L4M6 Supplier Relationships Questions and Answers

Explanation

Carter's 10 Cs are a way to qualify (aka shortlist) a supplier. See p.11 for more details on this and p.10 for the stages of the relationship cycle.

Explanation

The correct answer is ‘Yes-partnerships do not have end dates because they involve significant investment’. This is explained on p.126. Partnerships can involve contracts – so the other ‘yes’ answer is incorrect.

Explanation

The portable CD player has been replaced with a substitute product. This threat wasn't considered by the company and this resulted in poor sales. There are many questions in the exam on Porter's 5 Forces - see p. 39

Explanation

Internal stakeholders are those who work within the business so include the legal department, employees and end-users. End-users mean those people and departments who will be using the product or service. For example if Gabriel is procuring new software- an end-user would be anyone who would be using that software (whether they're employees, volunteers or agencies). CIPS outlines types of stakeholders on p.64

Negative leaders and promoters hold the most influence. Negative leaders can sway opposition, while promoters can actively advocate for project success. Managing these stakeholders effectively is crucial in procurement projects.

Partnership sourcing is ideal for high-spend, high-risk situations where collaboration mitigates risks and maximizes value through innovation, efficiency, and trust.

Explanation

CPV stands for Common Procurement Vocabulary. This is explained briefly on p.72 but it doesn’t really go into much detail as to what CPVs are or how they work. CPVs are a string of numbers which refer to an object that is being procured. For example the CPV for Fire Doors is 44221220. When a Tender gets advertised for Fire Doors, it will have this CPV code on, and any suppliers who provide fire doors will get a notification if they have this CPV code on their profile. It’s basically a code that links suppliers with tender opportunities.

Explanation

The correct answer is ‘No- a reverse e-auction would be more suitable as it will secure the lowest price’. An E-auction is something like eBay- where bids go up in price. If David wants to secure a lower price, he should use a Reverse E-Auction- where suppliers bid lower than the previous bid in order to win. For example, Supplier 1 offers to fulfil the contract at £50k per year, Supplier 2 can offer to beat this price by bidding £48k per year. Although Reverse E-Auctions may ensure cheaper prices, there are a lot of disadvantages to using this method. See p.21 and p.76 for more information

Explanation

Designing the specification is not a stage in the relationship cycle- this would be done before the relationship begins. There are 6 stages of the relationship cycle; on-boarding, qualification,segmentation and risk management, performance management, development and innovation, phase out. P.13

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

In the Kraljic Matrix, a 'Bottleneck' item is characterized by low financial impact but high supply risk. These items may be sourced from a limited number of suppliers or involve complex logistics, making them susceptible to supply disruptions. Managing bottleneck items requires strategies focused on risk mitigation, such as developing alternative suppliers or holding strategic stock reserves.

Explanation

This is a leverage supplier on the Kraljic Matrix; high cost impact and low risk impact. The diagram on p.20 gives the example of utility services such as electricity as a common leverage supplier. There are lots of questions on Kraljic in the exam - do revise this topic and ensure you understand each of the four quadrants of the matrix

CIPS defines value for money (VFM) as achieving the optimal balance between cost, quality, and sustainability over the whole life of the requirement.

Public sector procurement is governed by principles of:

Transparency

Fairness

Accountability

Best use of public funds

VFM does not mean lowest price; it means best outcome for the organisation and taxpayers, which includes quality, risk, and whole-life cost.

L4M6 Reference:

Learning Outcome 1: Understand objectives of procurement and supply

Topic: Public sector procurement objectives

CIPS L4M6 Study Guide – Value for money and public accountability

Cost modeling helps in understanding supplier pricing strategies, identifying cost drivers, and opportunities for negotiation or cost reduction, which supports profitability improvements.

Explanation

A product with an ‘inelastic price’ means that consumption doesn’t really depend on how much it costs. So you could increase the price of alcohol and cigarettes and people would tend to still buy them. A product with an elastic price means that a change in price would have a large affect on the number of people who bought the item. See p.95 for more details on price elasticity.

Explanation

Partnerships require the most investment out of those listed. The only relationship type that requires more investment than Partnerships is Co-Destiny. See p.9 for more information on this

In Tuckman’s model of team development, the Forming stage occurs at the outset. Team members meet, roles are unclear, and there is little conflict. Stakeholder teams will be in this stage initially before moving into storming (conflict), norming (agreement), and performing (high productivity).

Explanation

The correct answers are; tradeshows, internal stakeholders’ knowledge and e-procurement platforms. Intranet is incorrect as this is an internal system so you wouldn’t find information on external suppliers on here the careful not to confuse intranet with internet). OJEU is also incorrect; this is the platform on which tender opportunities in the public sector are published- its not a list of suppliers.

Explanation

The correct answers are; They are likely to be able to gain price stability and There may be greater continuity of supply. The other options are an advantage for the supplier rather than the buyer (They will gain an increased volume of business) and a disadvantage of entering into a partnership (The supplier may become complacent). As you may have guessed from these questions – Partnerships come up a LOT in the exam. See p.130 for info on pros and cons of partnerships.

In CIPS L4M6, supply risk is analysed alongside financial risk. Expensive and technically complex items are frequently bespoke or highly specialised, meaning that:

There are few alternative suppliers

Switching suppliers is difficult, costly, or impossible

This significantly increases supply risk, not reduces it. While financial risk is high due to value and complexity, supply risk is also high due to dependency and limited market availability.

The incorrect options misunderstand supply risk:

Single sourcing increases supply risk

Easy switching is rarely possible for complex supplies

High-value complex items never carry low combined risk

L4M6 Reference:

Learning Outcome 2: Understand supply chain risk and resilience

Topic: Financial risk vs supply risk

CIPS L4M6 Study Guide – Risk positioning and Kraljic portfolio thinking

Within the STEEPLED analysis framework, socio-cultural (social) factors relate to demographics, workforce behaviour, societal attitudes, and population trends.

Labour mobility directly relates to how easily workers move between regions, industries, or employers, affecting:

Availability of skilled labour

Recruitment and retention

Supplier workforce stability

The other options belong to different STEEPLED categories:

Employment law → Legal

Environmental regulations → Environmental

Consumer confidence → Economic

L4M6 Reference:

Learning Outcome 1: Understand external influences on procurement and supply

Topic: STEEPLED and PESTLE analysis

CIPS L4M6 Study Guide – Macro-environmental analysis

Explanation

Fred should hold a competition as this is a ‘key way of achieving value for money’ p.67. Fred shouldn’t put a business case together to make the product in-house without doing a make vs buy analysis, and that analysis showing make is the way to go. As the firm buy in 100s of components, it’s very unlikely that making the component in-house would bring ‘value for money’. He should also be careful of only looking at current suppliers or known suppliers- the best supplier of this new component might be unknown to the engineering firm at present.

When jointly developing software, intellectual property (IP) rights are a critical consideration. CIPS stresses that procurement professionals must clarify:

Ownership of developed IP

Rights to use, modify, or commercialise the software

Licensing arrangements after contract termination

Before terminating the relationship, the university must ensure it retains the necessary IP rights to continue using or developing the software, or it may lose access to a key asset.

Security, employment, and financial rights are relevant but secondary compared to IP ownership in a collaborative software development arrangement.

L4M6 Reference:

Learning Outcome 4: Understand legal and contractual aspects of supplier relationships

Topic: Intellectual property in collaborative relationships

CIPS L4M6 Study Guide – Contractual considerations and IP protection

The relationship spectrum describes the range of possible supplier relationship types, from arm’s-length transactional relationships to strategic partnerships.

CIPS explains that buyers should segment their supplier base and apply the most appropriate relationship type to:

Maximise value

Manage risk

Allocate resources effectively

The other options describe activities or tools, not the concept of classifying supplier relationships.

L4M6 Reference:

Learning Outcome 3: Understand approaches to managing supplier relationships

Topic: Relationship spectrum and supplier segmentation

CIPS L4M6 Study Guide – Supplier relationship models

Explanation

The 5 Rights of procurement are; place, quality, quantity, time, price. (Price and Cost are not the same thing). See p.38

Explanation

The correct answer is ‘The Matrix doesn’t consider whether the stakeholder is for or against the activity’. For a list of other limitations of using Mendelow’s Stakeholder Matrix see p.82

Explanation

The correct answer is Forming, storming, norming, performing (p.91). Note; some people add on two additional stages to this; mourning and adjourning. The study guide forgets to mention this, but theexam may ask you about these additional stages. So I strongly recommend doing some further reading on this (it’s called the Tuckman Group Development Model)

Explanation

The correct answer is ‘Intellectual Property Rights’. Grey Stone will need to share its idea for the vaccine with the pharmaceutical company and this is risky if there is no trust between the parties. See p.134 for more information on Risks of Partnerships.

Explanation

Tail spend items are low value, high volume. P. 132

Explanation

Legislative changes wouldn't affect rivalry in a market as all suppliers would be equally as affected, the same with supply chain disruptions. Factors which do affect rivalry include; industry growth and decline, product differences, brand identity, switching costs, diversity of competitors and exit barriers. These are listed on p.41

Explanation

The correct answer is ‘Strong levels of trust and honest communication’. The questions on Partnership in the exam tend to be quite straightforward, but if you’re struggling with this see p. 148 for further details of behaviour in Partnerships.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

The described relationship includes:

Joint Product Development:Collaborative involvement in strategic projects indicates a deep partnership.

Integrated Systems:JIT delivery systems require synchronized operations, reflecting significant integration.

These elements are hallmarks of a significant integration partnership.

Early Supplier Involvement (ESI) offers several advantages to buyers:

Shared expertise for problem solving: Engaging suppliers early allows for collaborative problem-solving, leveraging the supplier's specialized knowledge to enhance product development.

Improved understanding of seller capabilities: Early engagement provides insights into the supplier's capabilities, facilitating better alignment with project requirements.

Lower development costs: Collaborative efforts in the early stages can lead to cost savings by identifying efficiencies and reducing the need for later-stage modifications.

These benefits are highlighted in the CIPS Intelligence Hub:

"ESI can bring significant benefits to your organisation, due to the involvement of suppliers in the initial stages of product development... Here are some additional benefits that your organisation will see when adopting ESI... Helps to reduce cost... Integrates supplier capabilities in the manufacturers supply chain..."

— CIPS Intelligence Hub: Early Supplier Involvement

Early Supplier Involvement (ESI) is a strategic procurement approach designed to add value during the early stages of specification, design, or development. CIPS highlights that suppliers often possess specialist technical knowledge, innovation capability, and market insight that buyers may lack.

By involving suppliers early, organisations can:

Improve product or service design

Reduce lifecycle costs

Improve quality and functionality

Reduce time to market

Options A, B, and D focus on administrative convenience, budget spend, or supplier pricing power, none of which represent the strategic intent of ESI.

L4M6 Reference:

Learning Outcome 3: Understand approaches to managing supplier relationships

Topic: Early Supplier Involvement (ESI) and value creation

CIPS L4M6 Study Guide – Collaboration and innovation with suppliers

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

Fast-changing technology necessitates close collaboration between buyers and suppliers to stay ahead of market trends and innovations. Partnerships enable shared development efforts, quicker adaptation, and mutual growth in dynamic technological environments.

The stages of team development as defined by Tuckman include forming, storming, norming, and performing. These stages reflect how teams evolve and mature through collaboration and problem-solving.

Explanation

It can be difficult for buyers in the private sector to build relationships with suppliers because of rules that state competitive tenders must be undertaken every few years (within the EU this is usually every 4). This means that both parties aren’t as invested in developing the relationship as it’s possible the contact will end shortly. Competitive tendering is a requirement in the public sector to ensure value for money for taxpayers. See p.79 for further details. There are no rules stating Public Sector organisations can’t have good relationships with suppliers, and in fact most will have good relationships with their current suppliers- the issue is that neither party can get too invested in the relationship as everyone knows it may end shortly. There are rules, however, against entering into Partnership relationships (which is discussed in chapter 3).

Explanation

This question refers to Porter's Value Chain (p.35). There's a couple of questions on this in the exam so try to learn it. Procurement is a 'support activity' on this matrix along with firm infrastructure, HR and technology development

Explanation

This is a bottleneck supplier- refer to the Kraljic matrix on p.20; these types of supplier hold a monopoly in the marketplace and provide low-value items. There are lots of questions on Kraljic in the exam - do revise this topic and ensure you understand each of the four quadrants of the matrix

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

Collaborative partnering relationships are characterized by high levels of trust, mutual objectives, shared information, and long-term commitment. Among the options provided:

Co-destiny: This represents the highest level of collaboration, where both parties' futures are closely linked, and decisions are made jointly for mutual benefit.

Strategic alliance: This involves a formal agreement between organizations to pursue shared objectives while remaining independent entities.

These relationship types are positioned on the collaborative end of the relationship spectrum, emphasizing joint efforts and shared success.

Partnership sourcing is suitable for products that contribute to the buying organization's unique selling point (USP) and for critical products on which key customers depend. This approach ensures strategic alignment and mutual benefits for both parties, focusing on collaboration rather than cost alone.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

In Michael Porter's Value Chain model, primary activities are those that are directly involved in the creation and delivery of a product or service. These include:

Inbound Logistics:Activities related to receiving, storing, and distributing inputs internally.

Operations:Transforming inputs into the final product.

Outbound Logistics:Distributing the final product to customers.

Marketing and Sales:Activities that inform buyers about products and services, induce buyers to purchase them, and facilitate their purchase.

Service:Activities that maintain and enhance the product's value, such as customer support and repair services.

Firm infrastructure and technology development are considered support activities, as they assist the primary activities in helping the organization achieve its competitive advantage.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

In the Kraljic Matrix, products are categorized based on supply risk and profit impact:

Leverage items:These have a high profit impact but low supply risk. They are often high-expenditure items available from multiple suppliers, allowing the buyer to leverage purchasing power to negotiate better terms.

Given the product has high expenditure and is available from many suppliers, it fits into the 'Leverage' category.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

Effective contract termination involves addressing any breaches through agreed-upon remedies and compensation. This ensures that both parties are treated fairly and that any disputes are resolved in accordance with the contract terms.

Explanation

The Handfield ESI model is on p.98 and comprises of Black Box, Grey Box, White Box and None. Therefore Red and Blue can be automatically discounted. The correct answer is White Box as the definition given is correct. Grey Box is a formalised supplier integration; joint development activity between buyer and supplier. I have no idea why Handfield calls his system after coloured boxes- but it’s only briefly mentioned in the study guide and is not likely to be a big topic in the exam.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

By acquiring an Australian office furniture manufacturer, COFM can:

Access the Restricted Local Market:Acquisition allows COFM to operate as a local entity, thereby overcoming barriers to entry and benefiting from any local government support available to domestic manufacturers.

Improve Knowledge of the Local Market:The acquired company brings with it an understanding of local customer preferences, regulatory requirements, and market dynamics, which is invaluable for successful operations.

However, the acquisition does not remove government support for other local manufacturers, nor does it necessarily decrease competition.

CIPS refers to Tuckman’s team development model, which identifies the following stages:

Forming – team comes together

Storming – conflict and challenge

Norming – cooperation and cohesion

Performing – effective performance

Adjourning – team disbands

From the options provided:

Norming ✔

Forming ✔

Adjourning ✔

Achieving, Presenting, and Grieving are not recognised stages in Tuckman’s model.

L4M6 Reference:

Learning Outcome 3: Understand teamworking and collaboration

Topic: Team development and behaviour

CIPS L4M6 Study Guide – Tuckman’s team development theory

Explanation

The housekeeping team have low power and high interest. According to Mendelow’s stakeholder matrix, this puts them in the bottom right corner which is ‘keep informed’. See p.81 for more information

A partnership is the most appropriate type of relationship for high-value, long-term contracts involving strategic goods or services. This relationship allows both parties to work collaboratively toward common goals, share risks, and ensure continuity and quality over the long term. According to the CIPS L4M6 study materials, partnership relationships are encouraged where there is a high level of interdependence and shared objectives.

Explanation

Richie should do a Force Field Analysis – this is explained on p.86 and is an idea of Kurt Lewin – it identifies the driving forces for a project and the restraining forces (basically who will be for it and who will be against it). The textbook doesn’t go into much detail on this but there are questions on it in the exam- so have a quick google to familiarise yourself with Kurt Lewin’s Force Field Analysis.

Explanation

The correct answer is ‘items of high value’. This links into the EU procurement principle of ‘Proportionality’ meaning that the procurement process must be proportionate to the value of the contract. Therefore, high value contracts must be procured via competition. What is considered ‘high value’ is decided by ‘thresholds’. These are amended every 2 years to account for inflation etc, but you don’t need to know what the thresholds are for this exam. P.75

Technological factors play a pivotal role in IT equipment supply chains. Advancements, obsolescence, and innovation significantly affect production, cost, and competitiveness, making it a primary focus in supply chain development.

Internal stakeholders are individuals or groups within an organization who are directly involved in its operations and decision-making processes. The finance director plays a crucial role in budgeting and financial planning, while maintenance engineers are essential for ensuring equipment functionality and efficiency. Both are integral to the organization's internal operations, as outlined in the CIPS L4M6 study materials.

Explanation

Victoria should use a ‘request for proposal’ – this allows the security firms to submit ideas on how best to serve the hotel. They might come up with some ideas that Victoria hasn’t thought about and can price against their own ideas. As Victoria doesn’t have a concrete specification, an ITT or RFQ are not appropriate. A PIN tells suppliers that a tender opportunity is coming up and is used in the Public Sector. A hotel is not a Public Sector organisation. See p.76 for more information on when to issue a Request for Proposal

Setting minimum standards helps filter suppliers efficiently, ensuring that only capable and reliable suppliers are considered. This approach supports both cost and quality objectives.

Supplier pre-qualification is used to assess the suitability, capacity, and stability of suppliers before awarding contracts. While financial stability is important, CIPS emphasizes that it is not the only factor. Other considerations include technical capability, quality assurance, compliance with legislation, and sustainability of supply. Profitability ratios alone cannot determine suitability.

Explanation

Using an external supplier always comes with increased risk, as you become dependant upon them, and have less control over their performance (compared to an in-house team). In this example Harry will have the increased risk that the contract cleaners turn up late to their shifts, or don't do a good job. However, there is no reason to believe that the supplier will not perform as well as an internal team- we don't have enough information from the QUESTION NO: for this to be true. What is true is the RISK isgreater. The other answers are incorrect; the QUESTION NO: doesn't indicate whether outsourcing the cleaning will be more or less expensive for Harry. Allowing staff to focus on other areas is an advantage not a disadvantage. See p.4 for more information on 'External Suppliers'

Cost leadership strategy (Porter’s Generic Strategies) is often called a “no-frills” approach. The focus is on being the lowest-cost producer in the industry, allowing the organisation to serve a broad market with minimal differentiation. This approach reduces cost while widening competitive scope, enabling companies to compete on price advantage.

Explanation

The first step is to obtain business approval to terminate. If Senior Management don’t give approval, then the rest of the stages can’t happen and Sandra will be stuck with her current banana supplier. There’s a good diagram on p.109 detailing the steps to supplier termination.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

In strategic partnerships, including a continuous improvement clause is vital. This clause commits both parties to ongoing efforts to enhance processes, reduce costs, and improve quality over time. Such a commitment ensures that the partnership remains dynamic and responsive to changes, fostering long-term collaboration and mutual benefit.

The relationship spectrum runs from adversarial/transactional to collaborative partnerships such as strategic alliances and co-destiny. Also included are mid-spectrum arrangements like single sourcing and arm’s length. Options 2 and 3 list valid relationship types, making 2 and 3 correct.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

Leverage products are characterized by:

High profit impact:They significantly affect the company's bottom line.

Low supply risk:They are available from multiple suppliers, making it easy to switch if necessary.

These products often have standardized quality, and the competitive supply market allows buyers to negotiate favorable terms.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

In the Supplier Preferencing Model, customers are categorized based on their attractiveness and value to the supplier. A "Nuisance" customer is characterized by low profitability and high maintenance, often requiring disproportionate resources relative to the benefits they provide. Such customers may be deprioritized or even considered for discontinuation by the supplier.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

Partnership sourcing is most appropriate for products that are critical to the buyer's business, involve high spend, and are technically complex or require innovation. The chocolate brownie cake is the company's most popular product, indicating high sales volume and strategic importance. Establishing a partnership with suppliers for this product can lead to benefits such as improved quality, innovation, and supply chain efficiency.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

Forward buyinginvolves purchasing goods in advance of actual need, often in larger quantities, to take advantage of favorable pricing or to hedge against anticipated price increases. This strategy is commonly used in volatile markets to stabilize costs and ensure supply continuity.

In the context of the IT equipment industry,Technologicalfactors are paramount. The rapid pace of technological advancement influences product development, supply chain processes, and market competitiveness. Utilizing the STEEPLED framework, technological considerations would significantly impact the company's supply chain strategy.

As per the CIPS Intelligence Hub:

"STEEPLED analysis is a strategic planning methodology that can be used across all business functions to discover, evaluate, organise, and track external risk."

— CIPS Intelligence Hub: Using STEEPLED analysis to develop your supply chain

Using Kraljic’s Portfolio Matrix, CIPS classifies items based on:

Financial impact

Supply risk

Engines have:

High financial value

High supply risk, as production cannot proceed without them

This places the supplier firmly in the strategic quadrant, requiring close relationship management, risk mitigation, and long-term collaboration.

L4M6 Reference:

Learning Outcome 2: Understand supply positioning and risk

Topic: Kraljic portfolio analysis

CIPS L4M6 Study Guide – Strategic items and supplier relationships

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

For high-value and high-risk contracts, such as facilities management services for multiple schools,competitive tenderingis the most appropriate sourcing approach. This process involves inviting multiple suppliers to submit bids, ensuring transparency, fairness, and the opportunity to assess various proposals to select the most suitable supplier. It helps in mitigating risks and achieving value for money.

Explanation

The correct answer is Measurable, achievable and time-bound. This is from SMART KPIs on p. 151. Smart stands for specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, time-bound. In the exam they come up in different orders so be careful.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

In the context of portfolio analysis, particularly using the Kraljic Matrix, procurement items are categorized based on their profit impact and supply risk.Strategic criticalitems are those with high profit impact and high supply risk. These items are vital to the organization's operations and often have limited suppliers, making them critical to secure.

For such items, developing apartnership relationshipis appropriate. This involves close collaboration, mutual trust, and long-term commitment between the buyer and supplier to ensure reliability, innovation, and continuous improvement.

The relationship qualifies as a partnership due to their collaboration, shared investments, and mutual efforts toward improvement, regardless of the absence of formal contracts. Partnerships focus on shared goals, trust, and strategic alignment rather than mere documentation.

Explanation

The correct answer is ‘The product is easy to source elsewhere’. The other three are given as reasons a marketplace might be restricted on p.138. Other reasons also include; brand loyalty, difficult access to distribution channels, and companies colluding.

Explanation

This is an example of poor-communication. The information was not passed from the person who signed the contract to the staff on site who were to do the cleaning. See p.158 on communication issues.

Explanation

The three Es are; Effectiveness, Efficiency and Economy. Sometimes a 4th E is added which is Equity (but this is mainly for the public sector).

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

For one-off, low-value purchases that are readily available from multiple suppliers, anadversarialrelationship is often appropriate. This type of relationship is transactional, with minimal collaboration or long-term commitment. The focus is on obtaining the best price and terms for a specific purchase without investing in developing a deeper relationship.

Explanation

This would reduce inventory (holding stock). Inventory is considered a business waste because it costs money to store stuff (e.g. paying the rent on a warehouse, electricity to light it up etc). If you can reduce the need to store materials and components on site- you reduce costs. You also save time because you get deliveries when you need them- you don’t need to allow for staff unpacking things, storing them away, then going back to them later when they need them. For more information on the 7 Business Wastes see p.70. This comes up in a couple of modules, so it’s worth remembering.