Shared Assessments CTPRP Dumps Questions Answers

Terms for return or destruction of data should be defined and agreed upon during contract negotiation, as this is the phase where the organization and the third party establish the expectations, obligations, and responsibilities for the relationship, including the handling of data. According to the Shared Assessments CTPRP Study Guide, contract negotiation is the phase where "the organization and the third party negotiate and execute a contract that clearly defines the expectations and responsibilities of both parties, including the scope of work, service level agreements, performance measures, reporting requirements, compliance obligations, security and privacy controls, incident response procedures, dispute resolution mechanisms, termination rights, and other relevant terms and conditions."1 One of the key contractual terms that should be addressed is the return or destruction of data, which specifies how the third party will return or dispose of the organization’s data at the end of the relationship, or upon request, in a secure and timely manner. This term is important for ensuring the organization’s data protection, confidentiality, and compliance, as well as reducing the risk of data breaches, leaks, or misuse by the third party or unauthorized parties.

The other phases of the TPRM lifecycle are not the best choices for defining and agreeing upon terms for return or destruction of data, because:

• B. At third party selection and initial due diligence: This is the phase where the organization identifies, evaluates, and selects the third party that best meets its needs, objectives, and risk appetite. This phase involves conducting due diligence on the third party’s capabilities, qualifications, reputation, performance, security, and compliance, as well as assessing the inherent risk of the relationship. While this phase is important for screening and choosing the right third party, it does not involve defining and agreeing upon the specific terms and conditions of the relationship, such as the return or destruction of data, which are usually done in the contract negotiation phase.
• C. When deploying ongoing monitoring: This is the phase where the organization monitors and reviews the third party’s performance, service delivery, risk management, and compliance on a regular basis, as well as identifies and addresses any issues, gaps, or changes that may arise during the relationship. This phase involves collecting and analyzing data and information from various sources, such as reports, audits, assessments, surveys, feedback, incidents, and metrics, as well as communicating and collaborating with the third party to ensure alignment and improvement. While this phase is important for ensuring the quality and security of the relationship, it does not involve defining and agreeing upon the terms and conditions of the relationship, such as the return or destruction of data, which are usually done in the contract negotiation phase.
• D. At termination and exit: This is the phase where the organization terminates and exits the relationship with the third party, either by mutual agreement, expiration of contract, breach of contract, or other reasons. This phase involves executing the termination and exit plan, which may include notifying the third party, transferring or discontinuing the services, settling the financial obligations, returning or destroying the data, revoking the access rights, and conducting a post-termination review. While this phase is important for ensuring a smooth and secure transition and closure of the relationship, it does not involve defining and agreeing upon the terms and conditions of the relationship, such as the return or destruction of data, which are usually done in the contract negotiation phase.

References:

• 1: Shared Assessments CTPRP Study Guide, page 59, section 5.1: TPRM Lifecycle
• : Third-Party Risk Management: Vendor Contract Terms and Conditions, section: Data Ownership, Return and Destruction
• : [Third-Party Risk Management: The 3rd Party Ecosystem: How to Manage the Risk While Keeping the Benefit], section: Contract Negotiation
• : [Third-Party Risk Management: The 3rd Party Ecosystem: How to Manage the Risk While Keeping the Benefit], section: Termination and Exit

The frequency of cyclical assessments is one of the key factors that determines the effectiveness and efficiency of a TPRM program. Cyclical assessments are periodic reviews of the vendor’s performance, compliance, and risk posture that are conducted after the initial onboarding assessment. The frequency of cyclical assessments should be aligned with the organization’s risk appetite and tolerance, and should reflect the level of risk and criticality of the vendor to the organization’s operations. A common approach to determine the frequency of cyclical assessments is to use a vendor risk score, which is a numerical value that represents the vendor’s inherent and residual risk based on various criteria, such as the type, scope, and complexity of the services or products provided, the vendor’s security and privacy controls, the vendor’s compliance with relevant regulations and standards, the vendor’s past performance and incident history, and the vendor’s business continuity and disaster recovery capabilities. The vendor risk score can be used to categorize the vendors into different risk tiers, such as high, medium, and low, and assign appropriate frequencies for cyclical assessments, such as annually, biannually, or quarterly. For example, a high-risk vendor may require an annual assessment, while a low-risk vendor may require a biannual or quarterly assessment. The vendor risk score and the frequency of cyclical assessments should be reviewed and updated regularly to account for any changes in the vendor’s risk profile or the organization’s risk appetite.

The other three statements do not best reflect the factors that help you determine the frequency of cyclical assessments, as they are either too rigid, too vague, or too reactive. Statement A implies that vendor assessments are only necessary during onboarding and can be replaced by continuous monitoring afterwards. However, continuous monitoring alone is not sufficient to ensure the vendor’s compliance and risk management, as it may not capture all the aspects of the vendor’s performance and risk posture, such as contractual obligations, service level agreements, audit results, and remediation actions. Therefore, vendor assessments should be conducted during onboarding and at regular intervals thereafter, complemented by continuous monitoring. Statement C suggests that vendor assessments should be scheduled based on the type of services or products provided, without considering the other factors that may affect the vendor’s risk level and criticality, such as the vendor’s security and privacy controls, the vendor’s compliance with relevant regulations and standards, the vendor’s past performance and incident history, and the vendor’s business continuity and disaster recovery capabilities. Therefore, statement C is too vague and does not provide a clear and consistent basis for determining the frequency of cyclical assessments. Statement D indicates that vendor assessment frequency may need to be changed if the vendor has disclosed a data breach, implying that the frequency of cyclical assessments is only adjusted in response to a negative event. However, this approach is too reactive and may not prevent or mitigate the impact of the data breach, as the vendor’s risk level and criticality may have already increased before the data breach occurred. Therefore, statement D does not reflect a proactive and risk-based approach to determining the frequency of cyclical assessments. References:

• Third-Party Risk Management 101: Guiding Principles
• Mastering the TPRM Lifecycle
• Third Party Risk Management Maturity Assessment

According to the NIST Computer Security Incident Handling Guide1, one of the first steps in responding to an incident is to identify the scope, nature, and source of the incident. This involves gathering evidence, analyzing logs, interviewing witnesses, and performing forensic analysis. The goal is to determine the extent of the compromise, the type of attack, the identity or location of the attacker, and the potential impact on the organization and its stakeholders. This step is essential for containing the incident, mitigating the damage, and preventing further escalation or recurrence. References:

• NIST Computer Security Incident Handling Guide1, Section 3.2.2 Identification
• Cisco What Is an Incident Response Plan for IT?2, Section 2. Respond
• CrowdStrike Incident Response [Beginner’s Guide]3, Section 3. Incident Response Steps