, the integration of the IT department with business lines, the improvement of IT service alignment with business, and the necessity to update key risk indicators (KRIs) are not as significant as the shift from service delivery to service management for moving all IT applications to an external SaaS cloud provider from an IT governance perspective. They are more related to the outcomes or consequences of moving to a SaaS environment, rather than the impact or change itself. They may also not be unique or specific to a SaaS environment, as they may apply to other types or models of IT service delivery as well.

The primary role of the governance function in enabling an enterprise to achieve its business objectives is to provide a means to effectively manage stakeholders. Stakeholders are the individuals or groups that have an interest or stake in the enterprise’s activities, outcomes, and performance. They include shareholders, customers, employees, suppliers, regulators, and society at large. Effective stakeholder management involves identifying, engaging, communicating, and satisfying the needs and expectations of the stakeholders in a transparent and ethical manner. By providing a means to effectively manage stakeholders, the governance function can help the enterprise to align its vision, mission, strategy, and values with the stakeholder interests, foster trust and collaboration among the stakeholder groups, balance the economic and social goals and the individual and communal goals of the enterprise, and enhance the reputation and legitimacy of the enterprise in the market and society.

The other options are not as primary as providing a means to effectively manage stakeholders for the governance function. Determining risk thresholds that the enterprise can sustain is an important aspect of the governance function, but it is not the primary role. Risk thresholds are the levels of risk exposure that the enterprise is willing to accept or tolerate in pursuit of its business objectives. They are derived from the enterprise’s risk appetite and risk tolerance statements, which reflect the enterprise’s culture, values, and strategy. The governance function can help to define, communicate, and monitor the risk thresholds that the enterprise can sustain, but this is not its primary role. Preparing business continuity and resiliency plans is a vital responsibility of the management function, not the governance function. Business continuity and resiliency plans are the documents that outline the processes and procedures for ensuring the continuity of critical business functions and operations in the event of a disruption or crisis. They also describe how the enterprise can recover from the disruption or crisis and resume normal operations as soon as possible. The governance function can oversee and approve the business continuity and resiliency plans prepared by the management function, but this is not its primary role. Monitoring strategic plans to reach the desired target state is a key activity of both the governance function and the management function, but it is not their primary role. Strategic plans are the documents that define the long-term goals and objectives of the enterprise and how they will be achieved. They also specify the resources, actions, measures, and timelines for implementing the strategy. The governance function can set the direction and scope of the strategic plans, while the management function can execute and report on them. Both functions can monitor the progress and performance of the strategic plans to reach the desired target state, but this is not their primary role. References := The five functions of governance – Project Manager, What is a Governance Structure? - ESG | The Report, Develop an effective governance structure | Australian Public Service …

 The frequency of IT services risk profile updates is a metric that measures how often the IT organization assesses and updates the risks associated with its services. This metric is useful to ensure that IT services meet business requirements, as it helps to identify and mitigate potential threats and vulnerabilities that could affect the availability, performance, reliability, and security of the services. A high frequency of IT services risk profile updates indicates that the IT organization is proactive and responsive to changing business needs and expectations. A low frequency of IT services risk profile updates suggests that the IT organization is reactive and complacent, and may not be aware of or prepared for emerging risks that could impact the business. References := Performance Measurement Metrics for IT Governance - ISACA, The 8 IT service management metrics that matter most

A due diligence process is the best way to enable a clear understanding of the vendor’s capabilities that will be critical to the enterprise’s strategy. A due diligence process is a systematic and comprehensive investigation and evaluation of the vendor’s background, reputation, performance, quality, reliability, security, compliance, and suitability for the enterprise’s needs and expectations. A due diligence process can help the enterprise:

• Verify the vendor’s claims and credentials, and validate the vendor’s references and testimonials
• Assess the vendor’s financial stability, legal status, and ethical standards
• Identify the vendor’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats
• Compare the vendor’s offerings, capabilities, and prices with other vendors and market benchmarks
• Determine the risks and benefits of engaging with the vendor, and the mitigation and contingency plans
• Negotiate the terms and conditions of the contract, service level agreement (SLA), and key performance indicators (KPIs)

References:

• According to the CGEIT Review Manual 2022, "Due diligence is a comprehensive appraisal of a business undertaken by a prospective buyer or partner to establish its assets and liabilities and evaluate its commercial potential."1
• According to the ISACA article on Third-Party Vendor Selection: If Done Right, It’s a Win-Win2, “Once you have identified which processes can be outsourced as well as their inherent risks, you can begin performing due diligence on potential vendors. The level of due diligence should be tailored to the significance of the relationship as well as the potential risks it poses.”
• According to the Gartner article on How to Evaluate Technology Vendors in 4 Rigorous Steps1, “Evaluating vendors requires detailed objectives, criteria, prioritization and monitoring. Here’s help. When it comes to choosing a vendor, enterprise tech buyer teams can easily become bogged down in the details and documentation provided by sales teams.”

When an IT governance committee is reviewing its current risk management policy due to increased usage of social media within an enterprise, the first task should be to initiate an assessment of the impact on the business. This assessment will provide a comprehensive understanding of how social media usage affects various aspects of the business, including productivity, security, data privacy, and compliance with existing policies and regulations. Understanding the business impact will inform the committee's decisions on any necessary policy adjustments or controls to mitigate potential risks associated with social media usage. While reviewing current usage levels, blocking access, and reassessing BYOD policies are relevant considerations, they should be informed by an initial assessment of the business impact to ensure that any actions taken are aligned with the enterprise's strategic objectives and risk tolerance.

 Risk management is a crucial aspect of any cloud-based CRM system, as it involves identifying, assessing, and mitigating the potential risks that could affect the availability, performance, security, and compliance of the system. Before signing a contract for a new cloud-based CRM system, the CIO should ensure that the risk management responsibilities are clearly defined and allocated between the service provider and the customer, and that both parties accept and agree to them. This will help to avoid any confusion, conflict, or liability issues in case of any incidents or breaches that may occur in the future. Some of the risk management responsibilities that should be agreed upon and accepted are:

• The scope and frequency of risk assessments and audits
• The roles and responsibilities for risk monitoring and reporting
• The escalation and resolution procedures for risk issues
• The contingency and recovery plans for risk events
• The security and privacy policies and standards for data protection
• The service level agreements (SLAs) and key performance indicators (KPIs) for service quality and availability

References := Cloud-Based CRM: Best Practices for Implementation, The Best Contract Management Software, CRM Migration Best Practices: An Introductory Guide for HubSpot Agency Partners

Assigning information risk to a department without designating an individual owner is most likely to have a negative impact on accountability for information risk ownership. This lack of individual accountability can lead to ambiguities in responsibility, making it difficult to ensure that appropriate risk management actions are taken and followed up on. When an individual owner is clearly identified, it establishes direct responsibility and accountability, improving the effectiveness of risk management practices. While the scenarios described in the other options present challenges, the absence of a specific individual owner represents a fundamental weakness in establishing clear accountability for managing information risk.

Organizational responsibility for IT risk management is a critical factor for the success of the program. Without clear roles and responsibilities, the program may lack accountability, coordination, communication and alignment with the business objectives. The other options are not as concerning as option A, because they do not affect the core of the program. Having risk management-related certifications is desirable, but not mandatory, for the IT risk management team. Monitoring only a few key risk indicators (KRIs) is acceptable, as long as they are relevant and meaningful for the program. Retaining IT risk training records is important, but not essential, for the program effectiveness. References := ISACA, CGEIT Review Manual, 7th Edition, Chapter 3: Benefits Realization, Section 3.2: IT Risk Management, p. 113-114.

Utilizing a capability maturity model is the best way for a CIO to assess the consistency of IT processes against industry benchmarks and determine where to focus improvement initiatives. Capability maturity models provide a structured framework for evaluating the maturity of an organization's processes in comparison to industry best practices. This approach helps identify areas of strength and opportunities for improvement, guiding strategic decisions on where to allocate resources for process enhancements. While balanced scorecards, key performance measures, and IT process audit results are useful, a capability maturity model offers a comprehensive assessment specifically designed for process improvement.

• This is because continuous testing of disaster recovery capabilities can help to evaluate and validate the effectiveness and efficiency of the disaster recovery plan, identify and address any gaps or issues, and implement any improvements or adjustments based on the lessons learned1. Continuous testing can also help to ensure that the disaster recovery plan is aligned with the current and future business needs and expectations, and that the disaster recovery team and stakeholders are familiar and prepared with their roles and responsibilities1.
• B. Increased training and monitoring for disaster recovery personnel who perform below expectations. This is not the best way to enable the enterprise to accomplish the objective of improving its disaster recovery capabilities, as it only focuses on one aspect of the disaster recovery plan, which is the human factor. While training and monitoring are important for enhancing the skills and performance of the disaster recovery personnel, they are not sufficient to address the other aspects of the disaster recovery plan, such as the technology, process, and communication factors2. Moreover, increased training and monitoring may not be effective if they are not based on a clear and comprehensive assessment of the disaster recovery capabilities and outcomes.
• C. Annual review and updates to the disaster recovery plan (DRP). This is not the best way to enable the enterprise to accomplish the objective of improving its disaster recovery capabilities, as it may not be frequent or timely enough to capture and respond to the changing business environment and requirements. An annual review and update may also be insufficient to test and validate the disaster recovery plan, as it may not cover all possible scenarios or situations that could occur in a real disaster3. A more agile and adaptive approach to reviewing and updating the disaster recovery plan is recommended, such as using a continuous improvement cycle or a stage-gate process4.
• D. Increased outsourcing of disaster recovery capabilities to ensure reliability. This is not the best way to enable the enterprise to accomplish the objective of improving its disaster recovery capabilities, as it may introduce new risks and challenges for the enterprise, such as loss of control, dependency, compatibility, security, compliance, and cost issues5. Outsourcing some or all of the disaster recovery capabilities may also reduce the involvement and ownership of the enterprise’s internal staff and stakeholders in the disaster recovery planning process, which could affect their commitment and readiness in case of a disaster5. Outsourcing should be carefully considered and evaluated based on the specific needs and circumstances of the enterprise, and should be complemented by a robust governance and management framework5.

 A root cause analysis is the first step to identify the factors that are causing the loss of top talent and to devise appropriate solutions. A SWOT analysis, an incentive and retention program, and an aggressive talent acquisition program are possible outcomes of a root cause analysis, but they are not the first action to take. References := CGEIT Review Manual, 7th Edition, page 103.

Performing a business impact analysis (BIA) is the first course of action when a shortfall of IT resources is identified because it helps to assess the potential impact of the resource gap on the business processes, objectives, and goals. A BIA can also help to prioritize the criticality of the IT resources, identify the minimum acceptable levels of service, and determine the recovery strategies and resource requirements. A BIA can provide a basis for making informed decisions on how to allocate the available IT resources or acquire additional resources to close the gap.

References:

• According to ISACA’s CGEIT Review Manual 2021, one of the key activities for ensuring effective IT resource management is to "perform a business impact analysis (BIA) to identify and prioritize critical IT resources."1
• According to ISACA’s COBIT 2019 Framework, one of the governance objectives for managing IT resources is to "ensure that a BIA is performed to determine the required level of availability, continuity and security of IT services and data."2
• According to ISACA’s Business Continuity Management guide, one of the steps for developing a business continuity plan is to "conduct a BIA to identify the critical business processes and IT resources that support them."3

 A common risk management taxonomy is a set of terms and definitions that are used consistently across the enterprise to describe, measure, and report on risks. A common risk management taxonomy is essential for integrating IT risk with the ERM framework, as it enables a common understanding of risk concepts, categories, and levels among different stakeholders and functions. A common risk management taxonomy also facilitates the aggregation and comparison of risks across the enterprise, and supports the alignment of risk appetite and tolerance with business objectives12. References: 1: Integrated Enterprise IT Risk Management (ERM) Programs - CohnReznick3 2: Introducing Risk Taxonomy - ISACA4

The best way for IT to achieve compliance with regulatory requirements is to enforce IT policies and procedures that align with the compliance standards and guidelines. IT policies and procedures are the documents that define the roles, responsibilities, rules, and expectations for the IT function and its activities. They help to ensure that the IT systems and processes are secure, reliable, efficient, and consistent with the business objectives and legal obligations. By enforcing IT policies and procedures, IT can demonstrate its compliance with regulatory requirements and avoid violations, penalties, or reputational damage. The other options are not as effective as enforcing IT policies and procedures for achieving compliance with regulatory requirements. Creating an IT project portfolio is a good practice for managing IT investments and resources, but it does not guarantee compliance with regulatory requirements. Reviewing an IT performance dashboard is a useful technique for monitoring and measuring IT performance and value delivery, but it does not ensure compliance with regulatory requirements. Reporting on IT audit findings and action plans is a necessary step for improving IT governance and control processes, but it does not achieve compliance with regulatory requirements. References := What is IT Compliance? - Checklist, Guidelines & More | Proofpoint US, 6 Common IT Compliance Standards (A Guide to the Basics), Here’s Why Regulatory Compliance is Important - Reciprocity

The most important consideration regarding IT measures as part of an IT strategic plan is that the metrics can be traced to enterprise goals. This alignment ensures that IT initiatives and performance metrics directly contribute to achieving the broader objectives of the organization, demonstrating the value of IT in supporting strategic outcomes. While data collection automation, realistic minimum target levels, and thresholds aligned to KRIs are important attributes of effective metrics, the ability to trace metrics back to enterprise goals is fundamental to ensuring strategic alignment and justifying IT investments.

In the context of a resource shortage, reviewing the IT strategic plan would be most helpful for determining how to allocate IT resources. The strategic plan outlines the organization's vision, goals, and priorities, providing a clear framework for making informed decisions about resource allocation. It ensures that limited resources are directed toward initiatives that are most critical to achieving strategic objectives, thereby maximizing the impact and value of IT investments. While skills development plans, organizational structures, and skills inventories are important, they do not provide the strategic context needed for prioritizing resource allocation.

Reviewing the information governance framework should be the CIO’s primary focus before the migration, because it will help the CIO to ensure that the enterprise’s data and applications are secure, compliant, and aligned with the business objectives and policies in the cloud environment. The information governance framework defines the roles, responsibilities, processes, standards, and metrics for managing information assets across the enterprise. It also covers aspects such as data classification, data quality, data protection, data retention, data sovereignty, and data privacy. By reviewing the information governance framework, the CIO can identify the requirements, risks, and gaps that need to be addressed before moving to the cloud. The other options are not as important as reviewing the information governance framework, because they are either dependent on or secondary to it. Selecting best-of-breed cloud offerings is a tactical decision that should be based on the information governance framework and the enterprise architecture. Updating the enterprise architecture repository is a good practice, but not a primary focus before the migration. It can be done after the migration to reflect the changes in the IT landscape. Conducting IT staff training to manage cloud workloads is a necessary step, but not a primary focus before the migration. It can be done in parallel with or after the migration to ensure that the IT staff have the skills and knowledge to operate and optimize the cloud environment. References := Migration environment planning checklist, Practical Guide to Cloud Governance, Governance or compliance strategy

To measure the value of IT-enabled investments, an enterprise needs to identify its drivers as defined by its business strategy. The business strategy is the document that defines the vision, mission, goals, and objectives of the enterprise and how they will be achieved. It also specifies the value proposition, competitive advantage, and target market of the enterprise. The drivers of value are the factors that influence or determine the value creation and delivery of the enterprise. They can include aspects such as customer satisfaction, revenue growth, cost reduction, innovation, quality, and efficiency. By identifying its drivers as defined by its business strategy, the enterprise can align its IT-enabled investments with its strategic priorities and expectations. It can also establish the criteria, metrics, and indicators for measuring and evaluating the value of IT-enabled investments in terms of their contribution to the business outcomes and performance.

This action is important because corporate culture is the shared set of norms, beliefs, and values that influence the behavior and attitudes of the organization’s members. Corporate culture can support or hinder IT governance, depending on how well it aligns with the IT governance objectives. IT’s role in providing business value is the extent to which IT contributes to the achievement of the business strategy, goals, and needs. IT’s role in providing business value can vary depending on the industry, market, and competitive environment of the enterprise12.

By understanding corporate culture and IT’s role in providing business value, the new CIO can gain insight into the current state and challenges of IT governance in the enterprise, as well as the expectations and requirements of the stakeholders. The new CIO can also identify the gaps and opportunities for improvement or innovation in IT governance, and develop a vision and strategy for IT governance that is aligned with the corporate culture and business value34.

The other options are not the first action of a new CIO when considering an IT governance framework for an enterprise, but rather subsequent actions that depend on the outcome of understanding corporate culture and IT’s role in providing business value. Understanding critical IT processes to define the scope of the IT governance framework is a step that occurs after the new CIO has established the objectives and priorities for IT governance, and needs to determine which processes are essential for delivering value and managing risk5. Verifying stakeholder sponsorship of the IT governance initiative is a step that occurs after the new CIO has developed a business case and a communication plan for IT governance, and needs to secure the support and commitment of the key decision-makers and influencers6. Developing an IT balanced scorecard to monitor and track IT performance is a step that occurs after the new CIO has implemented and executed the IT governance framework, and needs to measure and report on the outcomes and benefits of IT governance7.

References: 1: Corporate governance of information technology - Wikipedia8 2: What is Business Value? Definition & Examples - Talend 3: How to Create an Effective IT Governance Framework | Smartsheet 4: 7 Rules for Demonstrating the Business Value of IT - Gartner 5: The internal process perspective within the Balanced Scorecard 6: Here’s What You Need in Your Whistleblower Policy (and Why) - Case IQ 7: The Balanced Scorecard Customer Perspective : What is Enterprise Architecture? | Gartner

Ensuring that IT policies are aligned with organizational strategies is best achieved when the policies are developed using a top-down approach. This approach starts with strategic objectives and cascades down to operational policies, ensuring coherence and alignment with the overall direction and goals of the organization. While board approval, annual updates, and periodic audits are important for policy governance, the top-down development approach ensures that policies are inherently designed to support organizational strategies from the outset.

Performing stage-gate reviews throughout the life cycle of each project is the best way to ensure IT investment management processes are fully realizing the benefits identified in business cases. Stage-gate reviews provide structured checkpoints at critical phases of a project, allowing for the evaluation of progress, performance against objectives, and the continued viability and alignment with business goals. This approach enables timely adjustments to be made, ensuring that projects stay on track to deliver the expected benefits. While CIO review and approval, evaluating delegation of authority, and documenting lessons learned are valuable, they do not offer the continuous oversight and opportunity for course correction that stage-gate reviews do.

• This is because enterprise architecture (EA) is a practice that helps organizations align their IT systems and processes with their business objectives. EA provides a holistic and integrated view of the current and future state of the organization’s IT infrastructure, as well as the gaps, issues, and opportunities for improvement1. By using EA, the organization can:

EA can help the organization plan for the necessary IT investments in a systematic and structured way, and ensure that they are aligned with the business vision and value.

The other options, risk assessment report, business user satisfaction metrics, and audit findings are not as useful as enterprise architecture (EA) for planning for the necessary IT investments. They are more related to the evaluation and monitoring of the IT performance, rather than the planning and alignment of the IT strategy. They may also provide limited or partial information about the IT infrastructure, rather than a comprehensive and integrated view. They may also depend on external factors or standards that may not be relevant or applicable to the organization’s specific context and needs.

According to the web search results, IT change management is the process of tracking and managing a change throughout its entire life cycle, from start to closure, with the aim to minimize risk1. One of the steps in the IT change management process is to collect and analyze data, quantify gaps and understand resistance, and modify the plan as needed2. The final step in completing the changes to IT processes is to ensure a return to stabilized business operations, which means that the change has been successfully implemented and the expected benefits have been realized3. This step also involves closing the change request, documenting the lessons learned, and celebrating the achievements4.

The other options are not the final step in completing the changes to IT processes, but rather intermediate steps that occur before or during the change implementation. Updating the configuration management database (CMDB) is a step that occurs during the change implementation, as it involves recording and tracking the changes made to the IT assets and services. Empowering the business to embrace the changes is a step that occurs before and during the change implementation, as it involves providing communication, training, and support to help the stakeholders adopt and adapt to the changes. Updating the enterprise architecture (EA) is a step that occurs before or during the change implementation, as it involves aligning the IT strategy, processes, and systems with the business goals and requirements.

References: 1: IT change management: A comprehensive guide - ManageEngine1 2: What is Change Management? Organizational, Process, Definition … - ASQ3 3: The Evolution of IT Change Management | Atlassian2 4: What is IT Change Management? - ServiceNow4 : What is Configuration Management Database (CMDB)? | ServiceNow : What is Organizational Change Management? | Prosci : What is Enterprise Architecture? | Gartner

Following a re-prioritization of business objectives by management, the first step to allocate resources to IT processes should be to update the IT strategy. This ensures that the IT strategic plan remains aligned with the overall business direction and objectives. An updated IT strategy will reflect the new priorities and guide the allocation of resources to support the revised business goals effectively. Refining the human resource management plan, implementing a RACI model, and performing a maturity assessment are important actions but should follow the strategic alignment to ensure that all IT efforts and resources are directed towards achieving the updated business objectives.

 Engaging stakeholders to identify and validate business requirements is the best way to improve the success rate of future IT initiatives. Stakeholders are the individuals or groups who have an interest or influence in the IT initiatives, such as business users, customers, managers, sponsors, etc. Engaging stakeholders can help:

• Understand the needs, expectations, and priorities of the stakeholders, and ensure that they are aligned with the business objectives and strategy
• Define and document the business requirements that specify what the IT initiatives should deliver in terms of functionality, quality, performance, and value
• Validate and verify that the business requirements are clear, complete, consistent, feasible, and testable
• Communicate and manage any changes or issues that may affect the business requirements or the IT initiatives

Engaging stakeholders to identify and validate business requirements can help avoid missing key functionality in the corporate applications, and ensure that they meet the stakeholder’s needs and expectations. This can also reduce the reliance on spreadsheets and databases as alternative software solutions, and increase the user satisfaction and adoption of the enterprise applications.

The other options are not the best way to improve the success rate of future IT initiatives. Engaging the business user community in acceptance testing of acquired applications is a good practice, but it is not sufficient to ensure that the applications have the key functionality that meets the business requirements. Acceptance testing is done at the end of the IT initiative lifecycle, after the applications have been developed or acquired. If the business requirements were not properly identified and validated at the beginning of the IT initiative lifecycle, acceptance testing may reveal significant gaps or defects that may be costly or difficult to fix. Establishing a process for risk and value management is a useful technique, but it does not directly address the issue of missing key functionality in the corporate applications. Risk and value management involves identifying, assessing, prioritizing, and treating the risks and benefits associated with IT initiatives. However, without clear and valid business requirements, risk and value management may not be effective or accurate. Prohibiting the use of non-approved alternate software solutions is a restrictive measure, but it does not solve the problem of missing key functionality in the corporate applications. Prohibiting the use of spreadsheets and databases may force the users to use the enterprise applications, but it may also create dissatisfaction, frustration, or resistance among them. Moreover, it may prevent them from performing their tasks efficiently or effectively if the enterprise applications do not meet their needs.

For more information on engaging stakeholders to identify and validate business requirements, you can refer to these web sources:

• Stakeholder Engagement - ISACA
• Business Requirements - ISACA
• Requirements Validation - ISACA

 A cost-benefit analysis (CBA) is a process that’s used to estimate the costs and benefits of projects or investments to determine their profitability for an organization. A CBA is a versatile method that’s often used for business administration, project management and public policy decisions1. A CBA can help the CIO prioritize the improvement initiatives based on their expected value and feasibility, and justify the allocation of resources and funding for them. A CBA can also align the IT goals with the enterprise objectives and demonstrate the IT value delivery to the stakeholders2. References :=

• 2: CGEIT Exam Content Outline | ISACA
• 1: Cost-Benefit Analysis: A Quick Guide with Examples and Templates

A communication plan is a document that outlines the objectives, strategies, tactics, and messages for communicating with a specific audience. A communication plan for disseminating information regarding the technical risks of BYOD should include the following elements12:

• The purpose and goals of the communication
• The target audience and their needs and preferences
• The key messages and tone of the communication
• The communication channels and methods
• The roles and responsibilities of the communicators
• The timeline and frequency of the communication
• The evaluation and feedback mechanisms

The most important element to include in this communication plan is the key messages, which should convey the potential exposures and impacts of BYOD using common terms that the audience can understand. The key messages should explain what BYOD is, why it is important, what are the benefits and challenges, what are the risks and threats, how to protect the devices and data, and what are the best practices and policies. The key messages should also be consistent, clear, concise, relevant, and engaging12.

The other options are not as important as the key messages, as they are either supporting or secondary elements of the communication plan. A link on the corporate intranet to the BYOD policy is a communication channel, which is a means of delivering the message, but not the message itself. A schedule and content for mandatory training is a communication tactic, which is a specific action or activity to implement the strategy, but not the strategy itself. Disciplinary actions for violation of the BYOD policy is a message detail, which is a specific piece of information to support the message, but not the message itself.

References: 1: How to Write a Communication Plan: A Start-to-Finish Guide3 2: How to Create a Communication Plan (with Pictures) - wikiHow4

Upon learning that business units have been independently procuring cloud services, the IT steering committee's best course of action is to define a procurement strategy based on business unit needs. This approach ensures that cloud service procurement aligns with the enterprise's overall IT strategy and governance policies while still addressing the specific requirements of individual business units. It fosters collaboration between IT and business units, ensuring that cloud services are vetted for compliance, security, and interoperability. Requiring cancellation, including business unit leadership in the EA review board, or limiting usage to open-source solutions may address aspects of the issue but do not provide a comprehensive strategy that aligns business needs with IT governance.

• This is because training metrics are measurable values that indicate the effectiveness and impact of the training programs on the IT staff’s knowledge, skills, and performance1. By embedding training metrics into the annual performance appraisal process, the CIO can:

Embedding training metrics into the annual performance appraisal process can help to create a culture of learning, development, and accountability for IT-related training within the organization. It can also help to align the individual goals of the IT management team and direct employees with the organizational goals of IT governance.

The other options, developing training programs based on results of an IT staff survey of preferences, promoting IT-specific training awareness program, and researching and identifying training needs based on industry trends are not as effective as embedding training metrics into the annual performance appraisal process for ensuring that IT-related training is taken seriously by the IT management team and direct employees. They are more related to the design and delivery of the IT-related training, rather than its integration and evaluation. They may also not have a significant impact on the behavior and attitude of the IT management team and direct employees towards IT-related training, as they may not provide sufficient motivation, feedback, or recognition for participation or completion.

Risk management is the process of identifying, analyzing, evaluating, and treating the uncertainties that may affect the achievement of objectives. Risk management helps to ensure that decisions are made with an awareness of probability and impact, which means that the likelihood and consequences of potential events are considered and weighed against the benefits and costs of the actions. This can help to optimize the risk-reward balance, enhance the quality and consistency of decision-making, and support the achievement of desired outcomes. References:

• CGEIT Review Manual 2021, Chapter 2: IT Risk Management, Section 2.1: Risk Management Overview, page 551
• CGEIT Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual 2021, Question 1, page 152
• The Benefits of Risk Management - PMI3

• This is because KPIs are measurable values that indicate how well the IT governance framework is achieving its objectives and delivering value to the business1. By evaluating KPI results, the organization can:

Evaluating KPI results can provide a comprehensive and objective overview of the IT governance framework’s effectiveness and impact.

The other options, developing a business case for the program portfolio, benchmarking the IT governance framework to industry best practice, and reviewing results of IT audit reports are not as effective as evaluating KPI results for assessing the effectiveness of a newly established IT governance framework. They are more related to the design and implementation of the IT governance framework, rather than its evaluation. They may also be too narrow or subjective for assessing the IT governance framework’s effectiveness, as they may not cover all aspects or perspectives of the IT governance framework. They may also depend on external factors or standards that may not be relevant or applicable to the organization’s specific context and needs.

According to the web search results, the CEO is accountable for providing sponsorship for the IT-enabled change across the enterprise. The CEO is the highest-ranking executive in the organization, and has the authority and responsibility to lead the strategic direction and vision of the enterprise. The CEO also has the power and influence to allocate resources, prioritize initiatives, resolve conflicts, and communicate with stakeholders. Therefore, the CEO is the best person to provide sponsorship for the ERP implementation, which is a major and complex IT-enabled change that affects the entire enterprise12.

The other options are not as accountable as the CEO for providing sponsorship for the IT-enabled change across the enterprise. The HR director is responsible for managing the human resources functions of the organization, such as recruitment, training, compensation, and performance management. The HR director may support the ERP implementation by facilitating change management, employee engagement, and organizational development, but does not have the same level of authority and accountability as the CEO3. The IT strategy committee is a group of senior executives from different business units that provide guidance and oversight for the IT strategy and governance of the organization. The IT strategy committee may advise and approve the ERP implementation, but does not have the same level of leadership and visibility as the CEO4. The CIO is responsible for managing the IT functions of the organization, such as planning, implementing, and operating the IT systems and services. The CIO may lead and execute the ERP implementation, but does not have the same level of responsibility and influence as the CEO.

References: 1: What Is A Project Sponsor & Do You Need One When Implementing ERP?1 2: Building a Successful ERP Implementation Team | NetSuite2 3: What Does an HR Director Do? | Indeed.com 4: What Is an IT Strategy Committee? | Bizfluent : What is a CIO? Everything you need to know about the Chief Information Officer explained | ZDNet