A. Roll-up summary fields can cause the parent record to go through Save:

When a roll-up summary field on a parent object (like Account) is updated due to changes in child records (like Branch), the parent record (Account) is implicitly saved again.

This can result in the execution of the trigger on the parent object. Developers must consider this behavior to avoid unintended recursion or infinite loops.

A: A Flow can guide sales reps through a set of scripted steps and call an Apex action to interact with an external REST endpoint.

B: An Invocable method is used to make an Apex method callable from a Flow. This method can call the REST endpoint and return the data for display.

Why not other options?

C: Future methods are asynchronous and cannot return data to the user in real time.

D: Triggers are used for database events, not for guiding users through scripted processes or making REST calls.

Invocable Methods in Flows

Developer Sandboxes are ideal for individual developers. They provide the same configuration as production and allow developers to work independently.

Full Sandbox: Used for staging or testing environments, not suitable for individual developer work.

Developer Edition: Not connected to the production org and lacks sandbox functionality.

Partner Developer Edition: Used by ISVs for AppExchange development, not suitable for internal teams.

Salesforce Sandbox Overview

Account Trigger:

Apex triggers allow for complex logic to retrieve and update theTimezonefield based onPostalCodeToTimezone__c.

Fast Field Updates Record-Triggered Flow:

A record-triggered flow in Fast Field Updates mode can fetch the necessary data fromPostalCodeToTimezone__cand update the Account.

Why Not Other Options?

A. Quick actions: Used for user interface updates, not for automation based on edits.

B. Approval process: Not relevant to dynamic field updates.

Option B: UsingSchema.sObjectType.Account.isDeletable()checks if the current user has permission to delete records of theAccountobject. This approach adheres to Salesforce's security model.

Not Suitable:

Option A:accountRec.isDeletable()is not a valid method.

Option C: Incorrect syntax for checking permissions.

Option D:Account.isDeletabledoes not exist.

Schema Methods for Object Permissions

A: Custom objects and fields are the fundamental building blocks of the database layer in Salesforce for creating and storing custom data.

C: Roll-up summary fields are a declarative feature used to perform calculations (e.g., sum, count) on child records and display the results on the parent record.

D: Relationships (e.g., master-detail, lookup) are essential for defining how data objects are related to each other.

Why not other options?

B: Triggers are a programmatic solution, which goes against the declarative-only requirement.

E: Flows are used for automation and logic, not for building the database layer.

Salesforce Data Modeling

A: An External ID field is designed to store an ID from another external system, which can be used to match Salesforce records with data from an external source during data imports or integrations.

D: External ID fields are automatically indexed, which can significantly improve the performance of SOQL queries when filtering based on the External ID.

Why not other options?

B: External IDs cannot be formula fields. Only text, number, email, and auto-number fields can be set as External IDs.

C: While External IDs are useful for integrations, they do not make external data visible within Salesforce Mobile.

External IDs Overview

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

To determine the correct definition of the Apex method for a Next Best Action strategy’s Enhance Element, we need to evaluate the syntax and requirements for an @InvocableMethod used in this context, focusing on its accessibility, input/output types, and compatibility with Next Best Action. Let’s analyze the problem and each option systematically, referencing Salesforce’s official documentation.

Understanding Next Best Action and Enhance Elements:

Next Best Action (NBA): NBA is a Salesforce feature that provides personalized recommendations to users, often used in process automation (e.g., via Flow or Einstein Next Best Action). It evaluates strategies to suggest actions, such as offering a discount to a Contact.

Enhance Element: In NBA, an Enhance Element allows developers to invoke custom logic (e.g., an Apex method) to modify or generate recommendations. The Salesforce Next Best Action documentation states: “An Enhance Element in a Next Best Action strategy can invoke an Apex method to dynamically generate or modify recommendations” (Salesforce Help, Next Best Action).

Apex Method Requirements:

The method must be annotated with @InvocableMethod to be callable from NBA or Flow.

It must be global and static to be accessible outside the class.

For NBA, the method typically returns recommendations as a List or List> (for bulk processing).

The input can be a List of a custom wrapper class (e.g., ContactWrapper) to pass data like Contact details.

The Apex Developer Guide specifies: “An @InvocableMethod must be global, static, and can take a List of inputs and return a List of outputs” (Salesforce Apex Developer Guide, InvocableMethod Annotation).

Requirement Analysis:

Purpose: The method determines a discount level for a Contact, which suggests it generates or modifies a recommendation (e.g., a discount offer).

Input: The method likely takes a List as input, where ContactWrapper is a custom class containing Contact data and other factors.

Output: Since this is for NBA, the method should return a List, where Recommendation is a standard Salesforce sObject used by NBA to represent suggested actions (e.g., a discount offer). The Salesforce Object Reference Guide confirms: “The Recommendation object represents a suggested action in Next Best Action, with fields like Name, Description, and ActionReference” (Salesforce Object Reference Guide, Recommendation Object).

Enhance Element Specifics: An Enhance Element typically expects a List as output for each input, not a nested List>, unless bulkified in a specific way. However, the method must support bulkification (taking a List as input and returning a List).

Evaluating the Options:

A.

apex

Copy

@InvocableMethod

global static List> getLevel(List input)

{ /*implementation*/ }

Accessibility: global static and @InvocableMethod are correct for an invocable method.

Input: List is appropriate, assuming ContactWrapper is a custom class with @InvocableVariable properties to pass Contact data.

Output: Returns List>, which is a nested list. The Apex Developer Guide notes: “An @InvocableMethod can return a nested List, but for Flow or NBA, the expected output is typically List for direct mapping” (Salesforce Apex Developer Guide, InvocableMethod Annotation). In NBA, an Enhance Element generally expects a List<Recommendation> to map directly to recommendations, not a nested list. A nested list (List<List<Recommendation>>) is more common in Flows when processing multiple outputs for multiple inputs, but for NBA, this is not the standard pattern for an Enhance Element.

Conclusion: Incorrect, as the nested List> return type does not align with the typical expectation of an Enhance Element in NBA, which expects List.

B.

apex

Copy

@InvocableMethod

global Recommendation getLevel(ContactWrapper input)

{ /*implementation*/ }

Accessibility: Uses @InvocableMethod and global, but the method is not static. The Apex Developer Guide states: “An @InvocableMethod must be static to be callable from Flow or Next Best Action” (Salesforce Apex Developer Guide, InvocableMethod Annotation). This results in a compilation error.

Input: Takes a single ContactWrapper, not a List. Invocable methods must support bulkification by taking a List as input, even if only one record is passed. The Apex Developer Guide specifies: “Invocable methods must take a List as input to support bulkification” (Salesforce Apex Developer Guide, InvocableMethod Annotation).

Output: Returns a single Recommendation, not a List. Similarly, the output must be a List to support bulkification.

Conclusion: Incorrect due to missing static keyword, and both input and output violate the bulkification requirement (must use List).

C.

apex

Copy

@InvocableMethod

global List> getLevel(List input)

{ /*implementation*/ }

Accessibility: Uses @InvocableMethod and global, but the method is not static, resulting in a compilation error (same issue as option B).

Input: List is correct for bulkification.

Output: Returns List>, which, as noted in option A, is not the typical return type for an NBA Enhance Element. It expects List to directly map to recommendations.

Conclusion: Incorrect due to missing static keyword and the nested List> return type, which is not ideal for NBA Enhance Elements.

D.

apex

Copy

@InvocableMethod

global static List getLevel(List input)

{ /*implementation*/ }

Accessibility: global static and @InvocableMethod are correct, making the method accessible to NBA.

Input: List supports bulkification and is appropriate for passing Contact data and factors.

Output: Returns List, which aligns with the expectation of an NBA Enhance Element. The Enhance Element can use the returned recommendations (e.g., discount offers) directly in the NBA strategy. The Salesforce Help documentation for Next Best Action confirms: “An Apex method invoked by an Enhance Element typically returns a List to provide or modify recommendations” (Salesforce Help, Next Best Action Enhance Element).

Conclusion: Correct, as it meets all requirements: proper accessibility, bulkified input/output, and the expected return type for NBA.

Why Option D is Correct:

Option D is correct because:

It uses @InvocableMethod, global, and static, making the method callable from a Next Best Action Enhance Element.

The input List supports bulkification and allows passing Contact data and other factors.

The output List matches the expected return type for an NBA Enhance Element, allowing the strategy to use the returned recommendations (e.g., discount offers) directly.

This aligns with Salesforce best practices for invocable methods in process automation, as outlined in the Apex Developer Guide and Next Best Action documentation.

Example for Clarity:

Here’s how option D might be implemented:

apex

Copy

global class DiscountCalculator {

@InvocableMethod(label='Get Discount Level' description='Determines discount level for a Contact')

global static List getLevel(List input) {

List recommendations = new List();

for (ContactWrapper wrapper : input) {

// Example logic to determine discount level

Decimal discountLevel = 0.1; // 10% discount based on factors

Recommendation rec = new Recommendation();

rec.Name = 'Discount Offer';

rec.Description = 'Offer a ' + (discountLevel * 100) + '% discount to ' + wrapper.contactName;

rec.ActionReference = 'ApplyDiscount'; // Reference to a Flow or action

recommendations.add(rec);

}

return recommendations;

}

}

global class ContactWrapper {

@InvocableVariable

global String contactName;

@InvocableVariable

global Id contactId;

// Add other factors as InvocableVariables

}

Usage in NBA: The Enhance Element in the Next Best Action strategy calls getLevel, passing a List with Contact data. The method returns a List, each representing a discount offer, which NBA can then present to the user.

Handling Typos:

The options are syntactically correct in the provided image, with no typos to address.

The question assumes ContactWrapper is a properly defined class with @InvocableVariable properties, which is a reasonable assumption for the context.

Option D’s ListRecommendation in the original question appears to be a typo (missing < and >). The correct syntax is List, as assumed in the analysis and corrected in the formatted options.

A: Formula fields are calculated at runtime based on the formula definition and are not stored in the database.

C: Formula fields can reference fields from related objects, allowing cross-object calculations.

Why not other options?

B: Formulas cannot reference themselves; doing so would result in a circular reference error.

D: If a field used in a formula field is deleted, the formula field will break, and Salesforce will prevent deletion until the formula field is updated.

Formula Fields Documentation

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

To determine how a developer can use the OrderRequest class within the CustomerOrder class, we need to evaluate the options based on Apex syntax for inheritance, focusing on the fact that OrderRequest is a virtual class. Let’s analyze the problem and each option systematically, referencing Salesforce’s official Apex Developer Guide.

Understanding Virtual Classes and Inheritance in Apex:

Virtual Class: In Apex, a virtual class allows other classes to extend it and inherit its methods and properties. It can also define methods that can be overridden by subclasses. The Apex Developer Guide states: “A virtual class can be extended by another class, allowing the subclass to inherit its methods and properties, and override virtual methods if needed” (Salesforce Apex Developer Guide, Classes).

Inheritance: Apex supports single inheritance using the extends keyword, where a subclass inherits from a single parent class. The Apex Developer Guide notes: “Use the extends keyword to create a subclass that inherits from a parent class” (Salesforce Apex Developer Guide, Inheritance).

Virtual vs. Interface:

A virtual class can contain method implementations and is extended using extends.

An interface defines method signatures without implementations and is implemented using implements. The question specifies OrderRequest as a virtual class, not an interface.

Requirement: The CustomerOrder class needs to use OrderRequest, which likely means inheriting its functionality, as OrderRequest is a virtual class.

Evaluating the Options:

A. extends (class="OrderRequest")public class CustomerOrder

Syntax: This option attempts to use extends followed by (class="OrderRequest") and then public class CustomerOrder.

Analysis: The syntax is incorrect. In Apex, the extends keyword is followed directly by the name of the class to extend, with no parentheses or class= notation. The correct syntax would be public class CustomerOrder extends OrderRequest. The Apex Developer Guide specifies: “The extends keyword is followed by the name of the parent class, without additional attributes or parentheses” (Salesforce Apex Developer Guide, Inheritance). The (class="OrderRequest") syntax resembles annotations or markup, but it’s not valid in Apex for inheritance.

Conclusion: Incorrect due to invalid syntax.

B. public class CustomerOrder implements Order

Syntax: Uses the implements keyword to implement an interface named Order.

Analysis: The implements keyword is used to implement an interface, not to extend a class. The question states that OrderRequest is a virtual class, not an interface, so implements is inappropriate. Additionally, the option references Order, not OrderRequest, which appears to be a mismatch with the class name provided in the question. The Apex Developer Guide clarifies: “The implements keyword is used for interfaces, while extends is used for classes, including virtual classes” (Salesforce Apex Developer Guide, Interfaces). Even if Order were intended to be OrderRequest, implements would still be incorrect for a virtual class.

Conclusion: Incorrect, as implements is for interfaces, not virtual classes, and Order does not match OrderRequest.

C. public class CustomerOrder extends OrderRequest

Syntax: Declares CustomerOrder as a subclass of OrderRequest using the extends keyword.

Analysis: This is the correct syntax for inheritance in Apex. Since OrderRequest is a virtual class, CustomerOrder can extend it to inherit its methods and properties. The extends keyword allows CustomerOrder to use (inherit) the functionality of OrderRequest. The Apex Developer Guide confirms: “A class can extend a virtual class using the extends keyword, inheriting its methods and properties” (Salesforce Apex Developer Guide, Inheritance). This matches the question’s intent of “using” OrderRequest within CustomerOrder, which typically means inheritance when dealing with a virtual class.

Conclusion: Correct, as it uses the proper extends keyword to inherit from the virtual OrderRequest class.

D. @Implements (class="OrderRequest")public class CustomerOrder

Syntax: Uses an @Implements annotation with (class="OrderRequest") before the class declaration.

Analysis: Apex does not have an @Implements annotation. The implements keyword (without @) is used for interfaces, and annotations in Apex (e.g., @AuraEnabled, @TestVisible) do not use this format for inheritance or interface implementation. The Apex Developer Guide does not define @Implements as a valid annotation (Salesforce Apex Developer Guide, Annotations). The correct way to extend a virtual class is with extends, as in option C.

Conclusion: Incorrect due to invalid syntax (@Implements is not a valid Apex annotation).

Why Option C is Correct:

Option C is correct because:

It uses the extends keyword to properly declare CustomerOrder as a subclass of OrderRequest, which is a virtual class.

This allows CustomerOrder to inherit and use the methods and properties defined in OrderRequest, fulfilling the requirement to “use” the OrderRequest class within CustomerOrder.

The syntax aligns with Apex best practices for inheritance as outlined in the Salesforce Apex Developer Guide.

Example for Clarity:

Here’s how the correct implementation (option C) would look:

apex

Copy

public virtual class OrderRequest {

public String getOrderDetails() {

return 'Order Details';

}

}

public class CustomerOrder extends OrderRequest {

public String getCustomerOrderInfo() {

// Inherit and use OrderRequest's method

String orderDetails = getOrderDetails();

return 'Customer Order: ' + orderDetails;

}

}

CustomerOrder extends OrderRequest, inheriting getOrderDetails().

The developer can use OrderRequest’s functionality (e.g., call its methods) within CustomerOrder.

Handling Typos:

The question’s code snippet and options are mostly clear, but option B references Order instead of OrderRequest, which appears to be a typo. The analysis assumes the intended class is OrderRequest, as stated in the question stem.

Option D has a typo in the class name: Customerorder should be CustomerOrder (capital O). This does not affect the analysis, as the syntax error (@Implements) is the primary issue.

Using a formula field is the most efficient solution to calculate the ratio between rejected and approved timesheets. It minimizes maintenance overhead by dynamically calculating the value based on the existing roll-up summary fields.

Example Formula:

Total_Rejected_Timesheets__c / Total_Approved_Timesheets__c

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

A (Correct):lightning-input-field is part ofLightning Data Service (LDS), and itautomatically enforces field-level security (FLS)and CRUD rules. This is thebest practicefor handling sensitive data in LWC forms and ensures compliance with user-level permissions.

Incorrect options:

B:force:inputField is used inAura, not in Lightning Web Components.

C/D:These are deprecated or older framework components that donotinherently enforce FLS.

75% Code Coverage (A):To deploy Apex code to production, Salesforce requires at least 75% of the code to be covered by tests across the organization.

B:@testSetupinserts data once and shares it across all test methods in the class, saving system resources.

D:@isTest(SeeAllData=true)is incompatible with@testSetupdue to their differing purposes for managing test data.

The Lightning Out library allows a Lightning Web Component to be embedded in a Visualforce page. This approach is the most suitable to make the LWC accessible in Salesforce Classic.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

When preventing the creation of records using business logic in an Apex trigger, it’s crucial to do it in a before insert trigger context so the records are not committed to the database. The method should be called using trigger.new (case-sensitive) which references the list of new records being inserted.

In Visualforce, data-binding requires getter and setter methods to access the attributes of a controller. Adding a getter method foractTypeensures that its value is retrieved properly.

SOSL:

Designed for full-text searches, making it faster for unstructured or broad text searches across multiple objects.

Ideal for searching multiple fields simultaneously.

SOQL:

Optimized for structured queries where you need more control over filtering and relationships.

Can return up to 50,000 records in a single query, while SOSL returns only 2,000.

CandDare incorrect because SOSL is faster for text searches, not SOQL.

To test Apex code that makes HTTP callouts, Salesforce provides theHTTPCalloutMockinterface. Developers create a test class that implementsHTTPCalloutMockto define the fake response that will be returned when the callout is executed during the test.

This ensures that tests do not depend on the availability or behavior of the external system.

Why not other options?

BandC: These are not relevant for testing HTTP callouts.

D: There is no concept of extendingHTTPCalloutMock. It is implemented, not extended.

Apex Testing for HTTP Callouts

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

The provided code runs a SOQL query inside a for loop, which violates Salesforce’s governor limit of 100 SOQL queries per transaction. To avoid hitting these limits, the best practice is to perform queries outside of loops by using a single query that retrieves all required records at once.

To query related child records in a lookup or master-detail relationship:

Use the parent object (Gym__c) to retrieve its child records (Trainer__c) through a nested query.

The child relationship name (Trainers__r) is derived from the lookup field.

A. Junction object between Applicant and Job:

Since anApplicantcan apply for multipleJobsand eachJobcan have multipleApplicants, this is amany-to-many relationship.

Salesforce requires ajunction objectto represent many-to-many relationships. The junction object will have two master-detail relationships: one to the Applicant object and one to the Job object.

The junction object could be named something like JobApplication__c, which would represent the specific instance of an applicant applying for a particular job.

Why this is the correct approach?

A junction object allows for robust data management and reporting capabilities in a many-to-many relationship.

This design ensures that each combination of applicant and job is captured as a unique record in the JobApplication__c junction object.

It also allows storing additional details about the application, such as application date, status, and feedback.

Why not the other options?

B. Lookup field from Applicant to Job:

A lookup field creates a one-to-many relationship. While an Applicant could reference one Job, it does not support the many-to-many relationship required in this scenario.

C. Master-detail field from Applicant to Job:

A master-detail relationship is a one-to-many relationship, which is unsuitable for a many-to-many relationship. Additionally, you cannot have two master-detail fields on a single object to connect Applicant and Job directly.

D. Formula field on Applicant that references Job:

A formula field cannot establish relationships between records or represent a many-to-many relationship. It is only for computed fields.

In Aura components:

B. Renderer:Contains custom rendering logic.

C. Controller:Manages user interaction and component events.

E. Helper:Contains reusable JavaScript functions for logic.

Why Lightning Pages?

The Lightning Component framework is designed for building responsive Lightning Pages.

Allows for dynamic and modular development.

Why Not Other Options?

A: Salesforce Classic does not support Lightning Components.

C: JavaScript buttons are replaced by Quick Actions in Lightning Experience.

D: While integrations are possible, the framework is not primarily used for integrations.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

A (Correct):The renderAs="application/pdf" attribute in the tag instructs the Visualforce page to render the content as a PDF file when accessed.

Example:

Invoice

Incorrect options:

B:renderAs="pdf" is incorrect; the correct MIME type is application/pdf.

C/D:contentType controls headers but doesn't render the content as PDF.

Why Lightning Data Service?

Enforces Salesforce’s security model, including:

Sharing rules.

Field-level security (FLS).

This eliminates the need for additional manual security checks.

Why Not Other Options?

A: Incorrect, LDS enforces FLS.

B:with sharingapplies to Apex, not Lightning Data Service.

D:isAccessible()is unnecessary for LDS because it already enforces FLS.

isOK is declared but not initialized, so its default value is null.

In the condition checks:

The first if evaluates as false because isOK == false is false.

The second else if evaluates as false because isOK == true is false.

The third else if evaluates as true because isOK == null is true and theString == 'Hello' is also true.

So, the value assigned to x is 3.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

To embed a Lightning component in a Visualforce page, you need to:

Include the Lightning framework using .

Use $Lightning.use to load Lightning components and resources.

Use $Lightning.createComponent to render the component dynamically in the Visualforce page.

When running a flow in debug mode, Salesforce rolls back any DML operations performed during the debugging process to ensure no data changes affect the org. This helps test and verify flow logic without impacting live data.

Apex Jobs Page:

Provides a user-friendly interface to view the status and details of enqueued jobs, including those implementing theQueueableinterface.

AsyncApexJob Object:

TheAsyncApexJobobject stores information about queued Apex jobs.

Developers can query this object for job details likeStatus,JobType, etc.

Example SOQL Query:SELECT Id, Status, JobType, CreatedDate

FROM AsyncApexJob

WHERE JobType = 'Queueable'

Why Not Other Options?

A. Apex Status page: Not a relevant Salesforce feature.

D. Apex Flex Queue: Only applicable to Batch Apex jobs, not Queueable jobs.

To create and manage scratch orgs in Salesforce DX, the Dev Hub must be enabled in your Salesforce production or Developer Edition org. Dev Hub acts as the central hub for managing scratch orgs.

UsingSecurity.stripInaccessibleensures compliance with field-level security (FLS) and prevents users from accessing fields they do not have permission to view. In this scenario:

The commission field is inaccessible to Sales Assistants, andSecurity.stripInaccessiblewill automatically remove this field from the result set.

It prevents runtime errors when a user without proper access attempts to retrieve restricted fields.

This is a classicbulkification problem, covered under"Apex Development Best Practices"in the PD1 guide.

sObject:SOQL queries can return single or multiple records assObjectinstances.

List:SOQL queries often return results as aListofsObject.

Double:SOQL aggregate queries can return numeric data types likeDouble(e.g., COUNT, SUM).

Roll-Up Summary Field:

Since the relationship between Order and Order Line Item is aMaster-Detail, a Roll-Up Summary field can be used on the Order object.

The MAX function in a Roll-Up Summary field calculates the latest date (the maximum value) among all the availability dates on the Order Line Items.

Why MAX Roll-Up Summary Field Works:

The latest availability date among the Order Line Items will determine when the entire Order can be shipped.

Why Not Other Options?

AandB: There is no such formula called "LATEST" or "CEILING" applicable to date fields.

C: A COUNT Roll-Up Summary is irrelevant for calculating dates.

Custom Permission:

Ensures that only the small group of users has access to this functionality.

Dynamic Action:

Allows displaying different fields depending on the user’s role directly on the Account Record Page.

Why Not A or C:

Dynamic Forms are not used to create records for custom objects in this context.

A Lightning Web Component is unnecessary when Dynamic Actions can be used.

Order of Execution Rules:

Step 1: Original record is loaded from the database.

Step 2: Field-level validations are performed, including maximum field lengths.

Step 3: Old values are overwritten with new record values.

Step 4: JavaScript validation runs in the browser.

Abefore triggerfires when records are inserted, updated, or deleted. Using the Data Loader or Bulk API to import data updates records, which triggers thebefore insertorbefore updateevents.

Not Suitable:

Option A: Renaming or replacing picklists does not trigger a record-level operation.

Option B: The Mass Address Update tool is not a record operation that triggersbeforetriggers.

Option D: Converting leads to contacts triggers lead conversion events, not directly related to Account triggers.

Apex Triggers

A Global Picklist Value Set allows the same set of picklist values to be shared across multiple objects, making maintenance easier and ensuring consistency.

Why not other options?

B: Alphabetical ordering does not ensure consistent value maintenance across objects.

C: Validation rules do not streamline picklist value maintenance.

D: Restricting picklist values helps ensure data integrity but does not streamline maintenance across objects.

Global Picklists Documentation

Upload the SVG file as astatic resourcein Salesforce.

Import it in the LWC JavaScript file and define it as a property.

Reference the property in the component’s HTML template.

Example:

importmySvgfrom'@salesforce/resourceUrl/mySvg';

exportdefaultclassMyComponentextendsLightningElement{

svgUrl = mySvg;

}

Lightning Web Components Static Resources

 Option B:Custom events in LWC allow data to be passed using thedetailproperty of theCustomEventobject. This is the recommended way to pass data in a custom event.

Creating test classes ensures that the Apex class works according to specifications by validating the functionality under various scenarios and edge cases. Running tests in the Developer Console provides detailed feedback on whether the class meets requirements.

C. Update the PrimaryId__c field definition to mark it as an External Id:

Marking PrimaryId__c as anExternal Idallows Salesforce to use this field to match records during the data import process, streamlining the process of mapping CSV rows to existing Candidate__c records.

External Id fields are indexed and can be used in tools likeData Loader,Data Import Wizard, orAPI-based upsertsto ensure that records are matched correctly based on the value of the external ID field.

In this case, since PrimaryId__c is unique, marking it as an external ID eliminates the need for custom triggers or flows.

Why this is the best solution?

This technique leverages built-in Salesforce capabilities (no need for custom code or automation).

It ensures accurate record matching and is the standard approach for data enrichment tasks involving unique identifiers.

Why not the other options?

A. Upload the CSV into a custom object related to Candidate__c:

This approach unnecessarily introduces another object, adding complexity. The goal is to update existing Candidate__c records, not store the data in a separate object.

B. Create a before insert trigger to correctly map the records:

Using triggers for this purpose is overengineering. Salesforce already provides tools likeupsertfor this exact use case. Writing a trigger would require additional effort and could introduce unintended errors or performance issues.

D. Create a before save flow to correctly map the records:

While flows are powerful, they are not the optimal solution for this use case. Data mapping is better handled using an external ID during import to ensure proper matching and updates.

Best practices in Apex development for triggers and service layers include:

Avoiding DML operations and queries in loops.

Handling bulk processing efficiently.

Option A ensures compliance by performing all updates at the end, reducing the risk of hitting governor limits.

To override the Account's standard Edit button in Lightning Experience, a Lightning action can be created and associated with the object. This action can include custom logic or a Lightning component.

Advantages of Lightning Web Components (LWC):

A. Rich component ecosystem:

LWCs have a modern, rich component library designed for modular and reusable development.

D. Self-contained and reusable units:

LWCs are designed to be modular, reusable, and self-contained, reducing duplication and enhancing maintainability.

Why Not Other Options?

B. Log capturing via Debug Logs Setup page: This is unrelated to LWC and is a debugging feature.

C. Built-in standard and custom set controllers: Relevant to Visualforce, not LWCs.

Why Validation Rule?

Validation rules are efficient for enforcing field-level conditions without requiring Apex or Flow.

A formula can check if the user’s profile is not "Sales Manager" and if theLost Reasonfield is blank whenStatusis set to "Closed Lost".

Why Not Other Options?

A: Triggers are more complex and unnecessary for this simple validation.

C: Record-triggered flows are less efficient for field validations compared to validation rules.

D: Approval processes do not handle this type of field-level restriction.

When building a Lightning Web Component (LWC) to collect and manage data, developers must ensure compliance with Salesforce's security model, including field-level security (FLS) and object-level security (OLS). To meet the requirement of respecting security controls,lightning-input-fieldis the correct choice.

Why lightning-input-field?

Field-Level Security (FLS):lightning-input-field respects the user’s field-level security settings. This means users can only view or edit fields that they have permissions for, ensuring compliance with the organization’s security model.

Object-Level Security (OLS):It respects object-level security, ensuring users cannot access objects they are restricted from accessing.

Simplified Development:It is part of the Lightning Data Service (LDS), which eliminates the need to write custom Apex or SOQL queries for CRUD operations, reducing the potential for security gaps.

Dynamic Rendering:Since the component dynamically renders fields based on the user’s permissions, developers can share the component across various user groups without additional customization.

Declarative Syntax:lightning-input-field simplifies form creation in LWC by using declarative syntax to bind to record fields directly.

Example Code Implementation:

Public Method (A):The parent component can call a public method defined in the child component to pass data directly.

Salesforce CLI allows developers to automate deployments and run unit tests as part of a continuous integration (CI) pipeline. It is the most efficient tool for scripting these processes.

When troubleshooting batch Apex jobs:

Asynchronous Job Monitoring:

Navigate toSetup > Apex Jobsto view the status of the batch job.

Provides information such as success, errors, and total execution time.

This step is crucial to diagnose whether the issue is with system limits, batch size, or specific records.

Debug Logs:

After identifying the issue in the job monitoring page, use debug logs to pinpoint specific errors or bottlenecks.

B. Check the debug logs for the batch job: Debug logs are a secondary step after checking the job status.

C. Disable and recreate with fewer records: Premature without investigating the root cause.

D. Decrease the batch size: Adjusting batch size is a solution but only after identifying the cause of the timeout.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

Flow Builder is designed for automating business processes declaratively. In this scenario, it can be configured to update the Timezone field on Account whenever the Postal Code is changed by querying the PostalCodeToTimezone__c object and updating the Account accordingly.

Since theCaseandDefect__cobjects have aPrivateorganization-wide default (OWD), their records must be explicitly shared for a user to gain access to the relatedCase_Defect__crecord. Sharing both parent records ensures that the user can access the junction object and the associated parent objects.

AnExternal ID fieldis used to match data in Salesforce with data from external systems (like an on-premise SQL database). It allows for easy upserts and data integration without relying on Salesforce IDs.

Why not other options?

A: External objects are used for real-time integration with external systems but do not address data matching directly.

C: Formula fields are calculated fields and cannot be used for data matching.

D: Lookup fields are used for creating relationships between objects within Salesforce, not for matching external data.

The Apex Interactive Debugger allows developers to step through code execution in real time, which is the most effective way to identify the root cause of the duplication issue.

B: Salesforce requires that all Apex code have at least 75% test coverage in production before deployment. This ensures that the system remains reliable.

C: All triggers must have some test coverage as part of the overall 75% requirement for Apex code.

Why not other options?

A: Object visibility settings are not a deployment requirement.

D: Visual Flows do not require test coverage for deployment to production.

Apex Test Coverage Requirements

LimitExceptioncannot be caught in atry-catchblock because it is thrown when governor limits are exceeded, and Salesforce does not allow further processing in such cases.

Other exceptions, such as custom exceptions,NoAccessException, orCalloutException, can be caught and handled.

Exceptions in Apex

WhyWITH SECURITY_ENFORCED?

Ensures field-level security and sharing rules are enforced in SOQL queries.

Prevents unauthorized records or fields from being accessed or displayed.

Why Not Other Options?

B and C:with sharingandinherited sharingenforce record-level access but do not handle field-level security.

D:without sharingignores sharing rules, which would display all records regardless of user permissions.