SC-300 Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator Questions and Answers

According to the Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator (SC-300) official study guide and Microsoft Learn module “Implement and manage user risk policies”, the scenario where “users must be forced to change their password if there is a probability that their identity was compromised” directly maps to the Azure AD Identity Protection “User risk policy.”

In Azure AD Identity Protection, user risk represents the likelihood that an account’s credentials have been compromised. When Azure AD detects a high user risk (for example, leaked credentials, atypical sign-in behavior, or sign-ins from unfamiliar locations), the User Risk Policy can be configured to automatically block access or require the user to reset their password upon the next sign-in.

Before a user can reset their password or complete remediation, they must have a registered authentication method (for password reset and MFA). Therefore, users must first register for multi-factor authentication (MFA) — this registration enables the authentication methods (like phone number or authenticator app) that are also used during password reset verification.

The SC-300 documentation specifically highlights:

“To enforce a password change when a user’s identity risk is high, the user must be registered for MFA, and a user risk policy must be configured to require password change.”

Thus, the correct configuration is:

Users must first register for MFA — to ensure they have verified methods available.

Configure a user risk policy — to automatically trigger password reset upon detection of compromised credentials.

Correct Answers:

Users must first: Register for multi-factor authentication (MFA).

You must configure: A user risk policy.

In Azure AD Privileged Identity Management (PIM) for Azure AD roles, the exam materials describe that you tailor how a role (for example, User administrator) is used by editing its Role settings. These settings control activation behavior, including require multi-factor authentication, justification, approval, assignment/activation durations, and notifications. The guide states that administrators can “configure activation requirements and time-bound eligibility on a per-role basis” and “enforce approval workflows and MFA at activation.” Access reviews are used to periodically verify who still needs a role, but they do not implement the operational changes to how the role is activated. Active assignments simply shows and changes who currently holds active/eligible assignments; it does not set policy for the role’s activation behavior. Administrative units scope certain directory tasks, but they are not how you change PIM activation/approval/MFA requirements. Therefore, to meet planned changes for the User administrator role (such as least privilege activation with approval, justification, and MFA), you update PIM → Azure AD roles → User administrator → Role settings. This aligns with the SC-300 objective to “configure PIM settings and policies for Azure AD roles,” ensuring governance by policy rather than ad-hoc assignment.

As per the Microsoft SC-300: Identity and Access Administrator Study Guide and official Microsoft Learn content under “Monitor and troubleshoot Azure AD using reports and logs”, Conditional Access policy data is captured in the Sign-ins log within Azure Active Directory. Each sign-in record contains detailed information about the authentication process, including which conditional access policies were evaluated, the policies applied, and their enforcement results (e.g., “Grant access,” “Block,” or “Require MFA”).

The Audit logs in Azure AD, on the other hand, track directory-level changes such as policy creation, modification, or administrative actions — they do not include user authentication or conditional access evaluation data. Therefore, to analyze Conditional Access activity in an external SIEM system, you must export Sign-in logs, which contain the conditional access evaluation details.

Microsoft documentation specifies that exporting in JSON format is preferred for integration with third-party SIEM systems because JSON preserves nested policy evaluation data structures that CSV format cannot fully represent. CSV exports omit detailed conditional access results (e.g., policy IDs and results per policy), making them unsuitable for automated parsing and deep analysis.

Thus, based on official Microsoft documentation:

“Conditional Access policy evaluation results are only available in Sign-in logs and should be exported in JSON format for SIEM integration.”

✅ Correct Answer: A. sign-ins in JSON format

According to the Microsoft SC-300: Identity and Access Administrator official study guide and Microsoft Learn modules on Azure AD Identity Governance, the correct way to manage user access—especially for scenarios involving both internal and external users—is through Entitlement Management in Azure AD Identity Governance.

Entitlement Management uses access packages to define and automate how users obtain access to resources such as groups, SharePoint sites, and applications. Access packages contain policies that specify who can request access (internal users, external users, or both) and how that access is approved and periodically reviewed. The guide clearly states:

“Access packages provide a structured method to configure and automate access for users, ensuring that access assignments follow the organization’s policy and compliance requirements.”

To enable external collaboration with another organization (such as fabrikam.com), Microsoft documentation emphasizes that you must create a connected organization. A connected organization represents an external directory or domain whose users can be invited to request access packages or participate in identity governance workflows. The connected organization defines trust boundaries for cross-tenant collaboration, without requiring domain federation or acceptance.

In summary:

Access packages configure and automate user access.

When performing a bulk user creation in Azure Active Directory (via a CSV template upload), certain attributes are required to successfully create user objects.

According to Microsoft’s Azure AD user bulk import documentation, the required properties are:

accountEnabled – Boolean (True/False) value to enable or disable the account.

passwordProfile – Includes the user’s initial password details.

usageLocation – Specifies the country or region for license assignment.

userPrincipalName – Unique sign-in name for the user.

Other properties such as givenName, surname, or displayName are optional.

From Microsoft Docs:

“The minimum required attributes for user creation are accountEnabled, displayName, mailNickname, userPrincipalName, and passwordProfile. However, when bulk importing, usageLocation is also required for license assignment compliance.”

Therefore, among the given options, Option D matches these required fields exactly.

✅ Correct Answer: D. accountEnabled, passwordProfile, usageLocation, and userPrincipalName

First create: ✅ An Azure Automation account

Distribute Catalog1 by using: ✅ An access package

According to the Microsoft SC-300 study guide and Microsoft Entra Identity Governance documentation, when creating custom extensions for Entitlement Management catalogs, the extensions must be hosted in an Azure Automation account. This automation account provides the execution environment for scripts or runbooks that perform external actions when certain events occur, such as user assignments or access removals.

Entitlement Management in Microsoft Entra (formerly Azure AD) allows administrators to automate user access lifecycle processes through access packages. These packages are distributed to internal or external users and define which resources (applications, groups, teams, or SharePoint sites) they can request access to — all under a governance framework.

First create an Azure Automation account

To use a custom extension in a catalog, Microsoft Entra requires an Azure Automation account.

The automation account hosts runbooks (PowerShell scripts or actions) that execute when access package events trigger (e.g., user request approval, role assignment, or removal).

The automation account acts as the backend engine for entitlement management extensions.

As per Microsoft documentation:

“To add a custom extension to an access package, create an Azure Automation account that contains the runbook to handle the automation triggered by access lifecycle events.”

Distribute Catalog1 by using an access package

Once the catalog (Catalog1) and custom extension are configured, access to the resources in that catalog is granted through access packages.

Each access package defines eligibility, approval workflows, and access duration for users.

Access packages serve as the distribution mechanism of catalogs — users request access through them, and the catalog defines what access is granted.

From Microsoft SC-300 content:

“In Entitlement Management, catalogs define available resources, while access packages define who can request them and under what conditions. Access packages are the method of distributing access in a catalog.”

When registering an application in Azure Active Directory (Azure AD) for authentication, one of the key configuration items is the redirect URI. According to Microsoft Identity Platform Documentation and the SC-300 official study guide, the redirect URI (or reply URL) specifies where Azure AD should send the authorization code or access token after a successful sign-in.

The guide explains:

“During app registration, Azure AD requires a redirect URI to identify where authentication responses are sent. For web apps, this must be a valid HTTPS endpoint where your app listens for responses from the Azure AD authorization endpoint.”

In contrast:

The executable name, bundle ID, and package name are identifiers relevant to desktop or mobile app packaging and are not part of Azure AD web app registration configuration.

Only the redirect URI ensures proper return of authentication tokens in OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect flows.

Thus, when registering a .NET web app (App1) for Azure AD authentication, you must configure the redirect URI to handle token responses securely.

In Azure AD, license automation is implemented through group-based licensing. The SC-300 materials explain that “you can assign licenses to a group in Azure Active Directory; when you assign a license to a group, all users who are members of the group are assigned that license”. They also clarify that “dynamic group membership uses rules to automatically add or remove users based on user attributes”, which is the recommended way to on-board new populations without manual effort. For licensing, the guide is explicit that “group-based licensing works with security groups and Microsoft 365 Groups” and that “distribution lists are not supported for license assignment”. Administrative Units are described as “a scoping mechanism for delegating administrative permissions to subsets of users and devices”, not a licensing entity. Likewise, Organizational Units (OUs) are on-premises AD containers and “do not control license assignment in Azure AD”.

Given the requirement to allocate licenses automatically to new A. Datum users as they appear, the least-effort, policy-driven approach is to create an Azure AD Dynamic User security group with a membership rule that targets those users (for example, by domain, company attribute, or a synced attribute), then assign the required Microsoft 365/Azure AD licenses to that group. As the documentation notes, “when users join or leave the group based on the rule, licenses are added or removed automatically.”

Implementing Pass-through Authentication (PTA) ensures that Azure AD delegates the authentication process directly to the on-premises Active Directory in real-time. When a user signs in, Azure AD routes the authentication request through a secure channel to the on-premises Authentication Agent, which verifies credentials against AD.

If a user account is disabled in Active Directory, authentication immediately fails because the request is validated directly against the on-premises domain controllers — there’s no delay or dependency on synchronization intervals.

From Microsoft documentation (SC-300 official guide):

“Pass-through Authentication provides real-time authentication directly against on-premises Active Directory. If an account is disabled on-premises, authentication requests are denied immediately.”

Thus, enabling PTA satisfies the requirement for immediate blocking of disabled accounts.

✅ Correct Answer: A. Yes

According to Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps documentation and the SC-300 study guide, an OAuth app policy monitors third-party applications that request access to Microsoft 365 data through Microsoft Graph API permissions. These apps can request delegated or application permissions. When an app is authorized by many users and requests high permissions such as Calendars.ReadWrite, it can introduce security risks.

Defender for Cloud Apps allows administrators to create OAuth app policies to generate alerts when an app:

Requires high permissions (e.g., read/write to mailboxes, calendars, or files).

Is authorized by more than a specified number of users (for example, more than 20).

This matches the requirement in the question exactly. Other policy types (anomaly detection, access, or activity) monitor user or session behavior, not app consent behavior.

As per Microsoft’s documentation:

“Use OAuth app policies to detect risky OAuth apps, monitor application permissions, and alert when apps are authorized by an unusual number of users or request excessive permissions.”

In Azure AD Monitoring and Reporting documentation and the SC-300 Study Guide (Module: Monitor and report on identity and access), sign-in logs in Azure Active Directory are retained for a default duration of 14 days.

The sign-in logs contain information about user sign-in activity, including application usage, conditional access policies, and multi-factor authentication details. These logs are accessible through the Azure portal → Azure Active Directory → Sign-ins, or programmatically via Microsoft Graph.

Microsoft specifies:

“Azure AD stores sign-in activity for 14 days by default. For longer retention, you must integrate with Azure Monitor (Log Analytics), Azure Storage, or Event Hub.”

This 14-day retention limit applies to tenants without additional premium log retention solutions.

 The users must first: Register for multi-factor authentication (MFA)

 You must configure: A user risk policy

According to Microsoft SC-300 official learning materials and Exam Ref SC-300: Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator, when the requirement is to address the probability that user identities were compromised, the appropriate feature is Azure AD Identity Protection. Identity Protection detects risky sign-ins and risky users through continuous analysis of login behavior, location, device, and credential exposure signals.

Two types of policies can be created:

Sign-in risk policy – Triggers actions based on suspicious sign-in behavior (for example, unfamiliar location).

User risk policy – Triggers actions when the user’s overall identity is deemed at risk (for example, compromised credentials).

The documentation specifies:

“When user risk is detected, the policy can require the user to change their password to remediate the risk. Users must first be registered for MFA to perform secure password change operations.”

Therefore, before the user risk policy can be enforced, users must be enrolled in multi-factor authentication (MFA). MFA is used during the remediation step (password change) to verify the user’s identity securely.

Thus, to meet the requirement for “the probability that user identities were compromised,” you configure a user risk policy in Azure AD Identity Protection, and ensure that users first register for MFA so that they can complete password change or verification flows when risks are detected.

According to the Microsoft SC-300: Identity and Access Administrator Study Guide and the Microsoft Learn module “Publish on-premises apps for remote access using Azure AD Application Proxy”, Azure AD Application Proxy enables secure remote access to internal, on-premises web applications without requiring VPN access.

In the scenario, App1 is an on-premises application hosted within the Litware network, and the technical requirements specify that it must be securely accessible to both internal and external users — including Fabrikam guest accounts — through Azure AD authentication.

Microsoft’s official documentation states:

“Azure AD Application Proxy provides secure remote access to on-premises web applications, integrating with Azure AD for single sign-on (SSO) and conditional access policies.”

Given that the environment already includes a server (SERVER1) running the Azure AD Application Proxy connector, and that Litware wants to enforce Azure AD Conditional Access and MFA for App1, Azure AD Application Proxy is the correct implementation.

The other options are not suitable:

A. Policy set in Microsoft Endpoint Manager: Used for device compliance and app management, not for publishing on-premises apps.

B. App configuration policy in Endpoint Manager: Used for mobile app configuration (e.g., MAM policies), not for access publishing.

C. App registration in Azure AD: Used for modern cloud or SaaS apps integration, but App1 is on-premises and needs proxy access.

Correct Answer: D. Azure AD Application Proxy

In Microsoft 365 and Azure AD Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA), the supported verification methods include:

Microsoft Authenticator app (notification or verification code)

Phone call

Text message

Hardware token (OATH)

According to the Microsoft SC-300 Study Guide and Microsoft Learn: Plan and deploy Azure AD MFA, the Microsoft Authenticator app offers two modes:

Push notification – requires an active internet connection on the mobile device.

Verification code (time-based one-time password - TOTP) – does not require internet or mobile connectivity. The Authenticator app continuously generates verification codes every 30 seconds locally on the device.

In this scenario, users are working remotely in areas without Wi-Fi or mobile network connectivity. Hence, methods relying on push notifications, SMS, or phone calls are not feasible. The only viable MFA method that works offline is the verification code from the Microsoft Authenticator app, since it functions using the device’s internal clock without external connectivity.

As per the Microsoft SC-300: Identity and Access Administrator official study materials and Microsoft Learn documentation on “Manage administrative units in Azure Active Directory”, Administrative Units (AUs) are designed to delegate administrative permissions within large organizations based on divisions such as geography or department. They provide scoped administrative control—allowing helpdesk or user administrators to manage users only within a specific subset of the directory, such as a branch office or department.

In this scenario, Contoso’s technical requirement states:

“The helpdesk administrators must be able to manage licenses for only the users in their respective office.”

To fulfill this, you must create an administrative unit for each branch office (e.g., Montreal, London, Seattle) and assign helpdesk administrators scoped to those AUs. This ensures that each helpdesk admin can only manage licenses for the users within their respective office, enforcing the principle of least privilege.

The Azure Active Directory admin center is the correct tool for creating and managing administrative units. SC-300 guidance clarifies that administrative units are Azure AD objects, not on-premises Active Directory objects like Organizational Units (OUs). Therefore, they are created and managed exclusively through the Azure portal, Microsoft Graph, or PowerShell for Azure AD, but the most straightforward interface for exam purposes is the Azure AD admin center.

In Microsoft Entra (Azure AD) app registrations, permissions are categorized as either delegated or application.

Delegated permissions are used when an app acts on behalf of a user who is signed in.

Application permissions are used when an app acts as itself, without user interaction — typically for background services, daemons, or APIs.

Because App1 is a service application that will:

Run without user interaction,

Access the Microsoft Graph API, and

Collect audit logs (sign-in logs) —

It requires application permissions such as AuditLog.Read.All or Directory.Read.All granted to the app identity itself.

Microsoft documentation states:

“Applications that run as background services or daemons use application permissions when calling Microsoft Graph APIs that access organization data without a signed-in user.”

To configure the account lockout settings so that accounts are locked out for five minutes after 10 failed sign-in attempts, you can follow these steps:

Open the Microsoft Entra admin center:

Sign in with an account that has the Security Administrator or Global Administrator role.

Navigate to the lockout settings:

Go to Security > Authentication methods > Password protection.

Adjust the Smart Lockout settings:

Set the Lockout threshold to 10 failed sign-in attempts.

Set the Lockout duration (in minutes) to 5.

Please note that by default, smart lockout locks an account from sign-in after 10 failed attempts in Azure Public and Microsoft Azure operated by 21Vianet tenants1. The lockout period is one minute at first, and longer in subsequent attempts.However, you can customize these settings tomeet your organization’s requirements if you have Microsoft Entra ID P1 or higher licenses for your users1.

SC-300 emphasizes using Conditional Access with named locations to scope MFA—especially to exclude trusted corporate egress IPs. The materials state that administrators can define named locations by public IP ranges and “mark them as trusted” for policy exceptions. This aligns with the requirement: enforce MFA for all users, but exempt users authenticating from the Boston office. Because Azure AD evaluates the client’s public egress address, private RFC1918 ranges are never seen by Azure AD on the internet, so defining private IP ranges would not work. Likewise, the legacy “Trusted IPs” setting belongs to the old per-user MFA service settings; SC-300 guidance prefers Conditional Access named locations for modern MFA deployments and for combining with other conditions (apps, platforms, user risk, locations). Implementing the Boston office as a named location using its public egress IP range(s), and marking it trusted, lets you exclude that location from the tenant-wide MFA policy while still meeting the broader requirement to enforce MFA for everyone else and for on-prem apps published via Azure AD Application Proxy. In short: define Boston’s public IP as a named location and use it in your Conditional Access policy exclusion to satisfy the exemption precisely and securely.

According to the Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator (SC-300) Exam Ref and the Azure AD Dynamic Membership Rules documentation, when you create a dynamic group in Azure Active Directory (now Entra ID), you define rules that automatically add or remove users based on their attributes.

The scenario requires a group named LWGroup1 that contains all Azure AD user accounts for Litware but excludes all guest accounts. In Azure AD, internal users created within the tenant are designated with the attribute user.userType = "Member", while external or guest accounts from partner organizations have user.userType = "Guest".

To ensure only internal (Litware) users are included, the membership rule must:

Ensure the user object exists — by checking (user.objectId -ne null) which confirms that the rule only applies to valid user objects.

Include only members, excluding guests — by filtering with (user.userType -eq "Member").

Hence, the dynamic rule that satisfies these conditions is:

(user.objectId -ne null) and (user.userType -eq "Member")

This rule guarantees that LWGroup1 dynamically includes all internal users from litware.com and excludes all external users or guest accounts (such as Fabrikam users).

This logic aligns precisely with the Microsoft Learn module “Manage groups in Azure Active Directory” and SC-300 study guide section “Implement and manage dynamic membership rules”, which states:

“Use user.userType to distinguish between internal members and external guests when configuring membership rules for dynamic groups.”

✅ Correct Answer:

(user.objectId -ne null) and (user.userType -eq "Member")

SC-300 materials stress that to enforce modern controls (like MFA) on on-premises apps, you must front them with Azure AD so Conditional Access can evaluate sign-ins. The documentation states that Azure AD Application Proxy “provides secure remote access to on-premises applications” and that apps published through it can have “Conditional Access policies, including multifactor authentication” applied at sign-in. In other words, once the legacy app is published by Application Proxy, Azure AD sits in the path, enabling you to meet the requirement to enforce MFA when accessing on-premises applications and to combine it with your location-based exemptions.

For SharePoint Online restrictions, SC-300 points to Microsoft Cloud App Security (Defender for Cloud Apps) for real-time governance: you can create session policies that “control and limit activities in real time” and, for SharePoint Online and other Microsoft 365 apps, “monitor user sessions and block download, cut, copy, and print” when conditions (device state, risk, or location) warrant it. Since the scenario already has anomaly detections enabled, configuring Cloud App Security policies aligns directly with the requirement to place access restrictions on SharePoint Online without altering tenant-wide consent settings. Thus, publish on-prem apps with Application Proxy to bring them under Conditional Access (for MFA), and use Cloud App Security policies to enforce SharePoint Online session and download controls.

Server1

On DC1

Azure AD Password Protection has two components: the DC agent (installed on domain controllers) and the proxy service (installed on one or more member servers). The SC-300 materials and Microsoft Identity Governance guidance explain that the proxy service is required when domain controllers do not have direct internet access. The proxy retrieves the password protection policy and custom banned password list from Azure AD over outbound HTTPS and makes it available to DC agents. The documentation further states that you should deploy at least one proxy per forest and two for high availability, and that domain controllers do not need internet connectivity when a proxy is deployed. In this scenario, DCs are explicitly blocked from internet access, so the proxy must be placed on member servers. Both SERVER1 (Application Proxy connector) and SERVER2 (Azure AD Connect) are domain-joined member servers with internet connectivity and are appropriate locations for the AzureADPasswordProtectionProxy service; selecting both provides the recommended redundancy. The custom banned password list is configured in Azure AD at the tenant level (as part of Azure AD Password Protection settings), not on individual servers. Once configured, the policy and list are downloaded by the proxy and enforced by the DC agent during password set or change operations, satisfying the requirement to implement a banned password list for the litware.com forest.

According to the Microsoft SC-300: Identity and Access Administrator Study Guide and the Microsoft Learn module “Monitor and respond to Azure AD events with Azure Sentinel”, multi-staged attacks are advanced threat scenarios that require correlation of multiple events — for example, a suspicious sign-in followed by abnormal Office 365 activity.

The scenario in the question states:

“Litware wants to use the Fusion rule in Azure Sentinel to detect multi-staged attacks that include a combination of suspicious Azure AD sign-ins followed by anomalous Microsoft Office 365 activity.”

Azure Sentinel’s Fusion rule is a built-in, machine-learning–driven correlation rule that automatically detects multi-stage attacks by analyzing anomalies across multiple data sources such as Azure AD sign-in logs, Office 365 activity, and security alerts.

However, to fine-tune detection or meet specific organizational monitoring requirements, administrators can customize the rule logic in Sentinel analytics. This allows you to define how different signals and events are correlated, what thresholds trigger an alert, and how Sentinel interprets combined anomalies.

Microsoft documentation states:

“Fusion uses correlation logic in analytics rules to detect complex multi-stage attacks. Administrators can customize rule logic to meet specific detection requirements and fine-tune alert sensitivity.”

The other options do not meet the requirement:

B. Create a workbook → Used for visualization and reporting, not detection.

C. Add data connectors → Used to ingest data sources; this is already configured.

D. Add a playbook → Used for automated response, not for detection logic configuration.

✅ Correct Answer: A. Customize the Azure Sentinel rule logic

In Azure AD Identity Governance, application access granted through Entitlement management is organized around catalogs and access packages. The SC-300 study materials explain that “a catalog is a container for resources and access packages” and that you must add your enterprise applications (or the groups tied to those apps) to a catalog before you can build access packages that users can request. Creating the catalog first enables you to place only the required resources in scope and to delegate day-to-day ownership: “catalog owners can manage the resources and access packages within their catalog without being tenant-wide admins,” satisfying the delegation requirement to use custom catalogs and least privilege. After the catalog exists, you create one or more access packages that include the application (or groups) and policies that control who can request, how they are approved, and for how long. Identity Governance then lets you track access package assignments and review who has the app over time. By contrast, programs are used to group and report on governance initiatives (for example, collections of access reviews) rather than to onboard application resources; and modifying user/admin consent settings affects app consent behavior, not the lifecycle tracking of assignments. Therefore, the correct first step to track application access assignments while meeting the delegation requirements is to create a catalog.

The SC-300 coverage of Azure AD Connect explains that when you need to bring in a new set of on-premises users or change what is synchronized (for example, adding an additional domain/OU such as ADatum or adjusting filtering), you reopen the Azure AD Connect wizard and choose “Customize synchronization options.” The guide notes that this path lets you “modify directory/OU filtering, add or remove forests, and enable optional sync features” so that only the intended users are synchronized. It contrasts with operational commands: Start-ADSyncSyncCycle merely triggers an immediate delta/full sync of the current configuration; Set-ADSyncScheduler changes the sync cadence or pause/resume behavior; and “Change user sign-in” alters the authentication method (e.g., PHS vs. PTA) but does not control scoping of which users are synced. To meet a requirement to sync the ADatum users according to technical constraints (such as OU/domain selection or feature toggles), you must first configure the scope by running the wizard and selecting Customize synchronization options, then perform/allow a sync cycle to bring those users into Azure AD as defined.

According to the Microsoft SC-300: Identity and Access Administrator official study guide and the Microsoft Learn module “Manage user and group licenses in Microsoft Entra ID (Azure AD)”, when you need to automatically assign licenses to users based on specific attributes (such as department, location, or a custom attribute like LWLicenses), you should use a Dynamic User Security Group in Azure Active Directory (Entra ID).

In the scenario, Litware wants to:

“Manage the assignment of Azure AD licenses by modifying the value of the LWLicenses attribute. Users who have the appropriate value for LWLicenses must be added automatically to the Microsoft 365 group that has the appropriate license assigned.”

This requirement directly maps to a Dynamic User security group, which supports dynamic membership rules that automatically include users when their attributes meet defined conditions (for example, user.extensionAttribute15 -eq "E5"). When a license is assigned to this dynamic group, Azure AD automatically provisions or removes licenses for members based on their attribute values — eliminating manual license management.

Per Microsoft documentation:

“You can assign licenses to a group that has dynamic membership. When a user’s attributes change, Azure AD automatically adds or removes them from the group, which updates their license assignments accordingly.”

Now, analyzing the other options:

B. An OU (Organizational Unit): Used in on-premises Active Directory, not Azure AD. It cannot manage cloud-based license assignments.

C. A Distribution Group: Used for email distribution in Exchange Online; cannot be used for license assignment.

D. An Administrative Unit: Used for scoping administrative permissions, not for license assignment.

Therefore, the only object type that satisfies both the technical and automation requirements is a Dynamic User Security Group.

✅ Correct Answer: A. A Dynamic User security group

To ensure that all users can consent to apps that require permission to read their user profile and prevent them from consenting to apps that require any other permissions, you can configure the user consent settings in the Microsoft Entra admin center. Here’s how you can do it:

Sign in as a Global Administrator:

Access the Microsoft Entra admin center with Global Administrator privileges.

Navigate to user consent settings:

Go toIdentity>Applications>Enterprise applications>Consent and permissions>User consent settings1.

Configure the consent settings:

Under User consent for applications, select the option that allows users to consent to apps that only require permission to read their user profile.

Ensure that all other permissions are set to require administrator consent, thus preventing users from consenting to apps that require additional permissions1.

Save the settings:

After configuring the consent settings, select Save to apply the changes.

By following these steps, you will have configured the system to allow user consent for apps that need to read the user profile while blocking consent for apps that require additional permissions. This setup helps maintain user autonomy where appropriate while safeguarding against unauthorized access to broader permissions.

According to the Microsoft SC-300: Identity and Access Administrator Study Guide and Microsoft Learn modules “Implement and manage Azure AD roles” and “Implement Privileged Identity Management (PIM)”, there is a clear distinction between Azure AD built-in roles and Azure (resource-based) built-in roles.

Azure AD built-in roles govern directory-level access — such as managing users, groups, enterprise apps, or security settings in Azure Active Directory (Entra ID).The Privileged Role Administrator role allows the user to manage role assignments for directory roles in Azure AD, including activating roles through PIM.The Global Administrator also has this capability, but the Privileged Role Administrator is the least privilege role that meets the delegation requirement — aligning with the principle of least privilege stated in the scenario.As the documentation notes:

“Privileged Role Administrator manages role assignments in Azure AD, including the ability to activate and assign roles through Azure AD Privileged Identity Management.”

Azure built-in roles, on the other hand, are used to control access at the Azure resource level — for subscriptions, resource groups, and individual resources.The role responsible for managing these assignments is the User Access Administrator.This role can grant or revoke access to Azure resources by managing role assignments within Azure RBAC (Role-Based Access Control).The Microsoft documentation states:

“User Access Administrator allows management of user access to Azure resources. It can assign roles in Azure RBAC for resources, subscriptions, and management groups.”

Therefore:

✅ To manage Azure AD built-in role assignments → Privileged role administrator

✅ To manage Azure built-in role assignments → User access administrator

This approach satisfies the delegation requirement mentioned in the scenario by assigning the least-privileged roles necessary for each type of role management task.

In the SC-300 coverage of Azure AD Connect and Identity Governance, Microsoft explains that to surface a custom on-premises attribute in Azure AD you must enable Directory extensions in Azure AD Connect. The guide states that “Directory extensions lets you synchronize additional attributes from on-premises Active Directory to Azure AD so they are available in the cloud directory for apps and policy.” This is the supported way to bring a custom attribute (here, LWLicenses) from the litware.com forest into Azure AD so it can be referenced by cloud features such as dynamic group rules. Domain filtering or optional features do not expose a new attribute to Azure AD; directory extensions does.

For license automation, the SC-300 materials on group-based licensing and dynamic groups emphasize that “licenses can be assigned to Azure AD groups; group members then inherit the licenses, and when membership changes, licenses are added or removed automatically.” They further note that “dynamic user groups evaluate rules against user attributes to add or remove users without manual effort,” and that “nested groups are not supported for license inheritance—only direct members receive licenses.” Using the synced LWLicenses attribute in a Dynamic User group rule (for example, user.extensionAttribute… -eq "E5") ensures users are automatically added to the correct group and therefore receive the specified licenses without administrative intervention, fully meeting Litware’s requirement to “manage the assignment of Azure AD licenses by modifying the value of the LWLicenses attribute.”

For Identity Governance (Entitlement Management), the materials clarify who can create and manage access reviews of access packages: “To create or manage access reviews for access packages, you must be a Global administrator, an Identity Governance administrator, a catalog owner for the catalog that contains the access package, or an access package manager.” The exam text also states: “User administrator does not grant the ability to manage entitlement management access reviews unless the user is delegated as a catalog owner or access package manager.” Given the scenario’s user roles, User3 (Identity Governance administrator) and User5 (Global administrator) satisfy these permissions and therefore can create and manage the access review for Package1. By contrast, User4 (User administrator) cannot perform this task by role alone. This selection follows the least-privilege guidance emphasized in SC-300: use specialized governance roles (Identity Governance admin or delegated catalog roles) rather than broad directory roles when possible.

Azure AD External collaboration settings govern who can bring guests into the tenant. The SC-300 content specifies: “External collaboration settings let you control who can invite guests (Anyone, Members, Guests, or Only admins and users in the Guest Inviter role) and whether guests can invite.” It also highlights: “To restrict guest invitations to administrators or designated inviters, configure External collaboration to ‘Only admins and users in the Guest Inviter role’ and disable guest-to-guest invitations if required.” Because the problem states that “Anyone in the organization can invite guest users, including other guests and non-administrators,” the remediation is to tighten External collaboration settings so only approved roles (e.g., Global admins, Guest Inviter, or specific administrators) can invite. Access reviews address periodic entitlement verification, Conditional Access enforces sign-in/session policies, and Continuous Access Evaluation relates to token lifetime/signal-based revocation; none of these change who can send guest invitations. Adjusting External collaboration settings directly resolves the issue and aligns with the requirement that “only users that are assigned specific admin roles can invite guest users.”

In Microsoft Entra ID (Azure AD), the per-user device cap is controlled in Devices > Device settings. The SC-300 materials describe that administrators can configure “Users may join devices to Azure AD” and the “Maximum number of devices per user”. The guide notes that this limit defaults to five and is used to “control how many devices a user can join or register in Azure AD”; when users reach the limit, “they cannot add additional devices until the limit is increased or an existing device is removed.” For scenarios like field or sales staff who use multiple devices, the study content recommends adjusting this value to meet business needs. Because A. Datum’s sales users hit the current cap and a requirement states “Increase the maximum number of devices that can be joined or registered to Azure AD to 10,” the fix is to change the tenant’s Device settings—not User settings, Access reviews, or Security defaults. This aligns with the exam objective to configure device settings for Azure AD join and registration and addresses the precise symptom reported by users.

In Azure AD Privileged Identity Management (PIM), the SC-300 materials explain that role assignment type determines how a user obtains permissions. An eligible assignment means the user requests activation when needed; an active assignment grants continuous permissions. As the guide states, “Eligible assignments require the user to activate the role for just-in-time access, while active assignments grant standing access.” To allow users of the User administrator role to request the role when needed, you must set assignments to Eligible rather than active.

The same objective also calls for ensuring this capability is available “for up to one year.” In PIM role configuration, the duration of an eligibility is controlled by the Expire eligible assignments after policy. The documentation describes that administrators can “configure the maximum duration for eligible assignments by setting ‘Expire eligible assignments after’ to a specific period (for example, months up to one year).” Therefore, you must modify the “Expire eligible assignments after” setting to the required period.

No requirement mentions activation justification or ticket metadata; those are optional controls used to add context to activations. Consequently, the two actions that directly satisfy the stated technical requirement are: set all assignments to Eligible (C) and configure “Expire eligible assignments after” (D).

Answer is

This question asks you to apply the stated Technical Requirements for Self-Service Password Reset (SSPR) to complete the form. The specific scenario about "User3" is a distraction, as the configuration applies to all users.

The relevant technical requirements are:

"Users must provide one authentication method to reset their password by using SSPR."

This directly dictates the value for the Number of authentication methods required, which is 1.

"Available methods must include: Email, Phone, Security questions, The Microsoft Authenticator app"

This lists all the options that are configured to be available for SSPR, which determines the value for Authentication methods that can be used: Email,Phone,Security questions,The Microsoft Authenticator app.

According to the Microsoft SC-300: Identity and Access Administrator Study Guide and the Microsoft Learn module “Implement and manage synchronization for Azure AD”, Azure AD Connect Cloud Sync is the preferred solution when you need to synchronize objects from multiple Active Directory (AD DS) forests without establishing forest trusts.

The scenario specifies that trust relationships must NOT be established between adatum.com and litware.com, but A. Datum must still sync the AD DS users and groups of litware.com to their existing Azure AD tenant (adatum.com).

The SC-300 training materials clarify:

“Azure AD Connect cloud sync enables syncing from multiple AD forests to a single Azure AD tenant without the need for forest trusts or a full Azure AD Connect installation in each forest.”

Unlike staging mode (which provides a standby sync server for failover) or extending the same Azure AD Connect instance to another domain (which requires trust relationships and network connectivity between forests), Azure AD Connect Cloud Sync uses lightweight agents and does not depend on forest trust.

Therefore, to meet the requirement of syncing Litware’s AD DS to A. Datum’s Azure AD tenant without creating a trust, the correct choice is to configure Azure AD Connect Cloud Sync between the Azure AD tenant and the litware.com domain.

Assigning built-in directory roles (like Device Administrators) to a group requires a role-assignable group. The SC-300 documentation explains: “You can assign Azure AD roles to a cloud security group by creating the group with the setting ‘Azure AD roles can be assigned to the group.’” It further emphasizes: “This attribute is immutable; you must decide at creation time. You cannot convert an existing group to be role-assignable later.” When a standard security group is not created as role-assignable, it will not appear in the picker when attempting to assign a directory role—exactly the behavior observed: “groups that aren’t role-assignable cannot be selected for Azure AD role assignments.” Therefore, the first step is to recreate IT_Group1 as a role-assignable security group (often called an “eligible for role assignment” group) and then assign the Device Administrators role to that group. Changing membership types (Dynamic User or Dynamic Device) or adding owners does not convert an existing group into a role-assignable one and thus would not resolve the issue.

The requirement is:

“Require admin approval for application access to organizational data.”

According to the Microsoft SC-300 exam guide and Microsoft documentation on “Configure consent settings for applications”, Azure AD provides User consent settings under Enterprise applications → Consent and permissions to control how applications can request permissions to access organizational data.

By default, users can consent to allow apps to access organizational data on their behalf, which can create security risks. To ensure tighter control, administrators can:

Disable user consent entirely, or

Require admin consent workflow so that when users try to grant an app access, it must first be approved by an administrator.

The SC-300 study materials explicitly describe:

“To require administrator approval before an app can access organizational data, configure the User consent settings to use the admin consent workflow.”

This aligns perfectly with the stated requirement — to ensure admin approval is required before apps gain access to organizational data.

Other options are incorrect:

Authentication methods manage MFA and SSPR, not app consent.

Access packages are part of Identity Governance for resource access, not app consent.

Application Proxy publishes on-premises apps, not related to app consent permissions.

According to the Microsoft SC-300: Identity and Access Administrator official study guide and the Microsoft Learn “Implement and manage Azure AD Identity Protection” module, Azure AD Identity Protection detects two primary categories of risks: user risks and sign-in risks.

User Risk Policy:A user risk represents the probability that a user's identity (credentials) has been compromised. Examples of user risk signals include leaked credentials, unusual sign-ins from different geographies, or sign-ins from infected devices. The Exam Ref SC-300 specifically lists “leaked credentials detected on the dark web or other compromised repositories” as the main trigger for a user risk policy. Such a policy can automatically force password change or enforce MFA to remediate the threat.

Sign-in Risk Policy:A sign-in risk reflects the likelihood that a specific authentication attempt is not performed by the legitimate user. Sign-in risk is based on context, such as sign-ins from suspicious browsers, anonymous IP addresses (like TOR networks), or impossible travel scenarios. The SC-300 documentation highlights these examples as conditions best handled with a sign-in risk policy, where conditional access can block or require MFA for the risky sign-in attempt.

Therefore:

Leaked credentials are addressed through a User Risk Policy, since the account itself is compromised.

Sign-ins from suspicious browsers and access from anonymous IP addresses are handled through Sign-in Risk Policies, as they relate to risky sessions rather than compromised identities.