ISA-IEC-62443 ISA/IEC 62443 Cybersecurity Fundamentals Specialist Questions and Answers

ISA/IEC 62443-2-1 defines structured patch management phases, including evaluation, testing, deployment, and rollback considerations.

Step 1: Patch testing objectives

The patch testing phase focuses on ensuring that patches are authentic, safe, and compatible with the operational environment.

Step 2: Included activities

File authenticity verifies that patches are genuine and unaltered

Qualification and verification ensure patches do not disrupt operations

Notification ensures relevant stakeholders are informed of test results

Step 3: Why removal procedure is excluded

Removal or rollback procedures are part of deployment and recovery planning, not patch testing itself.

Thus, the correct answer is Removal procedure.

Even the most modern and sophisticated safety systems can be defeated by an attacker. This statement is validated by the discovery of malware specifically targeting safety instrumented systems (SIS), such as the "Triton/Trisis" malware that compromised the SIS of a petrochemical plant. Safety systems, while designed as independent protection layers, are not immune to cybersecurity vulnerabilities and require specific countermeasures. Integration, such as using Modbus TCP, does not inherently reduce risk to a tolerable level without additional controls.

Malware incidents are cited in ISA/IEC 62443 documentation and industry case studies as one of the primary causes of cyber-related production losses in process control environments. Such incidents can result in equipment shutdowns, process interruptions, and loss of visibility or control, leading directly to financial and operational impacts. While human error and hardware failure are also causes of downtime, in the context of “cyber-related” incidents, malware is the main contributor.

 The ISA/IEC 62443 standards are focused on industrial automation and control systems security. The assess phase within the ISA/IEC 62443 framework is designed to identify and analyze potential vulnerabilities in the industrial control system (ICS) environment. One of the key steps in this phase is the specification of cybersecurity requirements. Additionally, it involves the allocation of industrial automation and control system (IACS) assets to defined zones and conduits to manage and segregate the network and improve security. These measures help to ensure that security requirements are met and that the assets are protected according to their security needs. Therefore, the correct answer is B, which mentions both the cybersecurity requirements specification and the allocation of IACS assets to zones and conduits as part of the assess phase.

In the ISA/IEC 62443 framework, Security Levels (SLs) are categorized into three distinct types:

Target SL (SL-T) – The security level required based on risk assessment

Capability SL (SL-C) – The level a component or system can support

Achieved SL (SL-A) – The level actually implemented in the system

“Three types of security levels are defined:

Target (SL-T): derived from risk analysis

Capability (SL-C): supported by the product or system

Achieved (SL-A): implemented and operational in the environment”

— ISA/IEC 62443-1-1:2007, Clause 3.2.4 and Table 3

This classification supports gap analysis and helps asset owners ensure their system meets both required and feasible security levels.

 A router and a VPN can be employed as barrier devices in a segmented network. A barrier device is a device that controls the flow of traffic between different network segments, based on predefined rules and policies1. A router is a device that forwards packets between different networks, based on their IP addresses2. A router can act as a barrier device by applying access control lists (ACLs) or firewall rules to filter or block unwanted or malicious traffic2. A VPN is a technology that creates a secure and encrypted tunnel between different networks, such as a remote site and a corporate network3. A VPN can act as a barrier device by encrypting the traffic and authenticating the users or devices that access the network3. A VPN can also prevent unauthorized access or eavesdropping by outsiders3.

The Security Program (SP) portfolio is the correct foundational document for an evolving IACS cybersecurity approach according to the ISA/IEC 62443 family of standards. ISA/IEC 62443 is explicitly designed around the concept of continuous risk management and lifecycle-based cybersecurity, rather than static or one-time security implementations.

Step 1: Role of the Security Program (SP)

ISA/IEC 62443-2-1 defines the requirements for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and continuously improving an IACS Cybersecurity Management System. The Security Program provides organizational governance through policies, roles, responsibilities, procedures, training, incident handling, change management, and continuous improvement activities. These elements ensure cybersecurity adapts as threats, vulnerabilities, and system configurations evolve.

Step 2: Need for an evolving security approach

The standard recognizes that IACS environments are long-lived and subject to changing operational conditions, emerging threat actors, and new vulnerabilities. Therefore, cybersecurity must be managed as an ongoing process. The SP portfolio enables periodic reassessment of risks, updates to controls, and improvements to security processes throughout the system lifecycle.

Step 3: Relationship between SP and SPS

IEC 62443-2-2 introduces the Security Protection Scheme (SPS), which is a documented set of technical, procedural, and physical security measures selected to mitigate identified risks. However, the SPS is not the foundation; it is a product of the Security Program. The SP governs how the SPS is developed, implemented, operated, and modified over time.

Step 4: Elimination of incorrect options

“IEC 62443-2-2 only” is insufficient because it addresses SPS development without broader governance.

Corporate KPIs unrelated to IACS do not manage cybersecurity risk.

An SPS alone cannot evolve without programmatic oversight.

In alignment with the intent and structure of ISA/IEC 62443, the Security Program (SP) portfolio is the correct foundation for a cybersecurity plan that must continuously evolve.

The Triton (also known as Trisis) malware specifically targeted and compromised Safety Instrumented Systems (SIS), disabling the emergency shutdown capabilities at a petrochemical plant. This attack demonstrated that safety systems, once considered isolated and secure, are vulnerable to sophisticated, targeted cyberattacks. Neither Zeus, Stuxnet, nor WannaCry had this specific impact on emergency shutdown safety systems.

SP Element 2 in ISA/IEC 62443-2-1 focuses on Configuration Management, with the asset inventory baseline as a foundational requirement.

Step 1: Purpose of an inventory baseline

The inventory baseline documents all hardware, software, firmware, and configuration items that make up the IACS. This establishes a known, trusted state of the system.

Step 2: Architecture visibility

By maintaining this baseline, the asset owner gains a clear and accurate understanding of the IACS architecture, including system components, versions, and dependencies.

Step 3: Why other options are incorrect

Physical access control and user authentication are addressed in different SP Elements. Event management detects anomalies, but it relies on the inventory baseline rather than replacing it.

Thus, the primary reason is to document IACS architecture.

ISA/IEC 62443-6-1 defines a security evaluation methodology specifically intended for use with 62443-2-4 (Service Providers) and 62443-4-1 (Secure Development Lifecycle). It provides assessment techniques and scoring models for verifying conformance.

“This part specifies requirements and provides guidance for the assessment of conformity to selected parts of the ISA/IEC 62443 series. It supports evaluation of suppliers per 62443-2-4 and 62443-4-1.”

— ISA/IEC 62443-6-1:2020, Clause 1 – Scope

It is not focused on patching, technologies, or security phases, but rather on evaluating and validating conformance to the standards.

OPC stands for Open Platform Communications, and it is a series of standards and specifications for industrial telecommunication based on Object Linking and Embedding (OLE) for process control. It allows the communication of real-time data between devices from different manufacturers using various data transportation technologies, such as Microsoft’s OLE, COM, DCOM, .NET, XML, and TCP123. OPC is not a protocol itself, but rather a standardized approach for data connectivity supported by the OPC Foundation3. OPC is widely used in industrial automation and control systems, as well as other industries, to achieve interoperability and integration between different applications and devices3.

A is incorrect, because OPC is not a field bus protocol, but rather a standard for data exchange between devices that may use different field bus protocols, such as Modbus, Profibus, or Ethernet/IP2. C is incorrect, because OPC is not a serial communications protocol, but rather a standard that can use various data transportation technologies, including serial, Ethernet, or wireless2. D is incorrect, because OPC is not a vendor-specific proprietary protocol, but rather an open standard that can be implemented by any vendor or device that supports the OPC specifications3. References: 1: Open Platform Communications - Wikipedia 2: What is OPC Protocol - The Automization 3: What is OPC? - OPC Foundation

The “Addressing Risk” CSMS category consists of three element groups: Security Policy, Organization and Awareness; Selected Security Countermeasures; and Implementation of Security Program1. These element groups cover the aspects of defining the security objectives, roles and responsibilities, policies and procedures, awareness and training, security countermeasures selection and implementation, and security program execution and maintenance1. The “Addressing Risk” CSMS category aims to reduce the security risk to an acceptable level by applying appropriate security measures to the system under consideration (SuC)1. References: 1: ISA/IEC 62443-2-1: Security for industrial automation and control systems: Establishing an industrial automation and control systems security program

The ISASecure Integrated Threat Analysis (ITA) Program is a certification scheme that certifies off-the-shelf automation and control systems to the ISA/IEC 62443 series of standards1. The ITA Program consists of three main components2:

Software Development Security Assurance (SDSA): This component evaluates the security lifecycle and practices of the product supplier, such as security requirements, design, implementation, verification, and maintenance. The SDSA certification is based on the ISA/IEC 62443-4-1 standard.

Functional Security Assessment (FSA): This component verifies the security functions and features implemented in the product, such as identification and authentication, access control, encryption, audit logging, and security management. The FSA certification is based on the ISA/IEC 62443-4-2 standard.

Communications Robustness Testing (CRT): This component tests the resilience of the product against network attacks, such as denial-of-service, fuzzing, spoofing, and replay. The CRT certification is based on the ISA/IEC 62443-4-2 and ISA/IEC 62443-3-3 standards .

Role-based access control (RBAC) is a method of restricting access to resources based on the roles of individual users within an organization. RBAC assigns permissions and responsibilities to roles, rather than to individual users, and then assigns users to those roles. This way, users can only perform the actions that are relevant and necessary for their role, and not access or modify any other resources that are beyond their scope of authority. RBAC is one of the security countermeasures that can be implemented in a defense-in-depth strategy, which is a layered approach to protect industrial automation and control systems (IACS) from cyber threats. RBAC can help prevent unauthorized access, misuse, or sabotage of IACS resources, as well as reduce the risk of human error or insider attacks.

In the OSI model, the Data Link layer (Layer 2) is responsible for error detection/correction and for assigning and handling MAC (Media Access Control) addresses, which are unique identifiers for network interfaces. This layer ensures reliable transmission of data frames between devices on the same local network. The Network layer (Layer 3) handles IP addressing and routing, not MAC addresses.

 Layer 2 of the OSI model is the data link layer, which is responsible for transferring data frames between nodes on a network segment. The data link layer is divided into two sublayers: logical link control (LLC) and media access control (MAC). The LLC sublayer deals with issues common to both dedicated and broadcast links, such as framing, flow control, and error control. The MAC sublayer deals with issues specific to broadcast links, such as how to access the shared medium and avoid collisions. The LLC and MAC sublayers are not related to the ISA/IEC 62443 cybersecurity standards, which focus on the security of industrial automation and control systems (IACS). References: https://www.baeldung.com/cs/data-link-sub-layers

https://bing.com/search?q=Layer+2+sublayers

According to the ISA/IEC 62443 standard, the connections between security zones are called conduits. A conduit is defined as a logical or physical grouping of communication channels connecting two or more zones that share common security requirements. A conduit can be used to control and monitor the data flow between zones, and to apply security measures such as encryption, authentication, filtering, or logging. A conduit can also be used to isolate zones from each other in case of a security breach or incident. A conduit can be implemented using various technologies, such as firewalls, routers, switches, cables, or wireless links. However, these technologies are not synonymous with conduits, as they are only components of a conduit. A firewall, for example, can be used to create multiple conduits between different zones, or to protect a single zone from external threats. Therefore, the other options (firewalls, tunnels, and pathways) are not correct names for the connections between security zones. References:

ISA/IEC 62443-3-2:2016 - Security for industrial automation and control systems - Part 3-2: Security risk assessment and system design1

ISA/IEC 62443-3-3:2013 - Security for industrial automation and control systems - Part 3-3: System security requirements and security levels2

Zones and Conduits | Tofino Industrial Security Solution3

Key Concepts of ISA/IEC 62443: Zones & Security Levels | Dragos4

For U.S. federal agencies, mandatory cybersecurity requirements under law are established through Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS). FIPS are issued by the U.S. government and are legally enforceable for federal agencies and contractors when specified by statute or regulation. This legal enforceability distinguishes FIPS from voluntary standards and frameworks.

Step 1: Understand the legal nature of FIPS

FIPS are developed under U.S. law to define minimum security requirements for federal information systems. When a federal agency operates or procures information systems, compliance with applicable FIPS is mandatory. This makes FIPS a legal obligation rather than a best-practice recommendation.

Step 2: Differentiate standards vs regulations

ISA/IEC 62443 is an international consensus-based standard intended primarily for industrial automation and control systems. While widely adopted and referenced by regulators, it is not legally mandatory unless explicitly incorporated into law or contracts. Therefore, it does not satisfy the requirement “under law” by itself.

Step 3: Eliminate incorrect options

The EU Cyber Resilience Act applies to products placed on the European Union market and has no jurisdiction over U.S. federal agencies.

NIST SP 800-171 provides requirements for protecting Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) in non-federal systems, but it becomes mandatory only through contractual flow-downs, not directly as federal law.

Step 4: Align with ISA/IEC 62443 perspective

ISA/IEC 62443 acknowledges that regulatory and legal obligations override voluntary standards. Asset owners must comply with applicable laws first, then apply ISA/IEC 62443 controls to meet industrial cybersecurity objectives.

Thus, for a U.S. federal agency facing mandatory cybersecurity requirements under law, NIST FIPS is the correct answer.

 According to the ISA/IEC 62443 Cybersecurity Fundamentals Specialist resources, patches are software updates that fix bugs, vulnerabilities, or improve performance of a system. Patches are classified into three categories based on their urgency and impact: low, medium, and high. Low priority patches are those that have minimal or no impact on the system functionality or security, and can be applied at the next scheduled maintenance. Medium priority patches are those that have moderate impact on the system functionality or security, and should be applied within a reasonable time frame, such as three months. High priority patches are those that have significant or critical impact on the system functionality or security, and should be applied as soon as possible, preferably at the first unscheduled outage. Applying patches in a timely manner is a best practice for maintaining the security and reliability of an industrial automation and control system (IACS). References:

ISA/IEC 62443 Cybersecurity Fundamentals Specialist Study Guide, Section 4.3.2, Patch Management

ISA/IEC 62443-2-1:2009, Security for industrial automation and control systems - Part 2-1: Establishing an industrial automation and control systems security program, Clause 5.3.2.2, Patch management

ISA/IEC 62443-3-3:2013, Security for industrial automation and control systems - Part 3-3: System security requirements and security levels, Clause 4.3.3.6.2, Patch management

According to ISA/IEC 62443-1-1:2007 (Terminology, Concepts, and Models), the functional levels of the Industrial Automation and Control System (IACS) are derived from the Purdue Enterprise Reference Architecture (PERA). These levels are defined as follows:

Level

Function

Description

Level 0

Process

The actual physical process, including sensors and actuators.

Level 1

Basic Control

Devices responsible for direct control, such as PLCs and RTUs.

Level 2

Area Supervisory Control

Supervisory systems such as HMIs and SCADA, responsible for monitoring/control.

Level 3

Site Manufacturing Operations Management

Operations management systems such as MES, production scheduling, and workflow.

Level 4

Business Planning and Logistics

Enterprise-level systems such as ERP, supply chain, and logistics.

Analysis of Each Option:

Option A: Level 1: Supervisory Control

Incorrect. Level 1 is defined as Basic Control, not Supervisory Control. Supervisory functions appear at Level 2.

Option B: Level 2: Quality Control

Incorrect. Level 2 is defined as Area Supervisory Control, not Quality Control.

Option C: Level 3: Operations Management

Correct. Level 3 is specifically identified as Operations Management, which includes manufacturing execution and scheduling functions.

Option D: Level 4: Process

Incorrect. Level 4 corresponds to Business Planning and Logistics. The Process is represented at Level 0.

Monitoring and improving a Cybersecurity Management System (CSMS) as per ISA/IEC 62443 standards involves several key activities that ensure the system remains effective and responsive to emerging threats. Two critical elements of this ongoing process are:

A. Increase in staff training and security awareness: Regular training and increasing security awareness among staff are vital to maintaining a secure operating environment. This proactive measure helps in reducing human error and enhancing the ability to respond effectively to cybersecurity incidents.

D. Review of system logs and other key data files: Continuous review and analysis of system logs and other relevant data files are essential for detecting, investigating, and responding to potential security incidents. This monitoring helps in identifying anomalies that may indicate a security breach or operational issues needing attention.

The reference model provides the overall conceptual basis in the design of an appropriate security program. It defines the common terminology, concepts, and models that can be used by all stakeholders responsible for IACS security. The reference model describes the general characteristics of IACS, the typical threats and vulnerabilities, the security lifecycle phases, and the security levels. The reference model also introduces the concepts of zones and conduits, which are used to group and isolate assets with similar security requirements and to control the communication between them. References https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/solutions/Verticals/IoT_Security_Lab/IEC62443_WP.pdf

https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/solutions/Verticals/IoT_Security_Lab/IEC62443_WP.pdf

 ISA-TR62443-2-3 is the technical report that describes the requirements for asset owners and industrial automation and control system (IACS) product suppliers that have established and are now maintaining an IACS patch management program. Patch management is the process of applying software updates to fix vulnerabilities, bugs, or performance issues in the IACS components. Patch management is an essential part of maintaining the security and reliability of the IACS environment. The technical report provides guidance on how to establish a patch management policy, how to assess the impact and risk of patches, how to test and deploy patches, and how to monitor and audit the patch management process. References: 1, 2, 3

The NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) is explicitly designed to be flexible, voluntary, and sector-agnostic, making it suitable for diverse environments — including multinational corporations operating in multiple regulatory jurisdictions.

“The Framework is intended to be used by organizations of all sizes, across all sectors and countries. It is technology-neutral and allows for continuous improvement through its tiered implementation and feedback loop.”

— NIST Cybersecurity Framework v1.1, Section 1.2 – Framework Overview

This flexibility allows organizations to tailor their implementation to fit their risk appetite, regulatory requirements, and industry practices.

The ISA/IEC 62443 standards explain that continuous operation is often required in IT systems (such as data centers and online services), but for IACS environments, scheduled operation (for example, planned maintenance windows) is typically sufficient. IACS systems may accept limited downtime for maintenance, but require high availability during production runs.

The asset model is used in ISA/IEC 62443 to represent and describe the relationships and dependencies between different assets in an IACS environment. This model helps organizations identify and document assets, their interconnections, and their significance for operational and cybersecurity purposes. The zone model builds upon the asset model for segmentation, but the asset model itself establishes the foundational relationships.

ISA/IEC 62443-1-3 is specifically titled "System Security Conformance Metrics" and introduces a methodology to develop quantitative metrics for assessing how well a system conforms to the ISA/IEC 62443 requirements.

“Part 1-3 defines a set of metrics to quantitatively measure the conformance of systems and components to the ISA/IEC 62443 series. It supports repeatable assessment and benchmarking.”

— ISA/IEC 62443-1-3:2013, Scope and Clause 5

This allows organizations to establish measurable KPIs and drive continuous improvement in IACS cybersecurity programs.

OPC Classic uses Microsoft's DCOM (Distributed Component Object Model) for communication, which dynamically opens multiple ports, making it extremely difficult to manage with firewalls.

“OPC Classic is firewall-unfriendly because DCOM requires dynamic port negotiation, making it difficult to define consistent firewall rules.”

— ISA/IEC 62443-3-3:2013, Annex A – Communication Protocols and Security Concerns

This lack of port predictability presents a significant security and operational risk, which led to the development of OPC UA, which uses fixed ports and supports encryption.

According to the ISA/IEC 62443-2-1 standard, security policy, organization, and awareness is one of the four foundational requirements for an IACS security management system. It defines the “policies, procedures, and organizational structure necessary to support the security program” 1. One of the elements of this requirement is staff training and security awareness, which involves “providing appropriate security education and training to all personnel who have access to or are responsible for IACS components” 1. This element aims to ensure that the staff are aware of the security risks, policies, and procedures, and are able to perform their roles and responsibilities in a secure manner. Staff training and security awareness can include topics such as security principles, threats and vulnerabilities, incident response, password management, physical security, and social engineering 2. References:

ISA/IEC 62443 Series of Standards - ISA

Security of Industrial Automation and Control Systems - ISAGCA

Ethernet/IP is an industrial network protocol that adapts the Common Industrial Protocol (CIP) to standard Ethernet. CIP is an object-oriented protocol that provides a unified communication architecture for various industrial automation applications, such as control, safety, security, energy, synchronization and motion, information and network management. CIP defines a set of messages and services for interacting with devices and data on the network, as well as a set of device profiles for consistent implementation of automation functions across different products. Ethernet/IP uses the transport and control protocols of standard Ethernet, such as TCP/IP and IEEE 802.3, to define the features and functions for its lower layers. Ethernet/IP also uses UDP to transport I/O messages and supports various network topologies, such as star, linear, ring and wireless. Ethernet/IP is one of the leading industrial protocols in the United States and is widely used in a range of industries, such as factory, hybrid and process. Ethernet/IP is managed by ODVA, Inc., a global trade and standards development organization. References:

EtherNet/IP - Wikipedia

EtherNet/IP | ODVA Technologies | Industrial Automation

Phishing is a type of cyberattack that relies on a human weakness to succeed. Phishing is the practice of sending fraudulent emails or other messages that appear to come from a legitimate source, such as a bank, a government agency, or a trusted person, in order to trick the recipient into revealing sensitive information, such as passwords, credit card numbers, or personal details, or into clicking on malicious links or attachments that may install malware or ransomware on their devices. Phishing is a common and effective way of compromising the security of industrial automation and control systems (IACS), as it can bypass technical security measures by exploiting the human factor. Phishing can also be used to gain access to the IACS network, to conduct reconnaissance, to launch further attacks, or to cause damage or disruption to the IACS operations. The ISA/IEC 62443 series of standards recognize phishing as a potential threat vector for IACS and provide guidance and best practices on how to prevent, detect, and respond to phishing attacks. Some of the recommended countermeasures include:

Educating and training the IACS staff on how to recognize and avoid phishing emails and messages, and how to report any suspicious or malicious activity.

Implementing and enforcing policies and procedures for email and message security, such as using strong passwords, verifying the sender’s identity, and not opening or clicking on unknown or unsolicited links or attachments.

Applying technical security controls, such as antivirus software, firewalls, spam filters, encryption, and authentication, to protect the IACS devices and network from phishing attacks.

Monitoring and auditing the IACS network and devices for any signs of phishing attacks, such as anomalous or unauthorized traffic, connections, or activities, and taking appropriate actions to contain and mitigate the impact of any incidents. References:

ISA/IEC 62443-1-1:2009, Security for industrial automation and control systems - Part 1-1: Terminology, concepts and models1

ISA/IEC 62443-2-1:2009, Security for industrial automation and control systems - Part 2-1: Establishing an industrial automation and control systems security program2

ISA/IEC 62443-2-4:2015, Security for industrial automation and control systems - Part 2-4: Security program requirements for IACS service providers3

ISA/IEC 62443-3-3:2013, Security for industrial automation and control systems - Part 3-3: System security requirements and security levels4

ISA/IEC 62443-4-2:2019, Security for industrial automation and control systems - Part 4-2: Technical security requirements for IACS components5

ICS-CERT (Industrial Control Systems Cyber Emergency Response Team) issues alerts to inform critical infrastructure owners and operators about newly discovered vulnerabilities, threats, and mitigation strategies.

“ICS-CERT Alerts provide timely information to critical infrastructure owners and operators concerning current security issues, vulnerabilities, and exploits.”

— ICS-CERT Advisory Documentation (now under CISA)

Alerts may be sector-wide or vendor-specific, and are part of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s proactive cyber defense strategy.

Clarification of Options:

Not specific to the energy sector only (D is too narrow)

Not promotional in nature (eliminates A and B)

The document titled “Patch Management in the IACS Environment” corresponds to IEC TR 62443-2-3, which belongs to the Policies and Procedures category of the ISA/IEC 62443 series.

IEC TR 62443-2-3 is a technical report providing guidance for managing software updates and patches in IACS environments without disrupting critical operations.

From the IEC 62443 document structure:

“The -2-x family of documents focuses on policies and procedures, especially in relation to the asset owner responsibilities within a CSMS (Cyber Security Management System).”

IEC TR 62443-2-3 specifically describes:

“Recommended practices for planning and executing the patch management process for industrial control systems in a structured and secure manner.”

Incorrect Options:

A. System – System-level requirements are found in 62443-3-x.

B. General – General documents include 62443-1-x, focused on terminology and concepts.

C. Component – Component requirements are covered in 62443-4-x documents.

According to the ISA/IEC 62443-3-2 standard, a security zone is a grouping of systems and components based on their functional, logical, and physical relationship that share common security requirements. The primary objective of defining a security zone is to apply a consistent level of protection to the assets within the zone, based on their criticality and risk assessment. A security zone may contain assets from different vendors, different levels in the Purdue model, or different physical locations, as long as they have the same security requirements. A security zone may also be subdivided into subzones, if there are different security requirements within the zone. A conduit is a logical or physical grouping of communication channels connecting two or more zones that share common security requirements.

Separation of duties is a security principle that aims to prevent fraud, errors, conflicts of interest, or misuse of resources by dividing critical tasks or functions among different people or teams. It is one of the foundational requirements (FRs) of the ISA/IEC 62443 standards for securing industrial automation and control systems (IACSs). According to the ISA/IEC 62443-2-1 standard, separation of duties includes the following system requirements (SRs):

SR 2.1: Security management policy

SR 2.2: Personnel security

SR 2.3: System development and maintenance

SR 2.4: Incident response and recovery

SR 2.5: Compliance and review

Among these SRs, the one that is most related to the example of system development and maintenance is SR 2.3. SR 2.3 requires that the IACS shall provide the capability to ensure that the development and maintenance of the system and its components are performed in a secure manner. This means that the IACS should have a mechanism to control the access and authorization of developers, testers, integrators, and maintainers who work on the system and its components. It also means that the IACS should have a mechanism to verify and validate the quality and security of the system and its components before, during, and after the development and maintenance processes.

Therefore, an example of separation of duties as a part of system development and maintenance is that changes are approved by one party and implemented by another. This ensures that the changes are authorized, documented, and reviewed by someone who is not involved in the implementation. This reduces the risk of introducing errors, vulnerabilities, or malicious code into the system and its components.

OPC Unified Architecture (OPC UA) introduces a browsable namespace that supports hierarchical organization of data including folders, classes, methods, and object types. This is critical for structured access to real-time and historical data across heterogeneous control systems.

“OPC UA provides a flexible, secure, and platform-independent mechanism for exchanging information. Its browsable namespace allows structured navigation of nodes, types, and attributes in a hierarchical format.”

— OPC UA Specification, Part 3 – Address Space Model

This is a key improvement over OPC Classic, which was tightly coupled to DCOM and lacked standardized structures across systems.

Multiuser accounts and shared passwords are accounts and passwords that are used by more than one person to access a system or a resource. They inherently carry the risk of unauthorized access, which means that someone who is not authorized or intended to use the account or password can gain access to the system or resource, and potentially compromise its confidentiality, integrity, or availability. For example, if a multiuser account and password are shared among several operators of an industrial automation and control system (IACS), an attacker who obtains the password can use the account to access the IACS and perform malicious actions, such as changing the system settings, deleting data, or disrupting the process. Multiuser accounts and shared passwords also make it difficult to track and audit the activities of individual users, and to enforce the principle of least privilege, which states that users should only have the minimum level of access required to perform their tasks. Therefore, the ISA/IEC 62443 standards recommend avoiding the use of multiuser accounts and shared passwords, and instead using individual accounts and strong passwords for each user, and implementing authentication and authorization mechanisms to control the access to the IACS. References:

ISA/IEC 62443-3-3:2013 - Security for industrial automation and control systems - Part 3-3: System security requirements and security levels1

ISA/IEC 62443-2-1:2009 - Security for industrial automation and control systems - Part 2-1: Establishing an industrial automation and control systems security program2

ISA/IEC 62443 Cybersecurity Fundamentals Specialist Training Course3

Shared passwords and multiuser accounts pose specific risks, notably unauthorized access and privilege escalation. In ISA/IEC 62443's framework, these practices are discouraged because they complicate the attribution of actions to individual users and increase the likelihood that accounts can be used beyond their intended scope. Unauthorized access occurs when individuals exploit the shared nature of an account to gain entry to systems or data that they should not access. Privilege escalation can happen when users leverage shared accounts to perform actions at higher permission levels than those assigned to their personal accounts. Conversely, buffer overflows and race conditions are types of vulnerabilities or programming errors, not directly associated with the risks of multiuser accounts or shared passwords.

SP Element 3 in ISA/IEC 62443-2-1 focuses on Network and Communication Security, with segmentation as a foundational control.

Step 1: Threat origin reality

Many cyberattacks targeting IACS originate from enterprise IT networks, remote access paths, or external connections. Without segmentation, these threats can propagate directly into control systems.

Step 2: Zones and conduits concept

ISA/IEC 62443 requires logical and physical separation between IACS zones and non-IACS zones, with controlled conduits enforcing security policies.

Step 3: Attack surface reduction

Segmentation limits exposure by ensuring that only explicitly authorized communications can cross zone boundaries.

Step 4: Why other options are incorrect

Data classification, identity persistence, and backup verification are handled by other SP Elements and foundational requirements.

Thus, segmentation is critical to prevent attacks originating outside the IACS, making Option B correct.

 Access control is the process of granting or denying specific requests to obtain and use information and related information processing services. It is one of the foundational requirements (FRs) of the ISA/IEC 62443 standards for securing industrial automation and control systems (IACSs). According to the ISA/IEC 62443-3-3 standard, access control includes the following system requirements (SRs):

SR 1.1: Identification and authentication control

SR 1.2: Use control

SR 1.3: System integrity

SR 1.4: Data confidentiality

SR 1.5: Restricted data flow

SR 1.6: Timely response to events

SR 1.7: Resource availability

Among these SRs, the ones that are most related to the critical variables of account management and password strength are SR 1.1 and SR 1.2. SR 1.1 requires that the IACS shall provide the capability to uniquely identify and authenticate all users, processes, and devices that attempt to establish a logical connection to the system. This means that the IACS should have a robust account management system that can create, modify, delete, and monitor user accounts and their privileges. It also means that the IACS should enforce strong password policies that can prevent unauthorized access or compromise of user credentials. Password strength refers to the level of difficulty for an attacker to guess or crack a password. It depends on factors such as length, complexity, randomness, and uniqueness of the password.

SR 1.2 requires that the IACS shall provide the capability to enforce the use of logical connections in accordance with the security policy of the organization. This means that the IACS should have a mechanism to control the access rights and permissions of users, processes, and devices based on their roles, responsibilities, and needs. It also means that the IACS should have a mechanism to audit and log the activities and events related to access control, such as successful or failed login attempts, password changes, privilege escalations, or unauthorized actions.

Therefore, account management and password strength are the critical variables related to access control, as they directly affect the identification, authentication, and authorization of users, processes, and devices in the IACS.

ISA/IEC 62443 clearly assigns operational cybersecurity responsibility to the asset owner. During the Operate and Maintain phase of the IACS lifecycle, the asset owner is accountable for ensuring that cybersecurity controls are executed, monitored, and adapted as risks evolve.

Step 1: Definition of the SPS

IEC 62443-2-2 defines the Security Protection Scheme (SPS) as a documented set of technical, procedural, and physical measures selected to manage cybersecurity risk. While other parties may contribute to its design or implementation, execution during operation is the asset owner’s responsibility.

Step 2: Operational accountability

ISA/IEC 62443-2-1 establishes that the asset owner must operate and maintain the IACS security program, including incident handling, vulnerability management, patching, monitoring, and response to emerging threats.

Step 3: Why other roles are incorrect

Product vendors are responsible for product security, not operational risk response.

System integrators support design and implementation, not ongoing ownership.

External auditors assess compliance but do not execute controls.

Step 4: Risk ownership principle

Because the asset owner bears the consequences of downtime, safety incidents, and regulatory impact, the standard assigns them responsibility for executing SPS measures and responding to new risks.

Therefore, Option A is correct.

According to ISA/IEC 62443-2-3, patch testing involves several tasks to ensure the patch is safe and effective before deployment. These include:

File authenticity verification

Notification of applicable systems/users

Qualification and verification testing

However, a "removal procedure" is not listed as a standard activity under patch testing — although rollback planning might be a best practice, it is not specifically listed in the test phase.

“Patch testing activities include verification of patch authenticity, notification to relevant stakeholders, and qualification testing in a representative environment.”

— ISA/IEC 62443-2-3:2015, Clause 6.1.2 – Patch Testing and Validation

IT systems and IACS have different security priorities, requirements, and challenges. According to the ISA/IEC 62443 standards, the security priority for IT systems is confidentiality, which means protecting the data from unauthorized access or disclosure. The security priority for IACS is integrity, which means ensuring the accuracy and consistency of the data and the functionality of the system. A loss of integrity in an IACS can have severe consequences, such as physical damage, environmental harm, or human injury. Therefore, IACS cybersecurity must address safety issues, which are not typically considered in IT security. Safety is the ability of the system to prevent or mitigate hazardous events that can cause harm to people, property, or the environment. The ISA/IEC 62443 standards provide guidance and best practices for ensuring the safety and security of IACS, as well as the availability and reliability of the system. Availability is the ability of the system to perform its intended function when required, and reliability is the ability of the system to perform its intended function without failure. These properties are also important for IT systems, but they may have different trade-offs and implications for IACS. For example, an IACS may have stricter performance and availability requirements than an IT system, as a delay or disruption in the IACS operation can affect the industrial process and its outcomes. Additionally, an IACS may have longer equipment lifetimes and less frequent maintenance windows than an IT system, which can make patching and updating more difficult and risky. Furthermore, an IACS may use different technologies and architectures than an IT system, such as legacy devices, proprietary protocols, or specialized hardware. These factors can create compatibility and interoperability issues, as well as increase the attack surface and complexity of the IACS. Therefore, IT security solutions and practices may not be sufficient or suitable for IACS, and they may need to be adapted or supplemented by IACS-specific security measures. The ISA/IEC 62443 standards address these differences and provide a comprehensive framework for securing IACS throughout their lifecycle.

The ISA99 Committee (which develops the ISA/IEC 62443 series) clearly outlines four key consequences of compromising an Industrial Automation and Control System (IACS):

Endangerment of public or employee safety

Loss of public confidence

Violation of regulatory requirements

Loss of proprietary or confidential information

Economic and operational losses

“Increased product sales” is not listed — in fact, a compromise would likely result in the opposite, such as brand damage and loss of customer trust.

“The scope of the ISA99 Committee includes addressing risks such as the endangerment of public safety, loss of information, and economic harm arising from cyber incidents affecting IACS.”

— ISA/IEC 62443-1-1:2007, Clause 1 – Scope and Purpose

The four documents classified under the General category of ISA/IEC 62443 are:

Part 1-1: Terminology, concepts, and models

Part 1-2: Master glossary of terms and definitions

Part 1-3: System security conformance metrics

Programmable Logic Controllers (PLCs) were originally designed to replace relay-based control systems in industrial automation. Early manufacturing and process control systems relied on hard-wired relays, timers, and sequencers, which were inflexible and difficult to modify. PLCs offered a software-based alternative that could easily be reprogrammed for various automation tasks, making plant operations more efficient and flexible. Their purpose was not specifically to enhance network security or Ethernet functionality, but rather to modernize and simplify control logic implementation.

Packet filter firewalls, as defined by ISA/IEC 62443 standards on cybersecurity, primarily examine the source, destination, and ports in the header of each packet. This type of firewall does not inspect the packet content deeply (such as its structure or sequence) or maintain awareness of the relationships between packets in a session. Instead, it operates at a more superficial level, filtering packets based solely on IP addresses and TCP/UDP ports. This approach allows packet filter firewalls to quickly process and either accept or block packets based on these predefined criteria without delving into the complexities of session management or the content of the packets up to the application layer.

The ISA99 Committee (which developed ISA/IEC 62443) defines the scope and impact of IACS cybersecurity incidents in terms of negative consequences.

Step 1: Recognized consequences

The standard identifies consequences such as:

Financial losses

Environmental damage

Endangerment of public or worker safety

Loss of proprietary or sensitive information

Step 2: Purpose of defining consequences

These consequences justify why IACS cybersecurity must prioritize availability, integrity, and safety in addition to confidentiality.

Step 3: Why increased product sales is excluded

“Increased product sales” is not a negative consequence and is not mentioned anywhere in the ISA99 scope as a result of a cybersecurity compromise.

Therefore, the correct answer is Increased product sales.

Defense in depth is a core concept of ISA/IEC 62443, and security zones are a structural method to implement it. According to ISA/IEC 62443-3-2 and 62443-1-1, layering can be achieved by nesting zones — creating zones within zones (i.e., subzones) — to enhance protection through multiple barriers.

“Defense in depth is realized through segmentation into zones and conduits. A zone may contain subzones to establish additional layers of security, providing multiple barriers to intrusion.”

— ISA/IEC 62443-3-2:2020, Clause 5.3.2 – Zone and Conduit Model

This layered zoning approach enables tiered security controls, reducing the impact of breaches and limiting lateral movement within a network.

The selection of countermeasures is driven by the output from a risk assessment, which identifies the risks and their associated likelihood and consequences for each zone and conduit in the industrial automation and control system (IACS). The risk assessment also determines the target security level (SL-T) for each zone and conduit, which represents the desired level of protection against the identified threats. The countermeasures are then selected based on the SL-T and the existing security level (SL-A) of the zone and conduit, as well as the cost and feasibility of implementation. The countermeasures should aim to reduce the risk to an acceptable level by increasing the SL-A to meet or exceed the SL-T. References: ISA/IEC 62443-3-2:2018 - Security risk assessment for system design, ISA/IEC 62443-3-3:2013 - System security requirements and security levels, ISA/IEC 62443 Cybersecurity Fundamentals Specialist Training Course

ISASecure is a conformity assessment scheme developed under the ISA Security Compliance Institute (ISCI), an affiliate of ISA. Its primary focus is the certification of IACS (Industrial Automation and Control System) products, systems, and supplier processes for cybersecurity. The program’s aim is to facilitate and ensure the cybersecurity of automation and control systems by certifying that products and systems meet the requirements set forth in the ISA/IEC 62443 standards. ISASecure offers certifications such as ISASecure EDSA (Embedded Device Security Assurance), SSA (System Security Assurance), and CSA (Component Security Assurance), all of which are tightly mapped to the 62443 series requirements.

 The ISASecure conformance certification program is managed by the Security Compliance Institute (ISCI), a non-profit organization established in 2007 by a group of industry stakeholders, including end users, suppliers, and integrators. ISCI’s mission is to provide a common industry-accepted set of device and process requirements that drive device security, simplifying procurement for asset owners and device assurance for equipment vendors12. References: 1: ISASecure - IEC 62443 Conformance Certification - Official Site 2: Certifications - ISASecure

 Intrusion detection systems (IDS) are tools that monitor network traffic and detect suspicious or malicious activity based on predefined rules or signatures. They are effective against known vulnerabilities, as they can alert the system administrators or security personnel when they encounter a match with a known attack pattern or behavior. However, IDS have some limitations and challenges, especially when applied to industrial automation and control systems (IACS). Some of these are:

Modern IDS do not recognize IACS devices by default, as they are designed for general-purpose IT networks and protocols. Therefore, they may generate false positives or negatives when dealing with IACS-specific devices, protocols, or traffic patterns. To overcome this, IDS need to be customized or adapted to the IACS environment and context, which may require additional expertise and resources.

They are not very inexpensive to design and deploy, as they require careful planning, configuration, testing, and maintenance. They also need to be integrated with other security tools and processes, such as firewalls, antivirus, patch management, incident response, etc. Moreover, they may introduce additional costs and risks, such as network performance degradation, data privacy issues, or legal liabilities.

They are not effective against unknown or zero-day vulnerabilities, as they rely on predefined rules or signatures that may not cover all possible attack scenarios or techniques. Therefore, they may fail to detect novel or sophisticated attacks that exploit new or undiscovered vulnerabilities. To mitigate this, IDS need to be complemented with other security measures, such as anomaly detection, threat intelligence, or machine learning.

They require a significant amount of care and feeding, as they need to be constantly updated, tuned, and monitored. They also generate a large amount of data and alerts, which may overwhelm the system administrators or security personnel. Therefore, they need to be supported by adequate tools and processes, such as data analysis, alert filtering, prioritization, correlation, or visualization.

Packet filter, application proxy, and stateful inspection are all recognized types or classes of firewalls in both IT and industrial control environments. A network monitor, on the other hand, is not considered a firewall but rather a tool for observing and analyzing network traffic. It does not provide firewall-like controls for blocking or allowing traffic.

One of the trends that has increased the security risks for industrial automation and control systems (IACS) is the integration of these systems with business and enterprise systems, such as enterprise resource planning (ERP), manufacturing execution systems (MES), and supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA). This integration exposes the IACS to the same threats and vulnerabilities that affect the business and enterprise systems, such as malware, denial-of-service attacks, unauthorized access, and data theft. Moreover, the integration also creates new attack vectors and pathways for adversaries to compromise the IACS, such as through remote access, wireless networks, or third-party devices. Therefore, the integration of IACS with business and enterprise systems is a trend that has caused a significant percentage of security vulnerabilities. References: ISA/IEC 62443 Standards to Secure Your Industrial Control System, page 1-2.

Tabletop exercises simulate cybersecurity incidents in a non-disruptive setting, helping teams test and improve their incident response plans and communication protocols.

“Tabletop exercises allow personnel to rehearse roles, responsibilities, and actions in a simulated event scenario. This enhances coordination, preparedness, and decision-making during actual incidents.”

— ISA/IEC 62443-2-1:2010, Clause 4.3.3.3 – Incident Response Preparedness

They are essential for verifying that the incident handling process (SP Element 7) is both understood and effective.

The first step in the Cyber Security Management System (CSMS) development process is to “Initiate the CSMS program,” which involves establishing its purpose, obtaining organizational support, allocating resources, and defining the program’s scope. These foundational activities are required to ensure that the program is properly structured and supported before detailed risk assessments or architecture planning are performed.

Patch management is the process of applying software updates to fix security vulnerabilities, improve functionality, or enhance performance. Patch management is an essential part of cybersecurity, as unpatched systems can be exploited by malicious actors. However, patch management for industrial automation and control systems (IACS) is more challenging than for business systems, because patching a live automation system can create safety risks. According to the ISA/IEC 62443 standards, patching an IACS may have the following potential impacts1:

Patching may introduce new vulnerabilities or errors that compromise the availability, integrity, or confidentiality of the IACS.

Patching may affect the functionality or performance of the IACS, causing unexpected or undesired behavior, such as process shutdowns, slowdowns, or failures.

Patching may require downtime or reduced operation of the IACS, which may affect production, quality, or profitability.

Patching may require additional resources, such as personnel, equipment, or testing facilities, which may not be readily available or affordable.

Therefore, patch management for IACS requires careful planning, testing, and validation before applying patches to the operational environment. The ISA/IEC 62443 standards provide guidance and best practices for patch management in the IACS environment, such as1:

Establishing a patch management program that defines roles, responsibilities, policies, and procedures for patching IACS components and systems.

Identifying and prioritizing the IACS assets that need patching, based on their criticality, vulnerability, and risk level.

Evaluating and verifying the patches for compatibility, functionality, and security before applying them to the IACS.

Implementing and documenting the patching process, including backup, recovery, and rollback procedures, in case of patch failure or adverse effects.

Monitoring and auditing the patching activities and outcomes, and reporting any issues or incidents.

System availability is a core objective of ISA/IEC 62443, reflected in the Resource Availability (RA) foundational requirement. When frequent shutdowns occur, the standard directs attention to recovery and resilience mechanisms.

Step 1: Role of SP Element 8

SP Element 8 addresses backup, restore, and recovery capabilities. These activities ensure that systems can be restored quickly and reliably following failures, cyber incidents, or operational errors.

Step 2: Availability focus

Unexpected shutdowns often reveal weaknesses in backup integrity, restoration procedures, or recovery testing. ISA/IEC 62443 requires backups to be verified, protected, and periodically tested to ensure operational continuity.

Step 3: Why other SP Elements are secondary

Supply chain security, change control, and logging are important but do not directly restore operations after shutdowns. Backup and recovery directly impact downtime reduction.

Step 4: Operational outcome

Reviewing SP Element 8 activities helps identify gaps in restoration time objectives, backup completeness, and recovery procedures.

Thus, SP Element 8 – Backup restoration is the most relevant.

Transport Layer Security (TLS) is the primary cryptographic protocol used to secure web-based communications such as HTTPS in web browsers.

From ISA/IEC 62443-3-3 (System Security Requirements and Security Levels), Annex B:

“TLS provides confidentiality, integrity, and authentication for communications over untrusted networks. It is commonly used to secure HTTPS, SMTP, and other application protocols.”

TLS superseded SSL and is the backbone of secure data transmission over the Internet.

Incorrect Options:

B. L2TP – Used for VPNs; not typically browser-related.

C. PPTP – An older VPN protocol, not used for browser encryption.

D. IPsec – Used to secure IP traffic at the network layer; not directly used in browser-based communication.

In the context of international standards and frameworks, SDO stands for “Standards Development Organization.” SDOs are organizations like ISA, IEC, ISO, and NIST, which are responsible for developing, maintaining, and publishing standards used globally for industrial cybersecurity and other domains.

According to the ISA/IEC 62443-3-2 standard, implementing countermeasures is one of the steps in the security risk assessment for system design. The standard defines a comprehensive set of engineering measures to guide organizations through the process of assessing the risk of a particular industrial automation and control system (IACS) and identifying and applying security countermeasures to reduce that risk to tolerable levels. The standard recommends the following steps for implementing countermeasures:

Establish the risk tolerance: This step involves determining the acceptable level of risk for the organization and the system under consideration, based on the business objectives, legal and regulatory requirements, and stakeholder expectations. The risk tolerance can be expressed as a target security level (SL-T) for each zone or conduit in the system.

Select common countermeasures: This step involves selecting the appropriate security countermeasures for each zone or conduit, based on the SL-T and the existing security level (SL-A) of the system. The standard provides a list of common countermeasures for each security level, covering the domains of physical security, network security, system security, and application security. The selected countermeasures should be documented and justified in the security risk assessment report. References: ISA/IEC 62443 Cybersecurity Series Designated as IEC Horizontal Standards, Cybersecurity Risk Assessment According to ISA/IEC 62443-3-2

ISA/IEC 62443-3-2 introduces the concept of the System under Consideration (SuC) as the scope boundary for risk assessment.

Step 1: Purpose of the SuC

The SuC defines exactly what is being analyzed for cybersecurity risk.

Step 2: Inclusive scope

It includes a defined collection of IACS components, systems, zones, conduits, and supporting assets that contribute to the system’s function.

Step 3: Why definition matters

A clearly defined SuC ensures accurate threat modeling, impact analysis, and Security Level determination.

Step 4: Why other options are incorrect

Limiting the SuC to business assets or physical devices ignores logical, networked, and functional dependencies.

Therefore, the correct answer is a defined collection of IACS and related assets.

The ISA/IEC 62443 standards are divided into four main groups: General, Policies and Procedures, System, and Component. The first group, “General,” includes foundational standards and technical reports that provide essential concepts, models, terminology, and overall guidance for the rest of the series. This includes parts such as 62443-1-1 (concepts and models), 1-2 (glossary), 1-3 (metrics), and 1-4 (security lifecycle and use cases).

In cybersecurity, a demilitarized zone (DMZ) refers to a physical or logical subnetwork that contains and exposes an organization's external-facing services to an untrusted network, typically the internet. The main characteristic of a DMZ is that it acts as a buffer zone between the public internet and the private network. This allows for internet access through the firewall while keeping the internal network secure. Internet-facing servers are placed in the DMZ so that they are separated from the rest of the internal network. By doing so, if a server in the DMZ is compromised, the attacker would not have direct access to the internal network. This architecture is commonly used to host services such as web servers, mail servers, and FTP servers. Choice C is the most closely associated with the deployment of a DMZ as it allows for regulated and monitored internet access through a firewall.

A Wide Area Network (WAN) is a communications system that covers a large geographic area, such as a city, a country, or even several countries or continents1. WANs are often used to connect local area networks (LANs) and other types of networks together, so that users and computers in one location can communicate with users and computers in other locations2. WANs use various communication infrastructures, such as public telephone lines, undersea cables, and communication satellites, to transmit data over long distances1. WANs are typically established with leased telecommunication circuits or less costly circuit switching or packet switching methods2. WANs are often built by Internet service providers, who provide connections from an organization’s LAN to the Internet2. The Internet itself may be considered a WAN2. References: Hardware and network technologies - CCEA LAN and WAN - BBC, Wide area network - Wikipedia.