CIPS L4M1 Dumps Questions Answers

How to approach this question:

- Define stakeholder mapping – completing an analysis of the stakeholders of an organisation and dividing them into categories depending on certain characteristics. This is often represented visually on a graph or matrix.

- Describe a Stakeholder mapping tool – the most common tool is Mendelow’s Stakeholder Matrix so I would recommend using this one. It is explained in detail in the study guide. However, the question is open so you could choose to describe another tool such as Edgar’s Stakeholder Position Analysis if you so wished. You wouldn’t be wrong choosing this, but honestly, I’d just go for Mendelow. You can’t go wrong with Mendelow. Because the Matrix has 4 sections you can imagine you’d get 5 points for the definition of stakeholder mapping, and 5 points for each of the quadrants of the matrix.

Essay Plan:

Introduction - The reason why stakeholder mapping is important is because interests and expectations of stakeholder groups will be different and possibly conflicting. Mapping this allows an organisation to see the variety and decide on an appropriate management style for each stakeholder group.

Paragraph 1 - Mendelow’s Power / Interest Matrix maps stakeholders based on their influencing power and the strength of their motivation to use that power. It uses a 2x2 grid and defines power as high or low and interest and high or low. It then provides four strategies for managing the stakeholders based on which quadrant of the grid the stakeholder falls into. These 4 categories are:

Paragraph 2 - Keep satisfied – high power but low interest. If the stakeholder becomes dissatisfied or concerned their interest may peak. Examples include regulatory bodies, shareholders, senior management. The best approach is to keep them up to date so they are informed of what is going on, but do not burden them with information they do not need.

Paragraph 3 - Manage Closely – AKA Key players – includes major customers, key suppliers, partners, senior management. These stakeholders need to know everything that is going on and approve of what is going on. The recommended strategy is early involvement and participation, and integrating their goals with yours. This group requires regular communication and meetings. You should take their opinions on board.

Paragraph 4- Monitor – minimum effort required – this is the low priority group as they have low power and low interest. Includes small volume suppliers and other organisational functions with no direct interest in your activities. This group does not need to receive regular communication.

Paragraph 5 - Keep informed - high interest, but low power. If they’re not kept in the loop and understand the need for decisions, they may lobby together to protect their interest if they feel threatened. Employee groups, suppliers and community groups may be in this category. This group should receive regular communication.

Conclusion - Mendelow created the matrix in 1991 and it is still used today. It is a popular management tool due to its simplicity. It’s important to notes that stakeholders can move through the matrix- it isn’t stagnant. For example, at the beginning of a project a manager in another department may be classed as ‘low priority’ because they are seen to have no interest and no power in the project. However, as the project progresses the manager may become interested. They will then transfer into the keep informed category. Therefore, the matrix should be redone regularly throughout the lifetime of a project to capture any movements. The matrix should also be redone for each individual project – it cannot be assumed that a stakeholder who had interest in one project would be interested in another.

Tutor Notes

- The above essay plan is basically the entire essay, I got carried away. The only thing you’d need to add into that is an example of a stakeholder for each of the sections! (e.g. the CEO is high power, but low interest stakeholder for the procurement department. He/ She doesn’t care about the day to day operations but should be kept informed of any big news). For your examples you could use your own place of work.

- At level 4 you don’t have to analyse the model, you just have to be able to memorise it and repeat it. Mendelow comes up again at Level 5 and 6 in a bit more detail. If you want to score super bonus points you could mention in your conclusion that the main disadvantage of Mendelow’s Matrix is that it doesn’t take into consideration the stakeholder’s position on the project – whether they’re for it or against it. Therefore, it doesn’t provide the full picture or provide much help on how to manage stakeholders. E.g. two stakeholders might both be in ‘manage closely’ section, but one is for the project and the other against – they’d need to be handled very differently!

- Study guide p. 65

Five Ways Procurement Activities Can Contribute to BrightAid’s Organisational Objectives

Procurement plays a critical role in supporting the operational efficiency and sustainability of a not-for-profit organization like BrightAid. Given its reliance on donations and volunteers, a structured and strategic procurement approach can help maximize resources, reduce costs, and enhance the charity’s impact. Below are five key ways in which procurement can contribute to BrightAid’s organisational objectives.

1. Cost Reduction and Financial Efficiency

How Procurement Helps:

Implementing a formal procurement strategy ensures that goods and services are sourced at the most cost-effective prices.

Joining a buying group with other charities can enhance BrightAid’s purchasing power, securing bulk discounts and reducing overhead costs.

Supplier negotiations and competitive tendering can help maximize value for money on every purchase.

Impact on BrightAid:

More funds can be allocated to core aid and campaign activities.

Lower operational costs mean greater financial sustainability and improved service delivery.

2. Enhancing Transparency and Accountability

How Procurement Helps:

Implementing clear procurement policies and procedures ensures fair supplier selection, minimizing risks of fraud or inefficiencies.

Establishing a procurement audit process ensures compliance with ethical and legal standards.

Open and fair supplier engagement strengthens stakeholder trust (donors, volunteers, and partners).

Impact on BrightAid:

Increases donor confidence, encouraging repeat and larger donations.

Ensures resources are used efficiently and ethically, enhancing the charity’s reputation.

3. Improving Supply Chain Reliability and Efficiency

How Procurement Helps:

Strategic supplier selection ensures consistent delivery of essential goods and services.

Developing long-term supplier relationships can reduce risks of supply disruptions.

Procurement can introduce supplier performance reviews to ensure that services meet BrightAid’s needs effectively.

Impact on BrightAid:

More efficient aid distribution, ensuring beneficiaries receive timely support.

Reduced operational disruptions, allowing volunteers and staff to focus on charitable work instead of supply issues.

4. Supporting Ethical and Sustainable Procurement

How Procurement Helps:

Ethical sourcing policies ensure that supplies (e.g., food, clothing, medical aid) come from responsible and sustainable sources.

Procurement can help BrightAid select suppliers that align with its mission and values (e.g., fair trade suppliers, environmentally friendly packaging).

Working with ethical suppliers enhances CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility) partnerships, attracting more donors.

Impact on BrightAid:

Increases public trust and donor support, strengthening brand reputation.

Aligns procurement decisions with the charity’s core mission and sustainability goals.

5. Enhancing Operational Effectiveness and Stakeholder Engagement

How Procurement Helps:

A structured procurement process ensures timely and cost-effective delivery of goods and services, reducing inefficiencies.

Procurement professionals can engage stakeholders (staff, volunteers, donors) to understand their needs and improve sourcing decisions.

Implementing procurement technology or e-procurement systems can streamline purchasing and reduce administrative burdens.

Impact on BrightAid:

Staff and volunteers can focus more on core charitable activities rather than administrative tasks.

Better stakeholder engagement ensures that procurement aligns with donor expectations, strengthening long-term relationships.

Conclusion

By implementing a structured and strategic procurement function, BrightAid can significantly improve its financial efficiency, supply chain reliability, and ethical standards, ultimately enhancing its ability to deliver aid effectively and attract continued donor support. With growing competition for donations, a well-managed procurement process ensures cost savings, improved transparency, and stakeholder trust, directly contributing to the charity’s long-term sustainability and success.

- The question is asking you to explain the following:

- With this type of question you would be expected to discuss 3- 5 differences, giving examples.

Example Essay Structure

Introduction – explain what is meant by ‘procurement’ and ‘SCM’ – procurement is the traditional way and is to do with purchasing goods, SCM is the new way which is a more multifaceted way of securing goods and is the result of longer, more complex and more globalised supply chains.

Paragraph 1 – the objectives of each approach (5 Rights vs added value)

Paragraph 2 – the approach (reactive buying vs proactive ordering)

Paragraph 3 - the way of working (silo working vs cross-functional working)

Paragraph 4 – the relationships with suppliers (transactional vs collaborative)

Conclusion – There are many differences between the two approaches, and different companies may favour one over the other depending on their specific circumstances. E.g. small organisations that make low value and low risk purchases may take a traditional procurement approach and large multi-national organisations may require a SRM approach due to the volume of suppliers and com-plexities of the supply chains.

Example essay:

Procurement and Supply Chain Management (SCM) represent two distinct approaches to acquiring goods, reflecting the evolution of purchasing practices. Procurement, the traditional method, in-volves the straightforward purchase of goods. In contrast, SCM is a more intricate approach, born out of longer, more complex, and globalized supply chains. This essay explores the main differences between these two approaches, highlighting their objectives, methods, ways of working, and suppli-er relationships.

In the traditional procurement approach, the focus is on achieving the "5 Rights" – getting the right goods, in the right quantity, at the right quality, for the right price, and at the right time. This en-sures efficiency in the purchasing process. On the other hand, SCM goes beyond these basic objec-tives, aiming to add value to the entire supply chain. This might involve developing strategic rela-tionships with suppliers, ensuring sustainability, and aligning with broader organizational goals. For example, a company employing a traditional procurement approach might emphasize getting the lowest price, while an SCM approach could involve working with suppliers to enhance product in-novation or reduce environmental impact.

Secondly, the traditional procurement approach is often reactive, responding to immediate needs or demands. Companies using this method typically make purchases as required, without a long-term strategy. In contrast, SCM involves proactive ordering, anticipating future needs and trends. For instance, a company employing SCM might engage in demand forecasting, allowing for better plan-ning and inventory management. This proactive approach helps prevent stockouts, reduce costs, and enhance overall supply chain efficiency.

Moreover, traditional procurement often involves silo working, where different departments operate independently. The procurement team may not collaborate closely with other departments like pro-duction or marketing. In SCM, there's an emphasis on cross-functional working, breaking down de-partmental barriers for a more integrated approach. For example, an SCM team might work closely with production to ensure materials are aligned with manufacturing schedules, fostering efficiency and minimizing disruptions.

Lastly, in traditional procurement, the relationship with suppliers is transactional – focused solely on the exchange of goods for money. Conversely, SCM promotes collaborative relationships, emphasiz-ing long-term partnerships. A company using SCM might work closely with suppliers to improve processes, share information, and jointly address challenges. For instance, an SCM approach might involve collaborating with suppliers to implement just-in-time inventory systems, leading to cost savings and improved responsiveness.

In conclusion, the differences between traditional procurement and SCM are substantial and nu-anced. While a traditional procurement approach may suit smaller organizations with low-value and low-risk purchases, larger multinational companies with complex supply chains often find SCM more suitable. Understanding these differences allows companies to tailor their approach based on their unique circumstances, emphasizing the importance of flexibility and strategic alignment with organizational goals in the ever-evolving landscape of buying and supply chain management.

Tutor Notes

- This question is taken from learning outcome 1.1.1 (p2 onwards). The new study guide has drasti-cally simplified the information on this topic compared to the old syllabus (the table above comes from the old syllabus). This may be good news for students in that you don’t need to know as much, but I do wonder if the study guide gives students enough ‘content’ to write an essay on the subject.

- If a question is to come up from LO 1.1 it would be likely be something like: definitions and dif-ferences between procurement and SCM, difference between a supply chain and a supply network, elements of SCM, or how to add value in the supply chain.