FCSS_NST_SE-7.6 Fortinet NSE 6 - Network Security 7.6 Support Engineer Questions and Answers

The Internet Key Exchange version 2 (IKEv2) protocol simplifies the negotiation process compared to IKEv1. It is defined by a specific sequence of message exchanges to establish a secure IPsec tunnel.

The correct chronological order of the IKEv2 exchanges is:

IKE_SA_INIT (Initial Exchange):

This is the first exchange. It negotiates the security parameters for the IKE Security Association (IKE SA), sends nonces, and performs the Diffie-Hellman key exchange. At the end of this exchange, the communication is encrypted, but the peers are not yet authenticated.

IKE_AUTH (Authentication Exchange):

This is the second exchange. It authenticates the previous messages, exchanges identities and certificates (if used), and establishes the first Child SA (the actual IPsec Security Association used for data traffic).

CREATE_CHILD_SA (Subsequent Exchanges):

This exchange occurs after the IKE SA and the initial Child SA are established. It is used to create additional Child SAs (for different traffic selectors) or to perform re-keying for the IKE SA or existing Child SAs.

Why other options are incorrect:

A & B: Incorrect because CREATE_CHILD_SA cannot happen before the SA is initialized (IKE_SA_INIT) and authenticated (IKE_AUTH).

D: Incorrect because IKE_AUTH cannot occur before IKE_SA_INIT.

Therefore, the protocol flow is IKE_SA_INIT $\rightarrow$ IKE_AUTH $\rightarrow$ CREATE_CHILD_SA.

The correct answer is C .

The exhibit shows the neighbor state as Connect in the State/PfxRcd column. The study guide explains the BGP states exactly as follows:

“Connect: Waiting for a successful three-way TCP connection”

“OpenSent: Waiting for an OPEN message from the peer”

“Established: Peers have successfully exchanged OPEN and keepalive messages”

Because the router is still in Connect state, the TCP three-way handshake has not completed yet . In practical terms, the local router has sent the TCP SYN but has not successfully received the SYN/ACK needed to complete the handshake . That is why C is correct.

Why the other options are wrong:

A is wrong because the message counters alone do not prove that the neighbor is unreachable. The study guide says the State/PfxRcd field shows the BGP state when the session is not established, and here that state is specifically Connect

B is wrong because waiting for an OPEN message happens in OpenSent , not Connect

D is not the best answer for this output. The study guide ties the displayed state directly to the protocol phase: Connect means the device is still waiting for a successful TCP handshake

So the verified answer is: C .

https://community.fortinet.com/t5/FortiGate/Technical-Tip-Using-the-diagnose-sys-top-CLI-command/ta-p/190238

To establish a functional Security Fabric, specific network and configuration prerequisites must be met to ensure nodes can communicate, authorize, and share telemetry data:

A. You must ensure that TCP port 8013 is not blocked along the way:

TCP port 8013 is the dedicated port for FortiTelemetry (Fabric) communication. If firewalls (intermediate or local) block this port, the Fabric connection between the root and downstream FortiGates will fail.

D. You must authorize the downstream FortiGate on the root FortiGate:

Security Fabric relies on a trust relationship. When a downstream device attempts to join, it appears in the Root FortiGate ' s dashboard. The administrator must manually authorize this device (unless pre-authorized via serial number) to allow it to join the Fabric topology.

E. You must enable FortiTelemetry on the receiving interface of the upstream FortiGate:

The interface on the Root (upstream) FortiGate that faces the downstream devices must have the " Security Fabric Connection " (formerly CAPWAP/FortiTelemetry) administrative access setting enabled. Without this, the interface will not listen for or accept Fabric connection requests.

Why other options are incorrect:

B: Neighbor Discovery uses standard multicast/broadcast or static settings; changing the port is not a standard requirement.

C: FortiGates can participate in the Security Fabric in either NAT or Transparent mode; Transparent mode is not a mandatory requirement for the Fabric itself.

To identify the reason for the lack of prefixes, we must interpret the State/PfxRcd and Up/Down columns in the get router info bgp summary exhibit.

Analyze Neighbor Status:

Neighbor 10.125.0.60: State is OpenSent. This session is not established. It is stuck in the negotiation phase.

Neighbor 100.64.3.1: State is Active. This session is not established. The router is actively trying to initiate a TCP connection.

Neighbor 10.127.0.75:

Up/Down: 02:45:55. This indicates the BGP session has been Up (Established) for almost 3 hours.

State/PfxRcd: 0. This number represents the count of prefixes received. The session is fully established, but the neighbor has sent zero routes.

Determine the Cause:

Since the session with 10.127.0.75 is established, connectivity and handshakes (Options A, B, C) are not the issue for this neighbor.

The fact that it is Up but sending 0 prefixes strongly implies that the neighbor is configured to filter out its routes before sending them to the local FortiGate.

Option D correctly identifies this as a RIB-OUT (Routing Information Base - Outbound) configuration issue on the neighbor (Router 10.127.0.75), which prevents it from advertising its routes.

The 7.6 study guide explains the route selection order:

“Route Selection Process

Most specific route

Lowest distance

Lowest metric (dynamic routes)

Lowest priority (static routes)

ECMP (static, BGP, and OSPF routes)”**

It then states:

“If there are multiple routes with the same netmask, distance, metric, and priority, FortiGate shares the traffic among all of them. This is called equal-cost multi-path (ECMP).”

The FortiOS administration guide confirms the ECMP prerequisite:

“Routes must have the same destination and costs. In the case of static routes costs include distance and priority.”

In the exhibit, the kernel/FIB output shows the two default routes as:

gwy=100.64.1.254 dev=3 (port1) prio=0

gwy=100.64.2.254 dev=6 (port2) prio=10

So although both are default routes, their priorities are different . Since FortiGate uses the FIB/kernel for forwarding traffic, ECMP will not happen until the static-route priorities are the same. The study guide also notes that the FIB is the table used to perform standard routing

Therefore, to make the two default routes eligible for ECMP, the administrator must make the priorities equal. Since port2 is already 10, the needed change is to set the port1 default route priority to 10.

Why the other options are wrong:

A is wrong because snat-route-change affects how existing SNAT sessions react to routing changes, not whether static routes qualify for ECMP

B is wrong because changing port2 to priority 1 still would not match port1 at 0, so the routes still would not have equal cost for ECMP

C is wrong because preserve-session-route affects existing-session route persistence after routing changes, not ECMP qualification

The correct answers are C and D .

The study guide states: “SSL certificate inspection relies on extracting the FQDN of the URL from either: TLS extension server name indication (SNI), SSL certificate common name (CN).” It also says: “When using SSL certificate inspection, FortiGate is not decrypting the traffic. It is only inspecting the server digital certificates and the SNI field, which are interchanged before the encryption.”

This proves the second part of the answer:

under SSL certificate inspection , FortiGate does not decrypt the traffic

therefore, if the traffic is allowed , it still passes without decryption

That makes D correct.

For the SNI mismatch behavior, the FortiOS administration guide describes the default Server certificate SNI check behavior as:

“Enable: If it is mismatched use the CN in the server certificate for URL”

So if the SNI does not match the CN or any SAN, FortiGate falls back to using the CN from the Subject field for URL handling under the default setting. That makes C correct.

Why the other options are wrong:

A is wrong because with the default SNI-check behavior, when the SNI mismatches the certificate identity, FortiGate does not continue using the mismatched SNI . Instead, it uses the CN in the server certificate for the URL .

B is not the best answer in this single pair selection . While certificate inspection does not decrypt traffic, the key default behavior the documents explicitly highlight for this mismatch case is:

use the CN when SNI mismatches , and

certificate inspection does not decrypt allowed HTTPS traffic .

So the verified answers are: C, D .

Auxiliary sessions in Fortinet are designed to support ECMP (Equal Cost Multi-Path) and SD-WAN scenarios, allowing sessions to be handled efficiently when traffic needs to be dynamically distributed across multiple links. With the auxiliary session setting enabled, FortiGate creates additional session table entries for each possible path in ECMP or SD-WAN—meaning that if the routing path changes (such as a link failover), a new session can be immediately activated and offloaded to the NP6 network processor for acceleration, ensuring minimal disruption. This greatly benefits high-throughput deployments.

Official documentation specifies that when auxiliary sessions are enabled, FortiGate doesn’t just rely on dynamically creating new sessions after a routing event, it proactively creates sessions for all potential paths. This means that in the event of a route change, two sessions exist and the traffic is quickly re-routed and offloaded, maximizing performance and reliability. Without this feature, multiple paths cannot be efficiently offloaded, and routing changes trigger a single session update, reducing failover performance.

The Network Security Support Engineer 7.6 Study Guide explicitly explains this debug message:

“iprope_in_check() check failed, drop” means the packet is destined to a FortiGate IP address and one of these conditions applies:

The service is not enabled

The service is using a different TCP port

The source IP address is not included in the trusted host list

The packet matches a local-in policy with action deny

That directly confirms C. Trusted host list misconfiguration .

Why D is the second valid choice:

The FortiOS administration guide explains that:

“IP pools and VIPs are considered local IP addresses if responding to ARP requests on these external IP addresses is enabled … the FortiGate is considered a destination for those IP addresses … once an IP pool or VIP has been configured … the FortiGate considers it as a local address and will not forward traffic based on the routing table.”

Because iprope_in_check() is a local-in/local-destination type failure, a VIP or IP pool misconfiguration can cause traffic to be treated as destined for the FortiGate itself, which can then trigger this drop condition if the matching local service/local-in handling is not valid. So D is the closest supported second answer from the available choices.

Why the other options are wrong:

A is wrong because policy route problems are not the documented meaning of this specific debug message. The study guide instead ties iprope_in_check() check failed, drop to management/local-in conditions.

B is wrong because the study guide says traffic shaping drops appear as: “Denied by quota check”

The correct answers are A and B .

The exhibit shows:

override: disable

both members are currently in-sync

only port7 appears under HBDEV stats , so it is the active heartbeat interface

the cluster is in HA A-P mode

Why A is correct:

With override disabled , after a failover the new primary keeps that role when the old primary comes back. The FortiOS administration guide states:

“When the primary FortiGate rejoins the cluster the secondary FortiGate continues to operate as the primary FortiGate.”

So if FGVM...649 reboots and FGVM...650 becomes primary, FGVM...650 will remain primary after FGVM...649 rejoins.

Why B is correct:

The study guide states:

“When FortiGate devices configured in an HA cluster lose communication with each other on the heartbeat interface, each FortiGate assumes the role of the primary device.”

The exhibit shows only port7 as the heartbeat device in HBDEV stats

So if port7 is disconnected and heartbeat communication is lost, the cluster can enter a split-brain condition, where both units believe they are primary. The FortiOS administration guide confirms the same behavior: loss of heartbeat communication causes each member to think it is the primary

Why the other options are wrong:

C is wrong because configuration synchronization status is specifically used to detect whether secondary members remain synchronized with the primary. If members are no longer synchronized, the status changes from in-sync to out-of-sync

D is wrong because the study guide explains that during a configuration change, checksums may differ briefly while changes are copied, but it does not describe this as the secondary initiating a “synchronization reset”

So the verified answers are: A, B .

The correct answer is D .

In the exhibit, get router info routing-table database shows both static default routes:

0.0.0.0/0 [20/0] via 100.64.2.254, port2

0.0.0.0/0 [10/0] via 100.64.1.254, port1

But get router info routing-table all shows only:

0.0.0.0/0 [10/0] via 100.64.1.254, port1

The study guide explains that get router info routing-table all displays the routes that make it to the FIB — the best active routes . It also says that this command doesn’t show standby or inactive routes , which can remain only in the routing table database. It gives the exact rule: “when two static routes to the same destination subnet have different distances, the one with the lower distance is installed in the routing table, and the one with the higher distance is installed in the routing table database.”

The study guide also shows the route selection process:

Most specific route

Lowest distance

Lowest metric (dynamic routes)

Lowest priority (static routes)

ECMP

So the port2 default route is absent from the second output because its distance is 20 , while the port1 default route has distance 10 . The lower-distance route is installed in the active routing table/FIB.

Why the other options are wrong:

A is wrong because the exhibit does not indicate port2 is down or disabled.

B and C are wrong because priority is checked only after distance for static routes. Here, the routes already differ by distance , so priority is not the deciding factor.

So the verified answer is: D .

The correct answer is D .

The exhibit shows:

session_count=591

clash=162

memory_tension_drop=0

TCP sessions:

166 in NONE state

1 in ESTABLISHED state

3 in SYN_SENT state

2 in TIME_WAIT state

The study guide explains the TCP protocol states and states explicitly:

“When a session is closed by both the sender and receiver, FortiGate keeps that session in the session table for a few seconds, to allow for any out-of-order packets that might arrive after the FIN/ACK packet. This is the state value 5.”

In diagnose sys session stat, the exhibit shows 2 in TIME_WAIT state . Since TIME_WAIT = state value 5 , those are the sessions being kept briefly for possible out-of-order packets. That makes D correct.

Why the other options are wrong:

A is wrong because session_count=591 is the total number of sessions, while the TCP sessions shown add up to only 172 (166 + 1 + 3 + 2). So not all sessions in the table are TCP sessions.

B is wrong because the study guide says the number of sessions deleted because of low free memory is shown by memory_tension_drop , and in the exhibit it is 0 , not 162.

C is wrong because the study guide defines ephemeral/open TCP sessions as those not fully established , but the exhibit does not say all 166 in NONE state are specifically “waiting to complete the three-way handshake.” The clearest directly supported statement from the displayed states is the 2 TIME_WAIT sessions retained for out-of-order packets.

So the verified answer is: D .

The best verified answer is C .

The study guide says that when FortiGate is in conserve mode, it activates protection measures to recover memory space:

“System configuration cannot be changed”

“FortiGate skips quarantine actions (including FortiSandbox analysis)”

It also explains that inspection behavior can be reduced while in conserve mode:

“pass (default): All new sessions pass without inspection until FortiGate switches back to non-conserve mode.”

“The av-failopen setting also applies to flow-based antivirus inspection.”

The FortiOS administration guide summarizes this behavior as:

“This causes functions such as antivirus scanning to change how they operate to reduce the functionality and conserve memory without compromising security.”

That is why C is the closest correct choice: FortiGate can reduce functionality of some processes, especially antivirus-related inspection, to preserve memory.

Why the other options are wrong:

A is wrong because FortiGate does not automatically reboot as a default conserve-mode action. A reboot can be configured through an automation stitch , but that is an optional administrator-defined response, not the built-in conserve-mode behavior

B is wrong because the documentation does not say FortiGate switches from proxy-based inspection to flow-based inspection. Instead, it may pass traffic without inspection depending on av-failopen settings

D is not generally correct for conserve mode . The study guide says FortiGate starts dropping new sessions only when memory usage exceeds the extreme threshold : “If memory usage exceeds the extreme threshold, all new sessions that require inspection (flow-based or proxy-based) are blocked.”

So the verified answer is: C .

The exhibit shows:

memory conserve mode: on

memory used: 2706 MB 89% of total RAM

memory used threshold red: 2675 MB 88% of total RAM

memory used + freeable threshold extreme: 2887 MB 95% of total RAM

The study guide states that the default thresholds are:

Extreme = 95%

Red = 88%

Green = 82%

So this FortiGate is in conserve mode because memory usage is 89% , which is above the red threshold (88%) , but it has not yet reached the extreme threshold (95%) .

The study guide then explains exactly what happens during conserve mode:

“For traffic that requires proxy-based inspection (and if memory usage has not exceeded the extreme threshold):

config system global

set av-failopen [off | pass | one-shot]

pass (default): All new sessions pass without inspection”

It also says:

“The av-failopen setting also applies to flow-based antivirus inspection.”

And the same page adds:

“If memory usage exceeds the extreme threshold, all new sessions that require inspection (flow-based or proxy-based) are blocked.”

Therefore, with default settings and with memory usage below the extreme threshold , FortiGate is allowing new sessions that require inspection, but bypassing inspection . That matches C .

Why the other options are wrong:

A is wrong because the default behavior is not to block proxy-based inspected sessions; the default is pass , meaning they pass without inspection

B is wrong because if memory rises another 6% , it reaches 95% , which is the extreme threshold . At that point, the study guide says all new sessions that require inspection are blocked

D is wrong because FortiGate blocks all new inspected sessions only when memory usage exceeds the extreme threshold , and the exhibit shows it is currently at 89% , not 95%

The correct answers are A and C .

The exhibit shows that preserve-session-route is enabled on port1:

config system interface

edit " port1 "

set preserve-session-route enable

next

end

The study guide explains the effect of this setting exactly:

“enable: FortiGate marks existing session routing information as persistent, and applies only the modified routes to new sessions”

It also states:

“The current route must still be present in the FIB. Otherwise, FortiGate flags the session as dirty and reevaluates it”

And the same page further clarifies:

“If you enable this setting, sessions passing through that interface continue to pass without being affected by the routing changes. The routing changes apply only to new sessions. If the route is removed from the FIB, then FortiGate must flag the session as dirty, flush its gateway information, and reevaluate the session.”

This proves:

A is correct because with preserve-session-route enable, existing sessions are normally preserved and routing changes apply only to new sessions.

C is correct because the session remains unchanged unless the current route is removed from the FIB/routing table, in which case FortiGate dirties and reevaluates the session.

Why the other options are wrong:

B is wrong because when the active route is removed, FortiGate does not simply mark the session dirty and stop there. The study guide says it “flags the session as dirty and reevaluates it” , which means route lookup happens again.

D is wrong because the session does change if the active route is removed. FortiGate flushes gateway information and reevaluates the session.

So the verified answers are: A, C .

The key point is that the two VPNs are dynamic dialup IPsec tunnels on the same interface and both are using IKEv1 main mode . In this design, FortiGate cannot reliably distinguish which dialup phase1 to match before phase 1 completes.

The uploaded Network Security Support Engineer 7.6 Study Guide shows that XAuth happens only after phase 1 is already established:

“The IKE real-time debug shows, after phase 1, the exchange of extended authentication (XAuth) packets… You can also see the CFG_REPLY, showing the XAuth user and group name.”

That means the user group is learned too late to be used for selecting the correct phase1 definition. So the fix must be applied to the phase1 matching method itself , not to XAuth.

The FortiOS administration guide gives the exact rule for this scenario:

“When the remote VPN peer has a dynamic IP address and is authenticated by a pre-shared key you must select Aggressive mode if there is more than one dialup phase 1 configuration for the interface IP address.”

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract of Network Security Support Engineer Study Guide (FortiOS 7.6) topics:

The correct answers are A and B . Security Fabric communication uses Fortinet-proprietary protocols, mainly FortiTelemetry and Neighbor Discovery . The study guide states that FortiTelemetry uses TCP port 8013 , and that the connection is always established by the downstream FortiGate toward the upstream FortiGate . This validates option A . The same section also states that FortiTelemetry must be manually enabled . More precisely, the upstream FortiGate interface must have Security Fabric Connection enabled under administrative access so it can accept incoming Security Fabric connection requests. This validates option B .

Option C is wrong because only the FortiTelemetry TCP port 8013 can be changed; Neighbor Discovery uses UDP port 8014 and cannot be changed. Option D is also wrong because Security Fabric communication is not enabled automatically among all Fortinet devices. It requires the correct Security Fabric settings, interface administrative access, and downstream authorization. The study guide’s troubleshooting section confirms that when FortiTelemetry is disabled, the upstream FortiGate receives TCP 8013 SYN packets but does not complete the Security Fabric connection.

To determine the correct conclusions, we analyze the specific lines in the IKE real-time debug output provided in the exhibit:

Analysis for Option A (The remote peer is the initiating peer):

Evidence: The very first line of the debug output reads: ike 0:624000:98: responder: main mode get 1st message...

The keyword responder indicates that this local FortiGate is receiving the connection request. Consequently, the remote peer must be the initiator sending the request. The phrase " get 1st message " confirms the local unit is receiving the initial packet of the negotiation sequence.

Conclusion: This statement is True.

Analysis for Option B (This is a phase 1 negotiation):

Evidence: The same line mentions main mode.

In IPsec VPNs, Main Mode and Aggressive Mode are exclusively used for Phase 1 (IKE SA) negotiations. Phase 2 (Child SA) negotiations use Quick Mode. The presence of " main mode " definitively identifies this as a Phase 1 exchange.

Conclusion: This statement is True.

Analysis for Option C (There is a Diffie-Hellman group mismatch):

Evidence:

Incoming proposal (Remote): Lists type=OAKLEY_GROUP, val=MODP2048 (Group 14) in the first proposal proposal.

My proposal (Local): Lists type=OAKLEY_GROUP, val=MODP2048 (Group 14).

Since both the remote peer and the local gateway support and are proposing MODP2048 (Group 14), there is no Diffie-Hellman group mismatch. The actual mismatch visible in the logs is between the Encryption/Hash algorithms (Remote proposes AES-256/SHA2-256, while Local proposes AES-128/SHA), but the DH groups match.

Conclusion: This statement is False.

Analysis for Option D (This is a phase 2 negotiation):

As established in the analysis for Option B, " Main Mode " is a Phase 1 protocol. If this were Phase 2, the debug would show " Quick Mode " .

Conclusion: This statement is False.

The get router info bgp summary output lists BGP neighbor status:

Prefix Reception: The " State/PfxRcd " column shows the number of prefixes received from the neighbor—neighbor 100.64.1.254 has " 1 " , confirming option A.

Received Message Count: Under " MsgRcvd " , 18 packets have been received from neighbor 100.64.1.254. This matches option C.

The second neighbor 100.64.2.254 is in " Active " state and has received/sent 0 packets, indicating that its TCP connection is NOT established, disproving option B.

There is no indication anywhere that the router is " still calculating " prefixes; " Active " just means no session is established, so option D is incorrect.

The reported symptom—users unable to access any websites despite no explicit blocks in the profile—points to systemic connectivity or configuration issues rather than specific URL filtering rules.

Option B (SSL/TLS Inspection): When Deep Inspection is enabled, the FortiGate acts as a Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) and re-signs server certificates using its own CA. If the clients (browsers) do not trust this CA (i.e., the certificate is not installed in their Trusted Root store), they will reject the connection with certificate errors, effectively preventing access to all HTTPS websites.

Option D (DNS): Web browsing relies on DNS resolution . If the configured DNS server is unreachable or failing, the FortiGate (or the client) cannot resolve FQDNs to IP addresses. Consequently, browsers will fail to load any page, resulting in a total loss of web access.

Option E (License): If the FortiGuard Web Filtering license expires, the FortiGate can no longer query the FortiGuard Distribution Network (FDN) for ratings. By default, or if the allow-when-rating-error setting is disabled (a common security practice), the FortiGate will block all web traffic that it cannot rate, often displaying a " Web Filter Service Error " or invalid license page.

Option A is incorrect because clearing the cache only increases latency, it does not block traffic. Option C is incorrect because webfilter-force-off is typically used to disable the service (often allowing traffic to bypass checks if the service is down), rather than blocking it.

The correct answers are B and C .

The study guide has a section titled “Not Verified Status on the Collector Agent” and states:

“The collector agent cannot verify if the user is still logged in” and lists these common causes :

“A firewall is blocking traffic to port 139 and 445”

“The workstation remote registry service is not running”

The guide also explains the verification method:

“For WMI polling mode, the collector agent checks the WMI service. For all the other modes, the collector agent checks the HKEY_USERS hive through remote registry services.” If the workstation does not respond to these checks, the status can become not verified

An additional requirements slide in the same study guide confirms:

“TCP ports 139 and 445 must be open between the collector agent and all workstations”

“Remote registry service must be up and running on each workstation”

Why the other options are wrong:

A is wrong because the study guide mentions a workstation coming out of hibernate mode under a different problem: “No Internet After IP Address Change” , not as a common cause of Not Verified status

D is wrong because DNS resolution issues are also discussed under the IP address change scenario, where the collector agent uses DNS to resolve the workstation name after an IP change. That is separate from the Not Verified causes listed for this log message

So the verified answers are: B, C .

The correct answers are C and D .

The study guide’s get vpn ipsec tunnel details example shows:

replay: enabled

inbound and outbound sections with separate SPIs

NPU acceleration: encryption(outbound) decryption(inbound) and it labels these as “Phase 2 SAs for each direction” and “Hardware acceleration”

This directly proves D. Anti-replay is enabled , because the output explicitly says replay: enabled

For the NPU status, the study guide explains the exact npu_flag meanings:

npu_flag=00 = both IPsec SAs loaded to the kernel

npu_flag=01 = outbound IPsec SA copied to NPU

npu_flag=02 = inbound IPsec SA copied to NPU

npu_flag=03 = both outbound and inbound IPsec SAs copied to NPU

Because the exhibit shows hardware acceleration in both directions — encryption(outbound) and decryption(inbound) — the matching npu_flag is 03 , not 02. That makes C correct and A incorrect.

Why B is wrong:

The same study guide output labels the tunnel as having Phase 2 SAs for each direction , so different inbound and outbound SPIs are normal for the two SAs. Also, the FortiOS administration guide explains that auto-negotiate controls whether phase 2 SA negotiation is initiated automatically, not whether inbound and outbound SPIs are different: “By default the phase 2 security association (SA) is not negotiated until a peer attempts to send data… Auto-negotiate initiates the phase 2 SA negotiation automatically…”

So the verified answers are: C, D .

To determine the cause of the failure, we must analyze the IKEv2 debug output provided in the exhibit (image_ad3dc6.jpg):

Identify the Negotiation Phase:

The debug log shows: responder received CREATE_CHILD exchange.

In IKEv2, the CREATE_CHILD_SA exchange is used to create new Child SAs (Phase 2) or to rekey existing ones.

The fact that the tunnel was previously " brought up successfully " implies the initial IKE SA (Phase 1) is stable, and this error is occurring specifically during a rekey event, which often involves Perfect Forward Secrecy (PFS).

Analyze the Proposals (The Mismatch):

Incoming Proposal (Remote Peer):

The remote peer sends a proposal containing two Diffie-Hellman groups: type=DH_GROUP, val=MODP2048 (Group 14) and type=DH_GROUP, val=MODP1536 (Group 5).

My Proposal (Local FortiGate):

The local FortiGate configuration expects: type=DH_GROUP, val=MODP3072 (Group 15).

Result of the Negotiation:

The debug output concludes with: no proposal chosen and Negotiate SA Error.

This error occurs because the local FortiGate cannot find a common Diffie-Hellman group between what it requires (Group 15) and what the peer is offering (Groups 14 or 5).

While this is technically a mismatch occurring during the Phase 2 (Child SA) creation, " A Diffie-Hellman mismatch " (Option A) is the precise root cause identified in the logs.

Why other options are incorrect:

B: The log shows received create-child request, confirming that UDP traffic is reaching the device and is not blocked.

C: The failure is in the CREATE_CHILD exchange (Phase 2/Rekey), not the IKE_SA_INIT or IKE_AUTH (Phase 1) exchanges.

D: While the mismatch is occurring within the Phase 2 definitions, Option A is the specific technical reason for the no proposal chosen error shown in the DH_GROUP lines.

The diagnose debug authd fsso server command is the primary tool for troubleshooting communication between the FortiGate and the FSSO Collector Agent. This debug output reveals the status of the connection and the reasons for failure. The three most common connectivity issues identified by this debug are:

FortiGate cannot reach the IP address of the collector agent (Option C): The debug will show connection timeouts or " host unreachable " errors if the Layer 3 connectivity is missing.

The connection was refused / Port mismatch (Option B): If the FortiGate can reach the IP but the Collector Agent is not listening on the specified port (default 8000), the debug will display " Connection refused. " This often happens if the port configured on the FortiGate does not match the listening port on the agent.

The pre-shared key does not match (Option D): If the IP and Port are correct, the next step is authentication. If the password configured on the FortiGate does not match the one on the Collector Agent, the debug will explicitly show an " Authentication failed " or " password mismatch " error during the handshake.

Note on other options: Option A (SSL) is less common than basic connectivity/auth mismatches. Option E (Group filters) relates to user processing logic, which occurs after connectivity is established.

The output on FGT-01 confirms that the device is actively encapsulating traffic and sending it as ESP packets (Protocol 50) out of port1 towards the IP address 97.86.16.52. The logs show outgoing packets, which confirms FGT-01 is attempting to initiate or maintain the tunnel and that NAT-Traversal is not being used (as it uses raw ESP).

The output on FGT-02 , however, displays (no packets captured). This is significant because the sniffer command diagnose sniffer packet any ' esp ' captures traffic at the network interface level (ingress), regardless of whether a matching VPN configuration exists on the receiving unit. The absence of packets proves that the ESP traffic generated by FGT-01 is physically not arriving at FGT-02 ' s interface.

This behavior is explained by two primary factors:

Option A (Blocking): An intermediate device, such as an ISP router or firewall, is dropping Protocol 50 traffic. Unlike UDP 500/4500, raw ESP is often blocked by default on many networks or legacy devices.

Option C (Routing/Misconfiguration): If the administrator configured the wrong remote peer IP on FGT-01 , the packets are being routed to a different destination entirely. Consequently, they never arrive at FGT-02 to be captured.

Option B is incorrect because even without a configured VPN tunnel, the sniffer would still display the incoming ESP packets if they were reaching the interface. Option D is incorrect because FGT-01 is sending ESP, making ' esp ' the correct filter.

To understand why Type 5 LSAs (AS External LSAs) are missing from the Link-State Database (LSDB), we must look at how OSPF generates and propagates them:

A. There is no autonomous system border router (ASBR) in the network:

Reason: Type 5 LSAs are exclusively generated by an ASBR to advertise routes redistributed from other protocols (like Static, BGP, or RIP) into the OSPF domain. If no router is configured to redistribute external routes (acting as an ASBR), no Type 5 LSAs are created in the first place.

C. The local router is located in a stub area:

Reason: By definition, a Stub Area (and a Totally Stubby Area) prevents Type 5 LSAs from entering. The Area Border Router (ABR) connecting the stub area to the backbone filters out all Type 5 LSAs to reduce the size of the LSDB and routing table for routers inside that area. Instead, a default route is usually injected.

Why other options are incorrect:

B: While database filtering exists, standard prefix-list filtering typically affects the routing table (RIB) generation, not the underlying LSDB propagation of Type 5 LSAs, or it is less common than the architectural reasons (Stub/No ASBR).

D: IP Protocol 89 is the transport for OSPF itself. If this were blocked, the OSPF adjacency would not form at all, meaning the router would receive no LSAs (Type 1, 2, etc.), not specifically just Type 5.

The correct answer is D .

The study guide shows the ipsmonitor test usage exactly:

1: Display IPS engine information

2: Toggle IPS engine enable/disable status

5: Toggle bypass status

99: Restart all IPS engines and monitor

So diagnose test application ipsmonitor 5 is used to toggle bypass status , which corresponds to enabling IPS bypass mode .

Why the other options are wrong:

A is wrong because disabling the IPS engine is option 2 , not 5.

B is wrong because the study guide does not define option 5 as IPS session information.

C is wrong because restarting all IPS engines and monitors is option 99 , not 5.

So the verified answer is: D .

Based on the Fortinet FCSS - Network Security 7.6 documents and the analysis of the VPN tunnel exhibit, here is the verified answer.

Questions no: 91

Verified Answer: A, C

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation with all FCSS - Network Security 7.6 documents:

To determine the status of the VPN tunnel, we must examine the specific counters and fields in the diagnose vpn tunnel list output provided in the exhibit.

Analyze Phase 2 Status (Option A):

The output displays child_num=0.

In IKEv2 (and IKEv1 implementations in FortiOS), " Child SAs " refer to the Phase 2 (IPsec) Security Associations that carry the actual data traffic.

A value of 0 indicates that no Phase 2 tunnels are established. If Phase 2 were up, child_num would be at least 1.

Additionally, under the proxyid section, the field sa=0 confirms there is no active Security Association for that traffic selector.

Analyze Traffic Status (Option C):

The stat line shows: rxp=0 txp=0 rxb=0 txb=0.

rxp (Received Packets) and txp (Transmitted Packets) are both zero. This definitively confirms that no traffic is traversing the tunnel currently. This is expected since Phase 2 is down.

Analyze Phase 1 Status (Why B is incorrect):

The tunnel entry exists in the list with a valid tun_id, and NAT-Traversal is active (natt: mode=keepalive).

The presence of the tunnel in this command output, along with active Keepalive mechanisms, typically indicates that Phase 1 (IKE SA) is established and the peers are communicating on port 4500 (NAT-T), even though the data tunnels (Phase 2) failed to negotiate. If Phase 1 were down, the tunnel would often not appear in this " list " view or would show different status flags indicating a complete connection failure.

Conclusion: The exhibit shows a scenario where the Phase 1 control channel is likely up (evidenced by the entry existence and NATT keepalives), but the Phase 2 data channel is down (child_num=0), resulting in zero traffic flow (rxp=0/txp=0).

To display debug output on FortiGate devices, you must always run both the application-specific debug command and the global debug enable command. The command diagnose debug application ike -1 sets up the detail level for the IKE daemon debug, but it does not display any debug output on its own. As described in the FortiOS CLI debugging manuals, the command diagnose debug enable activates debug output on the console, making all previously set debugs visible. This is especially important for VPN troubleshooting—without the enable command, no output appears even if there is VPN traffic.

The correct diagnostic sequence is:

diagnose debug application ike -1

diagnose debug enable

This procedure is found in every FortiOS CLI debug tutorial and troubleshooting workflow.