CMMC-CCP Certified CMMC Professional (CCP) Exam Questions and Answers

Understanding CMMC 2.0 Incident Response PracticesTheIncident Response (IR) domaininCMMC 2.0 Level 2aligns withNIST SP 800-171, Section 3.6, which defines requirements forestablishing and maintaining an incident response capability.

The documentation provideddescribes an incident response capability that includes preparation, detection, analysis, containment, recovery, and user response activities.

IR.L2-3.6.1specifically requires organizations toestablish an incident handling processcovering:

Preparation

Detection & Analysis

Containment

Eradication & Recovery

Post-Incident Response

B. IR.L2-3.6.2: Incident Reporting (Incorrect)

Incident reporting focuses on reporting incidents to external parties (e.g., DoD, DIBNet),which isnot what the provided documentation describes.

C. IR.L2-3.6.3: Incident Response Testing (Incorrect)

Incident response testing ensures that the response process is regularly tested and evaluated,which isnot the primary focus of the documentation provided.

D. IR.L2-3.6.4: Incident Spillage (Incorrect)

Incident spillage specifically refers to CUI exposure or handling unauthorized CUI incidents,which isnot the scenario described.

The correct answer isA. IR.L2-3.6.1: Incident Handling, as the documentationattests to the establishment of an incident response capability.

Understanding IA.L1-3.5.1 (Identification and Authentication Requirements)TheCMMC 2.0 Level 1practiceIA.L1-3.5.1aligns withNIST SP 800-171, Requirement 3.5.1, which mandates that organizationsidentify system users, processes acting on behalf of users, and devicesto ensure proper access control.

To comply with this requirement, anOrganization Seeking Certification (OSC)must maintain documentation that demonstrates:

A unique identifier (username) for each system user

Mapping of system accounts to specific individuals

Identification of devices and automated processes that access systems

This documentation directly satisfies IA.L1-3.5.1because it showshow system users are uniquely identified and linked to specific accountswithin the environment.

Alist of users and their assigned accountsconfirms that the organization has a structured method oftracking access and authentication.

It allows auditors to verify thateach user has a distinct identityand that access control mechanisms are properly applied.

A. Procedures for implementing access control lists (Incorrect)

While access control lists (ACLs) are relevant for authorization, they do notidentify users or devicesspecifically, making them insufficient as primary evidence for IA.L1-3.5.1.

B. List of unauthorized users that identifies their identities and roles (Incorrect)

Identifying unauthorized users does not fulfill the requirement of trackingauthorizedusers, devices, and processes.

D. Physical access policy stating "All non-employees must wear a special visitor pass or be escorted" (Incorrect)

This pertains tophysical security, not system-baseduser identification and authentication.

The correct answer isC. User names associated with system accounts assigned to those individuals, as thisdirectly satisfies the identification requirement of IA.L1-3.5.1.

Background on Legacy Markings and CUI

Legacy markings refer to classification labels used before the implementation of theControlled Unclassified Information (CUI) ProgramunderDoD Instruction 5200.48.

Documents with legacy markings (such as “For Official Use Only” (FOUO) or “Sensitive But Unclassified” (SBU)) must be reviewed for re-marking or redaction to align withCUI requirements.

When Must Legacy Markings Be Updated?

If the document is retained internally (Answer A - Incorrect): Documents under DoD control do not require immediate re-marking unless they are being shared externally.

If the document is classified as Secret (Answer B - Incorrect): This question is aboutCUI, not classified information. Secret-level documents follow different marking rules underDoD Manual 5200.01.

If a document is being shared externally (Answer C - Correct):

According toDoD Instruction 5200.48, Section 3.6(a), organizations mustreview legacy markings before sharing documents outside the organization.

The document must bere-markedin compliance with the CUI Program before dissemination.

If the original document does not contain CUI (Answer D - Incorrect): The original source document's status does not affect the requirement to re-mark a derivative document if it contains CUI.

Conclusion

The correct answer isC: Documents with legacy markings must bere-marked or redacted when being shared outside the organizationto comply with DoD CUI guidelines.

CMMC Level 1applies toFederal Contract Information (FCI)systems.

Any system or device that is connected to an FCI-handling network is within the assessment scopebecause it canintroduce vulnerabilitiesinto the environment.

TheWi-Fi-enabled thermostat is connected to the FCI network, meaning it haspotential accessto sensitive contract-related data.

PerCMMC Scoping Guidance, this type of device is classified as aRestricted Information System (Restricted IS)—devices that do not store, process, or transmit FCI but areconnected to networks that do.

Restricted IS must be accounted for in the self-assessment scope to ensure they do not compromise security controls.

In the CMMC assessment process, conflicts of interest must be identified early to ensure an impartial and objective evaluation of an organization's compliance with CMMC 2.0 requirements. The appropriate phase for identifying conflicts of interest is during the"Verify Readiness to Conduct Assessment"phase.

Assessment Planning & Conflict of Interest Consideration

Before an assessment begins, theC3PAO (Certified Third-Party Assessment Organization)or theDIBCAC (Defense Industrial Base Cybersecurity Assessment Center) for DOD-led assessmentsmust confirm that there are no conflicts of interest between assessors and the organization being assessed.

A conflict of interest may arise if an assessor haspreviously worked for, consulted with, or provided direct assistance tothe organization under review.

CMMC Assessment Process and PhasesThe CMMC assessment process involves multiple steps, and the verification of readiness is acritical early phaseto ensure that the assessment is unbiased:

Analyze Requirements:This phase focuses on defining the assessment scope, but it does not include conflict of interest verification.

Develop Assessment Plan:This phase focuses on structuring the assessment methodology, not on identifying conflicts.

Verify Readiness to Conduct Assessment (Correct Answer):

At this stage, theC3PAO or assessment team must review potential conflicts of interest.

TheDefense Industrial Base Cybersecurity Assessment Center (DIBCAC)also ensures assessors do not have any prior relationships that could compromise the objectivity of the evaluation.

Generate Final Recommended Assessment Results:This phase occurs at the end of the process, after the assessment is complete, so conflict of interest identification is too late by this stage.

Official CMMC Documentation & References

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Guide– The CAP details procedures assessors must follow, including conflict of interest verification.

CMMC 2.0 Scoping and Assessment Guides– Published by the Cyber AB and DoD, these guides reinforce the need for impartiality and independence in assessments.

DoD Instruction 5200.48 (Controlled Unclassified Information Program)– Outlines requirements for ensuring objective cybersecurity assessments.

Step-by-Step Explanation:By ensuring conflicts of interest are identified in the"Verify Readiness to Conduct Assessment"phase, the integrity of the CMMC certification process is maintained, ensuring that assessments are conductedfairly, independently, and in accordance with DoD cybersecurity policies.

CMMC Level 2is designed to alignfullywithNIST SP 800-171, which consists of110 security controls (practices).

This meansall 110 practicesfrom NIST SP 800-171 are required for aCMMC Level 2 certification.

How Many Practices Are Included in CMMC Level 2?Breakdown of Practices in CMMC 2.0CMMC Level

Number of Practices

Level 1

17 practices(Basic Cyber Hygiene)

Level 2

110 practices(Aligned with NIST SP 800-171)

Level 3

Not yet finalized but expected to exceed 110

Since CMMC Level 2 mandatesall 110 NIST SP 800-171 practices, the correct answer isC. 110 practices.

A. 17 practices❌Incorrect.17 practicesapply only toCMMC Level 1, not Level 2.

B. 72 practices❌Incorrect. There is no CMMC level with72 practices.

D. 180 practices❌Incorrect. CMMC Level 2only requires 110 practices, not 180.

Why the Other Answers Are Incorrect

CMMC 2.0 Model– Confirms thatLevel 2 includes 110 practicesaligned withNIST SP 800-171.

NIST SP 800-171 Rev. 2– Outlines the110 security controlsrequired for handlingControlled Unclassified Information (CUI).

CMMC Official ReferencesThus,option C (110 practices) is the correct answer, as per official CMMC guidance.

TheCMMC Model consists of 14 domains, which are based on theNIST SP 800-171 control familieswith additional cybersecurity practices.

Eachdomaincontainspractices and processesthat define cybersecurity requirements for organizations seeking CMMC certification.

Understanding the Assessment Results Package SubmissionAfter completing aCMMC Level 2 Assessment, theCertified Third-Party Assessment Organization (C3PAO)mustsubmit the final assessment results packageto theEnterprise Mission Assurance Support Service (eMASS)system.

TheFinal Reportis themandatory documentthatcontains all assessment details, findings, and scoring.

It serves as theofficial record of the assessmentanddetermines certification eligibility.

Key Required Document: Final Report

A. Final Report → Correct

TheFinal Report is requiredin the submission package todocument assessment results officially.

It includes asummary of findings, scoring, and recommendations.

B. Certification rating → Incorrect

The C3PAO does not issue certification ratings—theDoDandCMMC-ABdetermine certification status after reviewing the Final Report.

C. Summary-level findings → Incorrect

While the Final Reportincludessummary findings, astandalone summary-level findings document is not a required upload.

D. All Daily Checkpoint logs → Incorrect

Checkpoint logsare part of the internal assessment process butare not required in the final eMASS submission.

Why is the Correct Answer "Final Report" (A)?

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Document

Specifies that theFinal Report must be submitted to eMASSafter a Level 2 assessment.

CMMC-AB Guidelines for C3PAOs

States that theFinal Report is the key document used to determine certification status.

DFARS 252.204-7021 (CMMC Requirements Clause)

Requires the assessment results to be documented in an official report and submitted via eMASS.

CMMC 2.0 References Supporting This Answer:

Final Answer:✔A. Final Report

UnderCMMC 2.0 Level 2, which aligns with the requirements ofNIST SP 800-171, maintaining robust control overnonlocal maintenance sessionsis critical. While multifactor authentication (MFA) is a required safeguard for secure access, additional measures must be implemented to fully meet the maintenance requirements as outlined inControl 3.3.5:

Key Requirements for Nonlocal Maintenance:

Termination of Nonlocal Maintenance Sessions:

To reduce the attack surface and prevent unauthorized access, nonlocal maintenance connectionsmust be terminated immediately after the maintenance activity is completed. This is a direct requirement to mitigate risks associated with lingering remote sessions that could be exploited by threat actors.

Supporting Reference:NIST SP 800-171, Control 3.3.5 states: "Ensure that remote maintenance is conducted in a controlled manner and disable connections immediately after use."

Multifactor Authentication (MFA):

OSCs are required to implement MFA for nonlocal remote maintenance sessions. MFA must includeat least two factors(e.g., something you know, something you have, or something you are).

While the OSC’s use of MFA satisfies part of the requirement, it does not complete the control unless proper termination procedures are in place.

Policy and Procedure Adherence:

The OSC must also document amaintenance policyand ensure it reflects the need for terminating connections post-maintenance. The policy should outline roles, responsibilities, and steps for ensuring secure nonlocal maintenance practices.

Incorrect Options:

B. Unlimited connections:Allowing unrestricted nonlocal maintenance sessions is a significant security risk and violates the principle of least privilege.

C. Removing restrictions:Removing restrictions for convenience directly undermines compliance and security.

D. Multifactor authentication details:While MFA is necessary, the question states the OSC already uses it. Termination of sessions is the missing requirement.

Conclusion:

The requirement toterminate nonlocal maintenance sessions after maintenance is complete(Option A) is critical for compliance withCMMC 2.0 Level 2andNIST SP 800-171, Control 3.3.5. This ensures that nonlocal maintenance activities are secured against unauthorized access and potential vulnerabilities.

Understanding the Role of a CCP in CMMC AssessmentsACertified CMMC Professional (CCP)is responsible for assistingCertified CMMC Assessors (CCA)in evaluating anOrganization Seeking Certification (OSC)during a CMMC assessment. One key aspect of this process isconducting interviewswith Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) to verify security practices.

Ensuring that interviewees canspeak freely without fear of retaliationiscriticalto obtainingaccurate and unbiased informationabout the implementation of security controls.

CMMC Assessment Process and the Role of Interviews

TheCMMC Assessment Guide (Level 2)outlines that interviews are conducted to confirm that security practices are effectively implemented.

Interviewees mustfeel comfortable sharing candid responseswithout concern that their statements will lead tonegative consequenceswithin the organization.

Ensuring Confidentiality and Non-Attribution

DoD Assessment Methodologyspecifies that interviews should be conductedconfidentiallytoprotect the identity of interviewees.

TheCMMC Code of Professional Conduct (CoPC)for assessors and professionals reinforces the requirement to maintain theconfidentialityof assessment participants.

Non-attributionensures that responses are used for evaluation purposeswithout linking statements to specific individuals.

Why the Other Answer Choices Are Incorrect:

(A) Performed in groups for more efficient use of resources:

Group interviews may prevent individuals from speaking openly.

Employees might be hesitant to contradict leadership or peers.

(B) Recorded for inclusion in the Final Recommended Findings report:

Interviews arenot directly recorded or attributedin assessment reports.

Instead, findings are documentedwithout identifying specific individuals.

(D) Mapped to specific CMMC practices to clearly delineate which practice is being evaluated:

While responsesinformwhich practices are being assessed, theprimary goalof an interview is to ensure accurate,unbiased information gathering.

Step-by-Step Breakdown:Final Validation from CMMC Documentation:According to theCMMC Assessment Guide and DoD Assessment Methodology, interview confidentiality iscrucialto gatheringaccurateandunbiasedresponses. This makesconfidentiality and non-attributionthe correct answer.

Thus, the correct answer is:

C. Confidential and non-attributable so interviewees can speak without fear of reprisal.

Understanding the Role of NIST SP 800-171 in CMMCNIST Special Publication (SP)800-171is the definitive standard for protectingControlled Unclassified Information (CUI)innonfederal systems and organizations. It provides security requirements that organizations handling CUImust implementto protect sensitive government information.

This document isthe foundationofCMMC 2.0 Level 2compliance, which aligns directly withNIST SP 800-171 Rev. 2requirements.

Breakdown of Answer ChoicesNIST SP

Title

Relevance to CMMC

NIST SP 800-37

Risk Management Framework (RMF)

Focuses on risk assessment for federal agencies, not directly applicable to CUI in nonfederal systems.

NIST SP 800-53

Security and Privacy Controls for Federal Systems

Provides security controls forfederalinformation systems, not specifically tailored tononfederalorganizations handling CUI.

NIST SP 800-88

Guidelines for Media Sanitization

Covers secure data destruction and disposal, not overall CUI protection.

NIST SP 800-171

Protecting Controlled Unclassified Information in Nonfederal Systems and Organizations

✅Correct Answer – Directly addresses CUI protection in contractor systems.

Key Requirements from NIST SP 800-171The document outlines110 security controlsgrouped into14 families, including:

Access Control (AC)– Restrict access to authorized users.

Audit and Accountability (AU)– Maintain system logs and monitor activity.

Incident Response (IR)– Establish an incident response plan.

System and Communications Protection (SC)– Encrypt CUI in transit and at rest.

These controls serve as thebaseline requirementsfor organizations seekingCMMC Level 2 certificationto work withCUI.

CMMC 2.0 Level 2alignsdirectlywith NIST SP800-171 Rev. 2.

DoD contractors that handle CUImustcomply withall 110 controlsfrom NIST SP800-171.

Official Reference from CMMC 2.0 DocumentationFinal Verification and ConclusionThe correct answer isD. NIST SP 800-171, as this documentexplicitly definesthe cybersecurity requirements for protectingCUI in nonfederal systems and organizations.

AC3PAO (Certified Third-Party Assessment Organization)is responsible for conductingCMMC Level 2 assessments.

After completing theassessment, theC3PAO generates the Final Recommended Assessment Results, which include key documentation reviewed by theCMMC Quality Assurance Professional (CQAP)for quality control.

ACMMC Level 2 Assessmentis conducted by aC3PAO (Certified Third-Party Assessment Organization)to determine whether theOrganization Seeking Certification (OSC)meets all required110 NIST SP 800-171 controls.

Before submitting the results, theC3PAO must complete a final briefing between the Lead Assessor and the OSCto review findings and clarify any concerns.

A. Pay an assessment submission fee→Incorrect

There is no mandatory submission fee for assessment results.Fees apply to the assessment process, not submission.

B. Complete an internal review of the results→Incorrect

While internal reviews are encouraged, they arenot a required step before submissionin CMMC assessment procedures.

C. Notify the CMMC-AB that submission is forthcoming→Incorrect

TheC3PAO submits results to the CMMC-AB through the CMMC eMASS system, but prior notification isnot a required procedural step.

D. Coordinate a final briefing between the Lead Assessor and the OSC→Correct

According toCMMC Assessment Process (CAP) guidelines, theLead Assessor must conduct a final briefing with the OSCbefore submitting the results.

This briefing ensures transparency, provides OSC with insight into the findings, and allows for final clarifications.

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) v1.0

Requires afinal briefing between the Lead Assessor and the OSC before submitting assessment results.

CMMC-AB and C3PAO Process Requirements

TheLead Assessor must communicate final findings with the OSC before submission to CMMC-AB.

Analysis of the Given Options:Official References Supporting the Correct Answer:Conclusion:The correct answer is:

✅D. Coordinate a final briefing between the Lead Assessor and the OSC.

Understanding the C3PAO Assessment MethodologyACertified Third-Party Assessment Organization (C3PAO)is an entity authorized by theCMMC Accreditation Body (CMMC-AB)to conduct officialCMMC Level 2 assessmentsfor organizations seeking certification.

C3PAOs must follow theCMMC Assessment Process (CAP), which outlines:✅Theassessment methodologyfor evaluating compliance.✅Evidence collectionprocedures (interviews, artifacts, testing).✅Assessment scoring and reportingrequirements.✅Guidance for assessorson executing standardized assessments.

ISO 27001 (Option A)is an international standard forinformation security managementbut isnot the basis for CMMC assessments.

NIST SP 800-53A (Option B)providessecurity control assessments for federal systems, but CMMC assessments arebased on NIST SP 800-171.

GAO Yellow Book (Option D)is agovernment auditing standardused forfinancial and performance audits, not cybersecurity assessments.

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) (Option C) is the correct answerbecause it defines how C3PAOs conduct CMMC assessments.

CMMC Assessment Process Guide (CAP)– GovernsC3PAO assessment execution.

CMMC 2.0 Model Documentation– RequiresC3PAOs to follow CAP proceduresfor assessments.

Key Requirement: CMMC Assessment Process (CAP)Why "CMMC Assessment Process" is Correct?Official References from CMMC 2.0 DocumentationFinal Verification and ConclusionThe correct answer isC. CMMC Assessment Process, as it is theofficial methodology all C3PAOs must follow when conducting CMMC assessments.

Understanding the Reporting Process in a CMMC 2.0 Level 2 AssessmentACMMC Level 2 Assessmentconducted by aCertified Third-Party Assessor Organization (C3PAO)follows a structured approach to gathering evidence, evaluating compliance, and reporting findings to theOrganization Seeking Certification (OSC). The reporting process is outlined in theCMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Guide, which specifies how findings should be communicated.

Daily Checkpoints:

Throughout the assessment, the assessor team holdsdaily checkpoint meetingswith the OSC to provide updates on progress, observations, and preliminary findings.

These checkpoints help ensure transparency and allow the OSC to address minor issues as they arise.

Final Results Delivery:

Thefinal assessment resultsare typically shared during thefinal daily checkpointOR in aseparately scheduled findings and recommendations reviewmeeting.

This ensures that the OSC receives a structured and complete summary of the assessment findings before the official report is submitted.

TheCMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Guide, Section 4.5clearly states that assessment findings should be presentedeither at the last daily checkpoint or during a separately scheduled final review.

This aligns with best practices formaintaining transparency and ensuring the OSC has clarity on their assessment resultsbefore the final report submission.

Option A (End of every day)is incorrect because while assessors do provide updates, they do not deliver the "final results" daily.

Option B (Daily and a separate final review)is misleading, as the CAP Guide allows assessors tochoosebetween the final daily checkpoint OR a separate findings review—not both.

Option D (After C3PAO approval)is incorrect because theC3PAO does not approve findings before they are communicated to the OSC. The assessment team directly presents the results first.

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Guide, Section 4.5: Reporting and Findings Communication

CMMC 2.0 Level 2 Assessment Process Overview

CMMC Assessment Final Report Guidelines

Assessment Communication StructureWhy Option C is CorrectOfficial CMMC Documentation ReferencesFinal VerificationBased on officialCMMC 2.0 documentation, thefinal assessment results should be presented to the OSC either at the last daily checkpoint or in a separately scheduled review session, making Option C the correct answer.

Understanding the Role of a Registered Provider Organization (RPO)ARegistered Provider Organization (RPO)is an entity recognized by theCMMC Accreditation Body (CMMC-AB)to provideconsulting servicesto organizations seekingCMMC certification.

Key Functions of an RPO✅Consulting servicesto help companies prepare for CMMC assessments.

✅Guidance on security controlsrequired for compliance.

✅Assistance with documentation, policy development, and gap analysis.

✅Preparation for third-party CMMC assessmentsbutdoes not conduct official CMMC assessments(this is the role of a C3PAO).

Consulting servicesare thebroadest and most comprehensivefunction of an RPO.

RPOs do not conduct assessments(eliminating option D).

Training and educationmay be part of consulting but arenot the primary function(eliminating A and B).

Consulting includes training, guidance, documentation assistance, and security readiness, making it themost comprehensive service offered.

Why "Consulting Services" is the Correct Answer?Breakdown of Answer ChoicesOption

Description

Correct?

A. Training services

❌Incorrect–RPOs may provide training, but this isnot their primary function.

B. Education services

❌Incorrect–Similar to training, butnot the most comprehensive service.

C. Consulting services

✅Correct – The core function of an RPO is consulting, which includes various readiness services.

D. Assessment services

❌Incorrect–Only aC3PAO (Certified Third-Party Assessment Organization)can conductofficial CMMC assessments.

TheCMMC-AB RPO Programdefines an RPO as aconsulting organization that assists companies in preparing for CMMC certificationbutdoes not perform assessments.

Official References from CMMC 2.0 DocumentationFinal Verification and ConclusionThe correct answer isC. Consulting services, asRPOs primarily provide advisory and readiness supportto organizations preparing forCMMC compliance.

In the context of the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) 2.0, the remediation review process is a critical phase where identified deficiencies from an initial assessment are addressed. The Lead Assessor, representing a Certified Third-Party Assessment Organization (C3PAO), plays a pivotal role in this process.

Role of the Lead Assessor in Remediation Reviews:

Validation of Remediation Efforts:

Objective:Ensure that the Organization Seeking Certification (OSC) has effectively addressed and corrected all deficiencies identified during the initial assessment.

Process:The Lead Assessor reviews the evidence provided by the OSC to confirm that each previously unmet practice now meets the required standards. This involves examining updated policies, procedures, system configurations, and other relevant artifacts.

Delta Assessment Remediation Package Submission:

Definition:A delta assessment focuses on evaluating only the components or practices that were previously found non-compliant or deficient.

Responsibility:After validating the remediation efforts, the Lead Assessor compiles a remediation package that includes:

Detailed documentation of the deficiencies identified in the initial assessment.

Evidence of the corrective actions taken by the OSC.

Findings from the reassessment of the remediated practices.

Internal Quality Review:This remediation package is then submitted for the C3PAO's internal quality review process. The purpose of this review is to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and consistency of the assessment findings before finalizing the certification decision.

Rationale for Selecting Answer C:

Alignment with CMMC Assessment Process:The submission of a delta assessment remediation package for internal quality review is a standard procedure outlined in the CMMC Assessment Process. This step ensures that all remediated items are thoroughly evaluated and validated, maintaining the integrity of the certification process.

Clarification of Incorrect Options:

Option A:"Help OSC to complete planned remediation activities."

Explanation:The Lead Assessor's role is to assess and validate the OSC's compliance, not to assist in the implementation or completion of remediation activities. Providing such assistance could lead to a conflict of interest and compromise the objectivity of the assessment.

Option B:"Plan two consecutive remediation reviews for an OSC."

Explanation:The standard process involves conducting a single remediation review after the OSC has addressed the identified deficiencies. Planning multiple consecutive remediation reviews is not a typical practice and could indicate a lack of proper remediation planning by the OSC.

Option D:"Validate that practices previously listed on the POA&M have been removed on an updated Risk Assessment."

Explanation:While it's essential to ensure that deficiencies are addressed, the primary focus of the Lead Assessor during a remediation review is to validate the implementation of remediated practices. Updating the Risk Assessment is the responsibility of the OSC's internal risk management team, not the Lead Assessor.

Understanding the Final Review Process in a CMMC AssessmentDuring aCMMC Level 2 Assessment, theAssessment Teamand theOrganization Seeking Certification (OSC)holddaily checkpoint meetingsto discuss progress, review evidence, and ensure transparency.

At theend of the assessment, afinal review meetingis conducted, during which theLead Assessor presents the results. Therecorded Daily Checkpoint logserves as theofficial document summarizing:

Theattendee list

Time, date, and locationof the final review

Final MET or NOT MET ratingsfor all practices

Discussion points, resulting actions, and due datesfor both the OSC and Assessment Team

TheCMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Guidespecifies that all assessment findings and discussions must bedocumented throughout the assessment in daily checkpoint logs.

TheFinal and Recorded Daily Checkpoint Logincludes all necessary details, such as attendee lists, discussion topics, and action items.

This document isused to ensure all discussed topics and agreed-upon actions are properly tracked and recordedbefore submission.

A. Final log report (Incorrect)

There isno specific "Final Log Report"required in CMMC assessments.

B. Final CMMC report (Incorrect)

TheFinal CMMC Reportdocuments the overall assessment results butdoes not serve as the official meeting logfor the final review discussion.

C. Final and recorded OSC CMMC report (Incorrect)

This documentdoes not include detailed discussion points from the daily checkpoint meetings.

The correct answer isD. Final and recorded Daily Checkpoint log, as this is the official document that captures thefinal meeting details, discussions, and action items.

Understanding Evidence Sufficiency in CMMC Level 2 AssessmentsDuring aCMMC Level 2 Assessment, theLead Assessormust determine whether the evidence collected for each practice issufficientto support an assessment finding. This aligns with theCMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Guide, which requires assessors to evaluate:

Examinations– Reviewing documents, configurations, and system records.

Interviews– Speaking with personnel to confirm implementation and understanding.

Testing– Observing security controls in action to validate effectiveness.

To determine whether evidence issufficient, the assessor ensures that it:

Directly supports the assessment objective.

Demonstrates that the practice is consistently implemented.

Can be independently verified.

Sufficiencyrefers to whetherenoughevidence has been collected to make an accurate determination about compliance.

Option A (Adequacy)is incorrect because adequacy relates tothe qualityof evidence, while sufficiency focuses on whetherenoughevidence exists.

Option C (Process Mapping)is incorrect because process mapping is used for understanding workflows but is not an assessment verification method.

Option D (Assessment Scope)is incorrect because defining the scope happensbeforeevidence collection, during the planning phase.

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Guide – Section 3.6 (Determining Sufficiency of Evidence)

CMMC Level 2 Assessment Guide – Evidence Collection and Evaluation

Why Option B (Sufficiency) is CorrectOfficial CMMC Documentation ReferencesFinal VerificationSince theLead Assessor is ensuring enough evidence is available to verify compliance, the correct answer isOption B: Sufficiency.

Understanding Asset Types in CMMC 2.0In CMMC 2.0, assets are categorized based on their role in handlingFederal Contract Information (FCI)orControlled Unclassified Information (CUI). TheCybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) Scoping GuidanceforLevel 1andLevel 2provides asset definitions to help organizations identify what needs protection.

According toCMMC Scoping Guidance, there are five primary asset types:

Security Protection Assets (ESP - External Service Providers & Security Systems)

People (Personnel who interact with FCI/CUI)

Facilities (Physical locations housing FCI/CUI)

Technology (Hardware, software, and networks that store, process, or transmit FCI/CUI)

CUI Assets (For Level 2 assessments, assets specifically storing CUI)

Why "Technology" Is the Correct AnswerThe IT manager is evaluatingservers, laptops, databases, and applications—all of which aretechnology assetsused to store, process, or transmit FCI.

According toCMMC Scoping Guidance,Technology assetsinclude:

✅Endpoints(Laptops, Workstations, Mobile Devices)

✅Servers(On-premise or cloud-based)

✅Networking Devices(Routers, Firewalls, Switches)

✅Applications(Software, Cloud-based tools)

✅Databases(Storage of FCI or CUI)

Since the IT manager is focusing on these components, the correct asset category isTechnology (Option D).

A. ESP (Security Protection Assets)❌Incorrect. ESPs refer tosecurity-related assets(e.g., firewalls, monitoring tools, managed security services) thathelp protectFCI/CUI but do notstore, process, or transmitit directly.

B. People❌Incorrect. While employees play a role in handling FCI, the question focuses onhardware and software—which falls underTechnology, not People.

C. Facilities❌Incorrect. Facilities refer tophysical buildingsor secured areas where FCI/CUI is stored or processed. The question explicitly mentionsservers, laptops, and applications, which arenot physical facilities.

Why the Other Answers Are Incorrect

CMMC Level 1 Scoping Guide (CMMC-AB)– Defines asset categories, including Technology.

CMMC 2.0 Scoping Guidance for Assessors– Provides clarification on FCI assets.

CMMC Official ReferencesThus,option D (Technology) is the most correct choiceas per official CMMC 2.0 guidance.

CMMC Level 1 includes 17 practices derived fromFAR 52.204-21. Among them, theMedia Protection (MP) practicerequires organizations to ensure thatmedia containing FCI is sanitized or destroyed before disposal or release for reuseto prevent unauthorized access.

This requirement ensures that any storage devices, hard drives, USBs, or physical documents containingFederal Contract Information (FCI)areproperly disposed of or sanitizedto prevent data leakage.

The evidence collected for this practice should demonstrate that an organization has established and followed propermedia sanitization or destruction procedures.

Why the Correct Answer is "B. Adequate"?TheCMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Guideoutlines that for an assessment to be considered complete, all submitted evidence must meet the standard ofadequacybefore it is accepted by the Lead Assessor.

Definition of "Adequate" Evidence in CMMC:

Evidence isadequatewhen itfully demonstrates that a practice has been performed as requiredby CMMC guidelines.

TheLead Assessorevaluates whether the submitted documentation meets the CMMC 2.0 Level 1 requirements.

If the evidenceaccurately and completely demonstrates the sanitization or destruction of media containing FCI, then it meets the standard ofadequacy.

Why Not the Other Options?

A. Official– While the evidence may come from an official source, the CMMCdoes not require evidence to be "official", only that it beadequateto confirm compliance.

C. Compliant– Compliance is the final result of an assessment, but before compliance is determined, the evidence must first beadequatefor evaluation.

D. Subjective– CMMC evidence isobjective, meaning it should be based on verifiable documents, policies, logs, and procedures—not opinions or interpretations.

CMMC 2.0 Scoping Guide (Nov 2021)– Specifies that Media Protection (MP) at Level 1 applies only to assets that process, store, or transmit FCI.

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Guide– Definesadequate evidenceas documentation that completely and clearly supports the implementation of a required security practice.

FAR 52.204-21– The source of the Level 1 requirements, which includessanitization and destruction of media containing FCI.

Relevant CMMC 2.0 References:Final Justification:The CCP’s statement that the evidence"fully reflects the performance of the practice"aligns with the definition ofadequate evidenceunder CMMC. Since adequacy is the key standard used before final compliance decisions are made, the correct answer isB. Adequate.

Understanding the Role of CAICO in the CMMC EcosystemTheCMMC Ecosystemconsists of multiple organizations that manage, implement, and oversee different aspects of theCybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC)program.

One of the key organizations is theCMMC Assessors and Instructors Certification Organization (CAICO), which is responsible for:

Training and certifying assessors and instructors.

Managing testing, authorization, and certificationfor CMMC professionals.

Ensuring assessors meet qualification and compliance standards.

TheCAICO is explicitly taskedwith thetraining, testing, authorization, and certification of candidate assessors and instructors.

Option A (DoD OUSD)is incorrect because theDoD Office of the Under Secretary of Defense(OUSD) provides policy oversight butdoes not handle certification of assessors.

Option B (DIB Collaborative Information Sharing Environment)is incorrect because theDIB CISfocuses on information sharing within the Defense Industrial Base, not assessor certification.

Option C (Committee on National Security Systems Instructions)is incorrect because CNSSI provides security standards butdoes not manage assessor training or certification.

CMMC Ecosystem Overview – Role of the CAICO

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Guide – Assessor Certification and Training

Why Option D (CAICO) is CorrectOfficial CMMC Documentation ReferencesFinal VerificationSinceCAICO is responsible for training, testing, and certifying CMMC assessors and instructors, the correct answer isOption D: CMMC Assessors and Instructors Certification Organization.

Understanding High-Level Scoping in a CMMC AssessmentDuringHigh-Level Scoping, aCertified Third-Party Assessment Organization (C3PAO)determines thepeople, processes, and technologythat are within scope for theCMMC Level 1 or Level 2 assessment.

Supporting Organization/Unitsrefer to thespecific groups, departments, or teamsthat handleControlled Unclassified Information (CUI)orFederal Contract Information (FCI)and are responsible for applyingCMMC security practices.

These units aredirectly involved in the contract's executionand are included in the CMMC assessment scope.

Key Term: Supporting Organization/Units

A. Host Unit → Incorrect

This term is not used inCMMC assessment scoping.

B. Branch Office → Incorrect

Abranch officemay or may not be in scope; scoping is based onwhether the unit handles CUI or FCI, not its physical location.

C. Coordinating Unit → Incorrect

No official CMMC term refers to a "Coordinating Unit."

D. Supporting Organization/Units → Correct

This termcorrectly describes the entities that apply security controls for the contract and are within the CMMC assessment scope.

Why is the Correct Answer "D. Supporting Organization/Units"?

CMMC Scoping Guidance for Level 1 & Level 2 Assessments

DefinesSupporting Organization/Unitsasin-scope entities responsible for implementing cybersecurity controls.

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Document

Specifies that theC3PAO must identify and document the units responsible for security compliance.

DoD CMMC 2.0 Guidance on Scoping

Requires theassessment team to define the people, processes, and technology that fall within the scopeof the assessment.

CMMC 2.0 References Supporting This Answer:

Understanding Policy Validation in CMMC AssessmentsDuring a CMMC assessment, policies must be evaluated based on:

Who has the authority to approve and enforce them

Whether they are current and implemented effectively

The validity of a policydoes not solely depend on the signatorybut rather onhow the organization assigns authority for policy creation, approval, and enforcement.

Some organizations assignauthority to a specific person, meaning anew signatory may be requiredwhen leadership changes.

Others assign authority to aposition/title(e.g., CISO, IT Director), in which casea new signature may not be requiredas long as the role remains responsible for policy enforcement.

The assessment teammust review the organization's policy management processto determine if the policy remains valid despite leadership turnover.

Key Considerations in Policy Validation:Thus,the correct answer is B, as additional research is needed to confirm whether the organization's policy is tied to the individual or the position.

A. The signatory is the authority to implement and enforce the policy, and since that person is no longer with the company, the policy is not valid.❌Incorrect. This assumes thatauthority is always tied to a person, which is not always the case. Some organizations delegate authorityto a position, not an individual.

C. The signatory does not validate or invalidate the policy. For the purpose of this assessment, ensuring that the policy is current and is being implemented by the individuals who are performing the work is sufficient.❌Incorrect. While implementation is crucial,the authority behind the policy must also be validatedper CMMC documentation requirements.

D. The authority to implement and enforce lies with the position, not the person. As long as that position's authority and responsibilities have not been removed from implementing that domain, it is still a valid policy.❌Incorrect. This assumes thatauthority is always assigned to a position, which is not universally true. More research is required to confirm this.

Why the Other Answers Are Incorrect

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Document– Outlines the importance of verifying the authority and enforcement of policies.

NIST SP 800-171 (3.12.1 - Security Policies and Procedures)– Requires that policies be maintained and enforced by appropriate personnel.

CMMC Official ReferencesThus,option B (More research on the company policy is needed) is the correct answer, as per official CMMC policy validation guidance.

When a company usesthird-party IT providersto manage their infrastructure, these organizations are classified asExternal Service Providers (ESPs)underCMMC scoping guidelines.

Step-by-Step Breakdown:✅1. What is an ESP?

External Service Providers (ESPs)arethird-party organizationsthat:

ProvideIT services, cloud hosting, and managed security solutions.

Process, store, or transmit FCI or CUIon behalf of a contractor.

Mustmeet the same security requirementsas the OSC if they handle FCI or CUI.

If a company relies ona hosting provider to manage IT infrastructure, that provider is anESPunderCMMC scoping guidelines.

✅2. Why the Other Answer Choices Are Incorrect:

(B) People❌

Incorrect:ESPs areorganizations, not individual people.

(C) Facilities❌

Incorrect:Facilities refer tophysical locationslike office buildings or data centers, not third-partyservice providers.

(D) Technology❌

Incorrect:While ESPs provide technology services, the correct term forthird-party IT providersunder CMMC isESPs, not just "Technology."

TheCMMC Level 1 Scoping GuidedefinesExternal Service Providers (ESPs)asthird-party organizations that manage IT infrastructure and security services.

Final Validation from CMMC Documentation:Thus, the correct answer is:

✅A. ESPs (External Service Providers).

AC.L1-3.1.22states:"Control information posted or processed on publicly accessible systems."

This control requires organizations toensure that FCI (Federal Contract Information) is not publicly postedor made accessible in an uncontrolled manner.

FCI must beprotected from unauthorized disclosure, even if it is not classified or CUI.

Step 1: Understand the Definitions of Evidence Evaluation CriteriaTheCMMC Assessment Process (CAP)introduces two key criteria for evaluating evidence:

Adequacy– Does the evidencealign with the practice?

Sufficiency– Is the evidencecomprehensive enoughin terms ofcoverage across systems, users, and scope?

CAP v1.0 – Section 3.5.4:

“Evidence must be evaluated for bothadequacy(is it the right evidence?) andsufficiency(is there enough of it across all in-scope assets and areas?) to score a practice as MET.”

✅Step 2: Applying to the ScenarioIn the question, the Lead Assessor is asking the team toverify that evidence is sufficient across:

Domains

Practices

Host Units

Supporting Organizations

Enclaves

➡️ This is adirect reference to sufficiency, which evaluates whether thebreadth and depthof evidence is enough to make an informed judgment that the control is truly implemented across theentire assessed environment.

A. Adequacy✘ Adequacy refers to therelevanceof the evidence to the specific practice — not itscoverageacross scope.

B. Capability✘ Not a term used in evidence validation within CMMC CAP documentation.

D. Objectivity✘ While objectivity is important, it refers to theunbiased nature of assessment activities, not to theextent of evidence coverage.

❌Why the Other Options Are Incorrect

When an assessor evaluates whether the evidence is broad enough across all necessary systems, units, and enclaves to score a practice as MET, they are evaluatingsufficiency— one of the two core criteria for evidence validity in a CMMC assessment.

Understanding RA.L2-3.11.1 Risk Assessment Scope in CMMC Level 2TheCMMC Level 2 control RA.L2-3.11.1aligns withNIST SP 800-171, Requirement 3.11.1, which mandates that organizationsperiodically assess risks to operations, assets, and individuals arising from the processing, storage, or transmission of CUI.

What is Required for Compliance?

The organization must performrisk assessments on all assets and entities involved in handling CUI.

Risk assessments mustevaluate potential threats, vulnerabilities, and impacts on CUI security.

The scopemust include people, processes, physical locations, and IT systemsto ensure comprehensive risk management.

Why the Correct Answer is "Processes, people, physical entities, and IT systems in which CUI is processed, stored, or transmitted":

CUIcan be exposed to risk in multiple ways—not just IT systems but also human error, physical security gaps, and process weaknesses.

Risk assessmentsmust evaluate all areas that could impact CUI security, including:

Personnel security risks(e.g., insider threats, phishing attacks).

Process vulnerabilities(e.g., mishandling of CUI, policy weaknesses).

Physical security risks(e.g., unauthorized access to servers, storage rooms).

IT systems(e.g., networks, servers, cloud environments processing CUI).

A. "IT systems"→Too narrow.Risk assessmentmust cover more than just IT systems, includingpeople, physical assets, and processesaffecting CUI.

B. "Enterprise systems"→Too broad.While enterprise systems might be assessed, thefocus is specifically on areas handling CUI, not all enterprise operations.

C. "CUI Marking processes"→Incorrect focus.While marking CUI correctly is important,RA.L2-3.11.1 pertains to risk assessments, not data classification.

In the context of a Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) Level 2 Assessment, specific practices must be evaluated to ensure compliance with established security requirements. One such practice is AC.L2-3.1.19, which mandates the encryption of Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) on mobile devices and mobile computing platforms.

Step-by-Step Explanation:

Requirement Overview:

Practice AC.L2-3.1.19 requires organizations to "Encrypt CUI on mobile devices and mobile computing platforms." This ensures that any CUI accessed, stored, or transmitted via mobile devices is protected through encryption, mitigating risks associated with data breaches or unauthorized access.

Assessment of Provided Evidence:

During the assessment, the Organization Seeking Certification (OSC) provided an inventory list encompassing servers, workstations, and network devices. Notably, this list lacks any mention of mobile devices or mobile computing platforms.

Implications of the Omission:

The absence of mobile devices in the inventory suggests that the OSC may not have accounted for all assets that process, store, or transmit CUI. Without a comprehensive inventory that includes mobile devices, it's challenging to verify whether the OSC has implemented the necessary encryption measures for CUI on these platforms.

Assessment Determination:

Given the incomplete inventory, the evidence is insufficient to make a definitive scoring determination for practice AC.L2-3.1.19. The OSC must provide a detailed inventory that encompasses all relevant devices, including mobile devices and computing platforms, to demonstrate compliance with the encryption requirements for CUI.

Understanding CUI Protection ResponsibilitiesControlled Unclassified Information (CUI)is sensitive butnot classifiedinformation that requires protection underDoD Instruction 5200.48andDFARS 252.204-7012.

Theprimary responsibilityfor handling CUIis safeguardingit against unauthorized access, disclosure, or modification.

TheCUI Program (as per NARA and DoD)mandatessafeguarding measuresto protectCUI in both digital and physical forms.

CMMC 2.0 Level 2 (Advanced) practices align with NIST SP 800-171, which focuses on safeguarding CUIthrough access controls, encryption, and monitoring.

DFARS 252.204-7012requires DoD contractors to implementcybersecurity safeguardsto protect CUI.

A. Shielding (Incorrect)–Shieldingis not a cybersecurity term associated with CUI protection.

B. Governing (Incorrect)–Governing refers to policy-making, not direct protection.

C. Correcting (Incorrect)–Correcting implies remediation, but the primary responsibility is tosafeguardCUI proactively.

The correct answer isD. Safeguarding, asCUI protection focuses on implementing cybersecurity safeguards.

Understanding the CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) PhasesTheCMMC Assessment Process (CAP)consists ofthree primary phases:

Phase 1 - Planning(Pre-assessment activities)

Phase 2 - Conducting the Assessment(Evidence collection and analysis)

Phase 3 - Reporting and Finalizing Results

DuringPhase 3, the Assessment Teamreviews evidenceto confirm if anyLimited Practice Deficiency Correctionshave been successfully implemented.

Scoring Practices in Phase 3The CAP document specifies that a practice can bescored as METif:

✅The deficiency identified in Phase 2 has been fully corrected before final scoring.

✅Sufficient evidence is provided to demonstrate compliance with the CMMC requirement.

✅The correction is notmerely plannedbutfully implemented and validatedby the assessors.

Since the evidence shows thatdeficiencies have been corrected, the correct score isMET.

B. POA&M (Plan of Action & Milestones)❌Incorrect. APOA&M (Plan of Action and Milestones)is usedonly when a deficiency remains unresolved. Since the deficiency is already corrected, this option does not apply.

C. NOT MET❌Incorrect. A practice is scoredNOT METonly if the deficiency hasnotbeen corrected by the end of the assessment.

D. NOT APPLICABLE❌Incorrect. A practice is markedNOT APPLICABLE (N/A)only if it doesnot apply to the organization’s environment, which is not the case here.

Why the Other Answers Are Incorrect

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Document– Defines scoring criteria for MET, NOT MET, and POA&M.

CMMC Official ReferencesThus,option A (MET) is the correct answer, as the deficiencies have been corrected before final scoring.

During aCMMC Level 2 assessment, assessors requireobjective evidencethat security controls are implementedin the actual operating environmentwhereControlled Unclassified Information (CUI)is handled.

This means thattests or demonstrations must be conducted in the production environment, where the organization’s real systems and security controls are in use.

Assessment teams need to validate security controls in the actual environment where they are applied, ensuring that security measures are in effect in thereal-world operating conditions.

Option A (Client)is incorrect because "Client" is not a defined assessment environment.

Option C (Development)is incorrect because testing in a development environmentdoes not accurately represent the production security posture.

Option D (Demonstration)is incorrect becausedemonstrations in a separate test environment do not provide valid evidence for CMMC assessments—actual security implementations must be verified in production.

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Guide – Section 3.5 (Assessment Methods)

NIST SP 800-171 Assessment Procedures(Verification must occur in the actual system where CUI resides.)

Understanding the Assessment Environment RequirementWhy Option B (Production) is CorrectOfficial CMMC Documentation ReferencesFinal VerificationSinceCMMC assessments require security controls to be validated in the actual production environment, the correct answer isOption B: Production.

Understanding IA.L2-3.5.3: Multifactor Authentication (MFA) RequirementTheIA.L2-3.5.3practice, derived fromNIST SP 800-171 (Requirement 3.5.3), requires thatmultifactor authentication (MFA) be implemented for both privileged and standard userswhen accessing:

✔Organizational endpoints(e.g., laptops, desktops, mobile devices).

✔Network resources(e.g., VPNs, internal systems).

✔Cloud services containing Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI).

Key Requirement for a "MET" RatingFor IA.L2-3.5.3 to beMet, the organization must:

Require MFA for all privileged users(e.g., system administrators).

Require MFA for standard users accessing endpoints and network resources.

Implement MFA across all relevant systems.

Sincestandard users do not require MFA in the OSC’s current implementation, the practiceis not fully implementedand must be ratedNOT MET.

A. The process is running correctly → Incorrect

MFA isonly applied to privileged users, but it isalso required for standard users. The process isnot fully implemented.

B. It is out of scope as this is a new acquisition → Incorrect

New acquisitionsmust still meet MFA requirementsif they handle CUI or network access.

C. The new acquisition is considered Specialized Assets → Incorrect

Specialized assets (e.g., IoT, legacy systems) may have alternative security controls, but standard users and endpointsmust still comply with MFA.

D. Practice is NOT MET since the objective was not implemented → Correct

MFA must be enabled for both privileged and standard usersaccessing endpoints and network resources. Since standard users are excluded, the practice isNOT MET.

Why is the Correct Answer "D" (Practice is NOT MET since the objective was not implemented)?

CMMC 2.0 Level 2 (Advanced) Requirements

Specifies thatMFA must be applied to all users accessing CUI and network resources.

NIST SP 800-171 (Requirement 3.5.3 – MFA Implementation)

Requires MFA forall user types, including privileged and standard users.

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Document

States that a practicemust be fully implemented to be considered MET. Partial implementation meansNOT MET.

CMMC 2.0 References Supporting This Answer:

Understanding Federal Contract Information (FCI)Federal Contract Information (FCI) is defined by48 CFR 52.204-21(Basic Safeguarding of Covered Contractor Information Systems). FCI refers to information that:

Is NOT intended for public release.

Is provided by or generated for the government under a contract.

Is necessary to develop or deliver a product or service to the government.

Excludes publicly available government information(such as information on public websites).

Excludes simple transactional information(e.g., necessary to process payments).

In the context ofCMMC 2.0, organizations thatprocess, store, or transmit FCImust meetCMMC Level 1 (Foundational), which requires implementing17 basic safeguarding practicesoutlined inFAR 52.204-21.

A. CDI (Controlled Defense Information)→ Incorrect

This term was used inDFARS 252.204-7012but has been replaced byCUI (Controlled Unclassified Information)in CMMC discussions.

B. CTI (Cyber Threat Intelligence)→ Incorrect

This refers to intelligence on cyber threats, tactics, and indicators, not contractual data.

C. CUI (Controlled Unclassified Information)→ Incorrect

CUI is sensitive information requiring additional safeguarding but is a separate category from FCI.

D. FCI (Federal Contract Information)→Correct

The definition of FCI explicitly matches the description given in the question.

Why is the Correct Answer FCI (D)?

FAR 52.204-21 (Basic Safeguarding of Covered Contractor Information Systems)

Defines FCI and the required safeguards.

Establishes17 cybersecurity practicesfor FCI protection.

CMMC 2.0 Framework

Level 1 (Foundational)is required for contractors handlingFCI.

Ensures compliance withbasic safeguarding requirementsoutlined inFAR 52.204-21.

NIST SP 800-171 and DFARS 252.204-7012

FCI doesnotrequire compliance withNIST SP 800-171, butCUI does.

CMMC 2.0 References Supporting this Answer:

What Does the Practice of Professionalism Require in the CMMC Code of Professional Conduct?TheCMMC Code of Professional Conduct (CoPC)sets ethical and professional standards forCertified CMMC Assessors (CCAs) and Certified CMMC Professionals (CCPs).Professionalismrequireshonesty and integrity in all CMMC-related activities.

Step-by-Step Breakdown:✅1. Professionalism Requires Ethical Behavior

TheCoPC states that professionalismincludes:

Acting with integrityin all assessment-related activities.

Providing truthful and objective assessmentsof cybersecurity practices.

Avoiding deceptive or misleading claimsabout assessments or compliance.

✅2. Why the Other Answer Choices Are Incorrect:

(A) Do not copy materials without permission to do so❌

This falls underIntellectual Property (IP) protection, notProfessionalism.

(B) Do not make assertions about assessment outcomes❌

Assessorsmustprovide findings based on evidence. The rule is aboutnot making false or misleading claims, not about avoiding assertions altogether.

(D) Ensure the security of all information discovered or received❌

This falls underConfidentiality, notProfessionalism.

TheCMMC Code of Professional Conduct (CoPC)definesProfessionalism as requiring honesty and integrityin allCMMC-related activities.

Final Validation from CMMC Documentation:Thus, the correct answer is:

✅C. Refrain from dishonesty in all dealings regarding CMMC.

During aCMMC readiness review, anOrganization Seeking Certification (OSC)may argue that a specificenclave (network segment or system) is out of scopefor assessment. TheLead Assessor is responsible for verifying and approving this request.

Certified CMMC Professional (CCP)

A CCP supports OSCs inpreparing for assessmentsbutdoes not make final scope determinations.

Certified Third-Party Assessment Organization (C3PAO)

The C3PAOoversees the assessmentbut doesnot personally verify scope exclusions—that falls under theLead Assessor’s role.

Lead Assessor (Correct Answer)

TheLead Assessor has the authorityto determine if anenclave is out of scopebased on OSC-provided evidence.

The Lead Assessor followsCMMC Assessment Process (CAP) guidelinesto ensure proper scoping.

Advisory Board

TheCMMC-AB (Advisory Board) does not make scope determinations. It focuses onprogram oversightandcertification processes.

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) v1.0

TheLead Assessor is responsible for confirming the assessment scopeand determining enclave applicability.

CMMC Scoping Guidance for Level 2 Assessments

Requires theLead Assessor to review and approve any enclave exclusionsbefore finalizing the assessment scope.

Roles and Responsibilities in CMMC Assessments:Official References Supporting the Correct Answer:Conclusion:TheLead Assessoris the correct answer because they have the authority to verify scope determinations during the assessment.

✅Correct Answer: C. Lead Assessor

In the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) assessment process, the presentation of the Final Recommended Assessment Findings is a critical step. According to the CMMC Assessment Process guidelines, the Lead Assessor is responsible for compiling and presenting these findings. The prescribed method for this presentation is the utilization of the standardized CMMC Findings Brief template.

Step-by-Step Explanation:

Responsibility of the Lead Assessor:

The Lead Assessor oversees the assessment process and is tasked with compiling the Final Recommended Assessment Findings.

Utilization of the CMMC Findings Brief Template:

To ensure consistency and adherence to CMMC standards, the Lead Assessor must use the official CMMC Findings Brief template when presenting the assessment findings.

Presentation of Findings:

The findings, documented in the CMMC Findings Brief template, are then presented to the Organization Seeking Certification (OSC). This presentation ensures that the OSC receives a clear and standardized report of the assessment outcomes.

In the context of the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) Assessment Process, understanding the roles of various entities associated with an Organization Seeking Certification (OSC) is crucial during the planning phase. When a Certified Third-Party Assessment Organization (C3PAO) staff reviews these entities for a CMMC Level 2 Assessment, it's essential to distinguish between internal components and external participants.

Step-by-Step Explanation:

Definition of the HQ Organization:

The HQ Organization refers to the entire legal entity delivering services under the terms of a Department of Defense (DoD) contract. This entity is responsible for ensuring compliance with CMMC requirements.

Identification of External Entities:

External entities encompass people, processes, and technology that are not part of the HQ Organization but support its operations. These entities participate in the assessment process due to their involvement in handling Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) or Federal Contract Information (FCI) related to the DoD contract.

Role of Supporting Organizations/Units:

According to the CMMC Assessment Process documentation, Supporting Organizations are defined as "the people, procedures, and technology external to the HQ Organization that support the Host Unit." These external entities are integral to the operations of the Host Unit but are not encompassed within the HQ Organization's immediate structure.

Assessment Implications:

While Supporting Organizations/Units play a vital role in supporting the Host Unit, they do not receive a separate CMMC Level certification unless an enterprise assessment is conducted. In such cases, the assessment would encompass both the HQ Organization and its Supporting Organizations to ensure comprehensive compliance across all associated entities.

1. Understanding CMMC 2.0 Levels and CUI Handling RequirementsUnderCMMC 2.0, contractors handlingControlled Unclassified Information (CUI)must meet aminimumcertification level to be eligible for contract awards involving CUI.

Level 1 (Foundational) – 17 Practices

Covers onlyFederal Contract Information (FCI)security.

Does NOT meet CUI handling requirements.

Level 2 (Advanced) – 110 Practices✅

REQUIRED for handling CUI.

Aligns withNIST SP 800-171, which establishes security controls for protecting CUI.

Contractorsmust achieve Level 2for contracts requiring CUI protection.

Level 3 (Expert) – 110+ Practices

Required for contracts involvinghigh-value CUIandcritical national security information.

Includesadditionalprotections fromNIST SP 800-172.

CMMC 2.0 Levels:

TheCMMC 2.0 Model Overviewclearly states that Level 2 is required for contractorshandling CUI.

DFARS 252.204-7012mandates that contractors protecting CUI must implementNIST SP 800-171, which is thefoundation of CMMC Level 2.

TheDoD’s CMMC Assessment Guidefor Level 2 specifies thatorganizations handling CUI must demonstrate full implementation of 110 practices from NIST SP 800-171to qualify for contract awards.

2. Official CMMC 2.0 References Confirming Level 2 for CUI

A. Level 1❌

Only covers FCI, not CUI.

Does notmeet DoD requirements for protectingCUI.

C. Level 3❌

While Level 3 offersadditional protectionsfor high-risk CUI, it isnot the minimumrequirement.

Level 2 is the minimumneeded to handle CUI.

D. Any level❌

OnlyLevel 2 and higherare eligible for contracts requiring CUI protection.

Level 1 doesnotmeet CUI security standards.

3. Why the Other Options Are Incorrect

Understanding the Role of "Discussion" and "Further Discussion" Sections in CMMC AssessmentsWhen assessing anOrganization Seeking Certification (OSC)forCMMC compliance, theLead Assessorrelies on various sources of guidance.

Eachpracticein the CMMC model includes:

The Practice Statement– The official requirement the OSC must meet.

Discussion Section– Providesclarifications, interpretations, and guidancefor implementation.

Further Discussion Section– Expands on the practice,offering additional details, best practices, and examples.

These sections arenot mandatory, but they help assessorsinterpret and evaluatewhether an OSC has met the practice requirements.

TheDiscussion and Further Discussion sectionsprovidecontext, explanations, and examplesto assist theLead Assessorin understanding how an OSC might demonstrate compliance.

Theyhelp guide the assessment processbut arenot prescriptiveormandatoryfor an OSC.

Theassessor uses these sectionsto verify whether theOSC's implementation meets the intent of the requirement.

Why "Provides Additional Information to Facilitate the Assessment" is Correct?Breakdown of Answer ChoicesOption

Description

Correct?

A. Is normative for an OSC to follow.

❌Incorrect–The sections areguidance, notnormative (mandatory)requirements.

B. Contains examples that an OSC must implement.

❌Incorrect–Examples aresuggestions, notmandatory implementations.

C. Is mandatory and aligns with FAR Clause 52.204-21.

❌Incorrect–The "Discussion" sections arenot mandatoryand arenot tied directlyto FAR 52.204-21.

D. Provides additional information to facilitate the assessment of the practice.

✅Correct – These sections help the assessor evaluate compliance but do not mandate specific implementations.

TheCMMC Assessment Guidestates that theDiscussion and Further Discussion sections provide clarificationsto help both assessors and OSCs.

These sections arenot bindingbut serve asinterpretive guidanceto assist in assessments.

Official References from CMMC 2.0 DocumentationFinal Verification and ConclusionThe correct answer isD. Provides additional information to facilitate the assessment of the practice.This aligns withCMMC 2.0 documentation and assessment guidelines.

Understanding Ethical Responsibility in the CMMC EcosystemEthics in theCMMC ecosystemis ashared responsibilitybetween theCMMC Accreditation Body (CMMC-AB)and itsmembers. TheCMMC-AB Code of Professional Conductoutlines ethical obligations forassessors, consultants, and other ecosystem participantsto ensure integrity, fairness, and professionalism.

CMMC-AB ensures the accreditation process remains fair, unbiased, and ethical.

CMMC ecosystem members (assessors, consultants, and organizations) are responsible for upholding ethical practices in assessments and implementations.

Ethical violations can result indisciplinary actions, revocation of certification, or legal consequences.

Key Ethical Responsibilities Include:

A. DoD and CMMC-AB → Incorrect

TheDoD oversees CMMC implementation, butit is not responsible for the ethical conduct of CMMC assessments.

B. OSC and Sponsors → Incorrect

TheOrganization Seeking Certification (OSC)is responsible for compliance but doesnot oversee ethics in the CMMC ecosystem.

C. CMMC-AB and Members of the CMMC Ecosystem → Correct

Ethics is explicitly stated as ajoint responsibility of the CMMC-AB and its ecosystem membersin official CMMC guidance.

D. Members of the CMMC Ecosystem and Lead Assessors → Incorrect

Lead Assessors are part of theCMMC ecosystem, butCMMC-AB is the governing body responsible for ethical oversight.

Why is the Correct Answer "CMMC-AB and Members of the CMMC Ecosystem" (C)?

CMMC-AB Code of Professional Conduct

Defines ethical responsibilities forassessors, consultants, and ecosystem members.

CMMC Ecosystem Governance Policies

Ethics isjointly managed by CMMC-AB and its accredited ecosystem members.

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Document

Outlines ethical expectations forassessors and consultantsduring certification assessments.

CMMC 2.0 References Supporting this Answer:

The prime contractor (contractor organization)is responsible for ensuring thatits subcontractorshave the requiredCMMC certification levelbefore engaging them inDoD contracts that involve FCI or CUI.

This requirement is enforced throughflow-down clausesinDFARS 252.204-7021, which mandates that subcontractors handlingCUImeet the necessaryCMMC Level 2 or Level 3 requirements.

Who Should Be Interviewed During a CMMC Assessment?During assessment planning, theOrganization Seeking Certification (OSC)may suggest personnel for interviews. However, the person interviewedmustbe someone who:

✅Implementsthe practice (directly responsible for executing it).

✅Performsthe practice (carries out day-to-day security operations).

✅Supportsthe practice (provides necessary resources or oversight).

Theassessor needs direct insightsfrom individuals actively involved in the practice.

Funding (Option A)does not providetechnical or operationalinsight into practice execution.

Auditing (Option B)focuses on compliance checks, but auditorsdo not implementthe practice.

Supporting, auditing, and performing (Option C)includesauditors, who arenot necessarily the right interviewees.

Why "Implements, Performs, or Supports That Practice" is Correct?Breakdown of Answer ChoicesOption

Description

Correct?

A. Funds that practice.

❌Incorrect–Funding is important but doesnot mean direct involvement.

B. Audits that practice.

❌Incorrect–Auditors check compliance but donot implementpractices.

C. Supports, audits, and performs that practice.

❌Incorrect–Auditing isnot a requirementfor interviewees.

D. Implements, performs, or supports that practice.

✅Correct – The interviewee must have direct involvement in execution.

CMMC Assessment Process Guide (CAP)– Requires that interviewees bedirectly responsiblefor implementing, performing, or supporting the practice.

Official References from CMMC 2.0 DocumentationFinal Verification and ConclusionThe correct answer isD. Implements, performs, or supports that practice, as the interviewee mustactively contribute to the execution of the practice.

Understanding CMMC 2.0 Levels and Their DescriptionsTheCybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) 2.0consists ofthree levels, each representing increasing cybersecurity maturity:

Level 1 – Foundational

Focuses onbasic cyber hygiene

Implements17 practicesaligned withFAR 52.204-21

Primarily protectsFederal Contract Information (FCI)

Level 2 – Advanced(Correct Answer)

Focuses onprotecting Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)

Implements110 practicesaligned withNIST SP 800-171

Requirestriennial third-party assessments for critical programs

Level 3 – Expert

Focuses onadvanced cybersecurityagainstAPT (Advanced Persistent Threats)

ImplementsNIST SP 800-171 and additional NIST SP 800-172 controls

Requirestriennial government-led assessments

TheCMMC 2.0 framework explicitly describes Level 2 as "Advanced."

Italigns with NIST SP 800-171to ensure robustCUI protection.

A. Expert (Incorrect)– This describesLevel 3, not Level 2.

C. Optimizing (Incorrect)– Not a defined CMMC level description.

D. Continuously Improved (Incorrect)– CMMC does not use this terminology.

The correct answer isB. Advanced, which accurately describesCMMC Level 2.

CMMCLevel 1focuses onbasic cyber hygieneand includes17 practicesderived fromNIST SP 800-171 Rev. 2butonly covers the protection of Federal Contract Information (FCI)—not Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI).

UnlikeLevel 2, which aligns fully withNIST SP 800-171,Level 1 does not require third-party certificationand can beself-assessedby the organization.

Domains Covered in a Level 1 Self-AssessmentCMMC Level 1 practices fall underthree specific domains:

Access Control (AC)– Ensures that only authorized individuals can access FCI.

Physical Protection (PE)– Protects physical access to systems and facilities storing FCI.

Identification and Authentication (IA)– Verifies the identity of users accessing systems containing FCI.

These domains focus on foundational security controls necessary toprotect FCI from unauthorized access.

CMMC Model v2.0states thatLevel 1 includes only 17 practicesmapped toNIST SP 800-171requirements specific toAccess Control (AC), Physical Protection (PE), and Identification and Authentication (IA).

CMMC Assessment Guide, Level 1confirms thatRisk Management (RM) and Media Protection (MP) are not included in Level 1, as they pertain to more advanced security measures needed for handlingCUI (Level 2).

A. Access Control (AC), Risk Management (RM), and Media Protection (MP)→ Incorrect.Risk Management (RM) and Media Protection (MP) are Level 2 domains.

B. Risk Management (RM), Access Control (AC), and Physical Protection (PE)→ Incorrect.Risk Management (RM) is not part of Level 1.

C. Access Control (AC), Physical Protection (PE), and Identification and Authentication (IA)→Correct.These are thethree domains covered in CMMC Level 1 self-assessments.

D. Risk Management (RM), Media Protection (MP), and Identification and Authentication (IA)→ Incorrect.Risk Management (RM) and Media Protection (MP) are Level 2 domains.

Official CMMC 2.0 Documentation ReferencesBreakdown of Answer ChoicesConclusionThecorrect answer is C. Access Control (AC), Physical Protection (PE), and Identification and Authentication (IA), as these are theonly three domains included in a CMMC Level 1 Self-Assessmentaccording toCMMC 2.0 documentation and NIST SP 800-171 mapping.

CMMC 2.0 Model Overview – DoD Official Documentation

CMMC Assessment Guide, Level 1

NIST SP 800-171 Rev. 2 (Basic Security Requirements for FCI)

Reference Documents for Further Reading

Step 1: Understand the Assessment Phases (CAP v1.0)TheCMMC Assessment Process (CAP)outlines a structured lifecycle for assessments, including:

Plan and Prepare Phase– Develop the assessment plan (before the assessment starts).

Conduct Assessment Phase– Execute the actual assessment activities.

Report Results Phase– Finalize and deliver the assessment outcomes.

CAP v1.0 – Section 3.5 (Conduct Assessment):

“The assessment team collects, examines, and evaluates evidence to determine if practices are MET or NOT MET.”

During the“Conduct Assessment” phase, the main activity is to:

Collect evidence(documentation, interviews, testing),

Validate adequacy and sufficiency,

Score practicesas MET/NOT MET.

✅Step 2: Why “Collect and Examine Evidence” Is the Primary ActivityThis is thecore responsibilityof assessorswhile conductingan assessment.

A. Develop assessment plan✘ This occurs in thePlan and Preparephasebeforeconducting the assessment.

C. Verify readiness to conduct assessment✘ Readiness verification is part ofpre-assessment activities, not during the assessment itself.

D. Deliver recommended assessment results✘ This is done during theReport Resultsphase after the assessment has been conducted.

❌Why the Other Options Are Incorrect

Theprimary activity performed during the actual executionof a CMMC assessment iscollecting and examining evidenceto determine compliance with practices.

TheAudit and Accountability (AU) domainis one of the14 familiesof security requirements inNIST SP 800-171 Rev. 2, which is fully adopted byCMMC 2.0 Level 2.

A. Level 1→Incorrect

CMMCLevel 1only includes17 basic FAR 52.204-21 safeguarding requirementsand does not coverAudit and Accountability (AU)practices.

B. Level 2→Correct

TheAU domain is required at Level 2, which aligns withNIST SP 800-171.

CMMC 2.0 Level 2includes110 security controls, among whichAU-related controlsfocus on logging, monitoring, and accountability.

C. Levels 1 and 2→Incorrect

Level 1 does not requireaudit and accountability practices.

D. Levels 1 and 3→Incorrect

CMMC 2.0 only has Levels 1, 2, and 3, andAU is present in Level 2, making Level 3 irrelevant for this answer.

NIST SP 800-171 Rev. 2 (Audit and Accountability - Family 3.3)

TheAU domainconsists of security controls3.3.1 – 3.3.8, focusing on audit log generation, retention, and accountability.

CMMC 2.0 Level 2 Practices (Aligned with NIST SP 800-171)

AU practices (Audit and Accountability) are only required at Level 2.

Analysis of the Given Options:Official References Supporting the Correct Answer:Conclusion:TheAU domain applies only to CMMC 2.0 Level 2, making the correct answer:

✅B. Level 2.

The Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) 2.0 framework categorizes assets based on their interaction with Federal Contract Information (FCI) and Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI). In a CMMC Level 1 self-assessment, assets are classified based on whether they process, store, or transmit FCI.

FCI Assets– These assets process, store, or transmit FCI and must meet CMMC Level 1 security requirements (17 practices from FAR 52.204-21).

CUI Assets– These assets handle Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) and are subject to CMMC Level 2 requirements, aligned with NIST SP 800-171.

Specialized Assets– Includes IoT devices, Operational Technology (OT), Government-Furnished Equipment (GFE), and test equipment. These are often categorized separately due to their specific cybersecurity requirements.

Out-of-Scope Assets– Assets that do not process, store, or transmit FCI or CUI. These do not require compliance with CMMC practices.

Government-Issued Assets– These are assets provided by the government for contract-specific purposes, often requiring compliance based on government policies.

The question specifies that the identified assetdoes not process, store, or transmit FCI.

According to CMMC 2.0 guidelines,only assets that handle FCI or CUI are subject to security controls.

Assets that are physically located within an OSC’s facility but do not interact with FCI or CUI fall into the"Out-of-Scope Assets"category.

These assets do not require CMMC-specific cybersecurity controls, as they have no impact on the security of FCI or CUI.

CMMC Scoping Guide (Nov 2021)– Definesout-of-scope assetsas those that are within an OSC’s environment but have no interaction with FCI or CUI.

CMMC 2.0 Level 1 Guide– Only requires security controls on FCI assets, meaning assets that do not process, store, or transmit FCI are out of scope.

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Guide– Identifies the classification of assets in an OSC’s environment to determine compliance requirements.

Asset Categories as per CMMC 2.0:Why the Correct Answer is C. Out-of-Scope Assets?Relevant CMMC 2.0 References:Final Justification:Since the assetdoes not process, store, or transmit FCI, it does not fall under "FCI Assets" or "Specialized Assets." It is also not a government-issued asset. Therefore, the correct classification under CMMC 2.0 isOut-of-Scope Assets (C).