APS Accredited Payables Specialist (APS) Certification Exam Questions and Answers

Procurement cards (P-cards) are corporate credit cards used for business purchases, and issuers often offer rebates or incentives to encourage their use. These rebates are typically based on the volume of spend, meaning the total dollar amount charged to the P-card over a specified period. This incentivizes organizations to consolidate more purchases on the card, benefiting both the issuer (through transaction fees) and the organization (through rebates).

The web source from Corcentric states: “P-card issuers commonly offer rebates based on the total volume of spend, encouraging organizations to increase card usage for eligible purchases.” This confirms that rebates are tied to the dollar amount spent (Option A), not the number of transactions (Option B), frequency of use (Option C), or number of cards issued (Option D).

The IOFM APS Certification Program covers “Payments,” including P-card programs and their benefits. The curriculum’s focus on “peer-tested best practices for each phase of the payment process” aligns with the industry standard that rebates are based on spend volume, as this drives cost savings and program efficiency.

Even when using a corporate travel card, employees must keep and submit T&E receipts for several reasons. First, there may be additional out-of-pocket expenses (e.g., tips, small cash purchases) not charged to the card, requiring receipts for reimbursement (Option I). Second, corporate card statements often lack sufficient detail (e.g., itemized expenses or business purpose), necessitating receipts to meet approval and compliance requirements (Option III). However, paper receipts are not inherently easier to handle or archive than electronic ones (Option II), as modern T&E systems favor digital receipt management for efficiency and accessibility.

The web source from Esker states: “Employees must submit receipts for T&E expenses, even with corporate cards, to account for out-of-pocket expenses and to provide detailed documentation for approval, as card statements may lack itemized details.” The NetSuite source adds: “Digital receipt management is preferred over paper receipts, as it simplifies archiving and retrieval.” This supports Options I and III, while refuting Option II, as paper receipts are less efficient in modern systems.

The IOFM APS Certification Program covers “Travel and Entertainment (T&E),” emphasizing proper documentation and compliance in expense reporting. The curriculum’s focus on “peer-tested best practices” aligns with the need for receipts to document out-of-pocket expenses and provide detailed approval data, but not for paper-based archiving.

Rush checks, issued outside the regular check run schedule, increase processing costs and disrupt workflows. Effective strategies to minimize rush check requests include distributing the check run schedule with clear cut-off dates and times to encourage timely submissions (Option I) and charging a rush check processing fee to deter unnecessary requests (Option II). Publishing the names of frequent requestors (Option III) is not a professional or recommended practice, as it may create workplace tension without addressing the root cause.

The web source from SAP Concur notes: “To reduce rush checks, organizations can communicate payment schedules clearly and impose fees for expedited processing to incentivize adherence to regular check runs.” This supports Options I and II. Option III is not mentioned in industry best practices and is considered inappropriate.

The IOFM APS Certification Program covers “Internal Controls,” including strategies to optimize payment processes. The curriculum’s emphasis on “peer-tested best practices” aligns with proactive measures like scheduling communication and fee structures to control rush checks.

Value Added Tax (VAT) invoices are subject to strict regulatory requirements, as they impact taxreporting and compliance. When a VAT invoice contains a billing error (e.g., incorrect amount, tax rate, or details), the recommended solution is to withhold payment and return the invoice to the vendor for correction. This ensures that the corrected invoice complies with VAT regulations, allowing accurate tax reporting and reclaiming of input VAT. Paying an incorrect invoice or reporting the error to the VAT administration without correction risks non-compliance and audit issues.

The web source from Avalara explains: “If a VAT invoice is incorrect, it must be corrected by the supplier issuing a new invoice or a credit note, depending on the nature of the error.” This aligns with the option to return the invoice to the vendor for correction. Paying the incorrect amount (Option B) or short/overpaying with an explanation (Option D) can complicate VAT reconciliation and may not be accepted by tax authorities, as the invoice must accurately reflect the transaction. Reporting the transaction to the VAT administration (Option A) is unnecessary unless the error involves fraud or persistent issues, and it does not resolve the invoice discrepancy.

The IOFM APS Certification Program covers “Tax and Regulatory Compliance,” including VAT compliance and invoice handling. While the specific question is not directly quoted in the provided sources, IOFM’s curriculum emphasizes compliance with tax regulations, as noted in the program description: “Review peer-tested best practices for each phase of the payment process – from receipt of invoice, through processing and payment.” The focus on accurate invoice processing supports returning the invoice for correction as the standard practice.

TheInternal Controlstopic in the IOFM APS Certification Program covers the COSO (Committee of Sponsoring Organizations) framework, a widely recognized model for designing and evaluating internal controls, as mandated by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX). The COSO framework includes five components: Control Environment, Risk Assessment, Control Activities, Information and Communication, and Monitoring Activities.Accounting principlesare not a COSO component, as they relate to GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles), not internal control categories.

Option A (Control environment): This is a COSO component, setting the tone for the organization’s control consciousness, including leadership and ethics.

Option B (Information and communication): This is a COSO component, ensuring relevant information is identified, captured, and communicated effectively.

Option C (Risk assessment): This is a COSO component, involving the identification and analysis of risks to achieving objectives.

Option D (Accounting principles): Accounting principles (e.g., GAAP) guide financial reporting but are not part of the COSO framework’s internal control categories. This is the correct answer.

Reference to IOFM APS Documents: The APS e-textbook underInternal Controlsstates, “The COSO framework includes five components: Control Environment, Risk Assessment, Control Activities, Information and Communication, and Monitoring Activities, used to design and testinternal controls.” It distinguishes COSO from GAAP, noting that “accounting principles govern financial reporting, not internal control frameworks.” The training video reinforces this by discussing COSO’s role in SOX compliance, listing the five components and excluding accounting principles.

In the context of accounts payable and financial operations, the acronymFIFOstands forFirst In, First Out, a method commonly used in inventory management and accounting to assume that the earliest goods purchased (first in) are sold or used first (first out). This affects cost of goods sold and inventory valuation. The other options are not relevant: “Fifty Invested, Five Optioned” (Option B), “Fraud In Financial Operations” (Option C), and “Final Invoice For Offset” (Option D) are not standard terms in AP or accounting.

The web source from SAP Concur states: “FIFO, or First In, First Out, is an inventory accounting method where the earliest goods received are recorded as sold first, impacting financial reporting.” This directly supports Option A.

The IOFM APS Certification Program covers “Internal Controls,” including accounting principles like FIFO that affect financial processes. The curriculum’s focus on “peer-tested best practices” aligns with understanding FIFO as a standard method in inventory and cost accounting.

TheTax and Regulatory Compliancetopic in the APS Certification Program includes understanding the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX), enacted in 2002 to enhance corporate governance and financial reporting accuracy. SOX imposes strict requirements on public companies and holds individuals (e.g., executives, accountants) accountable for misconduct, such as falsifying financial records or obstructing audits. Violations can result incriminal penalties, including fines and imprisonment, depending on the severity of the misconduct.

Option A (Corporate dissolution): While SOX violations can lead to significant financial and reputational damage, corporate dissolution (complete closure of the company) is not a direct legal consequence specified in the Act. This option is incorrect.

Option B (Criminal penalties): SOX includes provisions for criminal penalties, such as fines up to $5 million and imprisonment up to 20 years for willful violations (e.g., falsifying records under Section 802). This is the correct answer.

Option C (Industry blacklisting): There is no formal “industry blacklisting” mechanism in SOX. While individuals may face reputational damage or debarment from certain roles, this is not a legal consequence. This option is incorrect.

Option D (Community service): SOX does not prescribe community service as a penalty for misconduct. Penalties are financial or custodial (fines, imprisonment). This option is incorrect.

Reference to IOFM APS Documents: The APS e-textbook underTax and Regulatory Complianceexplains that “the Sarbanes-Oxley Act imposes criminal penalties, including fines and imprisonment, for misconduct such as falsifying financial records or obstructing audits.” Thetraining video discusses SOX’s impact on AP, noting that internal controls must prevent fraudulent reporting to avoid penalties under sections like 906 (certification of financial reports) and 802 (document tampering).

TheTax and Regulatory Compliancetopic in the APS Certification Program covers sales and use taxes, which are imposed on the sale or use of goods and services. In the U.S., sales and use taxes are levied bystatesand, in many cases,cities and towns(local jurisdictions). Thefederal governmentdoes not impose sales or use taxes, as this authority is reserved for state and local governments.

Item I (Cities and towns): Many cities and towns impose local sales taxes, often in addition to state taxes, to fund municipal services. This is a valid taxing authority.

Item II (Federal government): The federal government does not levy sales or use taxes; it imposes taxes like income or excise taxes. This is not a valid taxing authority for sales and use taxes.

Item III (States): States are the primary authorities for sales and use taxes, setting rates and rules for taxable transactions. This is a valid taxing authority.

Option A (II and III only): Incorrect, as Item II is not a valid taxing authority.

Option B (III only): Incorrect, as Item I is also a valid taxing authority.

Option C (I and III only): Correct, as only states and local jurisdictions (cities and towns) levy sales and use taxes.

Option D (I, II, and III): Incorrect, as Item II is not a valid taxing authority.

Reference to IOFM APS Documents: The APS e-textbook underTax and Regulatory Compliancestates, “Sales and use taxes are levied by states and local jurisdictions, such as cities and towns, but not by the federal government.” The training video discusses AP’s role in managing sales tax compliance, noting that “states and local governments set sales tax rates, while the federal government does not impose such taxes.”

Data integrity refers to the assurance that data remains accurate, complete, and unaltered throughout its lifecycle, whether during storage, processing, or transmission. It ensures that data is free from unauthorized modifications or corruption. While testing for accuracy (Option D) is related, data integrity specifically focuses on preventing unauthorized changes (Option A). A digital signature (Option B) or encryption (Option C) are security measures that may support data integrity but do not define it.

The web source from Corcentric states: “Data integrity means that data remains unaltered and consistent, ensuring it is free from unauthorized modifications or errors.” This directly supports Option A.

The IOFM APS Certification Program covers “Internal Controls,” including data security and integrity in AP processes. The curriculum’s focus on “peer-tested best practices” aligns with the definition of data integrity as preventing unauthorized alterations.

TheInternal Controlstopic in the APS Certification Program details the COSO framework’s Control Environment component, which establishes the foundation for effective internal controls. Key elements include clear roles and responsibilities, timely information distribution, and ongoing monitoring of controls. However,staff working in self-directed teamsis not a COSO requirement, as the framework focuses on structure and accountability rather than specific team management styles.

Option A (Internal controls are monitored and evaluated): This aligns with COSO’s Monitoring Activities component but also supports the Control Environment by ensuring controls are enforced. It is a necessary element.

Option B (Staff work in self-directed teams): COSO does not mandate self-directed teams. While teamwork may be beneficial, the Control Environment emphasizes defined roles and oversight, not specific team structures. This is the correct answer.

Option C (Information is distributed in a timely way): This supports the Control Environment by ensuring employees have the information needed to perform their duties, aligning with COSO’s Information and Communication component. It is a necessary element.

Option D (People know their responsibilities and limits of authority): This is a core element of the Control Environment, ensuring clear accountability and authority structures. It is a necessary element.

Reference to IOFM APS Documents: The APS e-textbook underInternal Controlsexplains, “The COSO Control Environment requires clear responsibilities, timely information flow, and ongoing monitoring to establish effective controls.” It lists elements like “defined roles and authority limits” and “effective communication” but does not mention self-directed teams as a requirement. The training video emphasizes COSO’s focus on accountability and structure, noting that team configurations are organizational choices, not COSO mandates.

TheInternal Controlstopic in the APS Certification Program emphasizes preventing employee fraud through robust controls, particularly in AP, where access to payments and vendor data creates risks.Conducting detailed background checkson new AP employees is a standard control to verify integrity and reduce the risk of fraudulent behavior. Other options, such as NDAs, accounting degrees, or temporary hiring, are less effective or irrelevant for fraud prevention.

Option A (Require that all potential employees sign an NDA prior to hire): Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) protect confidential information but do not directly prevent fraud, which involves financial misconduct (e.g., embezzlement). This is not a primary fraud control.

Option B (Ensure all staff members have accounting degrees): An accounting degree does not guarantee honesty or prevent fraud. Many AP roles require practical skills, not formal degrees. This is not a fraud control.

Option C (Hire only temporary employees and rotate them out): Temporary staffing and frequent rotation disrupt continuity and may increase fraud risk due to lack of accountability. This is not a fraud control.

Option D (Conduct detailed background checks on all new AP employees): Background checks verify criminal history, credit issues, and past employment, identifying potential fraud risks. This is a standard and effective control. Correct answer.

Reference to IOFM APS Documents: The APS e-textbook underInternal Controlsstates, “To prevent employee fraud, organizations should implement controls like detailed background checks for AP staff to ensure trustworthiness.” It lists background checks as a key measure, alongside segregation of duties and surprise audits, but does not mention NDAs, degrees, or temporary staffing as fraud prevention controls. The training video reinforces this, citing background checks as essential for roles with financial access.

TheGeneral Services Administration (GSA)is the U.S. government organization responsible for publishing per diem travel guidelines, which establish standard rates for lodging, meals, and incidental expenses for federal employees traveling on official business. These rates are widely used by organizations to set T&E policies for allowable travel expenses.

The web source from the GSA states: “The General Services Administration (GSA) establishes per diem rates for federal travel, providing guidelines for lodging, meals, and incidental expenses.” This directly supports Option D. The other options are incorrect:

Federal Reserve Board (A)regulates monetary policy, not travel guidelines.

Department of Treasury (B)oversees tax and financial policy, not per diem rates.

Department of Commerce (C)focuses on economic and trade issues.

The IOFM APS Certification Program covers “Travel and Entertainment (T&E),” including the use of per diem rates for expense management. The curriculum’s focus on “peer-tested best practices” aligns with referencing GSA per diem guidelines for T&E compliance.

TheVendor Master Filetopic in the APS Certification Program addresses managing dynamic vendor data, such as contact information, which can change frequently. An efficient approach is toinclude a contractual requirementfor vendors to notify the organization in writing of personnel or contact changes, ensuring the VMF remains accurate without excessive manual effort.

Option A (Conduct a thorough audit semiannually): Inefficient, as semiannual audits are too infrequent for frequently changing data and resource-intensive.

Option B (Include only the vendor web address): Inefficient and risky, as websites may not provide current contact details, and manual checks are time-consuming.

Option C (Assign an individual to review weekly): Inefficient, as weekly reviews are labor-intensive and impractical for large vendor bases.

Option D (Include in the vendor contract notification of personnel changes): Correct. Contractual notification shifts responsibility to vendors, ensuring timely updates with minimal organizational effort.

Reference to IOFM APS Documents: The APS e-textbook underVendor Master Filestates, “To manage frequently changing contact information, include contractual terms requiring vendors to notify the organization of changes in writing, reducing manual updates.” The training video notes, “Efficient VMF management leverages vendor contracts to ensure timely contact updates, avoiding labor-intensive audits.”

The current thinking on maintaining a petty cash fund is that it ispractically obsolete and should be eliminated, if possible, due to the availability of more efficient and secure alternatives, such as payment cards or electronic reimbursements. Petty cash funds are prone to mismanagement, theft, and lack of oversight, and modern AP practices favor digital solutions for small transactions.

The web source from SAP Concur states: “Petty cash funds are increasingly considered obsolete, as payment cards and electronic reimbursements offer more secure and trackable alternatives for small transactions.” This directly supports Option A. The other options are incorrect:

Option B: Requiring three individuals to sign off is excessive and not a standard practice.

Option C: Petty cash is not considered a best practice, even in service or consulting businesses.

Option D: Petty cash is typically managed by AP or administrative staff, not treasury executives.

The IOFM APS Certification Program covers “Internal Controls,” including best practices for managing small transactions. The curriculum’s focus on “peer-tested best practices” aligns with the trend toward eliminating petty cash in favor of modern payment methods.

TheVendor Master Filetopic in the APS Certification Program underscores the need for careful management of VMF changes due to the high risk of fraud.Many instances of fraud, such as redirecting payments to fraudulent accounts, are enabled by unauthorized or unverified changes to vendor data (e.g., bank account details), making rigorous controls essential.

Option A (Internal audit generally oversees this process and they must be consulted first): Incorrect. While internal audit may review VMF changes, they do not typically oversee the process directly; AP owns the VMF.

Option B (Many instances of fraud are enabled by changes in the VMF): Correct. Fraudulent changes, like altering bank details, are a common fraud vector, necessitating strict controls.

Option C (This task is generally performed by those who have little training on data entry): Incorrect. VMF changes are typically handled by trained AP staff, not untrained personnel.

Option D (Some AP software solutions have been shown to corrupt data during this process): Incorrect. There is no evidence in IOFM materials suggesting widespread software corruption issues specific to VMF changes.

Reference to IOFM APS Documents: The APS e-textbook underVendor Master Filestates, “Special care is required for VMF changes because many fraud schemes involve altering vendor data, such as bank accounts, to divert payments.” The training video emphasizes, “Fraud is often enabled by unauthorized VMF changes, requiring strict verification and audit trails.”

TheTax and Regulatory Compliancetopic in the APS Certification Program covers the Streamlined Sales Tax Project (SSTP), initiated to simplify U.S. sales tax compliance across states. The SSTP has achieveda uniform exemption certificate(Item II) to standardize resale and other exemptions andrate and boundary databases(Item III) to provide accurate tax rates and jurisdictional boundaries. However, it has not fullyresolved the origin vs. destination question(Item I), as sourcing rules (origin-based vs. destination-based taxation) remain state-specific.

Item I (Resolved the origin vs. destination question): Not fully accomplished. The SSTP provides guidelines for sourcing, but states still choose between origin-based (tax based on seller’s location) and destination-based (tax based on buyer’s location) rules, creating variability.

Item II (Implemented a uniform exemption certificate): Accomplished. The SSTP developed a uniform Streamlined Sales and Use Tax Exemption Certificate, accepted by member states to simplify compliance.

Item III (Created rate and boundary databases): Accomplished. The SSTP provides centralized databases for tax rates and jurisdictional boundaries, aiding accurate tax calculations.

Option A (I only): Incorrect, as Item I is not fully accomplished.

Option B (I, II, and III): Incorrect, as Item I is not fully accomplished.

Option C (II only): Incorrect, as Item III is also accomplished.

Option D (II and III only): Correct, as Items II and III are key SSTP achievements.

Reference to IOFM APS Documents: The APS e-textbook underTax and Regulatory Compliancestates, “The Streamlined Sales Tax Project has implemented a uniform exemption certificate and created rate and boundary databases to simplify compliance, but origin vs. destination sourcing remains variable across states.” The training video notes, “SSTP’s uniform certificate and tax databases are major achievements, though sourcing rules still differ by state.”

TheInternal Controlstopic in the APS Certification Program includes understanding key performance indicators (KPIs) to measure AP department performance. KPIs are metrics that track efficiency, accuracy, and cost-effectiveness, such as invoices paid on time, cost per invoice, and lost discounts.Positive pay, however, is a fraud prevention tool, not a performance metric.

Option A (Invoices paid on time): This is a KPI, measuring the percentage of invoices paid by their due date, reflecting AP efficiency and vendor relationship management.

Option B (Positive pay): Positive pay is a banking service that matches issued checks against presented checks to prevent fraud. It is a control mechanism, not a KPI, as it does not measure performance. This is the correct answer.

Option C (Cost per invoice): This is a KPI, calculating the average cost to process an invoice, used to assess operational efficiency.

Option D (Lost discounts): This is a KPI, tracking missed early payment discounts, which indicates opportunities for cost savings.

Reference to IOFM APS Documents: The APS e-textbook underInternal Controlslists common AP KPIs, including “percentage of invoices paid on time, cost per invoice, and lost early payment discounts,” as metrics to evaluate performance. It describes positive pay as “a fraud prevention tool under internal controls, not a performance indicator.” The training video reinforces this by discussing KPIs for benchmarking and positive pay as a separate control mechanism.

ThePaymentstopic in the APS Certification Program includes understanding the types of accounts involved in AP transactions, such as assets, liabilities, and expenses. Fixed assets are long-term, tangible assets used in business operations, such as furniture and fixtures, which are not intended for sale. Accounts receivable and inventory, however, are not fixed assets; they are current assets, as they are expected to be converted to cash within a year.

Item I (Accounts receivable): Accounts receivable represent money owed to the organization by customers for goods or services sold. They are classified ascurrent assets, not fixed assets, because they are short-term and liquid. This item is not a fixed asset.

Item II (Furniture and fixtures): Furniture and fixtures (e.g., desks, chairs, office equipment) are tangible, long-term assets used in business operations. They are classified asfixed assetsbecause they have a useful life exceeding one year and are not intended for sale. This item is a fixed asset.

Item III (Inventory): Inventory consists of goods held for sale or use in production. It is classified as acurrent assetbecause it is expected to be sold or used within a year. This item is not a fixed asset.

Option A (I, II, and III): Incorrect, as only II is a fixed asset; I and III are current assets.

Option B (I and II only): Incorrect, as I (accounts receivable) is not a fixed asset.

Option C (II only): Correct, as furniture and fixtures (II) are the only fixed asset among the options.

Option D (I and III only): Incorrect, as neither I (accounts receivable) nor III (inventory) are fixed assets.

Reference to IOFM APS Documents: The APS e-textbook underPaymentscovers basic accounting principles, including the classification of assets. It defines fixed assets as “tangible assets with a useful life of more than one year, such as furniture, fixtures, and equipment, used in business operations.” The text distinguishes fixed assets from current assets like accounts receivable and inventory, which are “expected to be converted to cash or used within a year.” The training video reinforces this by discussing how AP processes payments for fixed assets (e.g., capital expenditures) versus current assets (e.g., inventory purchases).

Evaluated Receipt Settlement (ERS) is a payment process that eliminates the need for a supplier invoice by triggering payments based on the purchase order (PO) and receiving documents (e.g., goods received note or delivery receipt). The PO establishes the agreed-upon terms, quantities, and prices, while the receipt confirms the actual delivery of goods or services. This allows payments to be processed without an invoice, streamlining the accounts payable process.

The web source from Esker states: “Evaluated Receipt Settlement (ERS) is a procedure for paying suppliers without requiring a paper invoice from the supplier… Payments are triggered by the receipt of goods or services against a purchase order.” The Corcentric source further clarifies: “ERS requires only the purchase order and receiving documents to initiate payment, eliminating the need for an invoice.” This directly supports Option B (PO and Receipt), as these are the two critical documents for ERS. Options A, C, and D are incorrect because they include the invoice, which is not required in ERS.

The IOFM APS Certification Program covers “Payments,” including ERS as an efficient payment method. The curriculum’s focus on “peer-tested best practices for each phase of the payment process” aligns with the industry standard that ERS relies on the PO and receipt.

The tolerance level for discrepancies between a purchase order (PO) and an invoice refers to the acceptable variance (e.g., in price or quantity) that an organization allows before requiring additional approval or investigation. Keeping this tolerance level confidential is critical to prevent vendor fraud, as vendors could exploit knowledge of the tolerance to submit invoices with intentional discrepancies just within the acceptable range, leading to overpayments or unauthorized charges.

The web source from NetSuite highlights the importance of internal controls in invoice matching: “Three-way matching is an AP process used to verify a supplier invoice by checking it against its corresponding purchase order and order receipt. It reduces the chances of fraudulent invoices going undetected and, worse, being paid.” While this source does not explicitly address confidentiality of tolerance levels, the emphasis on fraud prevention implies that exposing tolerance thresholds could undermine these controls. If vendors know the tolerance, they might adjust invoices to exploit it, bypassing scrutiny.

Options B, C, and D are incorrect. Keeping procurement alert (Option B) is a general goal but not directly tied to confidentiality of tolerance levels. Avoiding internal audit scrutiny (Option C) is not a legitimate reason, as internal audits ensure compliance. Option D (depositing overages into a fund) is unethical and unrelated to accounts payable processes.

The IOFM APS Certification Program covers “Internal Controls,” which includes measures toprevent fraud and ensure accurate invoice processing. The program’s focus on “peer-tested best practices” and fraud prevention, as noted in the curriculum description, supports the need to keep tolerance levels confidential to safeguard against vendor manipulation.

TheVendor Master Filetopic in the APS Certification Program emphasizes the importance of managing the vendor master file to prevent errors and risks. A key reason is toreduce the potential for fraud, as accurate and validated vendor data (e.g., TINs, addresses) prevents payments to fraudulent vendors and ensures compliance with regulations like OFAC.

Option A (Control the number of vendor calls): Not a primary reason. While a clean vendor master file may reduce inquiries, this is a secondary benefit, not a key focus.

Option B (Reduce the potential for fraud): Correct. Careful management, including TIN verification and sanction list checks, prevents fraudulent vendor setups and payments.

Option C (Monitor vendor quality): Vendor quality is typically assessed by Procurement or Operations, not the vendor master file, which focuses on data accuracy. Incorrect.

Option D (Gain visibility into payment status): Payment status is tracked in AP systems, not the vendor master file, which stores static vendor data. Incorrect.

Reference to IOFM APS Documents: The APS e-textbook underVendor Master Filestates, “Careful management of the vendor master file reduces fraud risk by ensuring accurate vendor data and compliance with validation processes.” The training video emphasizes, “A well-maintained vendor master file prevents fraud through rigorous verification, such as TIN matches and address checks.”

Wire transfers are a secure and immediate payment method typically used for high-value transactions due to their reliability and speed, despite higher transaction fees compared to other methods like ACH. Organizations commonly use wire transfers for high dollar payments, such as large vendor payments, international transactions, or critical one-time payments.

The web source from Corcentric explains: “Wire transfers are often used for high-value payments where speed and security are critical, such as large supplier payments or international transactions.” This aligns with Option B.

Direct deposit of executive pay (A)is typically handled via ACH for regular payroll.

Low dollar bulk payments (C)are more cost-effectively processed via ACH or checks.

Rent or mortgage payments (D)may use wire transfers in some cases but are not the most common use.

The IOFM APS Certification Program covers “Payments,” including payment methods like wire transfers. The curriculum’s focus on “peer-tested best practices” supports the use of wire transfers for high dollar payments due to their security and immediacy.

TheInternal Controlstopic in the APS Certification Program includes understanding foundational accounting standards, such asGenerally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), which govern financial reporting in the U.S. GAAP provides a standardized framework for recording and reporting financial transactions, ensuring consistency and transparency, which is critical for AP processes like invoice recording and financial statement preparation.

Option A (Government Accounting Acceptance Principles): Incorrect, as GAAP is not specific to government accounting and is not termed “acceptance principles.”

Option B (Government Accounting Actuarial Program): Incorrect, as GAAP is unrelated to actuarial programs or government-specific accounting.

Option C (General Accounting Administration Program): Incorrect, as GAAP is a set of principles, not an administrative program.

Option D (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles): Correct. GAAP is the standard framework for financial accounting, widely used by AP professionals to ensure accurate and compliant financial reporting.

Reference to IOFM APS Documents: The APS e-textbook underInternal Controlsstates, “Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) provide the rules and standards for financial reporting, ensuring that AP transactions are recorded consistently and transparently.” The training video mentions GAAP in the context of internal controls, noting its role in maintaining financial statement accuracy and compliance with regulations like the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

TheVendor Master Filetopic in the APS Certification Program emphasizes fraud prevention through robust vendor validation processes. Key practices include confirming a vendor’s physical address, checking government sanction lists (e.g., OFAC), and requiring a W-9 to verify tax identification numbers (TINs). However,verifying that vendors are bonded(i.e., insured against financial loss) is not a standard requirement for vendor fraud prevention, as it is more relevant to specific industries (e.g., construction) and not universally applicable.

Option A (Confirmation of a physical address): Verifying a physical address ensures the vendor is a legitimate entity, reducing the risk of fraudulent shell companies. This is a key practice.

Option B (Verifying that vendors are bonded): Bonding is not a standard AP requirement for fraud prevention. It may apply to certain vendors (e.g., contractors), but it is not essential for all vendor fraud prevention programs. This is the correct answer.

Option C (Checking government sanction lists): Checking lists like OFAC (Office of Foreign Assets Control) ensures compliance with regulations and prevents payments to sanctioned entities, a critical fraud prevention step. This is a key practice.

Option D (Requiring a W-9): A W-9 provides the vendor’s TIN, enabling verification with the IRS to prevent fraudulent identities and ensure tax compliance. This is a key practice.

Reference to IOFM APS Documents: The APS e-textbook underVendor Master Filelists “confirming physical addresses, checking sanction lists, and requiring W-9 forms” as essential for vendor fraud prevention. It notes that “bonding is not a universal requirement for vendor validation,though it may be relevant for specific contracts.” The training video emphasizes vendor verification processes, highlighting address checks, sanction list reviews, and W-9 requirements but not bonding.

TheTax and Regulatory Compliancetopic in the APS Certification Program covers IRS guidelines for determining independent contractor status, critical for 1099 reporting and avoiding worker misclassification. The IRS uses three categories:Behavioral Control(degree of controlover work results),Financial Control(control over finances, e.g., payment terms, investment in tools), andType of Relationship(contract terms, permanency). Thejob titleassigned is not a factor, as status depends on actual work arrangements, not labels.

Option A (The degree of control the employer exercises over the worker’s work results): Part of Behavioral Control, assessing how much the employer directs the worker’s tasks. This is a valid category.

Option B (The amount of control the employer has over the worker’s finances): Part of Financial Control, evaluating payment methods, expense reimbursement, and worker investment. This is a valid category.

Option C (The job title assigned to the worker): Not a factor. The IRS focuses on the nature of the work relationship, not the title (e.g., “contractor” vs. “employee”). Correct answer.

Option D (The type of relationship established between the parties): Part of Type of Relationship, considering contracts, benefits, and permanency. This is a valid category.

Reference to IOFM APS Documents: The APS e-textbook underTax and Regulatory Compliancestates, “IRS independent contractor status is determined by Behavioral Control, Financial Control, and Type of Relationship, not by job titles, which are irrelevant to actual work arrangements.” The training video explains, “Job titles don’t determine contractor status; the IRS looks at control and relationship factors.”

TheTax and Regulatory Compliancetopic in the APS Certification Program covers the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA), enacted in 2010 to combat tax evasion by U.S. taxpayers using foreign accounts. FATCA requires foreign financial institutions (FFIs) to report U.S. account holders’ information to the IRS, making it harder for individuals and organizations to hide income offshore and avoid U.S. taxes.

Option A (To ensure the privacy of individuals or organizations that bank outside of the U.S.): Incorrect. FATCA reduces privacy by requiring FFIs to report account details to the IRS, not protect it.

Option B (To make the rules regarding reporting payments made to U.S. persons and non-U.S. persons more consistent): Incorrect. FATCA focuses on reporting foreign accounts of U.S. taxpayers, not harmonizing payment reporting rules for U.S. and non-U.S. persons.

Option C (To make it more difficult for individuals or organizations to avoid paying taxes by banking outside of the U.S.): Correct. FATCA’s primary purpose is to prevent tax evasion by requiring FFIs and certain non-financial foreign entities to report U.S. account holders’ financial information, ensuring taxable income is reported.

Option D (To respond to attempts by foreign governments to capture taxes on activities of U.S. persons in their countries): Incorrect. FATCA addresses U.S. tax compliance, not foreign governments’ tax policies.

Reference to IOFM APS Documents: The APS e-textbook underTax and Regulatory Compliancestates, “FATCA was enacted to combat tax evasion by requiring foreign financial institutions to report U.S. account holders’ information, making it difficult to avoid taxes through offshore accounts.” TheMaster Guide to Form 1099 Compliance, a recommended IOFM resource, explains, “FATCA ensures compliance by imposing withholding on payments to non-compliant FFIs, targeting U.S. taxpayers hiding income abroad.” The training video reinforces this, noting FATCA’s role in “closing loopholes for offshore tax evasion.”

The three-way match is a standardized accounts payable process used to verify the legitimacy of a supplier invoice before payment by cross-referencing three key documents: the purchase order (PO), the supplier invoice, and the receiving documents (also referred to as the receiving report, goods received note, or delivery receipt). This process ensures that the invoice reflects the agreed-upon terms of the purchase order and that the goods or services were actually delivered as specified, thereby mitigating risks of overpayment, fraud, or errors.

The correct answer is “Receiving documents,” as these confirm the delivery of goods or services and are a core component of the three-way match. The purchase order authorizes the purchase, specifying quantities, prices, and terms. The invoice details the supplier’s request for payment. The receiving documents verify that the ordered items were delivered, matching the quantities and conditions specified in the PO.

The other options are not part of the three-way match:

Remittance adviceis a document sent to the supplier to confirm payment details after the payment is made, not part of the verification process.

Bank draftis a payment instrument, not a document used for matching.

P-card statementrelates to procurement card transactions, which are typically not subject to the three-way match process, as they follow a different reconciliation process.

The NetSuite source clearly defines the three-way match: “Three-way matching is a payment verification technique that compares the details associated with a particular purchase across a trio of related documents… Purchase order, which authorizes a purchase to be made… Delivery receipt, or a receiving report, which confirms that the purchase was delivered… Supplier’s invoice, which lists how much the buyer owes the supplier”. Similarly, the Tipalti source states: “PO Matching: Ensure accuracy and prevent fraud with 2 and 3-way PO matching,” reinforcing that the three-way match involves the PO, invoice, and receiving documents. The Ramp source further clarifies: “3-way matching is a fraud-prevention process used by accounts payable teams to verify invoices before payment. It cross-checks three documents: Purchase order (PO)… Goods received note (GRN)… Supplier invoice”.

While the IOFM APS study guide is not directly quoted in the provided sources for this specific question, the IOFM Accounts Payable Specialist Certification Program emphasizes the three-way match under the “Invoices” and “Internal Controls” modules. The program description notes that it covers “peer-tested best practices for each phase of the payment process – from receipt of invoice, through processing and payment,” which includes the three-way match process. The focus on accuracy, compliance, and fraud prevention in IOFM’s curriculum aligns with the standard definition of the three-way match involving the PO, invoice, and receiving documents.