COBIT-Design-and-Implementation ISACA COBIT2019Design and Implementation certificate Questions and Answers

The COBIT® 2019 Design Guide defines Step 2: Determine the Initial Scope of the Governance System, which explicitly includes considering the risk profile of the enterprise as a formal design factor. The enterprise risk profile identifies the types of IT-related risks that are most significant and therefore influence which governance and management objectives should be prioritized.

Enterprise culture and market position are contextual elements but are not listed as formal design factors in the initial scoping workflow. Similarly, the risk profile of the IT portfolio is a narrower operational view, whereas COBIT requires an enterprise-wide perspective to ensure governance decisions reflect overall business exposure.

By analyzing the enterprise risk profile early, governance designers can identify critical areas requiring stronger controls, assurance, or capability levels. This directly impacts the initial scope by determining which objectives fall inside or outside the governance system boundary.

Therefore, considering the enterprise risk profile is a core workflow component for determining the initial governance scope.

“…projects become part of the normal development life cycle and should be governed by established program and project management methods.”

==========

The COBIT 2019 Governance and Management Objective EDM05, "Ensured Stakeholder Engagement," focuses on ensuring that stakeholders are engaged, their expectations are considered, and the communication between IT and the business is effective.

"The purpose of EDM05 is to ensure that stakeholders are identified and engaged in alignment with enterprise objectives. It supports building commitment and accountability across stakeholders, especially at the executive and board levels."

In this scenario, where there is reluctance and lack of sponsorship from senior stakeholders, EDM05 is the most appropriate to address engagement and alignment.

It is critical to perform a due diligence review following a merger, acquisition, or divestiture. Such events involve significant changes to the organizational structure, assets, and operations, necessitating thorough review to identify risks, synergies, and compliance issues.

References in COBIT 2019 Design and Implementation:

COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives, APO12 (Managed Risk):This objective emphasizes the importance of risk management during significant organizational changes, such as mergers and acquisitions.

COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Chapter 3:This chapter outlines the need for due diligence in evaluating potential risks and ensuring that governance and management practices are adapted to new organizational contexts.

A due diligence review ensures that all aspects of the merger, acquisition, or divestiture are carefully assessed, mitigating risks and supporting a smooth transition.

COBIT® 2019 explicitly maps IT risk categories to governance and management objectives to demonstrate which objectives mitigate or control specific risk scenarios. This mapping does not redefine objectives as risks, nor does it assign risk appetite or tolerance values. Instead, it shows the degree of control coverage each objective provides for identified IT risk categories.

The Governance and Management Objectives publication clarifies that objectives function as controls or mitigations that reduce either the likelihood or impact of risk events. This relationship supports risk-informed governance design by enabling enterprises to select and prioritize objectives based on their risk exposure.

Risk appetite and tolerance are enterprise-level decisions established by governance bodies, not attributes of individual objectives. Likewise, objectives are not risk scenarios themselves. Therefore, the mapping’s purpose is to illustrate control relevance, helping enterprises design governance systems that effectively address their risk profile.

In the COBIT 2019 Design Guide, it is explained:

"The following steps should be performed when considering this design factor:

• Decide which combination of values best fits the current situation of the enterprise, as per the defined entries in figure 4.8."

This means the organization must assess and rate each value (First Mover, Follower, Slow Adopter) based on its current situation rather than simply selecting one or conducting a risk analysis for each.

During the Critical Success Factor (CSF) life cycle action plan review, the task associated with realizing benefits is "Monitoring performance against objectives." This task ensures that the expected benefits of the IT initiatives are being achieved by continuously assessing performance and making necessary adjustments.

Monitoring performance against objectives involves tracking the progress of IT initiatives to ensure they meet their goals and deliver the expected benefits. This includes using performance metrics, key performance indicators (KPIs), and regular reviews to evaluate whether the initiatives are on track and delivering value.

COBIT 2019 Framework References:

COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Chapter 7:Emphasizes the importance of monitoring and measuring performance to ensure that benefits are realized and objectives are met.

COBIT 2019 Design Guide, Chapter 4:Highlights the role of performance monitoring in managing and achieving IT governance and management objectives.

By monitoring performance against objectives, enterprises can ensure that their IT initiatives are successful and provide the intended benefits, making it a critical task in the CSF life cycle action plan review.

“Phase 1 identifies current change drivers … A change driver is an internal or external event, condition or key issue that serves as stimulus for change.”

==========

The CIO and the program steering committee are responsible for performing a stakeholder satisfaction survey and gathering feedback on lessons learned from the implementation of an EGIT program plan. They play a critical role in ensuring that the feedback is collected systematically and used to improve future initiatives.

References in COBIT 2019 Design and Implementation:

COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives, MEA04 (Managed Stakeholder Engagement):This objective outlines the importance of engaging stakeholders and gathering their feedback to improve governance and management practices.

COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Chapter 5:This chapter highlights the role of senior leadership, including the CIO and the steering committee, in overseeing the implementation of governance programs and ensuring continuous improvement through stakeholder feedback.

By actively gathering and analyzing feedback, the CIO and the program steering committee can identify areas for improvement and ensure that the governance framework remains aligned with stakeholder needs and expectations.

The final step in governance system design is to reconcile inherent priority conflicts. This ensures that all conflicting priorities among stakeholders are addressed and resolved to create a cohesive and aligned governance system.

The reconciliation of inherent priority conflicts is a critical final step to ensure that the designed governance system can effectively meet the needs and expectations of all stakeholders. This involves negotiating and balancing different priorities to ensure that the governance objectives are achievable and aligned with the enterprise’s strategic goals.

COBIT 2019 Framework References:

COBIT 2019 Design Guide, Chapter 5:Emphasizes the importance of addressing and reconciling priority conflicts to finalize the governance system design.

COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Chapter 7:Discusses the necessity of resolving conflicts and aligning objectives as part of the final steps in the governance system design process.

By reconciling priority conflicts, the enterprise ensures that the governance system is practical, balanced, and capable of delivering the desired outcomes.

When determining the initial scope of a governance system, one of the key considerations is thecurrent I&T-related issues of the enterprise. Understanding and addressing these issues ensures that the governance system is relevant and focused on the areas that need the most attention and improvement. This approach aligns with the practical and contextual nature of COBIT 2019, which emphasizes tailoring governance solutions to the specific needs and circumstances of the enterprise.

Detailed Explanation with References:

Current I&T-Related Issues (Option D):

COBIT 2019 stresses the importance of understanding the specific issues and challenges an enterprise is facing in its current I&T environment. These issues could include inefficiencies, security vulnerabilities, compliance gaps, misalignment with business objectives, or any other problems impacting the performance and value delivery of IT.

Addressing these issues directly in the initial scope ensures that the governance system can provide immediate value by targeting the most critical areas. This focus helps in demonstrating early successes and building credibility for the governance initiative.

According to the COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, understanding current issues allows the organization to prioritize actions that will have the most significant impact on improving governance and management practices.

Compliance Requirements (Option A):

Compliance requirements are essential and need to be considered when designing a governance system, but they are part of a broader context rather than the key initial driver. They ensure that the governance system meets regulatory and legal standards but do not necessarily prioritize the most urgent internal issues.

Size of the Enterprise (Option B):

The size of the enterprise influences the complexity and scalability of the governance system but is not a primary consideration for the initial scope. The focus should be on specific needs and issues rather than just the size.

Role of IT within the Enterprise (Option C):

The strategic role of IT is crucial for determining the overall governance approach, but it is more about aligning IT with business goals rather than pinpointing specific initial issues to address. It informs the design but does not drive the immediate focus of the initial scope.

Conclusion:The correct answer isD. Current I&T-related issues of the enterprise. Focusing on these issues ensures that the governance system addresses the most pressing needs and delivers tangible improvements, which is a fundamental principle in the COBIT 2019 framework.

I&T-related issues, also called pain points, could be considered risks that have materialized. These issues represent current challenges and problems that the enterprise is facing, indicating that certain risks have already impacted the organization.

References in COBIT 2019 Design and Implementation:

COBIT 2019 Design Guide, Chapter 2:This chapter explains that I&T-related issues or pain points are current problems that the enterprise needs to address, indicating that these risks have already materialized.

COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives, APO12 (Managed Risk):This objective emphasizes the importance of identifying and managing risks, including those that have already impacted the organization.

By recognizing that I&T-related issues are materialized risks, enterprises can focus on mitigating these issues and preventing future occurrences, ensuring better risk management and governance.

According to the COBIT 2019 Design Guide:

"Focus areas are governance topics, domains, or issues that can be addressed by a collection of governance and management objectives and components."

These are meant to tailor the governance system to enterprise-specific topics like security, digital transformation, etc.

When translating design factor values into governance and management priorities, a weighted calculation should be used. This method allows for the consideration of various factors according to their relative importance and impact on the governance system.

References in COBIT 2019 Design and Implementation:

COBIT 2019 Design Guide, Chapter 4:This chapter explains the process of translating design factor values into actionable governance and management priorities, emphasizing the use of weighted calculations to reflect the importance of different design factors.

COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology, Chapter 4:This chapter highlights how weighted calculations can help prioritize governance and management activities based on the enterprise's specific context and needs.

Using weighted calculations ensures a balanced and proportionate approach to prioritizing governance and management objectives, leading to a more effective and tailored governance system.

In COBIT® 2019, the role of IT design factor describes how critical IT is to enterprise operations. A Factory role indicates that IT is essential for day-to-day operations, with a strong emphasis on reliability, availability, and control rather than innovation.

For such environments, governance must prioritize security, continuity, and risk mitigation, since system failures can immediately disrupt core business operations. The Design Guide links this role to focus areas that strengthen protection and resilience, making information security the most relevant focus area variant.

Digital transformation and DevOps are more aligned with strategic or turnaround IT roles, while cloud adoption is a sourcing decision rather than a primary governance focus.

Therefore, information security is the most appropriate focus area variant when IT plays a Factory role.

Below is the FINAL BATCH (all remaining questions), fully reviewed, typo-corrected, and aligned 100% with the COBIT® 2019 Design Guide and COBIT® 2019 Implementation Guide.

Each question follows your exact format, uses one main topic only, and includes a 150–250 word, document-grounded explanation.

COBIT® 2019 clearly distinguishes between governance responsibilities and management responsibilities. While boards and business owners define direction and objectives, IT management is responsible for evaluating technical feasibility and cost-effectiveness of proposed solutions.

The Governance and Management Objectives guide assigns management the responsibility to plan, build, run, and monitor IT-related activities in alignment with governance direction. This includes assessing whether proposed governance solutions can be implemented with available technology, skills, architecture, and budget constraints.

The board does not assess technical feasibility; it evaluates strategic alignment and value. The finance office supports budgeting but does not determine feasibility. Business owners define requirements but rely on IT management for execution viability.

Therefore, IT management is accountable for confirming that governance solutions are both technically achievable and economically viable, making option A correct.

The primary benefit or output derived from setting targeted capability levels and performing a capability-level gap analysis for selected processes is the identification of process improvement opportunities. This analysis helps to pinpoint specific areas where processes can be enhanced to achieve the desired capability levels.

Setting targeted capability levels and conducting a capability-level gap analysis allows an enterprise to:

Identify gaps between current and desired process capabilities.

Highlight areas where processes are underperforming.

Prioritize improvement initiatives to close these gaps.

COBIT 2019 Framework References:

COBIT 2019 Design Guide, Chapter 2:Discusses the use of capability levels and gap analysis to identify and prioritize process improvement opportunities.

COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Chapter 5:Provides guidance on conducting capability-level gap analyses to drive process improvements.

By identifying process improvement opportunities through capability-level gap analysis, the enterprise can systematically enhance its processes, leading to better performance and alignment with business objectives.

The stakeholders responsible for creating or updating EGIT objectives following the completion of the first iteration of an EGIT program implementation life cycle are the CIO and business executives. They have the strategic oversight and authority to set and adjust objectives based on the initial outcomes and evolving business needs.

The CIO and business executives play a critical role in ensuring that the EGIT (Enterprise Governance of Information and Technology) objectives are aligned with business strategy and goals. After the first iteration, their involvement is crucial to review progress, adjust objectives, and ensure continued alignment with enterprise priorities.

COBIT 2019 Framework References:

COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Chapter 7:Highlights the roles of senior management, including the CIO and business executives, in setting and updating EGIT objectives.

COBIT 2019 Design Guide, Chapter 4:Emphasizes the importance of executive involvement in governance system design and iterative improvement.

By engaging the CIO and business executives in this process, the enterprise ensures that EGIT objectives remain relevant and aligned with overall business strategy.

The COBIT 2019 Design Guide clarifies that enterprise strategy is a critical design factor when aligning governance with business goals:

"Enterprise strategy guides the prioritization and selection of governance and management objectives. For example, if the strategy is to grow market share, the objectives related to innovation and service delivery will be emphasized."

Hence,enterprise strategyis the most important factor to consider in this scenario.

When developing an EGIT (Enterprise Governance of IT) implementation program plan, the best approach is to select projects that are high-benefit and relatively easy to implement first. This approach, often referred to as "low-hanging fruit," helps build momentum, demonstrate value quickly, and secure buy-in from stakeholders for more complex initiatives.

References in COBIT 2019 Design and Implementation:

COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Chapter 5:This chapter outlines the importance of prioritizing projects that can deliver quick wins to maintain stakeholder support and demonstrate the value of the governance framework.

COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives, BAI01 (Managed Programs):This objective discusses the prioritization of initiatives based on their potential benefits and implementation feasibility.

By focusing on high-benefit, easy-to-implement projects, enterprises can create a solid foundation for more challenging initiatives and ensure continuous progress in their governance implementation efforts.

According to COBIT 2019 Governance and Management Objectives under DSS05:

"Information security responsibilities include ensuring that information is classified appropriately and protected according to its classification."

Information security is responsible for applying and maintaining classification schemes.

Change enablement most effectively addresses the cultural aspects of a major international IT initiative that impacts the entire enterprise. It ensures that changes are managed smoothly and that the organization's culture is considered and aligned with the new initiatives.

References in COBIT 2019 Design and Implementation:

COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives, BAI05 (Managed Organizational Change):This objective focuses on managing organizational change effectively, including cultural aspects.

COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Chapter 4:This chapter emphasizes the importance of change management practices in addressing cultural aspects and ensuring successful implementation of major initiatives.

Effective change enablement considers the cultural context, helping to align stakeholder expectations and promote acceptance and adoption of new initiatives across the enterprise.

According to COBIT 2019 and general IT risk management principles:

"Risk mitigation is the most commonly used response strategy. It involves taking action to reduce the likelihood or impact of a risk, often by implementing controls or other countermeasures."

This is supported in COBIT’s treatment of risk under governance objective EDM03.

The COBIT® 2019 Implementation Guide explains that the business case documents both the drivers for change and the intended future (to-be) state. In merger scenarios, the business case outlines how systems should be consolidated, what capabilities are required, and what outcomes are expected.

Board announcements communicate intent but lack operational detail. Capability assessments describe the current state. Third-party reviews provide independent opinions but do not define the enterprise’s desired future configuration.

The business case serves as the authoritative reference for scope, objectives, benefits, and target capabilities, making it the correct source for future-state details.

According to the COBIT 2019 Design Guide:

"In the final stage of the design workflow, design factors are used to determine the relative importance of governance and management objectives, which helps prioritize implementation efforts."

This occurs during theconclusion of the governance system design.

In the process of refining the scope of the governance system, determining whether or not each design factor is applicable is a critical step. This step ensures that the governance system is tailored to the specific needs and context of the enterprise.

References in COBIT 2019 Design and Implementation:

COBIT 2019 Design Guide, Chapter 2:This chapter outlines the importance of assessing each design factor's applicability to ensure that the governance system is relevant and effective.

COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology, Chapter 4:This chapter emphasizes the need to refine the governance system's scope based on the specific design factors relevant to the enterprise.

By determining the applicability of design factors, enterprises can focus on the most pertinent aspects, ensuring a tailored and efficient governance system.

The group primarily responsible for setting the overall direction for IT governance implementation is the enterprise executives. Their role is crucial in aligning IT governance with the strategic goals and vision of the organization.

References in COBIT 2019 Design and Implementation:

COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives, EDM01 (Ensure Governance Framework Setting and Maintenance):This objective discusses the responsibilities of enterprise executives in setting the governance framework's direction.

COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Chapter 3:This chapter highlights the role of senior leadership in driving the implementation of IT governance.

Enterprise executives provide the strategic direction and support necessary to ensure that IT governance aligns with the enterprise's overall mission and objectives.

In COBIT 2019, information is seen as a key enabler because it underpins effective governance and management practices. Information items refer to the data and information that the organization needs to achieve its goals and support decision-making processes. This includes various types of information such as financial data, operational data, compliance reports, and performance metrics.

The COBIT 2019 Framework identifies seven components of a governance system:

Processes:Structured sets of practices and activities to achieve specific objectives and produce a set of outputs in support of achieving overall IT-related goals.

Organizational Structures:Key decision-making entities in an enterprise.

Principles, Policies, and Frameworks:Established rules and guidelines.

Information:All information produced and used by the enterprise, crucial for governance.

Culture, Ethics, and Behavior:Encompasses the values of the enterprise and its employees.

People, Skills, and Competencies:Required for successful completion of all activities and decision-making.

Services, Infrastructure, and Applications:Enabling and supporting the enterprise through its use of technology.

Information itemsfall under the fourth component, "Information," which is necessary for effective governance. Information items ensure that:

Decision-makers have the relevant data to make informed decisions.

There is transparency and accountability in reporting.

The organization can monitor and measure performance against strategic objectives.

Compliance with regulatory and legal requirements is maintained.

COBIT 2019 Design and Implementation Guide References:

COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology, Chapter 5:This chapter details the governance and management objectives and their components, highlighting the importance of information.

COBIT 2019 Design Guide, Chapter 2:This chapter provides a comprehensive overview of the components of a governance system, including information items.

COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Chapter 3:This chapter explains how to incorporate various governance system components, such as information items, into the tailored governance system design.

Considering information items is essential because they provide the necessary context and insights for effective governance. By ensuring that information is accurate, timely, and relevant, an organization can better align its IT governance with its overall business objectives, thereby enhancing decision-making, performance tracking, and compliance.

The role of IT management when executing an EGIT implementation program plan should be to monitor the implementation and provide direction when necessary. This ensures that the program stays on track and aligns with the enterprise’s strategic objectives.

IT management's role is to oversee the execution of the EGIT implementation program, ensuring that it adheres to the plan and meets the established objectives. This includes monitoring progress, addressing any issues that arise, and providing guidance to ensure successful implementation.

COBIT 2019 Framework References:

COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Chapter 7:Details the responsibilities of IT management in monitoring and directing the implementation of the EGIT program.

COBIT 2019 Design Guide, Chapter 4:Emphasizes the need for active management involvement to guide and support the implementation process.

By monitoring the implementation and providing direction, IT management ensures that the program remains aligned with business goals and can adapt to any changes or challenges encountered during execution.

“Challenge: Lack of required skills and competencies…” → “Root causes: … Business and management skills often not included in training …”

The most likely root cause for an enterprise lacking the required skills and competencies to execute an EGIT (Enterprise Governance of IT) implementation program plan is that enterprise training does not include business and management skill development. Effective EGIT implementation requires a blend of technical, business, and management skills.

References in COBIT 2019 Design and Implementation:

COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives, APO07 (Managed Human Resources):This objective emphasizes the importance of developing skills and competencies, including business and management skills, for successful governance and management of enterprise IT.

COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Chapter 3:This chapter outlines the need for comprehensive training programs that address not only technical skills but also business and management capabilities to ensure successful implementation of governance frameworks.

Without proper training that includes business and management skills, staff may be ill-prepared to handle the complexities of EGIT implementation, leading to skill gaps and competency issues.

In the context of COBIT 2019, design factors are essential for tailoring the governance system to the specific needs of an enterprise. These factors help shape the governance system to ensure it aligns with the enterprise's strategy, goals, and environment. When considering how to tailor the governance system to an enterprise strategy, a COBIT implementation expert would look at several design factors, one of which iscost leadership.

Detailed Explanation with References:

Cost Leadership (Option A): Cost leadership is a strategic objective where an organization aims to become the lowest-cost producer in its industry. This strategy can be a significant design factor in tailoring a governance system, as it impacts decisions on IT investments, process efficiencies, and cost management. In COBIT 2019, aligning IT governance with a cost leadership strategy involves ensuring that IT initiatives support cost reduction and operational efficiency, thereby enabling the organization to achieve competitive pricing.

Risk Optimization (Option B): While risk optimization is an essential component of IT governance, it is more related to managing and balancing risk rather than a design factor specifically tailored to enterprise strategy.

Business Transformation (Option C): Business transformation refers to major changes in an organization’s processes, systems, or structure. It is more of a broader business objective rather than a design factor used specifically in the context of tailoring the governance system to an enterprise strategy.

Value Delivery (Option D): Value delivery focuses on ensuring that IT delivers value to the business. It is a core principle of IT governance but is not typically categorized as a design factor for tailoring enterprise strategy in COBIT 2019.

Conclusion:The correct answer isA. Cost leadership. Cost leadership as a design factor directly influences how the governance system is tailored to support the enterprise strategy of achieving the lowest cost production. This alignment ensures that the governance system supports strategic goals focused on cost efficiency and competitive pricing.

When DevOps is selected as the IT implementation method design factor, COBIT® 2019 emphasizes continuous integration, automation, and rapid solution delivery. The Design Guide indicates that DevOps environments require strong governance over solution identification, development, and build practices.

BAI03 (Managed Solution Identification and Build) directly supports these needs by ensuring that solutions are designed, built, tested, and maintained in a controlled yet agile manner. While change transitioning (BAI07) and operational objectives remain important, DevOps shifts responsibility earlier in the lifecycle toward build and integration activities.

DSS02 and BAI04 focus on operational stability rather than rapid delivery. Therefore, under DevOps, BAI03 becomes a priority management objective to ensure quality, speed, and alignment with business requirements.

The COBIT® 2019 Design Guide explicitly defines its primary target audience as professionals responsible for designing, tailoring, and sustaining enterprise governance systems for information and technology. This includes governance professionals, enterprise architects, senior IT leaders, and consultants involved in governance system design decisions.

While assurance professionals, internal auditors, and other stakeholders may benefit from understanding the Design Guide, they are not the primary audience. Their roles are more directly supported by the Governance and Management Objectives guide and assurance-related materials.

The Design Guide focuses on design factors, governance system components, and structured workflows to tailor governance solutions based on enterprise context. This requires decision-making authority and design accountability, which typically reside with governance professionals rather than operational IT staff or assurance teams.

Although a broad group of stakeholders may use the guide indirectly, COBIT makes a clear distinction between primary and secondary audiences. Therefore, the correct answer is that the Design Guide is primarily intended for governance professionals involved in designing governance solutions.

In the COBIT 2019 implementation lifecycle, quick wins are essential for demonstrating early success and building credibility for the governance initiative. Implementing quick wins provides tangible results that can help secure stakeholder support and buy-in for the ongoing governance program. The appropriate phase for implementing quick wins is during the phase where the organization outlines and starts to execute the plan for achieving its governance objectives.

Detailed Explanation with References:

What needs to be done? (Option A):

This phase involves understanding the governance requirements, identifying gaps, and determining the necessary governance components. While important for planning, this phase is more about identifying needs rather than implementing solutions.

Where do we want to be? (Option B):

This phase focuses on defining the target state of the governance system, setting goals, and envisioning the desired outcomes. It is more strategic and future-oriented, outlining what the organization aims to achieve but not yet focusing on implementation.

How do we get there? (Option C):

This phase is about developing and executing the implementation plan to reach the desired state. It involves detailing the actions, resources, and timelines required to achieve the governance objectives. Implementing quick wins during this phase is crucial because it helps to demonstrate progress, build momentum, and validate the approach taken. Early successes in this phase can boost confidence and support for the broader governance initiative.

According to the COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, achieving and demonstrating quick wins during this phase is critical to maintaining stakeholder engagement and demonstrating the value of the governance improvements.

Where are we now? (Option D):

This phase involves assessing the current state of the governance system, identifying existing issues, and understanding the baseline. It is more diagnostic and evaluative, laying the groundwork for planning but not yet focusing on implementation.

Conclusion:The correct answer isC. How do we get there?. Implementing quick wins during this phase helps to build credibility and support for the governance program by showing early, tangible improvements and demonstrating the feasibility and benefits of the proposed governance changes.

Key goal indicators (KGIs) are best suited for evaluating the performance of processes. KGIs measure the outcome of processes and indicate whether the objectives are being met, providing a clear picture of performance.

References in COBIT 2019 Design and Implementation:

COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives, MEA01 (Managed Performance and Conformance Monitoring):This objective highlights the use of key goal indicators to measure and monitor the performance of governance and management processes.

COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Chapter 5:This chapter discusses the importance of using KGIs to evaluate process performance and ensure alignment with enterprise goals.

By focusing on KGIs, enterprises can effectively monitor and evaluate the success of their processes in achieving desired outcomes, leading to continuous improvement and better alignment with business objectives.